Biology of Race

[thunderbolt23]

@therajraj

He’s not asking me

That’s true, my mistake - we already know you do.

[EyeDentist]

@thunderbolt23

That’s a deliberate tactic for the new wave of supremacist idiots, by the way - instead of pounding the table and screaming about racial superiority, which will end the discussion, they are opting for a kinder, gentler approach that eases into the conversation

Great point.

@thunderbolt23

“hey, there are no superior or inferior races, they’re just different, but races like to keep to their own, and would not be a great idea for our society too if everyone did that?”

Another excellent point. Note that it’s now fashionable for such folk to refer to themselves not as ‘white supremacists,’ but rather as the much more benign-sounding white separatists.

[anon71262119]

I had no idea who Richard Spencer was before this thread. Good grief. New word, Bolt. He calls himself an “identitarian.”

[thunderbolt23]

@anon71262119

I had no idea who Richard Spencer was before this thread. Good grief. New word, Bolt. He calls himself an “identitarian.”

Yes, one of Raj’s heroes. Spencer picked up on the fact that a skinhead trying to project intimidation isn’t going to persuade anyone, so he started a white power 2.0 marketing shtick that softens the image with hipster haircuts, pop culture fluency (he listens to Depeche Mode!), and appearing to be erudite in lieu of angry screamer.

[therajraj]

@thunderbolt23

@loppar

Nah, we’re cool. It’s just @therajraj is an antisemitic creep and people sometimes don’t catch that when they drop into a middle of a discussion.

While his arguments may seem sane or partially reasonable at first, eventually he drops his guard and starts ranting about the Jews/blacks/Mexicans/whomever

Yes. That’s a deliberate tactic for the new wave of supremacist idiots, by the way - instead of pounding the table and screaming about racial superiority, which will end the discussion, they are opting for a kinder, gentler approach that eases into the conversation and let them hang around, saying such things as “hey, there are no superior or inferior races, they’re just different, but races like to keep to their own, and would not be a great idea for our society too if everyone did that?” This is the Richard Spencer approach.

But the ruse doesn’t last forever and the mask slips, and they wind up saying something like societies run by black folk are destined to disintegrate because of their wicked low IQs.

It’s quite obvious you can’t refute what was presented on IQ and race so it’s just constant finger wagging at people who refuse to deny reality.
You dispute IQ and race? Provide evidence

[therajraj]

@pfury

I’m personally against all countries doing this.

Then all races and different cultures are destroyed with everyone becoming a shade of brown.

How miserable a worldview you have

[therajraj]

@thunderbolt23

@anon71262119

I had no idea who Richard Spencer was before this thread. Good grief. New word, Bolt. He calls himself an “identitarian.”

Yes, one of Raj’s heroes. Spencer picked up on the fact that a skinhead trying to project intimidation isn’t going to persuade anyone, so he started a white power 2.0 marketing shtick that softens the image with hipster haircuts, pop culture fluency (he listens to Depeche Mode!), and appearing to be erudite in lieu of angry screamer.

My opinions aren’t even as far right as the average American who stormed Omaha beach

[therajraj]

@EyeDentist

Another excellent point. Note that it’s now fashionable for such folk to refer to themselves not as ‘white supremacists,’ but rather as the much more benign-sounding white separatists.

Mahatma Gandhi wanted the British out of India because he believed India was a homeland for indians and Indians had a right to self determination.

Do you consider him immoral as well?

[EyeDentist]

@therajraj

You dispute IQ and race? Provide evidence

The onus is on you to demonstrate that a causal relationship exists between race (which you have never defined, BTW) and IQ.

[therajraj]

@EyeDentist

@therajraj

You dispute IQ and race? Provide evidence

The onus is on you to demonstrate that a causal relationship exists between race (which you have never defined, BTW) and IQ.

It’s been defined plenty by myself and brickhead.

Do you also object to the concept when it comes to breeds of dogs?

[thunderbolt23]

@therajraj

It’s quite obvious you can’t refute what was presented on IQ and race so it’s just constant finger wagging at people who refuse to deny reality.You dispute IQ and race? Provide evidence

I haven’t refuted the data and have no reason to - the problem is it is correlation until someone proves it to be causation. You haven’t, and can’t.

[traininsaneorremainsame]

Your a racist cunt!

[thunderbolt23]

@therajraj

My opinions aren’t even as far right as the average American who stormed Omaha beach

Heh. Not only is this incorrect, it’s self-refuting - they were there to put a stop to the very type of ideology to which you subscribe.

[EyeDentist]

@therajraj

Mahatma Gandhi wanted the British out of India because he believed India was a homeland for indians and the Indian had a right to self determination.

It might also have had something to do with colonialism.

@therajraj

It’s been defined plenty by myself and brickhead.

Humor me, if you don’t mind. Provide a succinct, precise definition of the term.

@therajraj

Do you also object to the concept when it comes to breeds of dogs?

Are you saying that breed = race?

[anon50325502]

@traininsaneorremainsame

Your a racist cunt!

*You’re

As in, you are a fucking idiot. Go back to crying about your steroid thread you entitled cunt.

[traininsaneorremainsame]

Forum warrior fml

[therajraj]

@thunderbolt23

@therajraj

It’s quite obvious you can’t refute what was presented on IQ and race so it’s just constant finger wagging at people who refuse to deny reality.You dispute IQ and race? Provide evidence

I haven’t refuted the data and have no reason to - the problem is it is correlation until someone proves it to be causation. You haven’t, and can’t.

Does it even matter if it’s causal?

Even if it’s environmental (which you believe without proving it BTW) environment is extremely hard if not impossible to change

[therajraj]

@thunderbolt23

@therajraj

My opinions aren’t even as far right as the average American who stormed Omaha beach

Heh. Not only is this incorrect, it’s self-refuting - they were there to put a stop to the very type of ideology to which you subscribe.

You mean at a time of racial segregation? Man you really take the cake when it comes to lying

[therajraj]

@EyeDentist

@therajraj

Mahatma Gandhi wanted the British out of India because he believed India was a homeland for indians and the Indian had a right to self determination.

It might also have had something to do with colonialism.

@therajraj

It’s been defined plenty by myself and brickhead.

Humor me, if you don’t mind. Provide a succinct, precise definition of the term.

@therajraj

Do you also object to the concept when it comes to breeds of dogs?

Are you saying that breed = race?

1. ethnonationalism is ethnonationalism regardless of the reason. If you grant it to indians you’re hypocritical not to grant it to whites

2. we’ve gone over it multiple times not really interested in it again

3. yes

[thunderbolt23]

@therajraj

Does it even matter if it’s causal?

Of course it does. [quote=“therajraj, post:388, topic:228119”]
Even if it’s environmental (which you believe without proving it BTW) environment is extremely hard if not impossible to change
[/quote]

Ok, so? Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it. But in any event, it’s not as hard as you suggest.