Brokeback Propaganda

[quote]ZEB wrote:
I have been very steadfast and consistent in my discussion. If you think otherwise point it out![/quote]

You’ve been more steadfast and consistent than most religious fundamentalists – but that’s not saying much. Here are a few examples off the top of my head:

You entered the thread with a statement that there is no proof that homosexuality is genetic. I don’t think we’ve touched on that since you were proven wrong.

When you equated the ‘problem’ of homosexuality with obesity and alcoholism, and challenged someone to argue the positive aspects of obesity, I successfully did so. I don’t think we’ve heard that comparison since.

When you accused one of forlife’s sources of being politically biased, he mentionned about two dozen nationally-recognised medical organisations. Suddenly, you started parroting that one isolated statistic from the CDC and handily avoiding any discussion on the validity of various medical bodies’ data.

I could go on.

[quote]People of the same sex should be allowed to marry, because there are no reasonable contraindications.

Did men marry men in Sparta? No I guess not. But you think it’s going to happen in America?[/quote]

I’ve got news for you: it’s already happened in “America”.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_marb.htm

Besides the fact that it’s yet another example of myopic discrimination, what does that have to do with anything?

I take it you’re taking aim at me with the accusation of political correctness. In that case, I’ll point out that I’m a heterosexual and don’t dream of marrying another man. But I do dream about the eradication of dogmatic discrimination.

[quote]forlife wanted to talk about men who were not homosexual and could have sex with other men.

I then said they are called “bisexual.” He then stated flatly that he was not talking about “bisexuals.” That was the last time the word “bisexual” was mentioned.[/quote]

You’re going to have to understand the difference between behaviour and orientation before we continue talking about this.

[quote]You see he was attempting to make a point about “heterosexuals” being attracted and thus being able to have sex with other men.

I know…I know…forlifes twisted logic is not easy to follow.[/quote]

Not really. He was pointing out that people can behave sexually outside their orientation if the social pressures are great enough. This is a scientifically-confirmed fact.

-Glee

[quote]forlife wrote:

I was addressing YOUR claim that it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for straight men to have sex with one another. I proved to you that is not the case, in cultures that are not blatantly homophobic.[/quote]

You are one twisted little dude. But you do make me laugh so please continue.

You “proved” nothing!

Did men marry men in Sparta?

Now why didn’t they? Why don’t you fire up google and do some more research. Were they homophobic?

If anyone opposes gay marriage, or the gay lifestlye they are homophobic. Clever, but it does not wash anymore. the American people might be cowed into silence because they don’t want to be called names by the militant politically correct homosexual groups. But when they get in the ballot box they quickly get you back for your inner hatred by voting NO on gay marriage, gay adoption and a host of other pro gay measures.

And your tactics on this board are about as effective as your leaderships tactic nationally.

Keep the name calling up however as that is about all you have left.

No sir, I don’t talk out of my butt. And in fact don’t use it for anything other than what it is meant for.

Can you say the same?

(See why name calling is not good:)

You have typed that so much I think you are starting to believe that it has sway with me or the American people.

Simply because the APA was hijacked by a few homosexuals (note that there was never an open vote on this-it was rushed through and denied the proper vote) that sent the wheels in motion for the other organizations which you speak of to follow suit.

“If the APA says it’s no problem then it must not be a problem.”

Did the American Medical Association do their own research on the topic? Noooooooo.

Did any other organization that you tout do their own studies?

Now if they have done their own studies please produce them. Or you can stop waving their bull crap around as if it means something.

I showed you my evidence from every author and source as I presented it. Now it’s your turn to show me all the stuidies that were performed.

In other words put up or shut up!

(And shutting up is something that you hate to do. And I’m thankful for that.)

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
But, also it is one primary method that homosexual men have sex.

And that is quite dangerous according to ALL available data.

But let’s continue to ignore the fact that MORE HETEROSEXUALS PRACTICE ANAL SEX THAN HOMOSEXUALS, shall we?

[/quote]

First of all show me your proof that this is the case. You have stated it several times.

Secondly, if heterosexuals are practicing all of this anal sex (which you have yet to prove) why is it that 65% of all new HIV cases are homosexual men?

You want so hard for homosexuals to be just like heterosexuals but it just won’t ever happen…

Don’t go off and pout now. I need you right here on this thread…There’s much more for you to learn.

:slight_smile:

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
forlife wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
Yes, I would be opposed to the acting out of homosexual thoughts because it is contrary to nature and the organs involved. I don’t believe that saying a rectum was not designed or evolved to have some guys zimmy in it is subjective. That is a biological fact.

Why does there have to be only one biological purpose? Your mouth wasn’t specifically designed for oral sex either, but that doesn’t stop a lot of straight guys from using it for that purpose :wink:

And of course, as I pointed out earlier, more straight men perform anal sex than gay men.

Your kidding, right? Crap doesn’t literally come out of your mouth like it does the rectum. And AIDS is not spread by kissing. You need to do some research if you don’t know the difference between the mouth and rectum.

[/quote]

You might say he has it “ass backwards.”

[quote]Gleemonex wrote:
ZEB wrote:
I have been very steadfast and consistent in my discussion. If you think otherwise point it out!

You’ve been more steadfast and consistent than most religious fundamentalists – but that’s not saying much. Here are a few examples off the top of my head:

You entered the thread with a statement that there is no proof that homosexuality is genetic. I don’t think we’ve touched on that since you were proven wrong.[/quote]

LOL…the best minds in the world have not proven that one wrong bub!

Gee, I’m sorry about that. We all should have known that there many benefits from being obese. In fact, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that being obese is almost as beneficial as being a promiscuious homosexual!

(wakes Glee up) Come on time to get up…“You were having one of your silly ass dreams…wake up.”

[quote]People of the same sex should be allowed to marry, because there are no reasonable contraindications.
[/quote]

And so should people of the same family be allowed to marry. If they don’t have children together what’s the harm?

And also I think one man (or one woman) should be allowed to marry many partners. What’s the harm there?

And…why can’t we lower the age of consent? Kids grow up faster now a days anyway. What would be the harm?

“there are no reasonable contraindications.”

Let’s do it :slight_smile:

[quote]You might not want to buy into that. In fact check out the current Ohio bill which is actually going to take the right of adoption away from gay couples. This inspite of Rosie O’Donnell’s best efforts!

Besides the fact that it’s yet another example of myopic discrimination, what does that have to do with anything?[/quote]

Ha ha…thank you.

It means (still grinning) that the “homosexual cause” is back sliding my friend!

It means that surveys indicated that in the mid 90’s people were actually far more open to gay adoption and gay marriage than they are in 2006!

It’s called backsliding.

The more the American public saw of homosexuality, the more they didn’t like it.

Check the latest vote in Texas on gay marrige: 75% against! OUCH!

Let consenting adults do as they wish in the privacy of their own homes. And make sure that no one is discriminated against for practicing homosexuality. But don’t try to shove it down the throats of the American people, as that is not working!

Um…I think forlife said it was about sexual “preference.” Then he said orientation was about “choice.” And when he got sick of me reminding him of the facts regarding each, he copped the “orientation” plea.

I think that you and he are going to have to get your definitions straightbefore you question mine.

Ha ha…(why am I so lucky to have two politically correct, logic lacking, liberals to shoot down? I must be living right :wink:

Why don’t you define “orientation” for me. Please don’t take the definiton off of some gay web site (well you can if you want to we all need more laughter).

And what does the last part of that statement have anything to do with reality? We are all aware of the prison stats. But you see we don’t live in prison.

And why didn’t those spartans have the right to marry other men?

Those…ancient homophobes!

LOL…

Please post more. :slight_smile:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
What if Jesus was gay…the guy was thirty three and never got any?

I woulda been turnin water into wine all over the place, and getting broads like crazy[/quote]

Jesus was a rabbi, which implies he was married (couldn’t be a rabbi at the time and not be married). His wife and daughter fled after his ‘mock’ cruci’fiction’.

See cf James, where the execution was done on private ground, at dusk. It was all a trick.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Did men marry men in Sparta? [/quote]

I thought we were talking about whether straight men could have sex with other men, in a sexually permissive culture. Not whether they would marry one another.

Oh, you mean like “You are one twisted little dude”? Hello pot, this is kettle. Over!

So you ARE claiming that every major medical and mental health organization lacks scientific integrity, and is willing to blindly follow the lead of the APA (which you claim was hijacked by homosexuals). You are actually claiming that every one of these organizations has forsaken their scientific training and responsibility in the name of political correctness!!

Goodness Zeb, that is a tall order, even for you. Of course, just because you claim something is true doesn’t make it so (sound familiar)?

It is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence supporting your claim, not mine. The default assumption is that the American Medical Association, the Surgeon General, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Association of Social Workers, and all the other major medical and mental health organizations are behaving responsibly. If you can show that EVERY ONE of them has forsaken science and is being led around by homosexuals, please provide the proof.

Otherwise, integrity requires you to accept their conclusions on homosexuality as valid.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Jesus was a rabbi, which implies he was married (couldn’t be a rabbi at the time and not be married). His wife and daughter fled after his ‘mock’ cruci’fiction’.
[/quote]
That is not true. There were plenty of rabbi’s in the day that were not married.

yeah, I am sure that is a reputable source.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
First of all show me your proof that this is the case. You have stated it several times.[/quote]

I provided this earlier in the thread.

From Sexhealth.org:

Even using a conservative 10% estimate of the population as being gay, clearly far more heterosexuals than homosexuals have practiced anal sex.

According to a Playboy survey of 100,000 readers, the incidence of anal sex among heterosexuals is even higher than reported by Sexhealth.org:

So why aren’t you preaching to the poor heterosexuals, Zeb? Clearly, there are FAR MORE of them at risk than the homosexuals that you prefer to criticize.

You continue to ignore the fact that outside of the United States, the incidence of HIV is FAR HIGHER IN HETEROSEXUALS THAN IN HOMOSEXUALS:

From BBC News:
HIV heterosexual infections soar

[quote]For the first time, twice as many heterosexual than homosexual patients are now being told they have the disease.

Throughout the 1990s, most new cases of HIV infection occurred in gay men.

However, that situation changed in 1999 and heterosexual patients now account for a growing proportion of reported cases. [/quote]

From Irish Health:
HIV among heterosexuals increasing

[quote]The number of heterosexual people, particularly women, contracting HIV in Ireland is on the increase, new figures from the National Disease Surveillance Centre (NDSC) have shown.

According to the figures which cover the first six months of this year, 157 people were diagnosed with HIV, with heterosexuals accounting for 70% of cases. Of these, 80% were women.[/quote]

From eMedicine Consumer Health:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Check the latest vote in Texas on gay marrige: 75% against! OUCH![/quote]

Alas, ignorance is not easy to defeat. But acceptance is growing throughout the world (just as it did with civil rights for women and minorities). And you conveniently forgot to mention that even here in Texas, the proposal to deny gays the right to adopt children was defeated.

Does it help you to sleep at night by claiming that you don’t advocate discriminating against gays? More Zeb amnesia I see. Did you forget that just now, you were celebrating the fact that gays are denied the right to adopt chidren in some parts of the country? And that is not discrimination. Lol.

I gave you a clear definition for sexual orientation, as well as conclusive statements that behavior is different from orientation. But of course, you have forgotten about that again. You really should look into that selective amnesia, Zeb. It makes it so difficult for you to actually convince anyone of anything.

[quoteWe are all aware of the prison stats. But you see we don’t live in prison.[/quote]

I do believe that the point all along has been that people CAN behave outside their orientation when circumstances warrant (such as cultural acceptance or being in an alternate environment like a prison).

[quote]forlife wrote:

So you ARE claiming that every major medical and mental health organization lacks scientific integrity, and is willing to blindly follow the lead of the APA (which you claim was hijacked by homosexuals). You are actually claiming that every one of these organizations has forsaken their scientific training and responsibility in the name of political correctness!!

Goodness Zeb, that is a tall order, even for you. Of course, just because you claim something is true doesn’t make it so (sound familiar)?

It is YOUR responsibility to provide evidence supporting your claim, not mine.[/quote] No actually when you tout organizations as you have, it is your duty to provide the evidence. Otherwise, you have people like me all over you screaming bull crap, as I have done! [quote]The default assumption is that the American Medical Association, the Surgeon General, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Association of Social Workers, and all the other major medical and mental health organizations are behaving responsibly. If you can show that EVERY ONE of them has forsaken science and is being led around by homosexuals, please provide the proof.

Otherwise, integrity requires you to accept their conclusions on homosexuality as valid.[/quote]

Now that was indeed funny. And might I add well worth the wait!

There was really only two ways that you could have answered my query:

  1. Okay Zeb I’ll check to see if they have done any studies on the topic or they just swallowed the hook line and sinker fed to them by the poltically correct (homosexually) hijacked APA. Either way, I’ll get back to you.

Instead you went the way of the coward (is that name calling? Oh well I owed you one for the homophobe comment):

  1. You have to take the word of these institutions Zeb. Look how impressive they sound…come on you know as well as I do that they have no resources to actually perform their own stuides! Yikes! I never thought that you would ask me such a question. What am I supposed to do now? I hate it when my bluff gets called :frowning:

[quote]forlife wrote:
integrity requires you to accept their conclusions on homosexuality as valid.[/quote]

Actually, integrity would demand that you stay with your wife and children. I know you don’t like that but of all people YOU should not be talking about integrity!

Now supply the reasons that your illustrious organizatons backed up the politically correct APA or shut up.

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Check the latest vote in Texas on gay marrige: 75% against! OUCH!

Alas, ignorance is not easy to defeat. But acceptance is growing throughout the world (just as it did with civil rights for women and minorities).[/quote]

Women and minorities both genetic- homosexuality has not been proven to be genetic. And I might add after your feeble defense of same you have almost convinced me that it cannot be gentetic.

Keep talking.

Also, acceptance of homosexuality has taken a back slide over the past ten years. Do you want to see polls from the mid 90’s compared to today? You won’t like them.

The more the public hears and sees the less they like. And I might add if they were all reading this thread instead of 70% being against homosexuals marrying it would climb to about 90%!

You have lost ground nationally. Live with it!

Yes, but you conveniently forgot to mention that it is being brought up again “reworded.” And will most likely pass as it was a very close vote but many did not like the original wording of the bill!

You have to stay on top of these things. Do you understand what I mean?

That’s not the original point. You can claim all the homosexual sex you want in prision. That has nothing to do with the real world.

You are reaching …but I would expect anyone trying to make such a point to reach as you have no good data in front of you.

Keep trying lifer…

[quote]ZEB wrote:
No actually when you tout organizations as you have, it is your duty to provide the evidence. [/quote]

Not a good dodge, even for you Zeb. You’re losing your touch. Every major medical and mental health organization has unanimously made scientific statements on homosexuality, which directly contradict your claims.

Why should people believe you rather than these respected scientific organizations? Because you like to pretend that they are ALL politically motivated, and thus their conclusions are worthless? Without providing an iota of evidence in that regard?

Please.

What happened to accepting the statements of the CDC on faith, solely because they are a government organization? You’ll notice that I included the Surgeon General in my list of people that disagree with you. Last time I checked, the Surgeon General is an office of the government.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
You have to stay on top of these things. Do you understand what I mean?
[/quote]

That sounds kinda hot…is that an invitation?

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Actually, integrity would demand that you stay with your wife and children. I know you don’t like that but of all people YOU should not be talking about integrity!
[/quote]

More amnesia again. My wife independently chose to divorce, and wouldn’t be open to returning to a marriage.

I was always honest with her, and I never cheated on her. We’re friends now, but we both realize that we didn’t make a good husband and wife (the whole gay thing, you know).

Your integrity is another issue, though. You have blatantly ignored, misconstrued, and misrepresented not only my views, but those of others (like Spitzer) that you claim support your religious agenda. You really should go back to Exodus 20 and catch up on the commandments, Zeb. Being a good Christian and all, you know what the Lord says about bearing false witness.

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:

Why should people believe you rather than these respected scientific organizations? Because you like to pretend that they are ALL politically motivated, and thus their conclusions are worthless? Without providing an iota of evidence in that regard?[/quote]

They are claiming that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. And as far as I’m concerned they may be right, or wrong. I’m not sure that it’s all that important.

If it is not a mental disorder then what is it?

A “social disorder?” A flaw in their upbringing?

Simply another way for two adults to have sex?

Well this last one is what the politcally correct would have you believe.

But, I’m not so sure after talking to forlife for several days.

He has laid out a very stranges set of facts in his own life. Facts that would lead one to believe that he is far from “normal.” While I won’t rush to judge him, I suggest that all interested parties simply read over his very bizarre posts. And his sometimes goofy logic: “homosexual men can easily be drawn sexually to a woman.” (yea oooookay…)

However, you (forlife) are confused about many more things in life than you originally suspected!

it’s not me that people should believe it’s the following STUDIES,RECORDS, FACTS, AND PERTiNENT INFORMATION that they should take into consideration!

US Justice Department 2000:

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children."

Okay it’s not a mental disorder…Then what is it?

AND THIS:

Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
Timothy J. Dailey, Ph.D.
http://www.frc.org/get/is02e3.cfm

Scandals involving the sexual abuse of under-age boys by homosexual priests have rocked the Roman Catholic Church. At the same time, defenders of homosexuality argue that youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts should be forced to include homosexuals among their adult leaders. Similarly, the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a homosexual activist organization that targets schools, has spearheaded the formation of “Gay-Straight Alliances” among students. GLSEN encourages homosexual teachers – even in the youngest grades – to be open about their sexuality, as a way of providing role models to “gay” students. In addition, laws or policies banning employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation” usually make no exception for those who work with children or youth.

Many parents have become concerned that children may be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even “recruited” into adopting a homosexual identity and lifestyle. Gay activists dismiss such concerns – in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

However, despite efforts by homosexual activists to distance the gay lifestyle from pedophilia, there remains a disturbing connection between the two. This is because, by definition, male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. While many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. In this paper we will consider the following evidence linking homosexuality to pedophilia:

Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

Male Homosexuals Commit A Disproportionate Number of Child Sex Abuse Cases
Homosexual apologists admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offenses. After all, they argue, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.

The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.

Men Account for Almost All Sexual Abuse of Children Cases
An essay on adult sex offenders in the book Sexual Offending Against Children reported: “It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offences. Indeed, with 3,000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!” 1
Kee MacFarlane, et al., writing in Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment report: “The large majority of sexual perpetrators appear to be males (Herman & Hirschman, 1981; Lindholm & Willey, 1983).” 2

A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: “In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male.” 3
A study in the Journal of Sex Research states that “pedophilia does not exist, or is extremely rare, in women.” 4

A Significant Percentage of Child Sexual Abuse Victims are Boys
According to the Journal of Child Psychiatry: “It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about 9 to 1, but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. . . . The majority of community studies suggest a . . . ratio . . . in the order of 2 to 4 girls to 1 boy.” 5 The study adds that “some authors now believe that boys may be sexually abused as commonly as girls (Groth, 1978; O’Brien, 1980).” 6
A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that “approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males.” 7
Sexual Abuse of Boys is Underreported
The actual percentage of child sexual abuse victims who are boys very likely exceeds the above estimates. Many researchers echo the view of the Journal of Child Psychiatry study, which refers to the “under-reporting of the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in boys.” 8

Dr. Robert Johnson, in Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, reports: “The vast majority of cases of male sexual molestation is not reported. As a result, these young men keep both the incidents and their feelings to themselves.” 9

The Department of Justice report on child sexual exploitation explains why the percentage of boy victims is underestimated: “Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. . . . They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behavior and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization. . . . No matter what the investigator does, most adolescent boys will deny they were victims.” 10
The Journal of Child Psychiatry adds: “Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. . . . This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report.” 11
Homosexuals Comprise Less than 3 Percent of the Population
Relying upon three large data sets: the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. census, a recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. 12

A study of the sexual behavior of men in the United States based on the National Survey of Men (a nationally representative sample comprised of 3,321 men aged twenty to thirty-nine, published in Family Planning Perspectives), found that "2 percent of sexually active men aged twenty to thirty-nine . . . had had any same-gender sexual activity during the last ten years. Approximately 1 percent of the men (1.3 percent among whites and 0.2 percent among blacks) reported having had exclusively homosexual activity. 13

J. Gordon Muir, writing in The Wall Street Journal, discusses a number of studies that have found that homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. 14
In a survey of studies on homosexuals in different populations, the Archives of Sexual Behavior reported a random sample of Hawaii State residents interviewed by telephone. The study found “just about 3 percent of males and 1.2 percent of females as having engaged in same-sex or bisexual activity.” 15 However, this relatively higher number is attributed to the fact that the study was not limited to exclusive homosexuals, but included all those

AND THIS:

A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, “all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories,” which included males as young as age fifteen. 36

Okay enough about gay men molesting children. Let’s talk about the CDC report on homosexual men. But I don’t think you’ll like what they have to say:

An estimated 503,305 MSM (440,887 MSM and 62,418 MSM who inject drugs) had received a diagnosis of AIDS, accounting for 67% of all men and 54% of all people who received a diagnosis of AIDS [1]

It’s such a safe practice according to you but in reality it’s a very unhealthy lifestyle, both physcally and emotionally…as you might already know deep down:

Here you go take a look for yourself:

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/PUBS/Facts/msm.htm

Shall we look at some of the literature as to how people become “homosexual?” Sure why not!

And if you notice I have the source of each study listed.

Genetics and Childhood Molestation

(1995) Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us. Child Abuse and Neglect. 19: 582.
59% of male child sex offenders had been ?victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.?
Byne, W., (1994). The Biological Evidence Challenged. Scientific American, 54.
“The incidence of homosexuality in the adopted brothers of homosexuals (11%) was much higher than recent estimates for the rate of homosexuality in the population (1 to 5%).”
“Indeed, perhaps the major finding of these heritability studies is that despite having all of their genes in common and having prenatal and postnatal environments as close to identical as possible, approximately half of the identical twins were nonetheless discordant for orientation. This finding underscores just how little is known about the origins of sexual orientation.”
Byne, W., Parsons, B. (1993, March). Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised. Archives of General Psychiatry. 50: 228-39 (228).
?It is imperative that clinicians and behavioral scientists begin to appreciate the complexities of sexual orientation and resist the urge to search for simplistic explanations, either psychosocial or biologic.?
?Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking.?

“Although identical twins have the same genetic code, non-identical twins and regular siblings share the same proportion of genetic material. Therefore, the genetic theories should show a similar amount of homosexual concordance between non-identical twins and regular siblings.”
“First, they point out the fact that the study rests on the assumption that the relevant environment is the same for identical twins and non-identical twins. Then, the effects of potential bias in the sample is called into question, as Bailey and Pillard recruited their homosexual research subjects by advertising in various homosexually-oriented publications.”
“Third, there was no way to separate the intermingling of environmental and genetic effects, since all sets of twins in the study had been raised together and presumably subject to most, if not all, of the same environmental effects.”

“The most interesting question, however, is that if there is something in the genetic code that makes a person homosexual, why did not all of the identical twins become homosexual, since they have the exact same genetic code?”

“While all behavior must have an ultimate biologic substrate, the appeal of current biologic explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from a dissatisfaction with the current status of psychosocial explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data. Critical review shows the evidence favoring a biologic theory to be lacking. In an alternative model, temperamental and personality traits interact with the familial and social milieus and the individual’s sexuality emerges.”

Chapman, B., Brannock, J. (1987) Proposed model of lesbian identity development. An empirical examination. Journal of Homosexuality. 14:69-80.
63% of lesbians surveyed stated that they had chosen to be lesbians, 28% felt they had no choice, and 11% did not know why they were lesbians.
Elliott, D.M., Brier, J. (1992, February). The Sexually Abused Boy: Problems in Manhood. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 26 (2): 68-71.
Boys who were sexually molested have subsequently ?a higher incidence of homosexuality.?
Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.
“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”

“?homosexual men are more likely to become sexually active at much younger ages than heterosexual men. The average age of homosexual males at their first sexual encounter was 12.7, versus 15.7 for heterosexual males.”
“This evidence may suggest that abuse and early sexual experiences can contribute to homosexuality, perhaps because of familiarity with sexual acts, and in some cases because of an initial sexual experience with someone of the same gender.”
Golwyn, D., Sevlie, C. (1993) Adventitious change in homosexual behavior during treatment of social phobia with phenelzine. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 54, 1:39-40.
?We conclude that social phobia may be a hidden contributing factor in some instances of homosexual behavior.? (p. 40)

Harry, J. (1989) Parental physical abuse and sexual orientation in males. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 18, 3:251-261.
?These data suggest that some history of childhood femininity is almost always a precursor of adolescent homosexual behavior.? (p. 259)
Herrell, R., et al. (1999, October). Sexual Orientation and Suicidality: a Co-Twin Control Study in Adult Men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10): 867-874.
This study of male twins who were Vietnam veterans found that male homosexuals were 5.1 times more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors than were their heterosexual twins.

Hockenberry, S., Billingham, R. (1987) Sexual orientation and boyhood gender conformity: Development of the boyhood gender conformity scales (BGCS) Archives of Sexual Behavior. 16, 6:475-492.

??the absence of masculine behaviors and traits appeared to be a more powerful predictor of later homosexual orientation than the traditionally feminine or cross-sexed traits and behaviors.? (p. 475)
Horgan, J., (1995) Gay genes, revisited: Doubts arise over research on the biology of homosexuality. Scientific American. Nov.: 28. Hubbard, Ruth, Wald, Elijah (1993). Exploring the Gene Myth 6.
“The myth of the all-powerful gene is based on flawed science that discounts the environmental context in which we and our genes exist.”
“A gene does not determine a phenotype [noticeable trait] by acting alone; a gene cannot act by itself?Each gene simply specifies one of the proteins involved in the process.”
Jefferson, D.J., (1993, August 12). Studying the Biology of Sexual Orientation Has Political Fallout. Wall Street Journal. 1A.

Lisak, D., Luster, L. Educational, occupational, and relationship histories of men who were sexually and/or physically abused as children. J Trauma Stress. 1994 Oct; 7(4): 507-23.

Nearly one in four young men report sexual abuse as a child resulting in significant life difficulties (as compared to non-abused males).
McGuire, T., (1995) Is homosexuality genetic? A critical review and some suggestions. Journal of Homosexuality. 28, 1/2: 115-145.
?Even if we knew absolutely everything about genes and absolutely everything about environment, we still could not predict the final phenotype of any individual." (p. 142)
Nimmons, David. (March 1994). Sex and the Brain, Discover, 64-71.
“It is important to stress what I didn’t find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn’t show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. INAH 3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than a part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women’s sexual behavior?. Since I looked at adult brains, we don’t know if the differences I found were there at birth, or if they appeared later.”
Pollak, M. Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, ed. P. Aries and A. Bejin, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Tomeo, M.E., et al. (2001, October). Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 30 (5): 535-541.
942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation that did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation.
Whitehead, Neil, Whitehead, Brian. (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation, 158-159.

“Neil Whitehead tabulated other twin studies on other topics and those traits’ heritability: lying–43%, anorexia nervosa–44%, fear of the unknown–46%, psychological inpatient care–47%, extroversion–50%, depression–50%, altruism–50%, divorce–52%, racial prejudice, bigotry–70%.
“(Dean) Hamer’s genetic sequences have been calculated to affect about 5% of the homosexual population, so even if he is correct, there must be some other explanation for what causes the vast majority of homosexuality.”
“If a hormonal imbalance was responsible for homosexuality, then perhaps a simple dose of hormones to an adult would cure homosexuality. This is not the case, as has been demonstrated several times.”
Wolf, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life, Spence Publishing Co., Dallas, 1999, p. 70-71.
Homosexually-assaulted males identified themselves as subsequently becoming practicing homosexuals almost 7 times as often as bisexuals and almost 6 times as often as the non-assaulted control group. 58% of adolescents reporting sexual abuse by a man prior to puberty revealed either homosexual or bisexual orientation (control group 90% heterosexual). Age of molestation was 4-14 years. ?Nearly half of men who have reported a childhood experience with an older man were currently involved in homosexual activity.? A disproportionately high number of male homosexuals were incestuously molested by a homosexual parent. Conclusion was that the experience led the boy to perceive himself as homosexual based on his having been found sexually attractive by an older man.”

I don’t see any eveidence that homosexuals are born that way…

Let’s look at some social factors:

Social Factors

Bem, Daryl J. (1986) Exotic Becomes Erotic: A Developmental Theory of Sexual Orientation, 103 Psychol. Rev. 320.
Daryl Bem’s “Exotic Becomes Erotic” theory states that “what is exotic to children becomes erotic to them as adolescents.” For example, “boys who play with girls mostly instead of other boys, and who tend to like the way girls play, become familiar and comfortable with femininity. Male behavior and males become exotic, and thus erotic later in life.”
Burtoft, L. (1994). Behind the Headlines: Setting the Record Straight ? What Research Really Says About the Social Consequences of Homosexuality. Colorado Springs, CO: Focus on the Family.

Fisher, S., Greenberg, R. (1996) Freud Scientifically Reappraisal. NY: Wiley & Sons.
?Fisher analyzed the 58 studies and reported that a large majority supported the notion that homosexual sons perceive their fathers as negative, distant, unfriendly figures.? ?There is not a single even moderately well controlled study that we have been able to locate in which male homosexuals refer to father positively or affectionately.? (p. 136)
Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.
?the second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)
?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)
Friedman, Richard, Downey, Jennifer. (1993) Neurobiology and Sexual Orientation: Current Relationships, 5. J. Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 131, 139.
“Some typical childhood factors related to homosexuality are: feeling of being different from other children; parent, sibling, peer relationships; perception of father as being distant, uninvolved, unapproving; perception of parental perfection required; perception of mother as being too close, too involved; premature introduction to sexuality (such as child abuse or incest); gender confusion; defensive detachment, reparative drive, same-sex ambivalence; unmet affection needs; diminished/distorted masculinity, femininity.”
“?homosexual men are more likely to become sexually active at much younger ages than heterosexual men. The average age of homosexual males at their first sexual encounter was 12.7, versus 15.7 for heterosexual males.”
“This evidence may suggest that abuse and early sexual experiences can contribute to homosexuality, perhaps because of familiarity with sexual acts, and in some cases because of an initial sexual experience with someone of the same gender.”
Newman, L. (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.
?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J. Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.
Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.
Phillips, G., Over, R. (1992) Adult sexual orientation in relation to memories of childhood gender conforming and gender nonconforming behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 21, 6: 543-558.
?The 16-item discriminate-function ? yielded correct classification of 94.4% of heterosexual men and 91.8% of the homosexual men. These results indicate that heterosexual and homosexual men can be classified with equivalent accuracy on the basis of recalling having had or not having had gender conforming (masculine) experiences in childhood.? (p. 550)
Stephan, W., (1973) Parental relationships and early social experiences of activist male homosexuals and male heterosexuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 82, 3: 506-513.
??homosexuals reported experiencing their first orgasm at a younger age than the heterosexuals.? 24% of homosexuals’ first orgasms occurred during homosexual contacts versus 2% of heterosexuals. (p.511)
Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford.
“?we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)”

Let’s look at how many have changed from various therapies:

(May 9, 2001). Press Release, National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, Prominent Psychiatrist Announces New Study Results: “Some Gays can Change.” Available at http://www.narth.com/docs/spitzerrelease.html (last updated May 8, 2001.)
“Like most psychiatrists,” says Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”
Acosta, F., (1975) Etiology and treatment of homosexuality: review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 4:9-29.
??better prospects for intervention in homosexual life and in its prevention through the early identification and treatment of the potential homosexual child.? (p. 9)

Aries, P. and A. Bejin, ed., Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Bieber, I., et al. (1962) Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. NY: Basic Books.
?The therapeutic results of our study provide reason for an optimistic outlook. Many homosexuals became exclusively heterosexual in psychoanalytic treatment. Although this change may be more easily accomplished by some than by others, in our judgment a heterosexual shift is a possibility for all homosexuals who are strongly motivated to change.? (p. 319)

Bieber, I., Bieber, T. (1979) Male homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 24, 5:409-421.
?We have followed some patients for as long as 20 years who have remained exclusively heterosexual. Reversal estimates now range from 30% to an optimistic 50%.? (p.416)
Cappon, D., (1965) Toward an Understanding of Homosexuality. Englewoord Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Of patients with bisexual problems 90% were cured (i.e., no reversions to homosexual behavior, no consciousness of homosexual desire and fantasy) in males who terminated treatment by common consent. Male homosexual patients: 80% showed marked improvement (i.e., occasional relapses, release of aggression, increasingly dominant heterosexuality)? 50% changed.? (p. 265-268)
Clippinger, J., (1974) Homosexuality can be cured. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy. 21, 2:15-28.

?Of 785 patients treated, 307, or approximately 38%, were cured. Adding the percentage figures of the two other studies, we can say that at least 40% of the homosexuals were cured, and an additional 10 to 30% of the homosexuals were improved, depending on the particular study for which statistics were available.? (p. 22)

Fine, R., (1987) Psychoanalytic theory. (in Diamant L. Male and Female Homosexuality: Psychological Approaches. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.) 81-95.
??a considerable percentage of overt homosexuals became heterosexual? If patients were motivated, whatever procedure is adopted a large percentage will give up their homosexuality? The misinformation that homosexuality is untreatable by psychotherapy does incalculable harm to thousands of men and women?? (p. 85-86)

Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.
"The second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)
?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)
Goetze, R. (1997) Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 17 Published Studies. Toronto Canada: New Directions for Life.
44 persons who were exclusively or predominantly homosexual experienced a full shift of sexual orientation.
Hatterer, L., (1970) Changing Homosexuality in the Male. NY: McGraw-Hill.

49 patients changed (20 married, of these 10 remained married, 2 divorced, 18 achieved heterosexual adjustments); 18 partially recovered, remained single; 76 remained homosexual (28 palliated ? 58 unchanged) ?A large undisclosed population has melted into heterosexual society, persons who behaved homosexually in late adolescence and early adulthood, and who, on their own, resolved their conflicts and abandoned such behavior to go on to successful marriages or to bisexual patterns of adoption.? (p. 14)
James, Elizabeth (1978) Treatment of Homosexuality: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Outcome Studies (unpublished PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, on file with Brigham Young University Library).
Elizabeth James meta-analyzed over 100 outcome studies published between 1930 and 1976, and concluded that when all the research was combines, 35% of homosexual clients “recovered” and 27% improved.
Kaye, H., Beri, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M., Gershwin, B., Gershwin, P., Kogan, L., Torda, C., Wilber, C. (1967) Homosexuality in Women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17:626-634.

??optimism in the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexual women. ?at least a 50% probability of significant improvement in women with this syndrome who present themselves for treatment and remain in it.? (p. 634)
Kronemeyer, R. (1980) Overcoming Homosexuality. NY: Macmillian
?For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy it is ?curable?.? (p.7)
MacIntosh, H. (1994) Attitudes and experiences of psychoanalysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 42, 4: 1183-1207.
824 male patients of 213 analysts ? 197 (23.9%) changed to heterosexuality, 703 received significant therapeutic benefit; and of the 391 female patients of 153 analysts ? 79 (20.2%) changed to heterosexuality, 318 received significant therapeutic benefit. (p. 1183)

MacIntosh, H. (1995) Attitudes and Experiences of Psychoanalysts in Analyzing Homosexual Patients. Journal of the American Psychiatric Association 1183.
422 psychiatrists were asked if they had successfully treated homosexuals, and did they agree that a homosexual can be changed to heterosexual. Of the 285 responses, which involved 1,215 homosexuals, the survey stated that 23% changed to heterosexuality. 84% benefited significantly by reducing their attraction to other members of the same gender, with a decrease in homosexual activity.
Marmor, J. (1975) Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbances. (In Freedman, A., Kaplan, H., Sadock, B. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: II, Second Edition. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins)
?This conviction of untreatability also serves an ego-defensive purpose for many homosexuals. ?however, there has evolved a greater therapeutic optimism about the possibilities for change? There is little doubt that a genuine shift in preferential sex object choice can and does take place in somewhere between 20 and 50 per cent of patients with homosexual behavior who seek psychotherapy with this end in mind.? (p. 1519)
Newman, L., (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.

?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J., Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA: NARTH.
Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.

Pattison, E.M., Pattison, M.L. (1980, December) ?Ex-Gays?: Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (12): 1553-1562.
Authors evaluated 11 white men who claimed to have changed sexual orientation from exclusive homosexuality to exclusive heterosexuality. Corollary evidence suggests that the phenomenon of substantiated change in sexual orientation without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy may be much more common than previously thought.

Rekers, J. (1988) The formation of homosexual orientation. (In Fagan, P. Hope for Homosexuality. Washington DC: Free Congress Foundation.)
?With major research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, I have experimentally demonstrated an affective treatment for ‘gender identity disorder of childhood’, which appears to hold potential for preventing homosexual orientation in males.?

Satinover, J., (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids MI: Baker.
These reports contradict claims that change is impossible. It would be more accurate to say that all the existing evidence suggests strongly that homosexuality is quite changeable.
?Each individual?s homosexuality is the likely result of a complex mixture of genetic, intrauterine, and extrauterine biological factors combined with familial and social factors as well as repeatedly reinforced choices.? (p. 245)
“A study conducted by a homosexual couple found that out of 156 same-sex couples ‘only seven had maintained sexual fidelity; of the hundred couples that had been together for more than five years, none had been able to maintain sexual fidelity. The authors noted that the expectation for outside sexual activity was the rule for male couples and the exception for heterosexuals.’”
Schwartz, M.F., Masters, W.H. (1984, February). The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 141 (2): 173-181.
?Certain individuals who want to change their homosexual preference can be helped by a short-term intensive intervention. The failure rate in helping dissatisfied homosexuals establish heterosexual lifestyles after the intensive phase of the intervention was 20.9%, and after 5 years? follow-up it was 28.4%.
Spitzer, Robert (May 2001) Psychiatry and Homosexuality, Wall St. Journal, A26.

“In the sample he studied, Spitzer concluded that many (homosexuals) made substantial changes (after gender affirmative therapy) in sexual arousal and fantasy–not merely behavior. Even subjects who made less substantial change believed it to be extremely beneficial.”
Throckmorton, W. (1996) Efforts to modify sexual orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling. 20, 4: 283-305.
?I submit that the case against conversion therapy requires opponents to demonstrate that no patients have benefited from such procedures or that any benefits are too costly in some objective way to be pursued even if they work. The available evidence supports the observation of many counselors ? that many individuals with same-gender sexual orientation have been able to change through a variety of counseling approaches.? (p. 287)

West, D. (1977) Homosexuality Re-examined. London Duckworth
Behavioral techniques have the best document success (never less than 30%); psychoanalysis claims a great deal of success (the average rate seemed to be about 5%, but 50% of the bisexuals achieved exclusive heterosexuality.)
Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford. ??we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)

So please, don’t listen to me, as I’m just a guy behind a computer. But please do listen to the very credible information which has been shown to you in this and my many other posts. In formation which is free of the politically correct. Government statistics: CDC, Justice Department. Independent authors with very serious credentials. In fact, I would dare say that never before has there been so much evidence against a particular behavior. A behavior which has been embraced by the left thinking politically correct.

By all means decide for yourself!

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
You have to stay on top of these things. Do you understand what I mean?

That sounds kinda hot…is that an invitation?[/quote]

Once again you are misinterpreting what you read for your own personal end. Just as you do much of the information that you recieve.

I meant that you have to keep close watch of all information in order to truly understand it.

(Funny how he proves the substance of my argument post after post. Promiscuous homosexuals always on the make…thinking that heterosexuals are attracted to this type of thing…please get help!)

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
forlife wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
Yes, I would be opposed to the acting out of homosexual thoughts because it is contrary to nature and the organs involved. I don’t believe that saying a rectum was not designed or evolved to have some guys zimmy in it is subjective. That is a biological fact.

Why does there have to be only one biological purpose? Your mouth wasn’t specifically designed for oral sex either, but that doesn’t stop a lot of straight guys from using it for that purpose :wink:

And of course, as I pointed out earlier, more straight men perform anal sex than gay men.

Your kidding, right? Crap doesn’t literally come out of your mouth like it does the rectum. And AIDS is not spread by kissing. You need to do some research if you don’t know the difference between the mouth and rectum.

You might say he has it “ass backwards.”

[/quote]

I feel sorry for the guy! He is in for a lifetime of pain and regret.

[quote]forlife wrote:

More amnesia again. My wife independently chose to divorce, and wouldn’t be open to returning to a marriage.[/quote]

Independently? That’s funny you stated earlier it was a “mutual decision.”

Either way, can you blame her?

But where was your mind? If you know what I mean…

I have given the evidence as I have found it. That it does not agree with your homosexual agenda is not my fault!

You would not accept anything that puts your precious lifestyle in a bad light. You have thrown God out along with your family in order to live the life of a gay man. Lust controls your thoughts, and you will say anything and presumably do just about anything to feed that lust.

That no one has pointed this out to you earlier is to your own misfortune.

[quote]Being a good Christian and all, you know what the Lord says about bearing false witness.
[/quote]

I am not as good a Christian as I would like to be. In fact, as you know we are all sinners. But one difference between you and I is this: I continue to try even when I fail!

You on the other hand threw in the towel a long time ago when you began rationalizing your sin.