[quote]ZEB wrote:
OOPS![/quote]
Get your own catch-phrase.
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
OOPS![/quote]
Get your own catch-phrase.
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
And not one of your medical institutions claims that homosexuality is a perfectly safe practice. Or that it can ever be made safe!
forlife wrote:
Every major medical and mental health organization recommends that gays do NOT attempt to change their orientation. All of your hyperventilating about the “dangers of homosexuality” is contradicted by this single fact.
cap’nsalty wrote:
con?tra?dict Audio pronunciation of “contradict” ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kntr-dkt)
v. con?tra?dict?ed, con?tra?dict?ing, con?tra?dicts
v. tr.
So please tell me how homosexuality is in fact a safe practice.[/quote]
Well, for one, there are no known diseases that use sexual desire as a vehicle.
Shall I go on?
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
I don’t see any Christians trying to change a 5000 year old institution. Or any other group for that matter.[/quote]
What 5000 year old institution? Christianity is at the very most 1976 years old.
Sure, fundamentalist compared to other Americans. Take it from a Canadian – a solid 75% of you nutjobs are radical.
I see a boom in Canada’s interior design and hairstyling industries in the near future ![]()
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
It’s YOU and your “friends” who have a lot to answer for.
And you can start by trying to explain the AIDS epidemic.[/quote]
The short version as we currently understand it: A human immunodeficiency virus is communicated from gorillas to humans in Africa, and spreads like wildfire because the Western powers send expired or ineffective medications as “aid”. The inevitability of human migration leads to the disease spreading to all corners of the globe, where it’s the flavour of the week for a few years.
Care for the long version?
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
Not at all. It’s just that two guys living together having butt sex is not “family.”[/quote]
Are a guy and a girl having butt sex a “family”?
-Glee
[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Homosexuals cannot escape extreme health risks even in a “monogamous relationship.”[/quote]
By that metric, heterosexuals cannot escape extreme health risks even in a “monogamous relationship.”
Your point?
Then don’t do it?
I really don’t see the complication.
-Glee
[quote]terribleivan wrote:
Don’t downplay it man. Licking another man’s poop-shoot is pretty sick.[/quote]
Then don’t do it!
Really, I’m sure forlife is ingratiated that you have such an obsessive fascination with gay sex, but you really need to stop doing things you don’t enjoy.
-Glee
[quote]ZEB wrote:
CAUTION Do Not Insert Any Item Into The Anus! As this may cause serious consequences including but not limited to anal cancer.[/quote]
You once again forgot to address this to those who engage most often in this dangerous and harmful form of sex: heterosexuals.
-Glee
[quote]forlife wrote:
So by your own standard, there is no justification for bigotry and discrimination against gays. Finding happiness in a family is one of the deepest joys that people can experience in life, and gays should be free to find that happiness with people that they love.
ZEB wrote:
If you keep twisting my words I’m not going to be so gracious with you my friend![/quote]
Zeb, you’re already pedalling as hard as you can and getting nowhere. If you can possibly be less gracious, I’d be curious to see it.
A valid concern.
In the 1970s.
Since the 1970s, thousands of children have been adopted by homosexual men, women or couples, and they have been statistically proven to be overwhelmingly similar to their “nuclear family” corrolaries.
PS. Let alone all the studies on how homosexuality is formed/developed.
[quote]harris447 wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
harris447 wrote:
It’s nice to know you don’t confine your stupidity to the political threads.
What you wrote were, honest to Jebus, the most ignorant, hateful things I’ve ever heard.
You’re better than that.
You should take a look in the mirror. You are the most hate-filled person I have encountered in all these threads.
You are like an obnoxious rat-terrior. You constantly pick fights, and when you are blasted for being dumb as a rock, you run with your tail between your legs.
I sure hope you are strong, because you’ve missed out in the brains department.
What a great Christian you are!
If you ever met Jebus, he’d call you a scumbag.[/quote]
Who the heck is Jebus? Thanks for the valuable post. Now we see why my response to a hate-filled individual like yourself was so fitting.
[quote]forlife wrote:
One day, society will treat gays with fairness and respect. Looking back on how women and blacks were treated historically, most people today wonder at the bigotry that was so prevalent. People will eventually view the current treatment of gays in the same light.
Headhunter wrote:
Big difference – women and blacks are normal people, except those that are perverts.[/quote]
The same metric that makes homosexuals ‘abnormal’ (they aren’t a large portion of the population) also makes blacks abnormal in the USA. Oops.
Slippery slope fallacy. Invalid argument.
-Glee
Glee and harry are a little late. Or, did I interrupt some type of love-fest meeting? If so, sorry. You may continue.
[quote]terribleivan wrote:
harris447 wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
harris447 wrote:
It’s nice to know you don’t confine your stupidity to the political threads.
What you wrote were, honest to Jebus, the most ignorant, hateful things I’ve ever heard.
You’re better than that.
You should take a look in the mirror. You are the most hate-filled person I have encountered in all these threads.
You are like an obnoxious rat-terrior. You constantly pick fights, and when you are blasted for being dumb as a rock, you run with your tail between your legs.
I sure hope you are strong, because you’ve missed out in the brains department.
What a great Christian you are!
If you ever met Jebus, he’d call you a scumbag.
Who the heck is Jebus? Thanks for the valuable post. Now we see why my response to a hate-filled individual like yourself was so fitting.
[/quote]
Jebus is a reference to the Simpsons, shithead.
I came across an interesting study today, and couldn’t help thinking of my buddy Zeb. This study was published by Henry Adams (University of Georgia) in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology:
[quote]Prof. Adams tested a group of men who expressed homophobic attitudes, and who said they were exclusively heterosexual and had never had any homosexual experiences or fantasies. He wired these men to a plethysmograph. This is a calibrated, elasticated band which is fitted around the penis and detects any change in its size. Prof. Adams then showed the men three sets of sexually-explicit videos: heterosexual, lesbian and gay male.
In response to the gay sex videos, Prof. Adams found that 20 percent of the homophobic men showed no erection, 26 percent showed moderate erection, and 54 percent showed strong erection. By comparison, a control group of non-homophobic straight men produced very different reactions: 66 percent didn’t get aroused, 10 percent got slightly turned on, and 24 percent had definite hard-ons.
The response to the heterosexual video was also interesting. The homophobic group got less aroused by the heterosexual porn flicks than the non-homophobic group; which suggests that homophobia correlates with dysfunctional heterosexuality and impaired heterosexual erotic capability.
There was also a significant disparity between the claimed lack of sexual arousal by the homophobic men and the reality that most of them got some degree of erection. When viewing the gay sex videos, the homophobic men consistently underestimated their state of erotic excitement, as measured by the plethysmograph. Prof. Adams’s notes that the men’s “verbal judgements are not consistent with physiological activity”. In other words, the homophobes were in deep denial about their homosexual attraction.
From this evidence, Prof. Adams concludes that homophobia is an individual’s inability to cope with his “own homosexual impulses”. The findings concur, he says, with theories that hostility to gay people is a form of sub-conscious, distorted homosexuality, and that anti-gay attitudes indicate fear and loathing of one’s own inner, suppressed homosexual desires.[/quote]
Given how persistently outspoken against homosexuality Zeb has been in this thread, he strikes me as a prime candidate for this research. Anyone have a plethysmograph handy?
(Sorry Zeb, I couldn’t resist ![]()
hey i have an idea, why dont we legalize marriage between adult and child, the sexual attraction is natural right, i mean if you can honestly say homesexuality is natural, then you can make any kind of sexual attraction natural. hhmmmm, this chair looks cute i think im in love
A child isn’t capable of making an adult decision. Two consenting adults are, however. If they love each other and both happen to be the same gender, who are you to tell them otherwise?
[quote]hardcoreukno0359 wrote:
hey i have an idea, why dont we legalize marriage between adult and child, the sexual attraction is natural right, i mean if you can honestly say homesexuality is natural, then you can make any kind of sexual attraction natural. hhmmmm, this chair looks cute i think im in love[/quote]
You had to dig this tired piece of shit thread up just to post something that incredibly stupid? You must be a Zeb accolyte, that sounds like one of his idiot dog-fucking analogies.
[quote]tme wrote:
hardcoreukno0359 wrote:
hey i have an idea, why dont we legalize marriage between adult and child, the sexual attraction is natural right, i mean if you can honestly say homesexuality is natural, then you can make any kind of sexual attraction natural. hhmmmm, this chair looks cute i think im in love
You had to dig this tired piece of shit thread up just to post something that incredibly stupid? You must be a Zeb accolyte, that sounds like one of his idiot dog-fucking analogies.
[/quote]
Did you mean “acolyte?”
And by the way, do you even train? I mean other than pounding the key board…
[quote]forlife wrote:
A child isn’t capable of making an adult decision. Two consenting adults are, however. If they love each other and both happen to be the same gender, who are you to tell them otherwise?[/quote]
I agree with this.
Two consenting adults should certainly have the right to do as they please in the privacy of their own home.
It’s the marriage thing that you are not going to pull off my friend.
I think we are up to 40 states who have signed on against gay marriage.
![]()
[quote]ZEB wrote:
Did you mean “acolyte?”[/quote]
Yeah I did, thanks for picking that up, I was in a hurry.
[quote]
And by the way, do you even train? I mean other than pounding the key board…[/quote]
Yes. Do you? Do you count talking about chin ups as actual work done? If you say you did more this week than you said you did last week, do you consider that progress? You post more than almost anyone on this board, and this probably isn’t the only site you chose to litter with your homophobic bible thumping bullshit. When do you find time to train? Does each stroke of your right hand count as one rep?