Ban on Sex for Soldiers Lifted... Sort Of

ALALABAD, Afghanistan – Single soldiers and civilians working for the U.S. military in Afghanistan can now have sex legally. Sort of.

A new order signed by Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser, commander of Combined Joint Task Force-101, has lifted a ban on sexual relations between unmarried men and women in the combat zone.

General Order No. 1 outlines a number of prohibited activities and standards of conduct for U.S. troops and civilians working for the military in Afghanistan. Previously, under the regulation, sexual relations and “intimate behavior” between men and women not married to each other were a strict no-no. The regulation also barred members of the opposite sex from going into each other�??s living quarters unless they were married to each other.

But the latest version of General Order No. 1 for Afghanistan, which Schloesser signed April 19, eases those restrictions.

The new regulation warns that sex in a combat zone “can have an adverse impact on unit cohesion, morale, good order and discipline.”

But sexual relations and physical intimacy between men and women not married to each other are no longer banned outright. They�??re only “highly discouraged,” and that�??s as long as they�??re “not otherwise prohibited” by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, according to the new order.

Single men and women can now also visit each other�??s living quarters, as long as everyone else who lives there agrees, and as long as visitors of the opposite sex remain in the open “and not behind closed doors, partitions or other isolated or segregated areas,” according to the new regulation.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,167950,00.html?ESRC=army-a.nl

(Mods, can you throw this up in the War Room even though I’m not a member there?)

I’m guessing it’s a way to curb the following.

DVD Porn Viruses Ravage US Soldiers’ Computers

The question now is: why is out-of-wedlock sex OK but porn not?

The US military doesn’t care about porn, it’s just in your muslim countries where the constitutions say ‘women are for procreation, and boys are for pleasure.’

They are afraid we might somehow offend or corrupt the muslim boy lovers into heterosexuality so, they prohibit porn to not cause an incident.

Same with alcohol.

Ironically, most of the porn and alcohol us soldiers get in Iraq, is bought on the black market from Iraqis and Afghanis, so the ban just encourages improper fraternization.

If you are based in Germany, the military could give a shitless if you beat it to porn, and drink alcohol.

As long as you’re discreet about it.

I mean being an alcoholic is not okay, and watching some fucked up violent porn might cause female soldiers to feel uncomfortable, but it’snot explicitily banend…just widely discouraged.

Everyone does it.

[quote]Guerrero wrote:
The US military doesn’t care about porn, it’s just in your muslim countries where the constitutions say ‘women are for procreation, and boys are for pleasure.’

They are afraid we might somehow offend or corrupt the muslim boy lovers into heterosexuality so, they prohibit porn to not cause an incident.

.[/quote]

Don’t forget about their precious goats!! They NEED them worse than they need fresh young goatee’d Arab ‘twinks’ that are so highly prized over there.

Lixy’s silence is an obvious indicator that Arab culture is indeed the way we have described.

His lips are sealed from his deep boyhood shame of his Grandpa passing to him the bloodlines knowledge through semen transger…this same shame shall drive him to do the same to some unsuspecting Swedish youngster.

Right. Islam is the religion that has the boy-touching crisis. I’d forgotten.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Right. Islam is the religion that has the boy-touching crisis. I’d forgotten.[/quote]

Lol! Aye mate, lest we forget…

[quote]GDollars37 wrote:

Single men and women can now also visit each other�??s living quarters, as long as everyone else who lives there agrees, and as long as visitors of the opposite sex remain in the open “and not behind closed doors, partitions or other isolated or segregated areas,” according to the new regulation.
[/quote]

Meaning they’re allowed to get it on as long as it’s in full view of the roommates.

Awesome.

Wrong focus.

Why the hell do we think that people are going to obey the rules anyway?

Who the hell thinks it is actually possible to outlaw sex?

[quote]vroom wrote:
Who the hell thinks it is actually possible to outlaw sex?[/quote]

I’m guessing the same people who think it’s possible to outlaw Cannabis.

[quote]GDollars37 wrote:
ALALABAD, Afghanistan – Single soldiers and civilians working for the U.S. military in Afghanistan can now have sex legally. Sort of.

A new order signed by Maj. Gen. Jeffrey Schloesser, commander of Combined Joint Task Force-101, has lifted a ban on sexual relations between unmarried men and women in the combat zone.

General Order No. 1 outlines a number of prohibited activities and standards of conduct for U.S. troops and civilians working for the military in Afghanistan. Previously, under the regulation, sexual relations and “intimate behavior” between men and women not married to each other were a strict no-no.

The regulation also barred members of the opposite sex from going into each other�??s living quarters unless they were married to each other.

But the latest version of General Order No. 1 for Afghanistan, which Schloesser signed April 19, eases those restrictions.

The new regulation warns that sex in a combat zone “can have an adverse impact on unit cohesion, morale, good order and discipline.”

But sexual relations and physical intimacy between men and women not married to each other are no longer banned outright. They�??re only “highly discouraged,” and that�??s as long as they�??re “not otherwise prohibited” by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, according to the new order.

Single men and women can now also visit each other�??s living quarters, as long as everyone else who lives there agrees, and as long as visitors of the opposite sex remain in the open “and not behind closed doors, partitions or other isolated or segregated areas,” according to the new regulation.

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,167950,00.html?ESRC=army-a.nl

(Mods, can you throw this up in the War Room even though I’m not a member there?)[/quote]

the decision could go either way.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Right. Islam is the religion that has the boy-touching crisis. I’d forgotten.[/quote]

BURRRRNNNNN!

[quote]lixy wrote:
I’m guessing the same people who think it’s possible to outlaw Cannabis.[/quote]

The fools. To attempt the impossible is beyond retarded.