[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I tend to agree with the scientists [/quote]
Accept when it comes to abortion…[/quote]
what do you deem that I disagree with the scientific comunity about ?[/quote]
Maybe when you determined that a sperm is a human being, which came after claiming a zygote wasn’t…[/quote]
The definition of words is not a scientific issue , I never said a zygote was not they both are if human and they exist they are a human being . No science just a literal definition
[/quote]
So I suppose disagreeing with the scientists on this one falls under your “tend to” agree?
Because the “scientists” don’t agree with your idiocy here.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I tend to agree with the scientists [/quote]
Accept when it comes to abortion…[/quote]
what do you deem that I disagree with the scientific comunity about ?[/quote]
Maybe when you determined that a sperm is a human being, which came after claiming a zygote wasn’t…[/quote]
The definition of words is not a scientific issue , I never said a zygote was not they both are if human and they exist they are a human being . No science just a literal definition
[/quote]
So I suppose disagreeing with the scientists on this one falls under your “tend to” agree?
Because the “scientists” don’t agree with your idiocy here. [/quote]
prove it please . Show me where science says that a sperm is not by definition a human being
[quote]Aragorn wrote:
What I actually said was, “so and so and a number of other highly regarded scientists feel global warming is bullshit, therefore one cannot claim the generalization ‘The Scientists’ as one body agree on something”. There is a substantial difference between the two; one is fallacious and the other is not.
[/quote]
To which I retorted “97% is technically not ALL”…would you or would you not agree that 97% is a pretty fucking high number? If 97% of, say, roads in Pennsylvania were in terrible condition, would you not say “man those roads in Pennsylvania are awful”? You sound like you are just arguing for fucking arguments sake at this point man. Real mature.[/quote]
Lol. Coming from you, especially after making a fallacious claim against me, the irony in telling me I am “arguing for arguments’ sake” is thunderous.
The only reason I made the comment in the first place was because Pitt has a very pronounced and very obvious propensity to make gross generalizations, contradictory statements, and so forth. This is beyond normal generalizing inherent in message boards where discussion is fast and furious. I very clearly did not want to continue talking about climate change in a thread about Bill Maher.
At any rate, Bill Maher has always been a bad comedian in my view. That being said he does call them like he sees them which is admirable, I think.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
prove it please . Show me where science says that a sperm is not by definition a human being [/quote]
You’ve been asked in that other thread to back up any ounce of your claims over and over, and have ignored it. You were asked tough questions that you ignored, over and over.
You’ve done the equivalent of child sticking their fingers in their ears and making up “facts” repeatedly on the subject, and now sit back and ask me to prove something to you?
Priceless.
Again, you are in no position to call other people stupid, ridiculous or any of the other projected nonsense you uttered.