Yes, they do. Ever heard of the Nazis? Don’t see them running Germany anymore.
They traded up and now run the USA.
I am having a hard time dealing with this issue. I have spent half my professional career dealing with terrorists and terrorism. What I have read this morning on three national news websites, the Attorney General is in the process of declaring “outraged or angry parents” as domestic terrorists. WHAT? I know from watching the local news in my area, that school board meetings have become battle grounds for everything from CRT to COVID masking policies, but, domestic terrorism? NO.
I was in Portland and Seattle during the riots, but, an angry and raucous school board meeting is far, far, worse.
What the hell is administration doing?
1 Like
This is truly disgusting.
Would love to hear @dt79 thoughts about this. I know that the “Taiwan agreement” does not exist and that Joe is probably referring to the one-China policy, although it might also be pure incompetence from the POTUS’ inner circle.
I do know that one of my business contacts from Taiwan spent 15 minutes on a Zoom call having a complete meltdown over this statement as he interprets it as a green light to Xi for “reunification”.
1 Like
I haven’t got the concentration over the next little while to start a separate thread for this. Maybe someone will. This is a United States Government issue and also international, so I put this here:
Zuckerberg breaks silence, says whistleblower claims don’t make sense (usatoday.com)
Zuckerberg has already testified half nonesense to Congress before and I wonder if more legislative and regulatory weight will finally be applied with this. Straight off, a reference from the article says that only about 5% of hate speech is moderated out.
As to my reflections. I have been referring to Facebook as ‘Booked Face’ for some time now. My account has now only 3 friends, all of whom have multiple hundreds or thousands of their own friends. I used to get a plethora of posts from other people, but notice over the last few years that that has drastically gone down. When I asked one friend if they had any insight as to why there is the difference, that person said that due to the toxic nature of social media many people are tightening up what they let others see.
Is is just me? I ask if anyone here has noticed something the same or at least similar.
Commie types have infiltrated all levels of the govt, deep state, education, public service.
They are gaslighting the traditional Americans. Anyone who disagrees with them is a deplorable,redneck, right wing extremist, neo nazi, terrorist. These allegations are made without any basis in reality.
I have no idea what this “Taiwan Agreement” is either.
I think the Taiwanese have the right to self determination. They’ve established their own government, laws and economy independent from China without:
- Any major attempts to take back the country by China over the last 4-5 decades. Verbally disavowing their independence doesn’t hold much water IMO.
- Any existing legal contract like the Handover Treaty for Hongkong.
But I think this adds to what I wrote previously in another thread:
China will not invade Taiwan.
I do not even think their military will win the first few rounds and the death toll amongst the Chinese military will exceed that of the Taiwanese multiple times. I’m pretty sure they know this. Shit will hit the fan in China and they may actually see massive loss of support from their own citizens and quite a bit of social chaos there.
They’ll just continue to build more economic relations with Taiwan that result in more and more reliance on China for their economy as a form of “soft” pressure like they do with other countries. If any “re-unification” were to occur, it would be a result of this.
As for the Taiwanese, people I know are pretty nonchalant about this. I think they’re already used to all the prior empty threats of “invasion”. This isn’t new, just that it’s happened during the time when the US withdrew from Afghanistan.
The time when people in both Taiwan and China were getting really worked up about the topic of reunification was in the mid-2000s. Shit, so many people were going nuts on QQ that was when the China government first decided to make everyone register their ID cards to create an account on social media LMAO.
What is sufficiently undesirable about your post that you took it down? It is I think well thought out and reasonable.
In regards to any invasion of Taiwan:
While it is possible, it isn’t probable. At all.
In HK, there has NEVER EVEN BEEN A MILITARY, just a tiny garrison of men employed by the British whom were dismissed right after the Handover. There was a great movie made about these guys:
Which is why I wrote that HK was ALWAYS going to go back to China. There was no controversy about this. The British always planned on honouring the Treaty. Hongkongers were already migrating in massive numbers to countries like Canada from the mid 80s to the 90s.
YouTube fuckheads keep making some sort of comparison between Taiwan and HK but they’re full of shit. There is nothing to compare. And what did China do that was actually similar? They sent their troops to the province at the HK border to conduct training exercises LOLOLOL. That was like shit taken straight out of a Stephen Chow comedy.
Were any China troops actually utilized during the riots? NO. They passed the buck to Hong Kong, which had to deploy the equivalent of the Police Tactical Forces in most countries (The SDU) to curb the rioters.
You guys know why? Because one of their main international tactics to gain support is still playing THE FUCKING VICTIM CARD. They claimed the protests, along with the actual riots that ensued later were due to immense US interference. How do you play the victim card if you send in your military to suppress people in a country WITH NO FUCKING MILITARY?
Motherfucking YouTube fucktards.
“China’s gonna invade HK!”
Now, for Taiwan, things get even more complicated. The only reason the Taiwanese military exists is BECAUSE OF CHINA. There is literally nothing else they’ve been doing over the last several decades other than fortifying their mainland and surrounding islands to strategically defend against any attack.
Military service is compulsory for almost every male citizen although a duration of 1 year and the standard of training isn’t really sufficient to for them to mount a real badass defence on their own. BUT almost every motherfucker knows military protocol and how to use various forms of artillery so this adds up to a lot as a backup to their military regulars.
Shit, they were the first country to get intel on COVID. You guys think they don’t have even more intel on China’s military?
So, with this in mind:
- If China invades Taiwan, they’re gonna have to give up the victim card because we’re talking about a country of 1.3 billion people fucking with one with 22 million.
- While China would definitely win in the long run, will they even get to that point? Their top brass are in their positions because of bribery and nepotism. Taiwan is fucking ready for them. China is now a pretty developed country with an entire generation of “snowflakes” who have VPNs and live online. A massive death toll in the initial stages of this hypothetical invasion would be disastrous for the PR of the CCP internally.
- What is the CCP going to do when this happens? Fight both an external and internal war while fucking up international relations AND creating a politically unstable economic environment when they’ve already spent so much building corporate bases and tie-ups in almost every Asian country?
- Everyone remembers COVID came from China and they’ve spent the past 2 years trying to buy goodwill from several countries. This will completely render all their efforts redundant.
China flexes like the biggest gym bro you’ve ever seen in the gym. But they’re not fucking stupid.
I have a bad habit of doing that, thinking what I post might annoy someone.
Here it is again.
I told people years ago to not tag me in anything political or controversial, even if I agree with it. I don’t think it’s wise to comment on some matters even if anonymously.
I even have friends I will not add to my lists on social media because of their posts on PWI’s.
I also wrote I’ll be homeschooling my children because of the lunacy I see and hear about in public schooling. I don’t even want my kids to have the sort of experience I had in public high or middle school from 1991 to 1997. I knew it would get worse.
I don’t know, maybe they’re trying to stop one of these looney tunes dumb mf’ers from killing a volunteer school board member before it happens? Sounds like a good idea to me.
There’s no mention of labeling these idiots terrorists in Garland’s memorandum. The letter from the NSBA to the President can be read here:
In it, they are asking for the threats and violence against school board members to be treated equally to hate crimes and terrorism.
I don’t know if the AG and/or FBI will arrive at the same conclusion so we’ll wait and see if that happens. However, committing acts of violence and issuing threats against school board members or anybody else is against the law and should be prosecuted. The FBI does define domestic terrorism as acts that are a violation of criminal law intended to influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion so maybe the NSBA has a point.
What Garland has done is ask the FBI to address the issue, so before anybody gets too upset about this let’s just see what develops.
Interesting definitions of domestic terrorism. Perhaps the FBI should charge many of its own members with domestic terrorism. The very notion of CRT is inherently racist, and anti white. It promotes racial disharmony, not racial unity.
Any credible threats of violence against members of the school board, can surely be investigated by local police. The FBI is not needed.
Garlands own family members have a financial(as well as ideological) stake in pushing
CRT in schools.
(((Garland))) uses FBI, pressure parents, Son in law SELLS CRT BOOKS (bitchute.com)
I am against CRT being taught in the schools that my daughter goes to. I don’t think it’ll be an issue where I live, but should it come up I’ll make my thoughts clear on the subject without resorting to violence or threats. That’s what this is about. If you’re for against mask mandates, vaccines, CRT theory, etc. then make yourself heard without violence and/or threats. Simple.
Regarding Garland’s supposed conflict of interest is he supposed to allow crimes to occur because of the job his son in law has? Clearly the answer is no. So far this is just a typical runaway train news media narrative to scare the shit out of people and make then angry. Happens every day.
Will Garland overstep his bounds and do something to really suppress people who haven’t committed crimes? That remains to be seen and if he does I’ll be as pissed as anybody else. I doubt it’ll happen though.
Well, the FBI under Garland, has arrested and held in captive, no bail, a bunch of people that are guilty of no more than potential trespassing of the Capitol Building.
DHS routining puts people on the “no fly list” for expressing “unfavorable” political views, rather than there being any semblance of a chance at committing actual terrorism.
I’d say it is a conflict of interest, not supposed. This is actual ideological policy more so than financial. Garland doesn’t have to do anything as it isn’t the FBI’s job to do local policing. What actual crimes have been done let alone alleged for any sort of law enforcement to be called? 1984 style thought crimes perhaps?
There were supposedly death threats to school board members. Has anyone heard or read any of them? Considering it isn’t difficult to trace where threats come from these days, why haven’t the people who made them been arrested?
Did people expect parents not to flip out over the trajectories and well-being of their own children, particularly in the case of a book available in schools about oral sex between kids of single-digit ages?
1 Like
There are a few traitors who are being held without bail for their actions before/during the insurrection due to the severity of their alleged crimes. In fact, the courts have made an effort to separate those who were merely trespassing from those who committed violence against police and/or actively planned the insurrection. People are held without bail at times because of the severity of their crimes, flight risk, etc. This isn’t unique to these domestic terrorists.
Pure speculation on your part. Again, nothing has been done. Garland has given the FBI 30 days to develop strategies in concert with local law enforcement to address these issues. The FBI does in fact have outreach programs and coordinates with local LEA’s. It’s part of what they do.
# Do FBI agents work with state, local, or other law enforcement officers on “task forces”?
Absolutely, and we consider it central to our success today. Task forces have proven to be a highly effective way for the FBI and federal, state, and local law enforcement to join together to address specific crime problems and national security threats.
In reference to your last question, read the letter from the NSBA and chase down some of the 24 citations on your own.
The Chinese can’t fight worth shit; they know it; their history reeks of it. They ain’t starting no real wars. End of story.
1 Like
Like I just said in the previous post, please read the NSBA letter and the citations for information about threats, etc.
I read about the incident you’re talking about and it doesn’t apply to this. The parents in Loudoun County who have a problem with that book, as I would if my kid went there, seem to be effectively arguing against using the book in school without resorting to violence or threats. That’s the way it should be done and I applaud those parents for taking action in the right way. This isn’t surprising as Loudoun county is a wealthy area with great schools. Places like that have parent groups who are intelligent, highly educated and know how to take action effectively.
And yes unfortunately I do expect some parents to “flip out” and threaten or hurt people they disagree with on school boards. There are people like this out there but they should be held accountable if they break the law. However, there are plenty of other legal, rational and more effective ways to deal with real issues they have.
An individual was arrested in Illinois for aggravated battery and disorderly conduct during a school
board meeting.8 During two separate school board meetings in Michigan9
, an individual yelled a
Nazi salute in protest to masking requirements, and another individual prompted the board to call
a recess because of opposition to critical race theory.
Sounds like an epidemic of violence… call the FBI! 