[quote]ZJStrope wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]LoRez wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
Obesity doesn’t prevent someones offspring from surviving so there would be no advantage to having the ability to reduce your appetite when food is in excess. Unlike the opposite, being able to pack away as much as possible at once, that is highly advantageous to survival and makes sense that it would be a trait that would not die out.
[/quote]
I would imagine sometime in the past it actually was a factor though. You know, like back when the velociraptors are chasing you and all you can do is waddle away.[/quote]
I think fat storage as a calorie reservoir is vastly overblown. The numbers I’ve seen 10% bodyfat would give you a month or more of calories. Basically, you’d have deficiency problems first and adding more fat than that really wouldnÃ??Ã?¢??t help survive longer.[/quote]
Well, if an enormous amount of blubber really added that much of a survivial benefit we would instinctively find it attractive. [/quote]
It is attractive in poorer nations.
[/quote]
Isn’t that because it is a sign of status in those nations? Only the rich can afford to be fat in a poor country.