Except Trayvon was tall and skinny, so maybe the licorice whip of a kid.
“The licorice whip attacked the pasty as the pasty was retreating and got shot in the chest”.
It is odd how when you keep context the same but exchange descriptive words in X’s posts and logic they come across smacking of racism.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]h0nkey46 wrote:
Can you honestly say you would be upset if the kid was caucasion? I bet you wouldn’t. It would just be unfortunate…you think the kid is a victim because he is black (I think)
[/quote]
We just had a thread about a Muslim woman attacked. My opinion doers not change based on race when it comes to recognizing someone attacked.
the real question is why any black person who mentions race is somehow “racist” for doing so.
What you saw in this thread and the other was the statement that we don’t have all the facts.
Your opinion is biased as well…you just won’t admit it.[/quote]
It is a little weird the case overstand just posted isn’t receiving any attention in a thread where emotions are flying over a “tragedy” when that case is clearly more tragic.
Conjecture only but it seems the real tragedy for you is that a black kid is dead at the hands of a brown guy you are pretending is white. It’s weird.
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Except Trayvon was tall and skinny, so maybe the licorice whip of a kid.
“The licorice whip attacked the pasty as the pasty was retreating and got shot in the chest”.
It is odd how when you keep context the same but exchange descriptive words in X’s posts and logic they come across smacking of racism.[/quote]
LOL. I used “pasty” as an adjective, not a noun, dumbass.
That would be the difference.
Grammar is apparently where you came up short.
And again, the question is what a PASTY out of shape short guy was planning to do after he caught the athletic super tall “LICORICE WHIP” of a kid.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]HoustonGuy wrote:
Except Trayvon was tall and skinny, so maybe the licorice whip of a kid.
“The licorice whip attacked the pasty as the pasty was retreating and got shot in the chest”.
It is odd how when you keep context the same but exchange descriptive words in X’s posts and logic they come across smacking of racism.[/quote]
LOL. I used “pasty” as an adjective, not a noun, dumbass.
That would be the difference.
Grammar is apparently where you came up short.
And again, the question is what a PASTY out of shape short guy was planning to do after he caught the athletic super tall “LICORICE WHIP” of a kid.[/quote]
Most likely ask him who he was visiting in the neighborhood.
Or be eaten by a dude who saw dinner and desert talking on his lawn.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I don’t know exactly what happened.
[/quote]
Then why have you been vilifying Zimmermans punk ass (your words)without knowing all the facts now?
[/quote]
I think we have enough facts for me to form my opinion of his character.
It would be MY opinion after all. I wasn’t aware I had to clear that by you.[/quote]
Oh I forgot opinons go unchallenged in public forums.
[/quote]
LOL
What are you challenging? You are mad because I have an opinion different than your own? You serious?
Zimmerman got has ass whipped by a kid after running after him with a gun acting like a bad ass.
First. I would say the same about anyone who runs into a fight with no skill…ESPECIALLY if they carry a weapon. I am one of those who thinks it is usually the weaker guys mouthing off how “prepared” they are as far as weapons.
If you want to “challenge” that, go right ahead.
Just know I feel little reason to worry about it after this post.
I did want to explain why I think he was weak though.
Pasty out of shape guy chasing kids down in the rain like he was going to do something.
Maybe he should spend more time in the gym than sitting in cars at night following teenagers.
That might have kept him from needing to kill someone just to defend himself[/quote]
You continue to spit out unfactual nonsense.
So Zimmerman just ran in to fight brownie (no that is not directed towards blacks btw)treyvon? when did this fact come out? Or was he possibly following him to alert the cops and treyvon attacked first? We don’t know for sure but here you are talking like you know what happened. Laughable.
Hes a pasty fat dude just chasing kids out in the rain for no reason? or were there robbereies that have been taking place in the neighborhood that might just have been the reason for this?
Zimmerman was mouthing off now? where was this reported?
c’mon man
[quote]Professor X wrote:
The guy is fat and pale. How is that using a skin color reference in a negative way?
Unless “pasty” is now a racial slur your “offense” is a joke.
We were told many times in this thread that being offended means someone else needs to handle your emotions for you.
Why is that only applied in one direction?[/quote]
Who said anything about being offended? You make up a lot of what you write.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
The guy is fat and pale. How is that using a skin color reference in a negative way?[/quote]
Because it shows your fixation on Zimmerman’s appearance. In the context of your diatribe about racial impressions being based solely on skin color, it smacks of an irrelevant fascination with how Zimmerman looks.
Which has little to do with anything as far as this discussion is concerned. Him being fat can be considered relevant wrt the fight; his skin tone can not be.
Now, we’ve gone from pasty = fat → pasty = unhealthy → pasty = pale. You’ve (finally) got the definition right, but you are still trolling about the significance of your obsession with the term.
[[quote]Professor X wrote:
the real question is why any black person who mentions race is somehow “racist” for doing so.
[/quote]
No, the question is why a black person (or anyone) automatically assumes race was the driving factor in this case without knowing all the facts.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
So is this about race or “authority”? If he had a white brother, do you have more right to champion this social outrage, or does he?
It is my understanding that a neighborhood watch guy has exactly 0 more power than a regular guy.[/quote]
If he has zero power, why is he questioning anyone? Trayvon deserves every right to defend himself against some jackass trying to restrain him for questioning if they have no power.[/quote]
Cause anyone can ask anyone questions.
I question anyone I see around my house that I don’t know and I always carry a gun when I do it too.[/quote]
Depends on the questions and how they are asked. Also, anyone can tell you to fuck off and mind your own business and if you don’t they may, under certain conditions, legally consider you a threat (if they notice the gun they probably will) and act accordingly. Walk up to woman in a parking garage at night to ask a question and see if you don’t get peppered sprayed…legally. I don’t get how everyone seems to think they have the right to play sheriff…is it carrying a gun that empowers them? [/quote]
You are making huge incorrect assumptions about my situation. There aren’t parking garages in 30 miles of where I live.
And no, they don’t have any duty to respond or answer in the same way they don’t have the right to not be asked. [/quote]
No, someone does have a right to not be asked a question. Someone does have the right to not be followed. We have laws against stalking, menacing and harassment. You see a good looking woman somewhere; you do not have the right to ask her on a date. The Supreme Court has upheld the right to privacy. You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law.
The fact you avoided the parking garage scenario shows that you really don’t believe what you are saying.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
And again, the question is what a PASTY out of shape short guy was planning to do after he caught the athletic super tall “LICORICE WHIP” of a kid.[/quote]
AGAIN for the 1.276 millionth time, this has been addressed and ignored 3 million different times. It’s like you are in denial about the multitude of reasonable answers.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
I always knew it to mean soft too. [/quote]
The day I see you disagree with anything X writes, no matter how laughably off-base his comment might be, is the day my head explodes.
CHESTER COUNTY, SC (WBTV) - An investigation is underway after video shows a teenage girl being assaulted during a high school soccer match.
The attack happened during a soccer game between Chester High School and Lewisville High School on Monday evening around 5:30 p.m.
The video, which was shot by WBTV’s partner CN2 News, shows a player from Lewisville tripping and falling to the ground.
The player, later identified as 18-year-old Annette McCullough who is a senior at Lewisville, then gets off the ground and punches a nearby Chester High school player. The teen victim is then dragged to the ground by her hair, while McCullough continues to punch her in the face, the video shows.
The attack lasted around ten seconds before a woman is able to separate the two players. The video shows McCullough punching the victim at least eleven times.
http://www.wbtv.com/story/17265736/caught-on-tape-teen-girl-attacked-by-player-during-soccer-game
CALL AL SHARPTON! CALL JESSE JACKSON! We demand justice!
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
So is this about race or “authority”? If he had a white brother, do you have more right to champion this social outrage, or does he?
It is my understanding that a neighborhood watch guy has exactly 0 more power than a regular guy.[/quote]
If he has zero power, why is he questioning anyone? Trayvon deserves every right to defend himself against some jackass trying to restrain him for questioning if they have no power.[/quote]
Cause anyone can ask anyone questions.
I question anyone I see around my house that I don’t know and I always carry a gun when I do it too.[/quote]
Depends on the questions and how they are asked. Also, anyone can tell you to fuck off and mind your own business and if you don’t they may, under certain conditions, legally consider you a threat (if they notice the gun they probably will) and act accordingly. Walk up to woman in a parking garage at night to ask a question and see if you don’t get peppered sprayed…legally. I don’t get how everyone seems to think they have the right to play sheriff…is it carrying a gun that empowers them? [/quote]
You are making huge incorrect assumptions about my situation. There aren’t parking garages in 30 miles of where I live.
And no, they don’t have any duty to respond or answer in the same way they don’t have the right to not be asked. [/quote]
No, someone does have a right to not be asked a question. Someone does have the right to not be followed. We have laws against stalking, menacing and harassment. You see a good looking woman somewhere; you do not have the right to ask her on a date. The Supreme Court has upheld the right to privacy. You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law.
The fact you avoided the parking garage scenario shows that you really don’t believe what you are saying. [/quote]
No, you don’t have the right to not be followed. There infinite ways to approach questioning and following someone. Some of those ways crossing the line into harassment doesn’t mean they are all illegal. I didn’t avoid your parking garage I just noted that it doesn’t apply to what I have done or was discussing or what happened in the case.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law. [/quote]
No, it would depend more on the specific law and the interpretation of the comment and its intent by the people responsible for enforcing it.
Jesus Christ.
Black Panther party to mobilize 10,000 black men to find Zimmerman…offer $10K bounty.
http://nation.foxnews.com/attorney-general/2012/03/28/holder-lets-black-panthers-skate-again
Again I ask…if the KKK did the same thing, would Attorney General Holder stay silent?
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law. [/quote]
No, it would depend more on the specific law and the interpretation of the comment and its intent by the people responsible for enforcing it.
Jesus Christ.[/quote]
For the record, I normally ask something to the effect of “need directions?”
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law. [/quote]
No, it would depend more on the specific law and the interpretation of the comment and its intent by the people responsible for enforcing it.
Jesus Christ.[/quote]
For the record, I normally ask something to the effect of “need directions?”[/quote]
I’d be careful about that. Apparently, if someone gets offended by that question, you can be convicted of menacing/harassment.
[quote]anonym wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
You may ask anyone anything but depending on how they perceive it, you may be breaking the law. [/quote]
No, it would depend more on the specific law and the interpretation of the comment and its intent by the people responsible for enforcing it.
Jesus Christ.[/quote]
No, it would be whether or not the individual’s perception/interpretation was considered reasonable by a court. A 250 pound man might interpret something differently than a 100 pound woman.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]overstand wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Pasty, according to Websters can also mean unhealthy. It is funny what people choose to focus on.
Illogical: Short, fat, unmuscled guy running after Tall, athletic young teenager…IN THE RAIN…after leaving his car and stating “they always get away”…but no weapon drawn in an effort to not tail but literally run up to and question (and possibly retain until cops arrived).
[/quote]
past�??�??�??�??�??�??�?�·y/�??past�??/
Noun:
A folded pastry case filled with seasoned meat and vegetables.
Adjective:
(of a person’s face) Unhealthily pale.
It’s even funnier how you try to lie when everyone can google the fucking definition for themselves in 3 seconds.[/quote]
?? That word means pale or unhealthy. How the fuck does this not describe Zimmerman?
[/quote]
Actually it is referring to an unhealthy complexion in everything I see.
[/quote]
And? He is pale and unhealthy. Are some of you claiming only someone completely white can be pale and unhealthy?
The argument doesn’t even make sense.[/quote]
It’s only referring to complexion. Like if someone fainted and their skin went pale, that would be pasty. Fat doesn’t seem to fit. it is, either say a skin color reference predominately.
You said flabby and pasty were interchangeable, but a black guy can’t be pasty.
It is at minimum an interesting word choice. Like if I were to call Trayvon “the ebony kid” and I mean like the tree (he is tall after all).[/quote]
This whole last page has been guys complaining because pasty was used to describe a half white out of shape guy.
That’s sad.
The discussion was about what an armed man was planning to do after he caught the guy he was chasing.
Nice deflection…but it sucks.[/quote]
No the discussion was about you using a skin color reference in a negative way in the discussion. I think the rest was trying to get you the admit what everyone already knows.
The second part has been address in approximately 3 million previous posts all of which you’ve ignored.[/quote]
The guy is fat and pale. How is that using a skin color reference in a negative way?
Unless “pasty” is now a racial slur your “offense” is a joke.
We were told many times in this thread that being offended means someone else needs to handle your emotions for you.
Why is that only applied in one direction?[/quote]
At least he wasn’t a ginger…was that racist?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]overstand wrote:
Quoting myself before this is lost in X’s trolling us on the definition of pasty.
[/quote]
How do you know he pulled out a phone?
Was a call made?
If not, that is not a FACT.
He could have easily pulled out his gun instead.
[/quote]
That is plausible. He went for his gun but when questioned he claims he went for his phone. I’m not saying it is what happened but it is a possibility that isn’t far-fetched and given how Zimmerman supposedly was the one screaming like a girl it wouldn’t be surprising if he was so scared of the hooded black man that he went for his weapon.