Brokeback Propaganda

[quote]forlife wrote:
ZEB wrote:
But the wages of sin are still death.

Prove it. You have yet to provide objective evidence that a) homosexuality is a sin and b) that sin results in eternal death.[/quote]

At this point (as I have already done it a few times) I would start quoting scripture.

There are several verses in the New Testament which speak directly to this issue.

To this you would reply “that does not apply to homosexuals.” Or the homosexual activist dodge of “the word homosexual was not even in existance yet.”

I would then point out the word used for homosexuality in those days and prove you wrong.

I would then dissect each verse in the New Testament which explicitly states that homosexuality is wrong.

You would question the interpretation of said scripture. I would then painstakingly point out each Greek word to you from the original text.

And then later on put forth a series of documentation out side the Bible (ancient Jewish texts) which explicitly states that homosexuality is wrong

Then we would spend the next umpteen pages going back and forth…

You… never admitting that homsexuality is wrong as this is your lifestyle and you can’t admit that it is not acceptable in Gods eyes. I get it…I get it.

By then others would jump in the thread some attacking me for my beliefs (how mean and crule I am). Others attacking homosexuality. some even calling us both names and complaining that the thread is still going…bla bla bla…

Been there done that

Just read “Why Gay Marriage Is Wrong” thead and save us both some time.

I thank you,

Zeb

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Professor X wrote:

Do you even realize how many people have sex for pure pleasure?

Pay close attention:

  1. We are having a conversation about the Bible and the purpsose of sex.

  2. The Bible states that when a man and women marry they can have all the sex they want.

  3. Sexual promiscuity is one of the things that can lead to sexual disease.

We have God’s word as a guide. It is not to be used as some weapon to beat others over the head with.

Then you agree that the Bible is Gods word?

I quote the Bible I have never hit anyone with a Bible yet. You might be the first…If you are as big as you say I’ll need a weapon. :slight_smile:

You are not acting in a “loving” way by acting as if the gay person you were debating with is abnormal or anti-christian because of his sexual orientation.

A. Never said anyone was abnormal

B. Never said anyone was “anti-Christian.”

C. Are people “loving” when they allow others to harm themselves without giving them at least a warning?

D. Are you being loving right now? And are you “loving” in most of your posts?

The basic point is, with all of your talk of religion, you would make a horrible preacher simply because of how elitist you try to make Christianity seem. I have tried to explain this to you before but it is as if it does not sink in. You, Zeb, probably turn more people away from Christianity by doing this than you could ever help towards it. Get it?

And you have probably turned many people away from T-Nation with your ego driven diatribes. But then you have admitted this in the past.

Nothing new.
[/quote]

Why do you keep missing the point? Do you feel you are guiding the person you were debating with? It is pointless other than you just debating with someone. He probably made up his mind because of people responding like you are. You aren’t truly listening to him and he isn’t truly listening to any deeper points you may have hidden in between quoting studies from biased sources.

I knew coming into this discussion that the fundamentalists wouldn’t change their convictions about homosexuality. No amount of logic or appeal to fairness will have any influence on their beliefs, because they are emotionally motivated. History has shown that literally any act, no matter how atrocious or discriminatory, can be rationalized in the name of religion. I won’t waste any more effort talking into the wind.

I do believe that gays will one day achieve equal rights. As with women and racial minorities, it is a long process, but younger generations are generally more accepting and committed to equality. Just a matter of time, and we are already seeing progress in countries like Spain, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Canada.

The real purpose for my participation in this thread was to simply say THANK YOU. To those of you that are straight, but that support my right to happiness, you have my sincere appreciation. I hope I can learn to be similarly open minded and supportive of people that are different from myself.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
ZEB wrote:
horny yoda wrote:
ZEB wrote:
If the Bible is not Gods word then what is it?

The bible is: a book. It is not a word, and it is not “Gods Word.”

It is also completely full of horrible contradictions.

Do you keep to the rules of the bible?


Don’t have a variety of crops on the same field. (Leviticus 19:19)

Don’t wear clothes made of more than one fabric (Leviticus 19:19)

Don’t cut your hair nor shave. (Leviticus 19:27)

Any person who curseth his mother or father, must be killed. (Leviticus 20:9) Have you ever done that?

If a man cheats on his wife, or vise versa, both the man and the woman must die. (Leviticus 20:10). I wonder if Dr. Laura would like that one to be enforced?

If a man sleeps with his father’s wife… both him and his father’s wife is to be put to death. (Leviticus 20:11)

If a man sleeps with his wife and her mother they are all to be burnt to death. (Leviticus 20:14)

If a man or woman has sex with an animal, both human and animal must be killed. (Leviticus 20:15-16). I guess you should kill the animal since they were willing participants. Are they crazy?

If a man has sex with a woman on her period, they are both to be “cut off from their people” (Leviticus 20:18)

Psychics, wizards, and so on are to be stoned to death. (Leviticus 20:27)

If a priest’s daughter is a whore, she is to be burnt at the stake. (Leviticus 21:9)

People who have flat noses, or is blind or lame, cannot go to an altar of God (Leviticus 21:17-18)

Anyone who curses or blasphemes God, should be stoned to death by the community. (Leviticus 24:14-16)

Don’t let cattle graze with other kinds of Cattle (Leviticus 19:19)

ARE YOU TELLING ME THOSE ARE THE WORDS OF OUR PERFECT CREATOR???

I guess you would also tell me that it was GOOD AND ADMIRABLE that Abraham (the grandfather of your whole freaking superstition..er..religion) was WILLING TO KILL HIS SON because a VOICE TOLD HIM TO DO IT!

That is what my creator supposedly respects and admires?

To quit Ren, “You’ve really lost it this time, mon.”

Here are some more!

Anyone who dreams or prophesizes anything that is against God, or anyone who tries to turn you from God, is to be put to death. (Deuteronomy 13:5)

If anyone, even your own family suggests worshipping another God, kill them. (Deuteronomy 13:6-10)

If you find out a city worships a different god, destroy the city and kill all of it’s inhabitants… even the animals. (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)

Kill anyone with a different religion. (Deuteronomy 17:2-7)

That’s some great “WORD OF GOD” you got there, buddy! Can I have some, too!? I’m already crazy!

Ha ha…Whenever the topic turns to the Bible the God haters come out in droves. Welcome Mr. hornyyoda. :slight_smile:

Also, the Old Testament “rules” that you quote were washed away when Christ arrived.

They were there for various reasons. If you want an explanation for each one it will take some time and I’m not sure you’ll end up very happy.

By the way, there are no contradictions in the Bible.

I know you want to think that there are, but that just is not the case.

I agree with this. The Old testament laws are not carried over because of CHRIST. If someone is going to pick apart the bible, at least do it well and understand it first.[/quote]

Pro x, you are starting to redeem yourself and it’s freakin me out! Stop it!

Just kidding! Good post. I respect your honesty.

[quote]forlife wrote:

But of course you won’t allow gay couples to be married, in order to prevent the promiscuity that you say makes gay sex evil. LOL! I see what you’re doing here, and it’s not going to fly.[/quote]

Perhaps you should read the statistics on gay “committed relationships.” It’s not pretty my friend!

There is almost no such thing.

And since we are on the topic of gay marriage. When was gay marriage ever allowed in any civilized society?

Go do some research…

:slight_smile: I think it’s pretty safe to say that gay sex is unsafe and cannot produce children.

Yep…I’ll stand behind that one.

repeat that line over and over again everyone!

It’s a beauty!

We (the 75% of the population who are against gay marriage) are causing homosexuals to be promiscuious by not allowing gay marriage. LOL

Every legitimate study done demonstrates that gays are in fact promiscuious.

How can we make you be promiscuous?

Are we stopping you from living with another male in a committed relationship?

Nooooo

It seems your logic needs a bit of a jump start my friend.

Blacks and women? What does being a homosexual have to do with blacks and women?

Homosexuality has never been proven to be genetic.

You do know this right? Sheesh…

LOL

[quote]Professor X wrote:

You aren’t truly listening to him and he isn’t truly listening to any deeper points you may have hidden in between quoting studies from biased sources.[/quote]

You are quite wrong about the studies I have posted. Since when did the CDC become biased?

However, you have never been more right regarding the rest of what you stated.

As I have said in the past, no one’s mind is changed who is participating on an Internet debate of this kind.

But…those who are reading it…now that is a different matter.

[quote]forlife wrote:
I knew coming into this discussion that the fundamentalists wouldn’t change their convictions about homosexuality[/quote]

And to be fair there are no homosexuals who are chainging because of this discussion.

And the same can be said of you!

And even more evil acts have been done by those who have no affiliation to any religion: Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Sadam, Idi Amin…etc…

Homosexuals have equal rights. And the comparison to women and minorities is foolish as it has not been proven that homosexuality is gentic as I have already stated.

If you are talking about homosexuals marrying…well that’s been shot down in 17 out of 17 state ballots by very wide (Texas 75%) margins!

And in Mass. there are currently thousands of signatures on petitions to strike down a (liberal) court ruling which mistakenly allowed homosexuals to marry.

forlife:

Here is the petition that I was referring to relative to Massachusetts:

"Backers of a constitutional ban on gay marriage in Massachusetts have shattered a 20-year-old record for the most certified signatures ever gathered in support of a proposed ballot question.

The people have not just spoken, they have shouted to let the people vote on the definition of marriage," said Kristian Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, which spearheaded the signature drive…"

I think the people are mad because of the liberl activist judges who pushed the for the gay marriage law…

Go figure…folks getting mad over a little thing like this. :slight_smile:

As I stated earlier, I am for equal rights to all. I am however not for “special rights” for homosexuals.

If we change the institution of marriage for homosexuals where does it stop?

Polygamists?

Incestuous relationships?

I’m interested in hearing your thoughts on this. Not just homosexuals marrying but extending marriage rights to other groups who will inevitably want that same right.

I’m really done arguing, I’m pretty sure I’ve made my views known. Generally, I feel that people should be allowed to do what they want, within our legal system.

Modern western governments are predicated on the concept that religion should not be esconced within government, such that people are free to choose any religion they wish.

Religion, beliefs and faith are something that I feel should be mostly personal. Applying your own beliefs to other people and moralizing about their behavior is in fact exercising judgment on them.

This is particularly true in light that every person is free, based on the concept of government and community predominant today, to choose their own way to seek God. This means that everyone is free to have different rules and restrictions on their behavior, based on their own religion and belief.

Importantly, that is fine, as long as it falls within legal system imposed by our government.

Again, those following Christianity need to consider carefully what it means to be judging others. I would submit to you that your faith is tested by accepting and allowing others to have different opinions and viewpoints than you do, without judgment.

Perhaps some of you should work on this, because if you don’t, then you are not living your life as you should, and you know that the consequences to you will be as severe as those you suggest for the people that you are judging.

To put that explicitly, those of you who are rationalizing the judging of others are just as guilty of sinning as those you are judging for sinning. You can kiss your souls goodbye also. Congratulations!

Well said, Vroom. I think the worst form of judgment is the attempt to actually legislate your religious beliefs against others. It is one thing to sit in your church/synagogue and condemn others, but that form of judgment goes beyond words, and affects the lives of people that believe differently from you. Some “Christians” would do well to review the words of the person they claim to follow.

Vroom, I agree that one should be able to do what they want within the legal system. However, what happens when decisions people make affect others? What happens when gays make a lawful decision to engage in risky behavior and then get HIV/AIDS and then rely on the State or Federal government (Medicaid, etc) to pay for their treatment?

We don’t live in a vacuum. Many of the decision we each make affect others in some way. So the attitude of “just let them be free to do whatever because they aren’t hurting anyone” is naive and not quite inaccurate.

So why are these risky behaviors legal for gays and not for drug users? Why can gays engage in behaviors known to be self-destructive, high risk for disease etc., and drug users not?

If we are truly going to say, “let anyone do whatever they want”, then it’s hypocritical to legally allow sodomy and not drug use.

The difference now is that being gay is cool and PC and being a drug user is not.

Lorisco,

What the hell are you talking about?

People are allowed to smoke, and that is risky. People are allowed to sky-dive and that is risky. People are allowed to take some drugs, such as alcohol, and that is risky.

If you think the government should be the nanny that decides that nobody can do anything risky, then you sound like a brand spanking new liberal, asking for a huge government to monitor everyones behavior.

Regardless, the real problem is that you are claiming that laws suddenly have no meaning for some reason.

That I am afraid is a stinky crock of shit. The fact that you feel some things should be legal that aren’t, or that some things should be illegal that aren’t, doesn’t invalidate the legal system.

The legal system is fluid, over time, and laws change. Some people agree with the laws and some don’t, and that is how a democracy works. Get used to it.

I can hardly believe you tried to make such a lame argument.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

So let?s do the math?it has been 33 years since homosexuality was considered a mental illness. Once these organizations conducted decades of systematic, objective research on homosexuality, they realized that it does not qualify as a mental illness.

Show me the studies!

I have put forth numerous studies in this thread and others.

They made a decision purely based upon political correctness.

Did you read the link that I provided on the Spitzer study? Not only is Spitzer misrepresented, but the findings of his research are completely divorced from the context of the scores of research studies that have shown sexual orientation cannot be changed.

Please don’t think for a second that the Spitzer study is the only work out there that demonstrates that homosexuals can change:

"(May 9, 2001). Press Release, National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality, Prominent Psychiatrist Announces New Study Results: “Some Gays can Change.”

“Like most psychiatrists,” says Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, “I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted, but sexual orientation could not be changed. I now believe that’s untrue–some people can and do change.”
Acosta, F., (1975) Etiology and treatment of homosexuality: review. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 4:9-29.
??better prospects for intervention in homosexual life and in its prevention through the early identification and treatment of the potential homosexual child.? (p. 9)

Aries, P. and A. Bejin, ed., Male Homosexuality in Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991), 124-125.

Bieber, I., et al. (1962) Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. NY: Basic Books.
?The therapeutic results of our study provide reason for an optimistic outlook. Many homosexuals became exclusively heterosexual in psychoanalytic treatment. Although this change may be more easily accomplished by some than by others, in our judgment a heterosexual shift is a possibility for all homosexuals who are strongly motivated to change.? (p. 319)

Bieber, I., Bieber, T. (1979) Male homosexuality. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 24, 5:409-421.
?We have followed some patients for as long as 20 years who have remained exclusively heterosexual. Reversal estimates now range from 30% to an optimistic 50%.? (p.416)

Cappon, D., (1965) Toward an Understanding of Homosexuality. Englewoord Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Of patients with bisexual problems 90% were cured (i.e., no reversions to homosexual behavior, no consciousness of homosexual desire and fantasy) in males who terminated treatment by common consent. Male homosexual patients: 80% showed marked improvement (i.e., occasional relapses, release of aggression, increasingly dominant heterosexuality)? 50% changed.? (p. 265-268)
Clippinger, J., (1974) Homosexuality can be cured. Corrective and Social Psychiatry and Journal of Behavior Technology Methods and Therapy. 21, 2:15-28.

?Of 785 patients treated, 307, or approximately 38%, were cured. Adding the percentage figures of the two other studies, we can say that at least 40% of the homosexuals were cured, and an additional 10 to 30% of the homosexuals were improved, depending on the particular study for which statistics were available.? (p. 22)

Fine, R., (1987) Psychoanalytic theory. (in Diamant L. Male and Female Homosexuality: Psychological Approaches. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing.) 81-95.
??a considerable percentage of overt homosexuals became heterosexual? If patients were motivated, whatever procedure is adopted a large percentage will give up their homosexuality? The misinformation that homosexuality is untreatable by psychotherapy does incalculable harm to thousands of men and women?? (p. 85-86)

Fitzgibbons, R., (1999) The origins and therapy of same-sex attraction disorder. (in Wolfe, C. Homosexuality and American Public Life. Spence) 85-97.

"The second most common cause of SSAD [same sex attraction disorder] among males is mistrust of women?s love? Male children in fatherless homes often feel overly responsible for their mothers. As they enter their adolescence, they may come to view female love as draining and exhausting.? (p. 89)

?Experience has taught me that healing is a difficult process, but through the mutual efforts of the therapist and the patient, serious emotional wounds can be healed over a period of time.? (p. 96)
Goetze, R. (1997) Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 17 Published Studies. Toronto Canada: New Directions for Life.
44 persons who were exclusively or predominantly homosexual experienced a full shift of sexual orientation.
Hatterer, L., (1970) Changing Homosexuality in the Male. NY: McGraw-Hill.

49 patients changed (20 married, of these 10 remained married, 2 divorced, 18 achieved heterosexual adjustments); 18 partially recovered, remained single; 76 remained homosexual (28 palliated ? 58 unchanged) ?A large undisclosed population has melted into heterosexual society, persons who behaved homosexually in late adolescence and early adulthood, and who, on their own, resolved their conflicts and abandoned such behavior to go on to successful marriages or to bisexual patterns of adoption.? (p. 14)
James, Elizabeth (1978) Treatment of Homosexuality: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Outcome Studies (unpublished PhD dissertation, Brigham Young University, on file with Brigham Young University Library).
Elizabeth James meta-analyzed over 100 outcome studies published between 1930 and 1976, and concluded that when all the research was combines, 35% of homosexual clients “recovered” and 27% improved.

Kaye, H., Beri, S., Clare, J., Eleston, M., Gershwin, B., Gershwin, P., Kogan, L., Torda, C., Wilber, C. (1967) Homosexuality in Women. Archives of General Psychiatry. 17:626-634.

??optimism in the psychoanalytic treatment of homosexual women. ?at least a 50% probability of significant improvement in women with this syndrome who present themselves for treatment and remain in it.? (p. 634)
Kronemeyer, R. (1980) Overcoming Homosexuality. NY: Macmillian
?For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy it is ?curable?.? (p.7)
MacIntosh, H. (1994) Attitudes and experiences of psychoanalysts. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 42, 4: 1183-1207.
824 male patients of 213 analysts ? 197 (23.9%) changed to heterosexuality, 703 received significant therapeutic benefit; and of the 391 female patients of 153 analysts ? 79 (20.2%) changed to heterosexuality, 318 received significant therapeutic benefit. (p. 1183)

MacIntosh, H. (1995) Attitudes and Experiences of Psychoanalysts in Analyzing Homosexual Patients. Journal of the American Psychiatric Association 1183.
422 psychiatrists were asked if they had successfully treated homosexuals, and did they agree that a homosexual can be changed to heterosexual. Of the 285 responses, which involved 1,215 homosexuals, the survey stated that 23% changed to heterosexuality. 84% benefited significantly by reducing their attraction to other members of the same gender, with a decrease in homosexual activity.
Marmor, J. (1975) Homosexuality and Sexual Orientation Disturbances. (In Freedman, A., Kaplan, H., Sadock, B. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry: II, Second Edition. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins)

?This conviction of untreatability also serves an ego-defensive purpose for many homosexuals. ?however, there has evolved a greater therapeutic optimism about the possibilities for change? There is little doubt that a genuine shift in preferential sex object choice can and does take place in somewhere between 20 and 50 per cent of patients with homosexual behavior who seek psychotherapy with this end in mind.? (p. 1519)
Newman, L., (1976) Treatment for the parents of feminine boys. American Journal of Psychiatry. 133, 6: 683-687.

?Experiences of being ostracized and ridiculed may play a more important role than has been recognized in the total abandonment of the male role at a later time.? (p. 687)
?Feminine boys, unlike men with postpubertal gender identity disorders seem remarkably responsive to treatment.? (p. 684)
Nicolosi, J., Byrd, A., Potts, R. (1998) Towards the Ethical and Effective Treatment of Homosexuality. Encino CA:

Nicolosi surveyed 850 individuals and 200 therapists and counselors ? specifically seeking out individuals who claim to have made a degree of change in sexual orientation. Before counseling or therapy, 68% of respondents perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entirely homosexual, with another 22% stating they were more homosexual than heterosexual. After treatment only 13% perceived themselves as exclusively or almost entire homosexuality, while 33% described themselves as either exclusively or almost entirely heterosexual, 99% of respondents said they now believe treatment to change homosexuality can be effective and valuable.

Pattison, E.M., Pattison, M.L. (1980, December) ?Ex-Gays?: Religiously Mediated Change in Homosexuals. American Journal of Psychiatry. 137 (12): 1553-1562.
Authors evaluated 11 white men who claimed to have changed sexual orientation from exclusive homosexuality to exclusive heterosexuality. Corollary evidence suggests that the phenomenon of substantiated change in sexual orientation without explicit treatment and/or long-term psychotherapy may be much more common than previously thought.

Rekers, J. (1988) The formation of homosexual orientation. (In Fagan, P. Hope for Homosexuality. Washington DC: Free Congress Foundation.)
?With major research grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, I have experimentally demonstrated an affective treatment for ‘gender identity disorder of childhood’, which appears to hold potential for preventing homosexual orientation in males.?

Satinover, J., (1996) Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth. Grand Rapids MI: Baker.
These reports contradict claims that change is impossible. It would be more accurate to say that all the existing evidence suggests strongly that homosexuality is quite changeable.
?Each individual?s homosexuality is the likely result of a complex mixture of genetic, intrauterine, and extrauterine biological factors combined with familial and social factors as well as repeatedly reinforced choices.? (p. 245)
“A study conducted by a homosexual couple found that out of 156 same-sex couples ‘only seven had maintained sexual fidelity; of the hundred couples that had been together for more than five years, none had been able to maintain sexual fidelity. The authors noted that the expectation for outside sexual activity was the rule for male couples and the exception for heterosexuals.’”

Schwartz, M.F., Masters, W.H. (1984, February). The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 141 (2): 173-181.
?Certain individuals who want to change their homosexual preference can be helped by a short-term intensive intervention. The failure rate in helping dissatisfied homosexuals establish heterosexual lifestyles after the intensive phase of the intervention was 20.9%, and after 5 years? follow-up it was 28.4%.
Spitzer, Robert (May 2001) Psychiatry and Homosexuality, Wall St. Journal, A26.

“In the sample he studied, Spitzer concluded that many (homosexuals) made substantial changes (after gender affirmative therapy) in sexual arousal and fantasy–not merely behavior. Even subjects who made less substantial change believed it to be extremely beneficial.”

Throckmorton, W. (1996) Efforts to modify sexual orientation: A review of outcome literature and ethical issues. Journal of Mental Health and Counseling. 20, 4: 283-305.
?I submit that the case against conversion therapy requires opponents to demonstrate that no patients have benefited from such procedures or that any benefits are too costly in some objective way to be pursued even if they work. The available evidence supports the observation of many counselors ? that many individuals with same-gender sexual orientation have been able to change through a variety of counseling approaches.? (p. 287)

West, D. (1977) Homosexuality Re-examined. London Duckworth
Behavioral techniques have the best document success (never less than 30%); psychoanalysis claims a great deal of success (the average rate seemed to be about 5%, but 50% of the bisexuals achieved exclusive heterosexuality.)

Zucker, K., Bradley, S. (1995) Gender Identity Disorder and Psychosexual Problems in Children and Adolescents. NY: Guilford. ??we feel that parental tolerance of cross-gender behavior at the time of its emergence is instrumental in allowing the behavior to develop?? (p. 259)
??In general we concur with those (e.g. Green 1972; Newman 1976; Stoller, 1978) who believe that the earlier treatment begins, the better.? (p. 281) ?It has been our experience that a sizable number of children and their families can achieve a great deal of change. In these cases, the gender identity disorder resolves fully, and nothing in the children?s behavior or fantasy suggests that gender identity issues remain problematic? All things considered, however, we take the position that in such cases clinicians should be optimistic, not nihilistic, about the possibility of helping the children to become more secure in their gender identity.? (p. 282)

As you can see there is an overwhelming amount of studies that demonstrate that same sex attraction can be changed for many!

I fit the Spitzer definition of ?good heterosexual functioning? during the years that I was married. After all, I was able to have children and repress my orientation during those years. What the study doesn?t tell you though, is that there is a significant long term cost for that repression.

I understand that in your case therapy did not work. However, in many other cases it did work. Not every one of the people in all of the studies listed are repressing their desires.

*Granted, not all of them did. But then not all alcoholics can give up the bottle.?

I find this statement reprehensible on several levels.

What I find reprehensible is that two thirds of all new cases of AIDS are homosexual men!

I find the following reprehensible as well:

(1993). STD Treatment Guidelines: Proctitis, Proctocolitis, and Enteritis. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Available at: www.ama-assn.org/special/std/treatmnt/guide/stdg3470.htm.
GBS problems such as proctitis, proctocolitis, and enteritis as ?sexually transmitted gastrointestinal syndromes.?

(1998). Hepatitis C: Epidemiology: Transmission Modes. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Available at: www.cdc.gov/nidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/edu/1/default.htm.
Men who have sex with men who engage in unsafe sexual practices remain at an increased risk for contracting hepatitis C.

(1998, September 4). Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). p. 708.

?Outbreaks of hepatitis A among men who have sex with men are a recurring problem in many large cities in the industrialized world.?
(1999, December). Table 9. Male Adult/Adolescent AIDS Cases by Exposure Category and Race/Ethnicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention. Available at www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasr1102/table9.
?Men who have sex with men? and ?men who have sex with men and inject drugs? together accounted for 64 percent of the cumulative total of male AIDS cases.

(1999, January 29). Increases in unsafe sex and rectal gonorrhea among men who have sex with men ? San Francisco, California, 1994-1997. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). p. 45.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), from 1994 to 1997 the proportion of homosexuals reporting having had anal sex increased from 57.6 percent to 61.2 percent, while the percentage of those reporting ?always? using condoms declined from 69.6 percent to 60 percent.

The proportion of men reporting having multiple sex partners and unprotected anal sex increased from 23.6 percent to 33.3 percent.
(1999, January 29). Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). p. 48.

Male rectal gonorrhea is increasing among homosexuals amidst an overall decline in national gonorrhea rates.
(2000, November 14). Young People at Risk: HIV/AIDS among America?s Youth. Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention (Centers for Disease Control). Available at:

www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/youth.htm.
?At least half of all new HIV infections in the United States are among people under twenty-five, and the majority of young people are infected sexually.? By the end of 1999, 29,629 young people aged thirteen to twenty-four were diagnosed with AIDS in the United States. MSM were the single largest risk category: in 1999, for example, 50 percent of all new AIDS cases were reported among young homosexuals.

(2000, September 29). Viral Hepatitis B ? Frequently Asked Questions. National Center for Infectious Diseases (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Available at: Division of Viral Hepatitis | CDC.

Men who have sex with men are at increased risk for hepatitis B.
Increases in unsafe sex and rectal gonorrhea among men who have sex with men ? San Francisco, California, 1994-1997. Journal of the American Medical Association. 281 (8): 696-697.
Interviews of 21, 850 males: Increasing percentages of men who have sex with men reported engaging in unprotected anal intercourse. There was an Increase in rectal gonorrhea rates.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report. 51 (33): 733-736.
920 young black males, ages 15-22, who have sex with men, have very high rates (16%) of HIV infection.
Beral, et al., op cit.; Corey, Lawrence, and King K. Holmes. (1980, February 21). Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men. The New England Journal of Medicine. 302: (8) 435-438.

Bradford, J. (2002, July 10). Lesbian and bisexual health: an overview for healthcare providers. Journal Watch Women?s Health [On-line], Available: womens-health.jwatch.org.
Lesbian and bisexual women have higher reported rates of risk for cancer and cardiovascular disease as well as obesity and High rates of human papilloma virus infection.
Calabrese, L. Harris, B., Easley, K. (1987) Analysis of variables impacting on safe sexual behavior among homosexual men in the area of low incidence for AIDS. Paper presented at the Third International Conference for AIDS. Washington DC. (in Stall 1988)

Sample of gay men living outside of the large coastal gay communities, found that neither attendance at a safe sex lecture, reading a safe sex brochure, receiving advice from a physician about AIDS, testing for HIV antibodies, nor counseling at an alternative test site was associated with participation in safe sex.
Cannon, M.J. et al. (2001, March 1). Blood-borne and sexual transmission of human herpesvirus 8 in women with or at risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection. The New England Journal of Medicine. 344 (9): 637-743.
?Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), the causal agent of Kaposi?s sarcoma, is transmitted sexually among homosexual men.?

Cochran, S.D. et al. (2001 April). Cancer-related risk indicators and preventive screening behaviors among lesbians and bisexual women. American Journal of Public Health. 91 (4); 178-81.

prevalence rates were found in lesbian/bisexual women for obesity, alcohol use, and tobacco use.
Daling, J.R. et al. (1987, October 15). Sexual practices, sexually transmitted diseases, and the incidence of anal cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 317 (16): 973-977.
Anal cancers was strongly associated with a history of male homosexual activity.

et al. (2000, July). Sexually Transmitted Infections and Risk Behaviors in Women Who Have Sex with Women. Sexually Transmitted Infections. p. 345.
Women who have sexual relations with women are at significantly higher risk for certain sexually transmitted diseases: ?BV (bacterial vaginosis), hepatitis C, and HIV risk behaviors in WSW as compared with controls.?
Frieberg, P. (2001, January 12). Study: Alcohol Use More Prevalent for Lesbians. The Washington Blade. p. 21.
Lesbian women consume alcohol more frequently, and in larger amounts, than heterosexual women. Lesbians were at significantly greater risk than heterosexual women for both binge drinking (19.4 percent compared to 11.7 percent), and for heavy drinking (7 percent compared to 2.7 percent).
Frisch, M.F. et al. (1997, November 6). Sexually transmitted infection as a cause of anal cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 337 (19): 1350-1358.

In a study of 324 women and 93 men with invasive or in situ anal cancer, findings supported the previously recognized association between anal cancer and homosexual contact.
Garbo, J. (2000, July 18). Gay and Bisexual Men Less Likely to Disclose They Have HIV. Gay Health News. Available at www.gayhealth.com/templates/0/news?record=136.
Thirty-six percent of homosexuals engaging in unprotected oral, anal, or vaginal sex failed to disclose that they were HIV positive to casual sex partners.

45 percent of homosexuals reporting having had unprotected anal intercourse during the previous six months did not know the HIV serostatus of all their sex partners. 68 percent did not know the HIV serostatus of their partners.
Hastings, G.E., Weber, R.W. (1993). Inflammatory bowel disease: Part I. Clinical features and diagnosis. American Family Physician. 47: 598-608.

Hogg, R.S. et al. (1997). Modeling the impact of HIV disease on mortality in gay and bisexual men. International Journal of Epidemiology. 26 (3): 657-661.
?Life expectancy at age 20 years for gay and bisexual men is 8 to 20 years less than for all men. If the same pattern of mortality were to continue, we estimate that nearly half of gay and bisexual men currently aged 20 years will not reach their 65th birthday.?

Hoover, D., Munoz, A., Carey, V., Chmiel, J., Taylor, J., Margolick, J., Kingsley, L., Vermund, S. (1991) Estimating the 1978-1990 and future spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in subgroups of homosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology. 134, 10:1190-1205.

?The overall probability of seroconversion [from HIV- to HIV+] prior to age 55 years is about 50%, with seroconversion still continuing at and after age 55. Given that this cohort consists of volunteers receiving extensive and anti-HIV-1 transmission education, the future seroconversion rates of the general homosexual population may be even higher.

Jaffe, et al., op cit.; Quinn, Thomas C., et al. (1983, September 8). The Polymicrobial Origin of Intestinal Infections in Homosexual Men. The New England Journal of Medicine. 309: (10) 576-582.

Judson, F.N. et al. (1980). Comparative Prevalence Rates of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Heterosexual and Homosexual Men. The American Journal of Epidemiology. 112: 836-843.

Laughon, B.E., Druckman, D.A., et al., (1988). Prevalence of enteric pathogens in homosexual men with and without acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Gastroenterology. 94: 984-993.

Miles, A.J. et al. (1993, March). Effect of anorreceptive intercourse on anorectal function. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 83: (3) 144-147.

Morris, M., Dean, L., (1994) Effects of sexual behavior change on long-term human immunodeficiency virus prevalence among homosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology. 140, 3: 217-232.

Osmond, D., Page, K., Wiley, J., Garrett, K., Sheppard, H., Moss, A., Schrager, K., Winkelstein, W., (1994) HIV infection in homosexual and bisexual men 18 to 29 years of age: The San Francisco young men?s health study. American Journal of Public Health. 84, 12: 1933-1937.
Household survey of unmarried men 18 through 29 years of age found that of 328 homosexual men 20.1% tested positive tested for HIV.
Pauk, J., et al. (2000, November 9). Mucosal shedding of human herpesvirus 8 in men. The New England Journal of Medicine. 343: 1369-1377.
Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is likely the cause of Kaposi?s Sarcoma. Its prevalence in men who have sex with men is much higher than in the general population.
Quinn, T.C. (1984). Gay bowel syndrome. The broadened spectrum of non-genital infection. Postgraduate Medicine. 76: 197-198, 201-210.
Rotello, G. (1997). Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men. NY: Dutton.
?Who wants to encourage their kids to engage in a life that exposes them to a 50 percent chance of HIV infection? Who even wants to be neutral about such a possibility? If the rationale behind social tolerance of homosexuality is that it allows gay kids an equal shot at the pursuit of happiness, that rationale is hopelessly undermined by an endless epidemic that negates happiness.? (p. 286)

Roundy, B. (2000, December 8). STD?s Up Among Gay Men: CDC Says Rise is Due to HIV Misperceptions. The Washington Blade. Available at: www.washblade.com/health/a.
"A San Francisco study of Gay and bisexual men revealed that HPV infection was almost universal among HIV-positive men, and that 60 percent of HIV-negative men carried HPV.
Schwabke, J.R. (1991, April). Syphilis in the 90s. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 44-49.
Syphilis and gonorrhea are rising in the homosexual and bisexual population.
Shehan, D.A. et al. (2003). HIV/STD Risks in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Do Not Disclose Their sexual Orientation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 52: 81-86.
Young MSM who do not disclose their sexual orientation (non-disclosers) are thought to be at particularly high risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because of low self-esteem, depression, or lack of peer support and prevention services that are available to MSM who are more open about their sexuality (disclosers).
Smith, T.W. (1991, May/June). Adult Sexual Behavior in 1989: Number of Partners, Frequency of Intercourse and Risk of AIDS. Family Planning Perspectives. 23: (3) 102-107 (Table 2, 104).

Valleroy, L.A. et al. (2000, July 12). HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. Journal of the American Medical Association. 284 (2): 198-204.
Men who have sex with men were found to have a 100 to 700 times greater prevalence rate of HIV infection than primarily heterosexual men who applied for service in the U.S. military. Men who have sex with men were also found to have a high prevalence of hepatitis B viral markers (10.7%). High HIV rates were correlated with anal sex and having had sex with 20 or more men.
Zavodnick, J.M. (1989, January). Detection and Management of Sexual Abuse of Boys. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 80-90.
?Sixteen percent of adult men in the general population have said they were sexually abused as children.?
Zmuda, R. (2000, August 17). Rising Rates of Anal Cancer for Gay Men. Cancer News. Available at: cancerlinksusa.com/cancernews_sm/Aug2000/081700analcancer.

?Most instances of anal cancer are caused by a cancer-causing strain of HPV through receptive anal intercourse. HPV infects over 90 percent of HIV-positive gay men and 65 percent of HIV-negative gay men, according to a number of recent studies.?

And while we are at it I also find this reprehensible:

Aaron, D.J., Markovic, N., Danielson, M.E., et al. (2001). Behavioral risk factors for disease and preventive health practices among lesbians. American Journal of Public Health. 91 (6): 972-975.
Lesbians were more likely to report cigarette use, alcohol use, and heavy alcohol use.
Bailey, J.M. (1999, October). Homosexuality and Mental Illness. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56: 883-884.
?Homosexual people are at a substantially higher risk for some forms of emotional problems, including suicidality, major depression and anxiety disorder. Gay, lesbian, or bisexual people were at an increased lifetime risk for suicidal ideation and behavior, major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, and nicotine dependence.?
Beitchman, J., Zucker, K., Hood, J., DaCosta, G., Akman, D. (1991) A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. 15:257-556.
?Among adolescents, commonly reported sequalae (of child sexual abuse) include sexual dissatisfaction, promiscuity, homosexuality, and an increased risk for re-victimization.? (p. 537)
?A review of studies reporting symptomology among sexually abused adolescents revealed evidence for the presence of depression, low self-esteem, and suicidal ideation.? (p. 544)
Bradford, J. et al. (1994). National Lesbian Health Care Survey: Implications for Mental Health Care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 62: 239, cited in Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality, p. 81.
More than half of lesbians had felt too nervous to accomplish ordinary activities at some time during the past year and over one-third had been depressed.
Bradley, S., Zucker, K. (1997) Gender identity disorder: A review of the past 10 Years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 34, 7:872-880.
?Girls with GID [Gender Identity Disorder] ?have difficulty connecting with their mothers, who are perceived as weak and ineffective. We see this perception as arising from the high levels of psychopathology observed in these mothers, especially severe depression and borderline personality disorder.? (p. 877)
?In our female adolescents with GID, a history of sexual abuse or fears of sexual aggression has appeared commonly.? (p. 878)
Cochran, S.D., Mays, V.M. (2000). Relation between psychiatric syndromes and behaviorally defined sexual orientation in a sample of the US population. American Journal of Epidemiology. 151 (5): 516-523.
Homosexually active men were more likely than other men to have evidence of major depression and panic attack syndromes. Homosexually active women were more likely than other women to be classified with alcohol or drug dependency syndromes. Both men and women reporting any same-gender sex partners were more likely than others to have used mental health services.
Diamant, A.L., Wold, C., Sritzer, K., Gelberg, L. (2000, November-December). Health Behaviors, Health Status, and Access to and Use of Health Care. Archives of Family Medicine. 9: 1043-1051.
Lesbians and bisexual women were more likely than heterosexual women to use tobacco products and to report any alcohol consumption, but only lesbians were significantly more likely than heterosexual women to drink heavily.
Fergusson, D., Horwood., L., Beautrais, A. (1999) Is sexual orientation related to mental health problems and suicidality in young people? Archives of General Psychiatry. 56, 10:876-888.
The gay, lesbian, bisexual subjects have significantly higher rates of: suicidal ideation (67.9%/29.0%), suicide attempt (32.1%/7.1%), and psychiatric disorders age 14-21 ? major depression (71.4%/38.2%), generalized anxiety disorder (28.5%/12.5%), conduct disorder (32.1%11.0%), nicotine dependence (64.3%/26.7%), other substance abuse/dependence (60.7%/44.3%), and multiple disorders (78.6%/38.2%) than the heterosexual sample. (p. 879)
Findings support recent evidence suggesting that gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people are at increased risk of mental health problems, with these associations being particularly evident for measures of suicidal behavior and multiple disorder.
Fifield, L., Latham, J., Phillips, C. (1977) Alcoholism in the Gay Community: The Price of Alienation, Isolation and Oppression, A Project of the Gay Community Service Center, Los Angeles, CA.
??an alarming number of gay men and women (31.96%) are trapped in an alcohol-centered lifestyle.?
Garafolo, R., Wolf, R., Kessel, S., Palfrey, J., DuRant, R., (1998) The association between health risk behaviors and sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents: Youth risk behavior survey. Pediatrics. 101, 5:895-903.
?Gay and bisexual teenagers may take more risks, and engage in risky behavior earlier in life, than teenagers who describe themselves as heterosexual. GLB [gay, lesbian, bisexual] teenagers were more likely to consider or attempt suicide, abuse alcohol or drugs, participate in risky sexual activity, or be victimized, and to initiate these behaviors earlier.?
Gilman, S.E., Cochran, S.D., Mays, V.M., et al. (2001) Risk of psychiatric disorders among individuals reporting same-sex sexual partners in the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 91 (6): 933-939.
Higher 12-month prevalences of anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders and of suicidal thoughts and plans than did respondents with opposite-sex partners only. Homosexual orientation, defined as having same-sex sexual partners, is associated with a general elevation of risk for anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders and for suicidal thoughts and plans.
Herrell, R. et al. (1999, October). Sexual Orientation and Suicidality: a Co-Twin Control Study in Adult Men. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56 (10): 867-874.
This study of male twins who were Vietnam veterans found that male homosexuals were 5.1 times more likely to experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors than were their heterosexual twins.
Jorm, A.F. et al. (2002). Sexually orientation and mental health: results from a community survey of young and middle-aged adults. British Journal of Psychiatry. 180: 423-427.
The bisexual group was highest on measures of anxiety, depression and negative affect, with the homosexual group falling between the other two groups. Both the bisexual and homosexual groups were high on suicidality.
McKirnan, D.J., Peterson, P.L., (1989). Alcohol and drug use among homosexual men and women: epidemiology and population characteristics. Addictive Behavior. 14 (5): 545-553.
?This paper presents the findings of a large (n-3400) survey of the homosexual population?Substantially higher proportions of the homosexual sample used alcohol, marijuana, or cocaine than was the case in the general population.?
Moran, N. (1996, May). Lesbian health care needs. Canadian Family Physician. 42: 879-884.
Lesbians were found to smoke, drink alcohol and use caffeine more than other women.
Mulry, G., Kalichman, S., Kelly, J. (1994) ?Substance use and unsafe sex among gay men: Global versus situational use of substances. Journal of Sex Educators and Therapy. 20, 3: 175-184.
??men who never drank prior to sex were very unlikely to have engaged in unprotected anal intercourse, whereas 90% of men who had at least one occasion of unprotected anal intercourse also drank at least some of the time prior to sexual intercourse.? ??a virtual absence of individuals who did not drink but did engage unprotected anal intercourse.? (p. 181)
Parris, J., Zweig-Frank, H., Guzder, J. (1995) Psychological factors associated with homosexuality in males with borderline personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders. 9, 11: 56-61.
The rate of homosexuality in the BPD [Borderline Personality Disorder] sample was 16.7%, as compared with 1.7% in the non-BPD comparison group. The homosexual BPD group had a rate of overall Childhood Sexual Abuse of 100% as compared to 37.3% for the heterosexual BPD group. ?It is interesting that 3 out of 10 homosexual borderline patients also reported father-son incest.? (p. 59)
Remafedi, G. (1999, October). Suicide and Sexual Orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry. 56: 885-886.
The 1989 Report of the Secretary?s Task Force on Youth Suicide concluded that ?gay youth are 2 to 3 times more likely to attempt suicide than other young people. They may comprise up to 30% of completed youth suicides annually. To date, at least 10 peer-reviewed studies have found unusually high rates of attempted suicide, in the range of 20% to 42% among young bisexual and homosexual research volunteers. All have found a clinically and statistically significant association between suicide attempts and homosexuality, strongest among males.
Ritter, Malcolm (May 1999) Study: Some Gays Can Go Straight, Associated Press.
“Perhaps the most significant study to date was reported by Robert L. Spitzer, MD at the American Psychiatric Association. In his research, Dr. Spitzer studied 200 men and women who had participated in gender affirmative therapy. He concluded that 66% of the men and 44% of the women had arrived at what he called good heterosexual functioning. In addition, 89% of the men and 95% of the women said they were bothered slightly, or not at all, by unwanted homosexual feelings.”
Rogers, C., Roback, H., McKee, E., Calhoun, D. (1976) Group psychotherapy with homosexuals: A review. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 31, 3: 3-27
?In general, reports on the group treatment of homosexuals are optimistic; in almost all cases the therapists report a favorable outcome of therapy whether the therapeutic goal was one of achieving a change in sexual orientation or whether it was a reduction in concomitant problems.? (p.22)
Saghir, J., Robins, E. (1973) Male and Female Homosexuality: A Comprehensive Investigation. Baltimore MD: Williams & Wilkins.
30% of the homosexuals in their sample reported excessive drinking or alcohol dependence. (p. 119)
The average male homosexual live-in relationship lasts between two and three years (p. 225)
Sandfort, T.G., de Graaf, R., Bijl, R.V., Schnabel, P. (2001, January). Same-Sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders: findings from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study. (NEMESIS). Archives of General Psychiatry. 58: 85-91.
A Dutch study of 5998 heterosexual and homosexual men and women showed that ?psychiatric disorders were more prevalent among homosexually active people compared with heterosexually active people?On a lifetime basis, homosexual women had a significantly higher prevalence of general mood disorders and major depression than did heterosexual women?Lifetime prevalence of both alcohol and other drug dependence was also significantly higher in homosexual women than in heterosexual women.?
Skegg, K. et al. (2003, March). Sexual orientation and self-harm in men and women. American Journal of Psychiatry. 160 (3): 541-546.
New Zealand study of 770 heterosexual men and women and 172 men and women who experienced different degrees of same sex attraction, the authors found: That attempts to inflict self harm increase with the degree of homosexual attraction. There were elevated rates of substance abuse in both sexes experiencing same sex attraction. This was particularly prominent in lesbians.
Valamis, B.G., Bowen, D.J., Bassford, T., et al. (2000, September-October). Sexual Orientation and Health. Archives of Family Medicine. 9: 843-853.
Lesbian and bisexual women more often used alcohol and cigarettes, exhibited other risk factors for reproductive cancers and cardiovascular disease, and scored lower on measures of mental health and social support.
Whitehead, Neil, Whitehead, Brian. (1999) My Genes Made Me Do It! A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation, 158-159.
Neil Whitehead tabulated other twin studies on other topics and those traits’ heritability: lying–43%, anorexia nervosa–44%, fear of the unknown–46%, psychological inpatient care–47%, extroversion–50%, depression–50%, altruism–50%, divorce–52%, racial prejudice, bigotry–70%.
“(Dean) Hamer’s genetic sequences have been calculated to affect about 5% of the homosexual population, so even if he is correct, there must be some other explanation for what causes the vast majority of homosexuality.”
“If a hormonal imbalance was responsible for homosexuality, then perhaps a simple dose of hormones to an adult would cure homosexuality. This is not the case, as has been demonstrated several times.”
Zubenko, G., George, A., Soloff, P., Schulz, P. (1987) Sexual practices among patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal Psychiatry. 144, 6: 748-752.
?Homosexuality was 10 times more common among the men and six times more common among the women with borderline personality disorder than in the general population or in a depressed control group.? (p. 748)

First, homosexuality is not alcoholism.

I agree, statistically it’s far more than alcoholism!

It is more comparable to left-handedness, and there is nothing inherently damaging in it (once you set aside your religious prejudices).

No one has mentioned religion on this thread. Maybe you have not noticed that.

What has been mentioned are cold hard facts!

And…the homosexual sex act IS inherently dangerous.

(See prior posts)

Second, you have no idea what kind of effort I put into changing my nature. I have a LOT of willpower, and I spent literally decades trying as hard as possible to change who I was. It NEVER HAPPENED. So don?t accuse me of being weak willed, at least not until YOU are able to become homosexual through sheer willpower.

Who mentioned “weak willed?” Not me. Did anyone else mention it? Not that I have read.

I’m sure it’s very very difficult to change. Any dramatic change is difficult. Ask an alcoholic!

Furthermore, what about all of those that COULDN?T change? Are you just going to judge them? Or are you going to admit that sexual orientation CANNOT be changed, at least in some people?

I’m not judging anyone. You don’t like the facts that I put forth, sorry.

But, that does not negate the fact that some, or perhaps many can and have changed.

What sort of childhood did you have??

That is a red herring question. If I tell you that I was chronically sexually abused, that my mother was domineering and hateful, and that I used to play with Barbie dolls, will your claims be justified? Not that any of that is true, but even if it was, what would be the point? The origin of homosexuality appears to be due to a combination of genetics and environment.

You think.

But it doesn?t matter what causes homosexuality?

Oh but it does!

what matters is that you cannot change your orientation.

Let correct you there: “YOU” cannot change your same sex desire. However, others (many others) have indeed changed!

I know it from personal experience,

What you know from personal experience is that YOU cannot change. Others have changed.

You might not like it I don’t know, but they have changed. PERIOD.

you have NOTHING on which to substantiate your claims.

Scroll back and read the “claims.”

I won?t change your religious beliefs.

I never mentioned religion. I only mentioned cold hard facts. You don’t like those facts…sorry. It does not make them any less real.

But if you ever try to legislate your bigotry into laws that affect me, expect a fight.

You seem bitter and sort of vindictive.

I have only pointed out the facts on this thread.

And I honestly think it’s you who is bigoted against those who have left YOUR lifestyle.

Realax man…[/quote]

a religious man looking for studied evidence base. now Zeb, i am impressed!

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Professor X wrote:

You aren’t truly listening to him and he isn’t truly listening to any deeper points you may have hidden in between quoting studies from biased sources.

You are quite wrong about the studies I have posted. Since when did the CDC become biased?

However, you have never been more right regarding the rest of what you stated.

As I have said in the past, no one’s mind is changed who is participating on an Internet debate of this kind.

But…those who are reading it…now that is a different matter.[/quote]

On what grounds are we to assume the CDC is not biased? Your conepction of ‘equal rights’ is also incorrect. Gay only have equal writes if we ARTIFICALLY subscribe recognized sexual unions deriving legal benefits between opposite sexes as the right in question. At it’s core, the right in question is the ability to ‘marry’ any indivudal one wishes. I’m not talking about relgiously sanctioned marriage, personally. What legal benefits we afford people need not have anything to do with the bible.

The bottom line is that we have the right to marry any indiviual we wish. Gays do NOT have the right to marry or ‘unionize with’ any individual they wish. Nothing you can say can change that. You can argue that they shouldn’t for the various reasons you have. But you cannot say that they have the same rights as straight people.

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
Vroom, I agree that one should be able to do what they want within the legal system. However, what happens when decisions people make affect others? What happens when gays make a lawful decision to engage in risky behavior and then get HIV/AIDS and then rely on the State or Federal government (Medicaid, etc) to pay for their treatment?

We don’t live in a vacuum. Many of the decision we each make affect others in some way. So the attitude of “just let them be free to do whatever because they aren’t hurting anyone” is naive and not quite inaccurate.

So why are these risky behaviors legal for gays and not for drug users? Why can gays engage in behaviors known to be self-destructive, high risk for disease etc., and drug users not?

If we are truly going to say, “let anyone do whatever they want”, then it’s hypocritical to legally allow sodomy and not drug use.

The difference now is that being gay is cool and PC and being a drug user is not.

[/quote]

No. There is no need for people, gay or straight, who get HIV to have their drug regimen financed by taxpayers and federal programs. There are some unlucky indiviudals that practice safe sex and have good habits. But HIV is primarily a lifestyle disease. The majority of those who get HIV engage in risky sexual or other behaviors, gay or straight. I’m not going to argue whether they should or should not get funding.

But the decision can and should be made and applied to all who get the disease. There is no need and no reason to distinguish between gay and straight indiviuals who contract it. And medicaid applies to almost no one, by the way, save the extremely poor.

[quote]vroom wrote:
Lorisco,

What the hell are you talking about?

People are allowed to smoke, and that is risky. People are allowed to sky-dive and that is risky. People are allowed to take some drugs, such as alcohol, and that is risky.

If you think the government should be the nanny that decides that nobody can do anything risky, then you sound like a brand spanking new liberal, asking for a huge government to monitor everyones behavior.

Regardless, the real problem is that you are claiming that laws suddenly have no meaning for some reason.

That I am afraid is a stinky crock of shit. The fact that you feel some things should be legal that aren’t, or that some things should be illegal that aren’t, doesn’t invalidate the legal system.

The legal system is fluid, over time, and laws change. Some people agree with the laws and some don’t, and that is how a democracy works. Get used to it.

I can hardly believe you tried to make such a lame argument.[/quote]

Hey Bro, you missed my point. My point is that sure, people do all sorts of stupid risky things, but we don’t have to pay for it. People who engage in smoking, drug use, homosexual behavior, etc. should all have to pay for their own treatment.

The taxpayer should not have to bear the burden of paying for these irresponsible people. It has to do with being a good citizen and acting responsibly because you know your actions affect others.

[quote]jsbrook wrote:
No. There is no need people, gay or straight, need to have their drug regimen financed by taxpayers and federal programs. There are some unlucky indiviudals that practice safe sex and have good habits. But HIV is primarily a lifestyle disease. The majority of those who get HIV engage in risky sexual or other behaviors, gay or straight. I’m not going to argue whether they should or should not get funding.

But the decision can and should be made and applied to all who get the disease. There is no need and no reason to distinguish between gay and straight indiviuals who contract it. And medicaid applies to almost no one, by the way, save the extremely poor.[/quote]

Sorry Bro, but that is just stupid. So you are going to apply the same criteria to a guy who knowingly engages in anal sex with another guy and a child who gets the diseases from this gay guy who gave blood?

Think Bro! Statistically a very small percentage of people get HIV from straight sex or blood transfusions. So that would not be considered a risk behavior. The term “risk behavior” is related to one’s statistical probability of getting the disease. And the statistical probability for straight sex or blood transfusion people in getting the disease is very low. As such, NOT a risk behavior.

The statistical probability of getting HIV from IV drug use and gay sex is very high. So that means it IS a risk factor.

So yes, apply the same criteria to all those that engage in RISK behaviors, but not those who don’t.

[quote]Zeb wrote:

You seem bitter and sort of vindictive.

I have only pointed out the facts on this thread.

And I honestly think it’s you who is bigoted against those who have left YOUR lifestyle.

Realax man…

a religious man looking for studied evidence base. now Zeb, i am impressed![/quote]

Ha ha thanks man that actually means a lot coming from you.

Take care.

[quote]jsbrook wrote:

On what grounds are we to assume the CDC is not biased? Your conepction of ‘equal rights’ is also incorrect. Gay only have equal writes if we ARTIFICALLY subscribe recognized sexual unions deriving legal benefits between opposite sexes as the right in question. At it’s core, the right in question is the ability to ‘marry’ any indivudal one wishes. I’m not talking about relgiously sanctioned marriage, personally. What legal benefits we afford people need not have anything to do with the bible.

The bottom line is that we have the right to marry any indiviual we wish. Gays do NOT have the right to marry or ‘unionize with’ any individual they wish. Nothing you can say can change that. You can argue that they shouldn’t for the various reasons you have. But you cannot say that they have the same rights as straight people.
[/quote]

That all sounds pretty good in theory. And who knows what the next 50 years will bring?

But where do we draw the line on this “new marriage” you suggest?

Can Polygamists get married?

Can those practicing Incest get married?

Please put forth your ideas. I’m not being sarcastic, I really want to understand where you might want to take this.

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
vroom wrote:
Lorisco,

What the hell are you talking about?

People are allowed to smoke, and that is risky. People are allowed to sky-dive and that is risky. People are allowed to take some drugs, such as alcohol, and that is risky.

If you think the government should be the nanny that decides that nobody can do anything risky, then you sound like a brand spanking new liberal, asking for a huge government to monitor everyones behavior.

Regardless, the real problem is that you are claiming that laws suddenly have no meaning for some reason.

That I am afraid is a stinky crock of shit. The fact that you feel some things should be legal that aren’t, or that some things should be illegal that aren’t, doesn’t invalidate the legal system.

The legal system is fluid, over time, and laws change. Some people agree with the laws and some don’t, and that is how a democracy works. Get used to it.

I can hardly believe you tried to make such a lame argument.

Hey Bro, you missed my point. My point is that sure, people do all sorts of stupid risky things, but we don’t have to pay for it. People who engage in smoking, drug use, homosexual behavior, etc. should all have to pay for their own treatment.

The taxpayer should not have to bear the burden of paying for these irresponsible people. It has to do with being a good citizen and acting responsibly because you know your actions affect others.

[/quote]

Forgive me lorisco but you left out one very important ingredient.

You can try to help smokers, alcoholics, drug users and everyone else who practices risky, costly (in many ways) behavior with no one telling you that their behavior is just fine and dandy…(as they skip off to politically correct land doing the Howard Dean screech :slight_smile: