…and he has for a while, @pat…
Trump’s fanboys will spin anything Trump does as intelligent.
I’d love to hear their take on his birtherism or casino failures.
Just words. Sticks and stones…
Kids used to learn not to get upset about words. Modern day sooks can’t handle a few words. Imagine if they had to deal with the black plague or something hard.
How many casinos do you have?
Go to a football match. Thousands of abusive comments far worse.
Snowflakes…
Nah no difference at all between expected behavior from drunk people at a sports game and our highest elected official. Definitely the same expectation when you have that type of power versus being in the upper decks surrounded by other dudes in jerseys.
And I love how snowflake is the term people use if it’s ever the left complaining about anything but listen to the right cry like crazy over half the stuff and never call themselves that.
So you want some pompous bore waffling on with motherhood statements. Caring and sharing.
Trump is entertaining.
I’d love for a Trumper to spin this.
Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”
Sweet. If all you want in a President is entertainment then you’re good to go. It’s pretty much the opposite of what I want (I have Netflix, sports, kids, etc) but yes he is far more entertaining than anyone who has self control.
Maybe that should be his 2020 slogan. Are you not entertained?
So you want someone to hold your hand and say it will be alright.
Not sure how you got that out of my post but whatever.
I am not even sure what language this is.
This is definitely something that shows you’re a republican with no insight to Democrats lol.
Same reason as above. Even I noticed him doing it. And I don’t even watch the news.
The Republicans belong to white supremacists and are not very electable to most of this country.
(See how stupid that sounds)
The same number as Trump.
Is there a point you’re trying to make? Of course not, troll.
Speaking of boring…you won the internet.
The change that needs to happen is that people need to go back to voting for candidates based on their traits alone, not which party they “belong” to (and a lot of long term pols will switch parties if they think it gives them a better chance at keeping their job).
I try not to identify as R or D. I have what some would consider conflicting beliefs. I believe in strong defense spending and a mostly free market. However, I also know that we should be doing more for healthcare in the US and more to clean up the environment (Yes, I know China and India currently use more plastic and produce more greenhouse gasses than the US, but if you know better…do better).
I would vote for the right democratic or republican candidate who could identify that all these issues are important and would run on a campaign to help them (and I am not talking about the “Green New Deal” here…that is unsustainable).
Well, shows you how much you know. I wish I could take credit for realizing the real narrative and deliberate nature of the ‘twitter wars’ with the 4 dumb-dumbs, but I actually got it from this article on Vox.com by Ezra Klein, a very left-wing journalist:
But in unifying House Democrats against him, Trump unified them around the Squad, and raised their profile — the four women are getting even more coverage this week than they were last week, exactly what Pelosi was trying to avoid, and exactly what conservative media has been trying to achieve.
I am most definitely entertained.
No, people need to vote on policy, not the ‘traits’ of the person. JFK was no angel and if he lived in current times, he would have been the poster boy for #meeeeeee2. But he was a hell of a smart president.