Trump.
Can you substantiate that with police reports, medical examinations or any other forms of hard evidence?
DNA on a jacket maybe?
Rape and sexual assault. So funny. Another hot take from MAGAland.
Another baseles and overly emotional accusation from the rainbow brigade.
I asked for hard evidence that meets the legal standard.
You come back with ad hom.
Loooooooser.
1 Like
I believe every Republican Presidential candidate and Supreme Court nominee for the last 45 years has been a vile rapist. Something must really be wrong with the Republican party to keep nominating all of these people who are so quickly accused of rape as soon as they enter the public spotlight.
Why do they keep nominating all of these people who are so easily accused of rape by Democrats? Why don’t they just nominate people who don’t commit rape and then keep it quiet for decades?
2 Likes
9 hours ago.
Meeting the legal standard?
It met the legal standard. Ejean Carrol won her court case. In court. Per the legal standard.
“Judge Kaplan stated that the jury had actually found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word as they had ruled that Trump had forcibly and nonconsensually penetrated Carroll’s vagina with his fingers.”
Your great orange hope is a terrible person.
That was complete lunacy and you know it.
So did everybody in the DA’s office, which is why it was tried in a kangaroo civil court.
There’s a world of difference between the standards of civil court “to prove damages” and criminal proceedings to prove guilt.
Also, her damages were awarded foor Defamation.
1 Like
The numerous court cases are all tried in kangaroo courts.
The lost elections were really won. It all flies in the face of tried and true facts. He is not wrong, he is just persecuted.
Most of his top level staff from his presidency have publicly come out against him. They are all just jealous.
It’s just absurd the mental gymnastics you’ll jump through.
So does that make you a liar of convenience, or just ignorant?
Your choice.
You spot, you got it!
Huh? The jury ruled trump sexually abused her and defamed her. That was the ruling.
And later the judge is on record saying that the claim trump raped her is “substantially true”.
Yeah.
.
From the wiki:
Looks like it worked!
A judge in a civil case is not empowered to make that determination.
Thats a criminal act, for criminal courts, which…
Surprise! REQUIRE HARD EVIDENCE.
1 Like
What a guy to full fledged support. Guilty of sexual abuse (rape being substantially true according to the judge)… But it wasn’t in criminal court so he’s all good. Man, how low will you go to defend this loser.
Wait, I do know. To any depth necessary.
Go back to your libby echo chamber. No one in the real world gives a shit about your emotional tantrums that you mistake for political discourse.
You lost at the ad hom. Everything after that was just punchdrunk floundering.
1 Like
Did you slam your purse down real hard when you said that?
You aren’t very good at being a troll; I’m not biting.
He’s trolling.