[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I’d have to disagree about an age minimum. Firstly you could only televise at a later time and give it a rating neither of which would prevent kids seeing it. But also because I don’t see it as something that children shouldn’t see. There’s so much sick stuff on television that should be of far more concern in my opinion. Bullfighting is not about torturing the bull or glorifying killing or anything of course so I don’t see why kids shouldn’t be able to watch it.
[/quote]
Well, that age minimum goes back to what I mentioned in my first post about exposing children to the permanence of death early on. You could argue that is a good thing, and in general I believe it is, however I go back and forth on bull-fighting.
I will READILY agree that there are literally thousands of far more violent, sick, and depraved things on TV. And I am a fan of realism before hollywood exposure. There’s a reason people who “live” real life situations understand the difference between reality and TV at a younger age than those who do not get exposed to “nature’s way” early on and the consequences for certain actions. IE–farm kids, hunters, etc.
But on the other hand…I am not convinced that bullfighting is not about torturing the bull. I’ve seen bullfights. It didn’t make me sick to my stomach whatsoever. No effect. But I am also not convinced of your position. On the other hand, if statue urinating on a cross can be considered “high art”…
