[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
[quote]Chi-Towns-Finest wrote:
“HupA I’m not confident about recommending as I have seen too many patients test weak on it. In other words, hold a pill close to their nervous system and their deltoid muscle goes weak.”
Kind of lost you at the end the BBB, you’re saying you are not confident recommending vinpo – are you being serious about loosing strength specifically in your delt?[/quote]
No, it’s hupA I’m not recommending any more.
And yes, I’m serious about the weakness, though it will be evident in any ‘sim’ muscle, not just the delt.
I know it sounds kooky, and believe me, I tried like fuck not to believe in the whole muscle testing thing.
But ultimately I believe it can be used to good diagnostic effect for locating and treating CNS irritation, whether that irritation be caused by a mis-aligned spinal joint or a nutritional issue, or a requrement for (or toxicity to) a specific type of supplement or steroid.
When I was shown this, you couldn’t have had a more disbelieving student, BUT I have seen it work too many times to just write it off.
My patients like it, because I don’t push it on them as some sort of ‘be all and end all’ miracle, just a tool to guide my clinical evaluation.
If I test a muscle and it is noticably weak (unable to lock for time), and I can use that to guide me to a specific vertebral joint, which then (when challenged) makes the weak muscle test strong, then I adjust that vertebra in the direction of change/irritation. This results in a previously weak part of the kinetic chain become functional again.
How can you argue with that? The results speak for themselves. OK, so holding a sample of a specific noop next to the cheeck or sternum is different, it’s also ‘the same’ in a way.
That’s how I personalise my noop, nutrition and supplement protocols to specific individuals. I have worked with a guy who had biosignature done on him. My analysis revealed similar issues tl the biosig. but my nutritionsl and supplemental program worked better with the client - partly because I made the food palatable and enjoyable and didn’t push (IMO) unnecessary amounts of supps. But everything I recommended was then tested on the guy to double check that they ran in sympathy with his body, not against it.
In summanry, lol:
Muscle testing works, but may be too extreme for some.
That is my opinion.
BBB[/quote]
Er…wha? I may be misunderstanding this post, but are you saying that simply holding a substance near the body can affect it? Forgive me for saying this BBB, because I have a ton of respect for your opinion, but that sounds like utter bullshit. On what theory does that work exactly?