You still don’t get it man. It is not about symptoms it is about proliferation of tissue. It is about a common theme with breast cancer, high estrogen.
We don’t really know how it all translates, from the research I posted you can see this. But there is a certain mix that produces breast cancer, and estradiol is the main ingredient. And not just estradiol, HIGH ESTRADIOL
Yes there are people that can have a really high estradiol number and not have any symptoms, that does not mean it is good for you long term.
I have tried to explain to you this is the reason that Charles Huggins thought testosterone gave men prostate cancer. He found correlation with testosterone but not causation, but it was in fact estrogen not testosterone. What we know now is that testosterone has a limit to the tissue that it can proliferate. There is a saturation limit. So if it is not T, what is the obvious next guess?
So it is very possible, the missing link is estrogen, and this is where the confusion lies. Not only is there literature backing up my theory, it also just makes sense. It does not make sense to think testosterone gives you prostate cancer, if so every 21 year old male would have it. But it does make sense to say estrogen gives men prostate cancer, cause as we age estrogen dominance usually occurs.
This effect is going to be a lot like polycythemia, older men are going to MUCH MORE sensitization to inflammation. There is no doubt the culprit is estrogen, this is why they prescribe Tamoxifen with breast cancer meds.
So it has nothing to do with how you feel, you don’t feel prostate cancer. Long term high estrogen is DANGEROUS