Brokeback Propaganda

[quote]harris447 wrote:

I’ve been right all along: you just don’t like fags.[/quote]

And your IQ is what?
e

The funniest thing about this is that you have yet to prove even one of those statistics wrong!

Oh you condmn them all the time. But you never even come close to proving them wrong.

Now why is that?

Are people supposed to ignore the facts in order to be politically correct…like you?

[quote]so they’ll know you are a liar when you start in with your “hate the sin, love the sinner.”

You think queers are icky and should therefore be discriminated against.[/quote]

WOW harris you really are stupid. You should really have an award for how dumb you are! (shaking head and laughing)

Here’s what I said and I stand by it:

Read it over until you understand it moron.

I wrote:

"The ACT"

DUH!

[quote]And…if middle America is full of people like you, I’m gonna stay right here in good ol’ college educated New Jersey.
[/quote]

Funny you would say “college educated.” Out of the 71% (average) of the people who voted down gay marriage in 20 states, how many do you think were college educated?

Think about it harris.

It’s not “education” that separates people on this issue. It’s values that separate them.

And whenever the issue comes to “values” you will always be on the wrong end because you’re a low life. You’ve said way too much on this site for any of us to draw a different conclusion.

Please continue to post and make a total ass of yourself.

It’s become sport like to sort of slap you around the board…

[quote]Meddyg Stigg wrote:
steveo5801 wrote:

Harris, and you don’t find this repulsive? Are YOU gay too?

Why SteveO are you cruising for a piece of ass ?

[/quote]

No, I don’t wish to use these forums the way you do. Besides, I very much like women, you know, the sex that a man is supposed to like…

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Please continue to post and make a total ass of yourself.

It’s become sport like to sort of slap you around the board…
[/quote]
ZEB, does smacking harris around like you’ve been doing constitute some form of GPP? I’m lookin to add some variation in my training regimen…

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Please continue to post and make a total ass of yourself.

It’s become sport like to sort of slap you around the board…

ZEB, does smacking harris around like you’ve been doing constitute some form of GPP? I’m lookin to add some variation in my training regimen…[/quote]

Well let’s see, it’s not difficult. Therefore, we know it can’t be compared to “heavy lifting.”

:slight_smile:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
stellar_horizon wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Please continue to post and make a total ass of yourself.

It’s become sport like to sort of slap you around the board…

ZEB, does smacking harris around like you’ve been doing constitute some form of GPP? I’m lookin to add some variation in my training regimen…

Well let’s see, it’s not difficult. Therefore, we know it can’t be compared to “heavy lifting.”

:slight_smile:
[/quote]

It’s so amusing that you think you’re “slapping me around”. (What a Christian thought by the way…)

Maybe I’ll follow your lead and start proclaiming utter bullshit and expecting people to believe it to be true.

“I’m a millionaire!”

Did it work?

Also…the reason no one feels the need to answer any of your “statistics” is a number of reasons.

1st: when you find these “statistics” at sites that would make the KKK flinch, they don’t really need to be rubutted.

2nd: your lie that you care for people is pointed out as a lie by your constant assertions that fags are diseased sinners.

3rd: (and here’s why people truly dislike you) Your entire thesis is see-through. You say that government shouldn’t be “promoting an unhealthy lifestyle” by sanctioning gay marriage.

Yet you have no “statistics” about the obese getting married.

Or junkies.

Or bulimics.

Or alcoholics.

All of which are far more dangerous than being gay, which only seems like it would be dangerous around you.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
forlife wrote:
I love these facts. Do you want another fact? Men having sex with men can not produce children. How about another one - your butt was not designed (or created, if you prefer) to stick things inside of it.
[/quote]

Then be consistent. There are straight couples that cannot produce children, yet you don’t discriminate against them. There are straight couples that practice anal sex, yet you don’t deny them the right to marry.

Why not just admit that these are only excuses for pushing a homophobic religious agenda? It’s not infertility or anal sex that bothers you. It is the fact that you think it is icky for men to have sex with one another. Be honest for a change.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see through your smokescreen.

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
I didn’t say just women pastors. What I said is that the injunction against women speaking in the church covers women either preaching or teaching or leading men.[/quote]

No, actually the scripture says women are not to speak in church, period. Or is this one of those cases where you conveniently choose not to take the bible literally, and instead twist the scripture to suit your purposes?

Even if your interpretation were literal though, how many Christians do you think would agree with you that women should not be allowed to teach in church? Are they not “true Christians” if women are allowed to teach? Misogyny anyone?

Lol! As if Paul was preaching to a group of bald women and telling them they need to grow hair. Get real. He told women they needed to wear head coverings in church and clearly differentiated that from being bald:

So once again, are churches with women that pray with their heads uncovered not considered “true Christians”?

Somehow, you fundamentalists are fine with ignoring scriptural injunctions like this one while cherry picking other injunctions like Paul’s statement about homosexuality.

That is applying a double standard to scripture. It is disingenous, dishonest, and self-serving. Either follow all of your bible as written or admit that it is a record of a people at a certain point in history which continues to evolve and may no longer apply to today.

Quit being a smorgasbord Christian.

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
You are really hopless. Who cares what bigoted people told themselves to make them feel better about slavery. Do you not remember that Hitler’s henchmen wore on their belt buckles the insciption “All for God?”
[/quote]

The misogynists and racial bigots of earlier decades genuinely believed that their discrimination was justified. They used the bible to support their bigotry.

Blacks should be slaves. Women should not vote or teach in church. Gays should not be allowed to marry. The bible says it, so it must be true!

Bigots never see themselves as such. You’re not the first, and while times are slowly changing, sadly you won’t be the last.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:
Well said Steveo. It is important for all Christians to remember that Christian denominations will differ in their view of minor issues (cover the head with a garmet is one of them), but they do not differ in their views of the major issues (homosexuality is one of them).[/quote]

Where did Paul say that homosexuality was a major issue and women having their heads covered or speaking in church was a minor issue? That is an interpretation YOU placed on the scripture to suit your homophobic religious agenda.

Even if Paul said such a thing, as a true Christian, you should be consistent in applying everything dictated in the bible instead of picking and choosing what suits your purpose.

Quit being a smorgasbord Christian.

[quote]harris447 wrote:

Maybe I’ll follow your lead and start proclaiming utter bullshit and expecting people to believe it to be true.[/quote]

This is really really easy harris, even YOU can do it, or at least try.

All you have to do is disprove all of the facts and figures that I have posted throughout this thread.

Begin with the CDC statistics. Which demonstrate that 67% of all new HIV cases are homosexuals.

Go to the latest 20 state referendums where an average of 71% of all people voting voted down gay marriage.

After that we can talk about the “slippery slope” of gay marriage in the Netherlands. Four years after gay marriage was enacted polygamist civil unions began!

That means you have three places to begin.

It’s easy for you to rant and rave and scream homophobic (as if that word has any meaning at all).

But it’s quite another thing to actually debate the issues. I think the only reason why your side makes up all these meaningless hate words is that they lose on every fact related to homosexual marriage!

You say it’s “bullshit” now all you ahve to do is PROVE IT!

And that’s the one thing that you’re just not able to do harris.

[quote]Also…the reason no one feels the need to answer any of your “statistics” is a number of reasons.

1st: when you find these “statistics” at sites that would make the KKK flinch, they don’t really need to be rubutted.[/quote]

I see, so if YOU and your gay brothers, think the site is a radical site then any statistics that come from that site are all lies.

And, any site which counters the gay agenda is by your definition RADICAL.

That is your logic. And it’s very very poor logic. And you’re a teacher?

What you fail to say is that the information that I have posted about gay marriage, including health statistics, polls, referendums etc. come from very high quality sites.

For example, why don’t you dispute the CDC web site statistics that I have posted?

[b]Is the governments Center For Disease Control so radical that you have to ignore it?

Or is it so truthful that you have to ignore it?[/b]

You are one twisted little puppy!

You can continue to lie if you like but everytime you do I will correct you.

It’s obvious from the many statistics I have presented from the governments own CDC web site that homosexuals have a higher incidence of sexually transmitted disease, mental health problems such as anxiety and depression and a list of other diesease compared to the general population.

Does that mean that I hate homosexuals?

Not at all.

[b]No more than you hate your Aunt Bessy who is a heavy smoker. And she falls into a group of statistics which claim that she is shortening her life span by her dangerous action.

Do you hate her for it?

Does pointig out the statistics to her mean you hate her?[/b]

Or do you love her and want to help her by pointing out the dangers of her activity?

See…when you look at this in the light of day and take away the hate words of the politically correct left they make no sense at all.

[quote]3rd: (and here’s why people truly dislike you) Your entire thesis is see-through. You say that government shouldn’t be “promoting an unhealthy lifestyle” by sanctioning gay marriage.

Yet you have no “statistics” about the obese getting married.[/quote]

Wow…you’re just flat out stupid huh?

Has it been demonstrated through any solid data that two people getting married will promote an activity such as over eating, which has been proven to be unhealthy?

No, of course not.

One obese man and one obese woman can either marry or not. Whether they have sex or not has nothing to do with how much they eat.

Same with junkies.

Same with bulimics.

Same with alcoholics.

Actually harris facts are dangerous around you!

Some you twist them.

Some you turn them.

And most you ignore.

But no matter what you do those pesky little facts keep popping up. And the one thing that you are unable to do isREFUTE THEM!

And I’m sure that it’s frustrating to know that you’re wrong and be unable to do nothing more than rant and rave and use the usual homosexual agenda buzz words.

[b]And when it’s all said and done you are never able to counter even one fact!

NOT ONE FACT![/b]

[quote]forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
forlife wrote:
I love these facts. Do you want another fact? Men having sex with men can not produce children. How about another one - your butt was not designed (or created, if you prefer) to stick things inside of it.

Then be consistent. There are straight couples that cannot produce children, yet you don’t discriminate against them. There are straight couples that practice anal sex, yet you don’t deny them the right to marry.[/quote]

There are polygamists that can produce plenty of children yet we discriminate against them!

It’s not discrimination that is inherently wrong.

While in my 40’s and in great shape I could easily pass any military fitness entrance exam. Yet, I am not allowed to even try because they are discriminating against me because of age.

Are they wrong?

There are long lists of such things where the government in the interest of its people and the welfar of the state deny certain activities to certain groups.

Such is the case of gay “marriage.”

No one really wants this, the people don’t want it and the government does not want it.

You can’t hide behind the word “discrimination” it just flat out does not work!

[quote]forlife wrote:
steveo5801 wrote:
You are really hopless. Who cares what bigoted people told themselves to make them feel better about slavery. Do you not remember that Hitler’s henchmen wore on their belt buckles the insciption “All for God?”

The misogynists and racial bigots of earlier decades genuinely believed that their discrimination was justified. They used the bible to support their bigotry.[/quote]

forlife once again uses false logic.

Since blacks were in fact discrimated against and that was wrong he claims that ALL such discrimination is wrong.

Untrue!

Is discrimating against polygamists wrong?

How about incestual marraiges?

How about discriminating against killers, thieves and rapists?

So…not all discrimination is wrong forlife.

Pathetic and tired are your arguments.

But this will get us to our goal of 100 pages.

:slight_smile:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
harris447 wrote:

Maybe I’ll follow your lead and start proclaiming utter bullshit and expecting people to believe it to be true.

This is really really easy harris, even YOU can do it, or at least try.

All you have to do is disprove all of the facts and figures that I have posted throughout this thread.

Begin with the CDC statistics. Which demonstrate that 67% of all new HIV cases are homosexuals.

Go to the latest 20 state referendums where an average of 71% of all people voting voted down gay marriage.

After that we can talk about the “slippery slope” of gay marriage in the Netherlands. Four years after gay marriage was enacted polygamist civil unions began!

That means you have three places to begin.

It’s easy for you to rant and rave and scream homophobic (as if that word has any meaning at all).

But it’s quite another thing to actually debate the issues. I think the only reason why your side makes up all these meaningless hate words is that they lose on every fact related to homosexual marriage!

You say it’s “bullshit” now all you ahve to do is PROVE IT!

And that’s the one thing that you’re just not able to do harris.

Also…the reason no one feels the need to answer any of your “statistics” is a number of reasons.

1st: when you find these “statistics” at sites that would make the KKK flinch, they don’t really need to be rubutted.

I see, so if YOU and your gay brothers, think the site is a radical site then any statistics that come from that site are all lies.

And, any site which counters the gay agenda is by your definition RADICAL.

That is your logic. And it’s very very poor logic. And you’re a teacher?

What you fail to say is that the information that I have posted about gay marriage, including health statistics, polls, referendums etc. come from very high quality sites.

For example, why don’t you dispute the CDC web site statistics that I have posted?

[b]Is the governments Center For Disease Control so radical that you have to ignore it?

Or is it so truthful that you have to ignore it?[/b]

2nd: your lie that you care for people is pointed out as a lie by your constant assertions that fags are diseased sinners.

You are one twisted little puppy!

You can continue to lie if you like but everytime you do I will correct you.

It’s obvious from the many statistics I have presented from the governments own CDC web site that homosexuals have a higher incidence of sexually transmitted disease, mental health problems such as anxiety and depression and a list of other diesease compared to the general population.

Does that mean that I hate homosexuals?

Not at all.

[b]No more than you hate your Aunt Bessy who is a heavy smoker. And she falls into a group of statistics which claim that she is shortening her life span by her dangerous action.

Do you hate her for it?

Does pointig out the statistics to her mean you hate her?[/b]

Or do you love her and want to help her by pointing out the dangers of her activity?

See…when you look at this in the light of day and take away the hate words of the politically correct left they make no sense at all.

3rd: (and here’s why people truly dislike you) Your entire thesis is see-through. You say that government shouldn’t be “promoting an unhealthy lifestyle” by sanctioning gay marriage.

Yet you have no “statistics” about the obese getting married.

Wow…you’re just flat out stupid huh?

Has it been demonstrated through any solid data that two people getting married will promote an activity such as over eating, which has been proven to be unhealthy?

No, of course not.

One obese man and one obese woman can either marry or not. Whether they have sex or not has nothing to do with how much they eat.

Or junkies.

Same with junkies.

Or bulimics.

Same with bulimics.

Or alcoholics.

Same with alcoholics.

All of which are far more dangerous than being gay, which only seems like it would be dangerous around you.

Actually harris facts are dangerous around you!

Some you twist them.

Some you turn them.

And most you ignore.

But no matter what you do those pesky little facts keep popping up. And the one thing that you are unable to do isREFUTE THEM!

And I’m sure that it’s frustrating to know that you’re wrong and be unable to do nothing more than rant and rave and use the usual homosexual agenda buzz words.

[b]And when it’s all said and done you are never able to counter even one fact!

NOT ONE FACT![/b]

[/quote]

Here’s a fact:

4.9 million people became newly infected with HIV in 2005, including 700,000 children. Of these, 3.2 million new infections occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa

That’s from the UN. Please tell me how 67%of total cases could therefore be homosexual.

You can’t, because you cherry-pick your facts to back up your bigotry.

Your much-beloved 71% of people that voted against gay marriage?

These are the same people that would have voted against inter-racial marriage. Every–EVERY SINGLE POLL THAT YOU REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE–says that the number of people opposed to it shrinks every year.

(Forgetting, of course, the fact that maybe–just maybe–the people voting against gay marriage have been biased by scare tactics like yours.)

As for the rest…I don’t buy it. No one does, except for maybe terribleivan, and he’s a teenaged retard.

What I don’t buy is that you came to this controversy with an open mind and the “facts” turned you.

No sane and intelligent person could think that. No, what they would think is that you’re a person who thinks faggots are icky and went around cherry-picking “facts” out of context and making idiotic, superstition-based conclusions.

And…are you kidding? Obese people don’t promote the activity? Fatties all have skinny kids is what you’re saying?

Oh yeah…I don’t know where you ot the idea I’m gay from, because I’d place a good deal of money that I’ve had sex with more (and better looking) women than you.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
Here’s a fact:

4.9 million people became newly infected with HIV in 2005, including 700,000 children. Of these, 3.2 million new infections occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa

That’s from the UN. Please tell me how 67%of total cases could therefore be homosexual.

You can’t, because you cherry-pick your facts to back up your bigotry…[/quote]

harris, (clears throat) I have repeatedly stated that the 67% figure that I gave you is from the CDC. That would be the Center For Disease Control for the US. I have never even one time commented on the world wide AIDS epidemic.

But it’s nice that you actually looked up at least one fact. Unfortunately for you that fact does not refute my orginal assertion.

So…you’re still looking like the ignorant knot head that you are.

STIRKE ONE

[quote]Your much-beloved 71% of people that voted against gay marriage?

These are the same people that would have voted against inter-racial marriage.[/quote]

And you know this how?

Another one of your ignorant assertions?

You cannot place homosexuals on the same level as blacks. That was already tried by your politically correct brother forlife and he looked silly repeating it until everyone who read the thread was laughing.

Now we all get to laugh at you!

:slight_smile:

Black = genetic

Homosexual = action

End of that story!

STRIKE TWO

I have acknowledged all polls. People against gay marriage varies between 55% and 70% depending on the poll.

Here’s one that shows that 68% of the people are against gay marriage.

BUT

something of even more significance is taking place across the country…People are actually getting to vote on gay “marriage” through state referendums.

And good politicians will tell you “the only poll that counts is on election day.”

And you are losing by an average of 71% in those “polls.”

20 states have now not only voted down gay “marriage” but have also voted to not accept homosexuals who have been “married” or have civil unions in other states! All states are actually adding it to their constitution so that no one can fool with it in the future.

“Those 20 amendments have been adopted with an average of 71 percent of the vote.”

Please don’t take my word for it read it in the news. You know what the news is right? It’s that thing that you avoid looking at because you are too busy making yourself into a huge INTERNET JOKE.

Here, just for you:

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=23414

And in the six states that will vote on it this year all are expected to vote down gay “marriage” in the same fashion that the previous 20 did. In addition to that there are also several “blue” states that are banning gay marriage and adding the ban to the constitution.

This issue is not republicans vs democrats. It’s about those with family values against those with…um no values…like you.

The resounding defeat for gay “marriage” comes from a cross section of people who are really really tired of the politically correct attempting to hijack the system for a select few. In words in language that even YOU can understand we are tired of the politically correct pulling their respective pants down and trying to take a dump on what many have worked hard to build.

More of your words: “It aint happening.”

Oh…and that’s STRIKE THREE for you on this post.

Yes…I’m sure that those who have read the CDC nightmarish health statistics on homosexuals were indeed scared?

Tactics?

I call it Truth!

You don’t “buy it?”

LOL

You don’t have to “buy it.”

71% of all the people who care to go out and vote are buying it. And they’re buying it because they want to take a stand for traditional family values and against an “experiment” in disaster.

You might hang out with politically correct liberals like yourself all day long. And you can get together in the teachers room and blow smoke up each others ass until you just feel a nice warm glow…

But in the real world people are NOT for your new idea of marriage. And it won’t be passing in the USA, not even in New Jersey.

Now how does that make you feel? :wink:

[quote]What I don’t buy is that you came to this controversy with an open mind and the “facts” turned you.

No sane and intelligent person could think that. No, what they would think is that you’re a person who thinks faggots are icky and went around cherry-picking “facts” out of context and making idiotic, superstition-based conclusions.[/quote]

Yes, you have made your idiotic assertions many times in the past. Yet, this is one more post that has gone by the wayside and you have not been able to refute even ONE of my statistics!

NOT ONE!

Oh…and calling people names does not equal even a weak rebutall.

Yes, we all know that you are a politically correct liberal and feel a great amount of passion for the gay “marriage” issue.

You want to sit around a camp fire and sing “kumbia” stare at the sky and say “why can’t people just marry whatever and whoever they want…LORDY LORDY”… Oops no wait…none of you would be saying anything about God. Unless it had at least one profanity attached to it.

I’m just thankful that in the real world none of your nonsense counts for anything but hot air.

“Sniff…sniff Bigot, Homophobe”

“Bla…bla bla…”

Name calling and ranting and raving is not an argument. Oh it works to a degree with the weak willed. But not with the majority of Americans who are determined to hold the line on homosexual “marriage.”

(knocks on harris head) “hello…anybody home?”

Go back and reread what I wrote Einstein. I’m not going to repeat it again. this is not one of those remedial classes that you “teach.”

Good for you harris!

And that means what?

I can only pray (that would be to God) that you wear some sort of protection and you don’t spread that idiotic seed of yours. The world really does not need another harris running around making no sense.

Okay, games over, you lose AGAIN!

And those paying attention please note:

harris has yet to refute even ONE statistic which I have presented. NOT ONE!

[quote]forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
Well said Steveo. It is important for all Christians to remember that Christian denominations will differ in their view of minor issues (cover the head with a garmet is one of them), but they do not differ in their views of the major issues (homosexuality is one of them).

Where did Paul say that homosexuality was a major issue and women having their heads covered or speaking in church was a minor issue? That is an interpretation YOU placed on the scripture to suit your homophobic religious agenda.

Even if Paul said such a thing, as a true Christian, you should be consistent in applying everything dictated in the bible instead of picking and choosing what suits your purpose.

Quit being a smorgasbord Christian.[/quote]

[b]

Homosexuality is sin. Those who practice homosexuality are in grevious sin.

That is what the Book says – no matter how you try to turn and twist and justify yourself.

God wants you to turn from your sin and come to Him, before it is too late.

This is the last answer to you I will make on this thread. You are a hopeles, gay person, who cannot see beyond his gayness and lust for what you wish to practice. You and your kind will do anything and say anything to justify your sinful behavior.

Too bad…

Ok, for those of us keeping score…

ZEB is still a fag hating total fucking douchbag.

Steve is well beyond being a total fucking idiot.

Ivan is too busy PM’ing ZEB about how awesome his response was, and too stupid to know otherwise. Maybe he just doesn’t realize that blowing ZEB on the internet is just as gay as blowing ZEB in a car. Does that make ZEB gay too?

Forlife honestly thinks any of these idiots will even listen to facts that refute their beliefs.

XI: Thou shalt not be a tool in my name.

Damn, looks like some of you will have to rot in hell now.

[quote]tme wrote:
Ok, for those of us keeping score…

ZEB is still a fag hating total fucking douchbag.

Steve is well beyond being a total fucking idiot.

Ivan is too busy PM’ing ZEB about how awesome his response was, and too stupid to know otherwise. Maybe he just doesn’t realize that blowing ZEB on the internet is just as gay as blowing ZEB in a car. Does that make ZEB gay too?

Forlife honestly thinks any of these idiots will even listen to facts that refute their beliefs.

XI: Thou shalt not be a tool in my name.

Damn, looks like some of you will have to rot in hell now.

[/quote]

Another fine intellectualy gifted post from a low IQ God scoffing liberal…

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
Another fine intellectualy gifted post from a low IQ God scoffing liberal…
[/quote]

Another intellectualy[sic] challenged post from an idiotic god fearing jackass…

Thanks for proving my point, jackass.

[quote]forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
forlife wrote:
I love these facts. Do you want another fact? Men having sex with men can not produce children. How about another one - your butt was not designed (or created, if you prefer) to stick things inside of it.

Then be consistent. There are straight couples that cannot produce children, yet you don’t discriminate against them. There are straight couples that practice anal sex, yet you don’t deny them the right to marry.

Why not just admit that these are only excuses for pushing a homophobic religious agenda? It’s not infertility or anal sex that bothers you. It is the fact that you think it is icky for men to have sex with one another. Be honest for a change.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see through your smokescreen.[/quote]

Perhaps you lack that ounce of intellignece forlife because you fail to grasp the other issues surrounding homosexuality. Examples?

High suicide rate.

High depression rate.

High disease spreading rate.

Inability toward being monogamous (in general)

Heterosexuals dont suffer the same problems to such a large degree, so the act of sticking your penis in another mans butt is only part of what is damaging about choosing to live the homo lifestyle.

But, you are probably too bias to understand that.

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
forlife wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
Well said Steveo. It is important for all Christians to remember that Christian denominations will differ in their view of minor issues (cover the head with a garmet is one of them), but they do not differ in their views of the major issues (homosexuality is one of them).

Where did Paul say that homosexuality was a major issue and women having their heads covered or speaking in church was a minor issue? That is an interpretation YOU placed on the scripture to suit your homophobic religious agenda.

Even if Paul said such a thing, as a true Christian, you should be consistent in applying everything dictated in the bible instead of picking and choosing what suits your purpose.

Quit being a smorgasbord Christian.

[b]

Homosexuality is sin. Those who practice homosexuality are in grevious sin.

That is what the Book says – no matter how you try to turn and twist and justify yourself.

God wants you to turn from your sin and come to Him, before it is too late.

This is the last answer to you I will make on this thread. You are a hopeles, gay person, who cannot see beyond his gayness and lust for what you wish to practice. You and your kind will do anything and say anything to justify your sinful behavior.

Too bad…[/quote]

The fact that homosexuality is a sin means nothing to forlife. In fact, it just makes him want to go on a Christian bashing rampage.

He is so angry that a strong willed Christian will tell him how wrong he is, that he is unable to keep himself from bashing Christianity. If a strong willed atheist told him he was wrong, he would find a way to attack them for being an atheist I am sure.

I am not angry at him for it. I just pity him.