Barak Obama

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

How can someone get Ivy League degrees and be dumb?

Goodness. Like his family name had NOTHING to do with what university he was accepted into.

Everyone who thinks Bush would be where he is WITHOUT the name BUSH, raise your hand.

Dumb is relative. He sure as hell doesn’t “speak so eloquently”. It doesn’t surprise me at all that people question his intelligence. I also doubt that ANY of you would be willing to listen to one word Barack had to say if he spoke anywhere near the same as the current president regardless of his stance on issues.

I will say that while he may not be “stupid”, I don’t believe he would have ever made it to even the same general universe in terms of success on his own merits alone.[/quote]

Ah! The old ‘daddy got him’ logic. Original.

Let’s change your example. What if Obama spoke, to quote Tiki Barber with a “typical African-American diction”?

What then? Me thinks that anyone who pointed to his diction/public speaking skills would be called a racist. So we really couldn’t call him ‘dumb’. Could we? No way.

Bush is more accomplished in both his professional and public service lives then John Kerry. I’d submit that Bush is ‘smarter’ than Kerry while not as good a speaker. Compare Bush’s track record as governor of Texas (particulary in Education) with Kerry’s as a Senator. Yet Kerry was touted as ‘nuanced’ and borderline genius by the media. I have a feeling that you may have voted for him?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

How can someone get Ivy League degrees and be dumb? Bush is not dumb in any sense of the word.
[/quote]

Let me ask you this question: Would you hire Bush to work for you? Personally I don’t think he is qualified to manage a Dairy Queen let alone the country. He’s failed at nearly everything he has attempted and owes all his successes to his name. Ivy league schools are merely institutions for the privileged and have nothing to do with one’s intelligence.

[quote]DS 007 wrote:
Let’s change your example. What if Obama spoke, to quote Tiki Barber with a “typical African-American diction”?

What then? Me thinks that anyone who pointed to his diction/public speaking skills would be called a racist. So we really couldn’t call him ‘dumb’. Could we? No way.

[/quote]
No. If this were true Obama would never have succeeded in life. It would not be racist to call an uneducated black person so if it is true. The way a person speaks is directly related to how serious they will be taken by their potential listeners and also how successful they will become.

Bush may not be dumb–but he comes across that way to those whom actually speak proper English.

The hallmarks of perceived competence are in dress and speech which are purely superficial and indeed tend to hold people back if they have no other means. The proof that Bush is a moron is in his actions not the way he speaks–though it doesn’t help matters for him.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
How can someone become President of the United States and be ‘dumb’? The whole notion is simply ludicrous. (Bush is not ‘Chance the Gardener’. Bonus points for who can name the movie!).

How can someone get Ivy League degrees and be dumb? Bush is not dumb in any sense of the word.

He is not a conservative and he didn’t get his buddies to enact the Contract with America but calling him dumb is asinine.[/quote]

“Being There”.

Peter Sellers.

Yeah, an absolute genius…!

[quote]PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.[/quote]

I know the human being and fish can co-exist, peacefully.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.[/quote]

I cringe whenever I hear “nuc-u-lar”

[quote]Ren wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.

I cringe whenever I hear “nuc-u-lar”[/quote]

Jimmy Carter said it and he was a nuc-u-lar engineer.

This one always cracks me up…

This is a classic one also…

[quote]DS 007 wrote:
Ah! The old ‘daddy got him’ logic. Original.
[/quote]

That’s how it works at Ivy League schools… if you have a family history with the school, you have an advantage. “Affirmitive action” for blue bloods. It’s probably true of other schools as well.

Bush is not dumb per se, but he is dumb on the issues… he has a superficial grasp of history, geography, human events and political issues, compared to someone like Kerry, Clinton, Gore etc. In comparison to his peers, Bush is dumb as a rock.

Obama is more liberal than Hillary Clinton. I’ve got a feeling that some candidates (Kucinich, Obama) will only make Hillary Clinton seem more moderate and therefore more electable in comparison.

[quote]DS 007 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

How can someone get Ivy League degrees and be dumb?

Goodness. Like his family name had NOTHING to do with what university he was accepted into.

Everyone who thinks Bush would be where he is WITHOUT the name BUSH, raise your hand.

Dumb is relative. He sure as hell doesn’t “speak so eloquently”. It doesn’t surprise me at all that people question his intelligence. I also doubt that ANY of you would be willing to listen to one word Barack had to say if he spoke anywhere near the same as the current president regardless of his stance on issues.

I will say that while he may not be “stupid”, I don’t believe he would have ever made it to even the same general universe in terms of success on his own merits alone.

Ah! The old ‘daddy got him’ logic. Original.

Let’s change your example. What if Obama spoke, to quote Tiki Barber with a “typical African-American diction”?

What then? Me thinks that anyone who pointed to his diction/public speaking skills would be called a racist. So we really couldn’t call him ‘dumb’. Could we? No way.

Bush is more accomplished in both his professional and public service lives then John Kerry. I’d submit that Bush is ‘smarter’ than Kerry while not as good a speaker. Compare Bush’s track record as governor of Texas (particulary in Education) with Kerry’s as a Senator. Yet Kerry was touted as ‘nuanced’ and borderline genius by the media. I have a feeling that you may have voted for him?

[/quote]
I’m independent. I liked John McCain and would have voted for him. I wound up voting for Kerry. Record straight.

DS and Prof X have been right on the money with GWB. I was waiting for someone to mention family/dad when referring to GWB.

Let’s face it, GWB is the Ted Kennedy of the Bush dynasty which was just as powerful and just as ruthless as the Kennedys. GHB’s father was a Connecticut Senator (Prescott Bush), and according to Kitty Kelly, family members had backed Hitler but that’s another thread. The bottom line is that GWB goes absolutely nowhere without his father’s influence and political associates. NO WHERE. Couldn’t get elected Dog Catcher in San Antonio. As far as the Ivy League goes, it’s insulting to “family influence” that he did as poorly as he did in school and you could say business as well. Do you think for a second this guy is involved with a baseball team without dad?

GWB’s true attitude was bared when he was grounded in the National Guard due to attendance. That’s what the guy stood for. Let’s take two other people born with a “silver spoon in their mouth”, his father and JFK. One got shot down over the Pacific as a pilot and the other was a PT Boat Commander and war hero as well. And one of the reasons I would vote for McCain is the fact that while his father was Commander of the Naval Foces in Viet Nam, he was given the opportunity to be let out of prison and wouldn’t leave unless his fellow POWs were allowed to leave and as you know spent another couple of years there. GWB would have been in the first swiftboat down the Mekong Delta. Give credit where it is due and none is due him. Say what you want about Clinton, he came from a broken home and became a Rhodes Schoolar.

There isn’t much to be added to what has been said about his speaking skills. He is unwatchable. I would love to know what is going through the minds of his aides when he “wings” it. I loved it when they where saying how he wrote his own State of the Union speach, comparing him to FDR. I doubt he has an original thought in his head.

Barack would have a better shot if he had a few more years behind him not to say THEY couldn’t pull it off now. And it just might be good for him to have had his hand held to the fire a little bit with that $100,000 issue with the land deal. A nice lesson to learn early on as it seems to not have been made an issue. One parting shot, if he had the speaking skills of GWB, the only people in the country that would know his name would be his family and co-workers.

Prof X, Brad, and Olderguy are on the money.

I’m surprised that some of you seem to think that since Bush attended an Ivy League school and obtained a bachelor of arts in history, and then went on to obtain his MBA that this qualifies him as intelligent.

Maybe some of you are misunderstanding when I say that GWB is dumb. There are degrees of stupidity, and I don’t think GWB is an idiot… but he’s a very average guy. I don’t think an avergae guy like him deserves to be in the shoes of the President of the US. But that’s just me.

I know that I’ve labelled people as dumb for saying far less stupid shit than GWB. I used to think GWB was a good President. If I was a US citizen, I would’ve voted for him the first time around. But as time went by I couldn’t keep making the same excuses. His public image is indicative of his stupidity. I am sure I am not the only one in this thread who has written of people as being stupid for far less than GWB has shown us with his countless hours of stupidity (or mediocrity, at best) on display.

Keep in mind also that Ivy League schools like to service members of prominent families. It’s good for business to educate the members of dynasties. As was said above, the Bush family is a dynasty like the Kennedy family. Ivy League schools WANT to educate these people, it builds up their reputation.

To label GWB less severely, I’ll start referring to him as ‘simple’ instead of as ‘dumb’ or ‘stupid’, from now on.

And for all of us who’ve attended post-secondary studies and who have many friends and/or family members and/or associates who’ve attended post-secondary schooling, we understand that graduating from university can be done by idiots.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.[/quote]

Let’s not forget, “I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family”

And maybe I missed it, but did anyone mention him sitting there for 7 minutes on 9/11 when Andy Chard told him the nation was under attack. I could see 3 or 4 minutes, but 7 was overkill. I bought a poster that had about 50 of his quotes. Bought it in a book store in London. I’m sure they sell them here.

[quote]PGA wrote:
This is a classic one also…

They were both great. I have to forward them to some friends.

I have a friend that at one time said he was going to go down as the best president we ever had. I haven’t heard that from him for a while. LOL.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Ren wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.

I cringe whenever I hear “nuc-u-lar”

Jimmy Carter said it and he was a nuc-u-lar engineer.
[/quote]
Thanks for that
How painfully funny is that "fool me once ah, if you fool me, yada, yada. One of his best, but there are many to choose from.

[quote]olderguy wrote:
Professor X wrote:
PGA wrote:
Yeah, an absolute genius…!

“Breast and brightest”.

But that doesn’t beat, “rarely is the question asked, is our children learning”.

Let’s not forget, “I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family”

And maybe I missed it, but did anyone mention him sitting there for 7 minutes on 9/11 when Andy Chard told him the nation was under attack. I could see 3 or 4 minutes, but 7 was overkill. I bought a poster that had about 50 of his quotes. Bought it in a book store in London. I’m sure they sell them here.[/quote]

He says something stupid every time he speaks. Literally. Every time I’ve seem him on TV for longer than 10 minutes he’ll say something stupid. It never fails.

[quote]Brad61 wrote:
DS 007 wrote:
Ah! The old ‘daddy got him’ logic. Original.

That’s how it works at Ivy League schools… if you have a family history with the school, you have an advantage. “Affirmitive action” for blue bloods. It’s probably true of other schools as well.
[/quote]

It is that way for anyone that gets into some Ivy League schools.

Grade inflation is very real at Harvard, Yale etc.

Clinton did quite well in school, Bush, Gore and Kerry were all about equal in grades as well as standardized testing and I believe Bush was actually slightly ahead of them.

I have no idea what any of them really know. I was not impressed by the knowledge displayed by Bush, Kerry or Gore during the various debates. Bush lost points for his speaking style but they are all similar in substance. They all throw out talking points and do not truly discuss issues in public.

[quote]

Obama is more liberal than Hillary Clinton. I’ve got a feeling that some candidates (Kucinich, Obama) will only make Hillary Clinton seem more moderate and therefore more electable in comparison.[/quote]

Agreed.

[quote]disciplined wrote:
He says something stupid every time he speaks. Literally. Every time I’ve seem him on TV for longer than 10 minutes he’ll say something stupid. It never fails.[/quote]

Like “Too many OBGYN’s are unable to practice their…their love…for women all across this country?”