I know. It’s incredible. 15 people will try to explain it to him and all 15 will be propaganda spewing Big Pharm shills.
Can’t possibly be him, though…
1 Like
well really, we’re ALL propaganda spewing Big Pharma shills (even if we denounce some “big pharma” (whatever that means) tactics lol)
At least it’s a stable lunacy?
1 Like
So you claim the reason Big Pharma does this is all related to their profits. Then you turn around and deny your admission by claiming it would require for you to believe that all C.E.O.'s are 1 dimensional. So which is it?
It isn’t hard to figure out once you can see beyond your ideology.
You ought to take your own advice. As you contradict yourself and can’t explain why.
God damn I love your silly ass. Utter non-sense.
does not equate to
It’s like all zibs are zobs, but not all zobs are zibs. Logic is NOT your strong suit, I can tell.
Again, the more you speak, the more it’s certain you don’t know what you’re talking about. If only you’d follow the evidence…
1 Like
This
Has
Been
Explained
To
You
So
Many
Fucking
Times
2 Likes
So every executive doesn’t contradict your correct assertion that Big Pharma’s opposition to medicinal cannabis has to do with profits? Please explain.
Time to come clean bro. You’re Bernie Sanders, aren’t you?
3 Likes
No it has not. You think because you answer with a cartoon image or a couple lol’s that somehow that constitutes an answer.
Again another non-answer.
What is every executive doing?
you asked 2 questions:
One of which makes an assumption that “Big Pharma”'s main concern is profit and if I knew why. To which I responded with
The second question, which may or may not be related to the first:
was succinctly answered:
Of course, that’s me accepting assumptions that every “Big Pharma” company lobbied against MM.
I believe the assumption here is that every executive at every “Big Pharma” company is concerned with the impact legalized cannabis will have on their profits? Is that succinct?
I believe they are concerned with profits, yes. “Big Pharma” (still needs defining) is a for profit industry, by and large. However, some executives are NOT concerned with margin impact (profit) as their tasks aren’t profit related - some executives are tasked with overseeing security and other operational activities - and do so with reasonable deference from other executives.
Ultimately, they’re more concerned with market share rather than profit, per se. The more market share one company captures, in theory, the less available for their competition. Of course, the market needs change, which affects profit, and some executives are in charge of detecting and forming policy to respond to change - but I don’t expect a derelict like you to understand the nuances of large cap for profit businesses as it’s abundantly clear you have zero exposure to how corporations operate and with whom at the helm - nor how seriously some executives take some of their mission statements.
Also, an assumption here is that profits = bad, naughty greed. I don’t agree with that assumption. Maybe you can clarify why a profitable “Big Pharma” company necessarily equates to a negative thing.
Ideology
Profits
Big Pharma
Hobble
Nibble
Robble
Stubble
Fugizzle
2 Likes
I think he’s played the Resident Evil games too may times, myself.
1 Like
That makes more sense than anything Zepp has said in years
You know nothing of corporate charters.
So if the pharma industry campaigned against medicinal cannabis there must have been reasons. And that main reason is profit as their sales are down in the states that have legalized cannabis. Too bad for them. And very good for the public.
And you really didn’t answer the legalization question as you contradicted your assertion in the same post. Terrible answer from an obvious douchebag.
If the industry didn’t lobby against MM then prove it. But you can’t just like that moron Jeff Sessions who has the balls to say that marijuana is only slightly less harmful than heroin. He has no evidence to support this obvious joke but then again he made the choice to say this, why?
Capturing more market share to ultimately reduce competition sure sounds like more profit to me. But I wouldn’t expect a derelict to understand this obvious fact.
Profits and business practices designed to limit choice is a bad thing. How is it not?
Another non-answer as you can’t defend your position.
Again, another non-answer. Your side is too easy.
Man, you are stupid.
Plot Twist : Big Pharma and the leading doctors and researchers in the industry are actually super nice people that want to help sick folks and don’t want them being lead down a path that won’t actually cure certain diseases. Boom. Movie, right there. Call me Hollywood.
4 Likes