Bikini Clad Maine PETA Chicks Saving Chicks

Off Topic
41

[quote]Doyle wrote:
Why target KFC? In Australia at least, KFC are not responsible for slaughtering chickens but buys them already slaughtered from the same companies that just about everyone buys their chickens. It seems like thats wat happens in the US too by wat that spokes person said.

But then again nothing that PETA does seems to make much sense to me.

I think that animals should be killed in the most humain way that is economically plausible (I wouldn’t mind paying and extra 20cents for a more humainly killed chicken,. But not $4)

If the chicken is going to die though, wat does a few more seconds of pain matter?

I think the breeding and raising of chickens is a much bigger issue both morally (because they spend a lot more time living then dying) and because it effects the quality of the produce and therefore our health. [/quote]

I’m not sure how much of this information is still current and happening, but I know KFC has been well-known in thee past for cutting off the beaks of their chickens to eliminate chicken-on-chicken violence, the #1 reason of profit loss in the biz - I would imagine that’s why they’re targeting the Colonel.

42

[quote]SSC wrote:
Doyle wrote:
Why target KFC? In Australia at least, KFC are not responsible for slaughtering chickens but buys them already slaughtered from the same companies that just about everyone buys their chickens. It seems like thats wat happens in the US too by wat that spokes person said.

But then again nothing that PETA does seems to make much sense to me.

I think that animals should be killed in the most humain way that is economically plausible (I wouldn’t mind paying and extra 20cents for a more humainly killed chicken,. But not $4)

If the chicken is going to die though, wat does a few more seconds of pain matter?

I think the breeding and raising of chickens is a much bigger issue both morally (because they spend a lot more time living then dying) and because it effects the quality of the produce and therefore our health.

I’m not sure how much of this information is still current and happening, but I know KFC has been well-known in thee past for cutting off the beaks of their chickens to eliminate chicken-on-chicken violence, the #1 reason of profit loss in the biz - I would imagine that’s why they’re targeting the Colonel.[/quote]

My point is that KFC doesn’t produce chicken, only prepares it, and the place they get their chiken (at least in Australia) is the same place that supplies the chicken you buy at the supermarket or local resteraunt.

43

Fuck PETA.

44

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Those must be padded bras.[/quote]

Indeed.

45

[quote]SSC wrote:
Doyle wrote:
Why target KFC? In Australia at least, KFC are not responsible for slaughtering chickens but buys them already slaughtered from the same companies that just about everyone buys their chickens. It seems like thats wat happens in the US too by wat that spokes person said.

But then again nothing that PETA does seems to make much sense to me.

I think that animals should be killed in the most humain way that is economically plausible (I wouldn’t mind paying and extra 20cents for a more humainly killed chicken,. But not $4)

If the chicken is going to die though, wat does a few more seconds of pain matter?

I think the breeding and raising of chickens is a much bigger issue both morally (because they spend a lot more time living then dying) and because it effects the quality of the produce and therefore our health.

I’m not sure how much of this information is still current and happening, but I know KFC has been well-known in thee past for cutting off the beaks of their chickens to eliminate chicken-on-chicken violence, the #1 reason of profit loss in the biz - I would imagine that’s why they’re targeting the Colonel.[/quote]

“Debeaking” is an old practice that pre-dates KFC. While it suggests the whole beak is taken off, in reality it’s usually less than half of the top beak. I’ve seen it done, I’ve done it, It’s not that big a deal. It’s a far better deal than chicken-on-chicken aggression and/or cannibalism.

46

I just had KFC last night…ha.

47

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:

chicks from Maine aint that pretty either.

Dude, you ain’t seen hot until you seen mama on a cold day in her duck boots and flannel teddy hopped up on Allen’s Coffee Brandy shootin’ at raccoons.

I’m gettin’ all worked up just thinkin’ bout her.[/quote]

yeah nothing like seeing a couple foxy ladys on snowmobiles with rifles and chipped teeth from lobster fishing and grizzly wraslin.

for those who dont know, maine is pretty much the new england version of arkansas or alabama.

=P

48

[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
for those who dont know, maine is pretty much the new england version of arkansas or alabama.
[/quote]

That’s OK-- we refer to Boston as New England’s Chocolate Starfish (Translation: stah-fish).

49

FatCat:

Same thing happened to me last week!  Original recipe sucks! But extra crispy is pretty good.  I think its a conspiracy to force people to eat original recipe.  Notice the commercials pushing original recipe.  sorry KFC original recipe sucks -- its like eating pure grease.
50

[quote]Loose Tool wrote:
SSC wrote:
Doyle wrote:
Why target KFC? In Australia at least, KFC are not responsible for slaughtering chickens but buys them already slaughtered from the same companies that just about everyone buys their chickens. It seems like thats wat happens in the US too by wat that spokes person said.

But then again nothing that PETA does seems to make much sense to me.

I think that animals should be killed in the most humain way that is economically plausible (I wouldn’t mind paying and extra 20cents for a more humainly killed chicken,. But not $4)

If the chicken is going to die though, wat does a few more seconds of pain matter?

I think the breeding and raising of chickens is a much bigger issue both morally (because they spend a lot more time living then dying) and because it effects the quality of the produce and therefore our health.

I’m not sure how much of this information is still current and happening, but I know KFC has been well-known in thee past for cutting off the beaks of their chickens to eliminate chicken-on-chicken violence, the #1 reason of profit loss in the biz - I would imagine that’s why they’re targeting the Colonel.

“Debeaking” is an old practice that pre-dates KFC. While it suggests the whole beak is taken off, in reality it’s usually less than half of the top beak. I’ve seen it done, I’ve done it, It’s not that big a deal. It’s a far better deal than chicken-on-chicken aggression and/or cannibalism.

[/quote]

Right. I definitely wasn’t advocating / dissuading debeaking at all, I was just guessing that that’s probably what has those crazies all up in arms. It could also be a plethora of other factors, as you know - Boredom, mental instability, pussiness. Who knows.

51

Haha! I’m eating KFC right now. Original recipe chicken breast and a huge bowl of coleslaw.

52

Heck, I’m over 40 and married, and I still torture my chicken every once in a while.

53

I’m at the top of the food-chain (when I’m on land, and have a gun…) so it’s my right, no, my responsibility to eat as many animals below me on the the chain as possible. That’s a responsibility I take seriously, I’ve eaten like four chicken breasts today.

54

[quote]Westclock wrote:
entheogens wrote:
You guys are tough and insensitive. Bully for you, but the PETA folks have a point. Caring about these things does not make you a nut job. Maybe being completely insensitive to other beings, does make you a nut job. Check out this video:

Protesting should go by order of importance.

I have a problem with protesting how we treat chickens when education, healthcare, and the level of poverty in EVEN the US is out of control.

Not to mention the rest of the world, instead of trying to save some chickens why dont they try to save some human children in any number of foreign countries.

Its ridiculous. People join PETA because its easy to be an activist when you dont have to leave the comfort of your community. [/quote]

Symptoms of the same problem - people putting their own pocket before everything else.

I have some experience with chicken farms and what I see on those youtube videos are better conditions than 20, 30 years ago.

Nevertheless there is no excuse for such a crappy slaughterhouse. And I am against hormones to increase chicken growth. It makes inferior chicken meat.

I am all for eating animals.

Curious … if they developed a kind of “living meat” organism, not an animal but meat in a lab, feeding it and having it grow, would people eat that???

They are growing organs in labs, would people eat meat tissue grown in a lab?

Obviously it is nowhere near cost effective at the moment. But hey, it could be.

55

na

why the heck do my posts appear twice? I never hit the button twice?

56

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
for those who dont know, maine is pretty much the new england version of arkansas or alabama.

That’s OK-- we refer to Boston as New England’s Chocolate Starfish (Translation: stah-fish).

[/quote]

yeah, but if someone speaks in Maine…does it still make a noise?

57

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
LiveFromThe781 wrote:
for those who dont know, maine is pretty much the new england version of arkansas or alabama.

That’s OK-- we refer to Boston as New England’s Chocolate Starfish (Translation: stah-fish).

[/quote]

We hear you loud and clear.

And Malden is a polyp hanging out the stah-fish’s ahse.

58

Women who aren’t willing to put meat in their mouths aren’t generally worth the time of day.

59

[quote]Doyle wrote:
Why target KFC? In Australia at least, KFC are not responsible for slaughtering chickens but buys them already slaughtered from the same companies that just about everyone buys their chickens. It seems like thats wat happens in the US too by wat that spokes person said.

But then again nothing that PETA does seems to make much sense to me.

I think that animals should be killed in the most humain way that is economically plausible (I wouldn’t mind paying and extra 20cents for a more humainly killed chicken,. But not $4)

If the chicken is going to die though, wat does a few more seconds of pain matter?

I think the breeding and raising of chickens is a much bigger issue both morally (because they spend a lot more time living then dying) and because it effects the quality of the produce and therefore our health. [/quote]

It’s not about the pain just before death. It is about the pain of being alive.

60

People who
Eat
Tons of
Animals

PETA.