stefan: thats what Im saying, I agree. Yes you can fake it. He was studying this shit. Crazy people dont really study crazy, they are too busy being crazy. Crazy also does not plan, the snap and then form an attack.
[quote]hipsr4runnin wrote:
stefan: thats what Im saying, I agree. Yes you can fake it. He was studying this shit. Crazy people dont really study crazy, they are too busy being crazy. Crazy also does not plan, the snap and then form an attack.[/quote]
Please describe Hitler or Stalin then with your reasoning, were they insane?
ok haven’t been able to be on here lately, but I would like to bring two ideas to the table here.
Anyone know what DARPA is? I do, I am very familiar with it, and it is the section of DoD that does some really not so ethical things. To be in this doing his research he would have had to go through a stringent psych evaluation once every month and according to their protocol if there were any issues he would have been removed form the research. This is also the group Ted Kesinski was part of doing neuroscience research as well. And the kids from Columbine, had parents working in the same labs as this Holmes Character. His father was part of the same group and they are working computer chips that integrate with the human brain. Similar to what GSK is targeting as their new direction for drug therapy, only GSK is saying they are using the electronic signaling to help with different disorders and diseases. But the one being worked at in DARPA was for remote manipulation of behavior and action; supposedly for use in things like prison populations.
Secondly, where does an unemployed PhD student get the money for all of this, especially considering this program generally tracks purchses and such.
It isn’t like there was a big treaty being worked on in NYC to use UN troops to remove guns from US citizens, and the senate needed a little push to ratify said treaty, or like this administration hasn’t should through previous missions it was willing to sacrifice innocent human life to push an anti-gun agenda (ie fast and furious).
[quote]apbt55 wrote:
ok haven’t been able to be on here lately, but I would like to bring two ideas to the table here.
Anyone know what DARPA is? I do, I am very familiar with it, and it is the section of DoD that does some really not so ethical things. To be in this doing his research he would have had to go through a stringent psych evaluation once every month and according to their protocol if there were any issues he would have been removed form the research. This is also the group Ted Kesinski was part of doing neuroscience research as well. And the kids from Columbine, had parents working in the same labs as this Holmes Character. His father was part of the same group and they are working computer chips that integrate with the human brain. Similar to what GSK is targeting as their new direction for drug therapy, only GSK is saying they are using the electronic signaling to help with different disorders and diseases. But the one being worked at in DARPA was for remote manipulation of behavior and action; supposedly for use in things like prison populations.
Secondly, where does an unemployed PhD student get the money for all of this, especially considering this program generally tracks purchses and such.
It isn’t like there was a big treaty being worked on in NYC to use UN troops to remove guns from US citizens, and the senate needed a little push to ratify said treaty, or like this administration hasn’t should through previous missions it was willing to sacrifice innocent human life to push an anti-gun agenda (ie fast and furious). [/quote]
So now your trying to make the link that this was all a part of the DoD’s master plan?
There has been information put out that he was receiving a monthly stipend from a grant, not to mention if Mom & Dad were kicking any money his way.
all seems a bit fishy to me, but we’ll see I guess.
[quote]apbt55 wrote:
ok haven’t been able to be on here lately, but I would like to bring two ideas to the table here.
Anyone know what DARPA is? I do, I am very familiar with it, and it is the section of DoD that does some really not so ethical things. To be in this doing his research he would have had to go through a stringent psych evaluation once every month and according to their protocol if there were any issues he would have been removed form the research. This is also the group Ted Kesinski was part of doing neuroscience research as well. And the kids from Columbine, had parents working in the same labs as this Holmes Character. His father was part of the same group and they are working computer chips that integrate with the human brain. Similar to what GSK is targeting as their new direction for drug therapy, only GSK is saying they are using the electronic signaling to help with different disorders and diseases. But the one being worked at in DARPA was for remote manipulation of behavior and action; supposedly for use in things like prison populations.
Secondly, where does an unemployed PhD student get the money for all of this, especially considering this program generally tracks purchses and such.
It isn’t like there was a big treaty being worked on in NYC to use UN troops to remove guns from US citizens, and the senate needed a little push to ratify said treaty, or like this administration hasn’t should through previous missions it was willing to sacrifice innocent human life to push an anti-gun agenda (ie fast and furious). [/quote]
I started reading up on him being a mind controlled patsy, which spoke to what you are talking about, but I felt like I was reading a bourne book.
IDK, I’m not saying our government is above doing fucked up shit on this level, but most of me feels like they would spend too much time arguing about who’s plan was better the conservative one or the liberal one to actually get it done.
Sometimes I wonder if our government is really run by idiots, or I’m the idiot for not seeing that the people in the public eye and press are puppets to distract us from the really smart fuckers actually running shit.
But then I figure I should take off my tinfoil hat, and reality isn’t a Hollywood movie. 
America is way too punitive , Once some one is deemed to be untrustworthy in our society , we should exterminate them . NO punishment pure and simple extermination
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
America is way too punitive , Once some one is deemed to be untrustworthy in our society , we should exterminate them . NO punishment pure and simple extermination [/quote]
But we’re human, ergo too stupid to decide who is untrustworthy in society, thus rendering your solution invalid.
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:I don’t think that modern psychology gives a way to rehabilitate this type.[/quote]I know who does though “rehabilitate” is certainly the wrong word. Come on. It’s the 7th page. I couldn’t help myself.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
America is way too punitive , Once some one is deemed to be untrustworthy in our society , we should exterminate them . NO punishment pure and simple extermination [/quote]
But we’re human, ergo too stupid to decide who is untrustworthy in society, thus rendering your solution invalid.[/quote]
See, there is the constrained vision in a nutshell.
We are all a bunch of idiots, nobody should have that kind of power.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
America is way too punitive , Once some one is deemed to be untrustworthy in our society , we should exterminate them . NO punishment pure and simple extermination [/quote]
But we’re human, ergo too stupid to decide who is untrustworthy in society, thus rendering your solution invalid.[/quote]
See, there is the constrained vision in a nutshell.
We are all a bunch of idiots, nobody should have that kind of power.
[/quote]
Are we willing to allow innocent people to fall through the cracks and be killed?
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:I don’t think that modern psychology gives a way to rehabilitate this type.[/quote]I know who does though “rehabilitate” is certainly the wrong word. Come on. It’s the 7th page. I couldn’t help myself.
[/quote]
Ever consistent and ever faithful. I mean that in a good way.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
America is way too punitive , Once some one is deemed to be untrustworthy in our society , we should exterminate them . NO punishment pure and simple extermination [/quote]
But we’re human, ergo too stupid to decide who is untrustworthy in society, thus rendering your solution invalid.[/quote]
See, there is the constrained vision in a nutshell.
We are all a bunch of idiots, nobody should have that kind of power.
[/quote]
Are we willing to allow innocent people to fall through the cracks and be killed?[/quote]
Of course we are because we all imagine that it could not possibly happen to us.