The following quotes by others (these “others” are professing Christians whom I do not endorse, but their comments are spot on when it shows the utter intellectual and moral bankruptcy of atheism, materialism, etc., etc.):
“One meat bag shot other meat bags. One cog in the evolutionary wheel of life shot other cogs.”
"Virgina Tech was just an event. There was no moral significance to it. Shake up a Pepsi, it explodes. Shake up Cho, he explodes. So what? He’s removed himself from the gene pool. No more problem there. And those he killed…well, they were just too weak to survive in this hostile world. The cold, cruel march of evolution must procede.
Nature red in tooth and claw. You cannot evolve without death. Without competition, there is no pruning the weak; without struggle, there is no strength. Moralizing this–calling it a “tragedy”–has no place in evolution. It’s no more a tragedy than when homo sapiens offed the Neaderthals. It was a dispassionate event, nothing more."
"A law enforcement official who read Cho's note described it Tuesday as a typed, eight-page rant against rich kids and religion."
"Cho indicated in his letter that the end was near and that there was a deed to be done, the official said. He also expressed disappointment in his own religion and made several references to Christianity, the official said.
If Seung-Hui had written that he was told by God to do what he did, atheists would be railing against the “evils of religion.” But, in Seung-Hui, we have a man who dropped religion, and seemed particularly upset or angry with Christianity."
[To the atheists]“There is no God. Then what happened was about as ‘terrible’ as an anteater filling up at the local ant colony.”
[naturalists believe] “Seung-Hui is an evolved meat bag. Holman believes the victims were evolved meat bags.”
[The naturalist/atheist is] "Bertrand Russell’s poster child:
‘Brief and powerless is Man’s life; on him and all his race the slow, sure doom falls pitiless and dark. Blind to good and evil, reckless of destruction, omnipotent matter rolls on its relentless way; for Man, condemned to-day to lose his dearest, to-morrow himself to pass through the gate of darkness, it remains only to cherish, ere yet the blow falls, the lofty thoughts that ennoble his little day; disdaining the coward terrors of the slave of Fate, to worship at the shrine that his own hands have built; undismayed by the empire of chance, to preserve a mind free from the wanton tyranny that rules his outward life; proudly defiant of the irresistible forces that tolerate, for a moment, his knowledge and his condemnation, to sustain alone, a weary but unyielding Atlas, the world that his own ideals have fashioned despite the trampling march of unconscious power’ (Bertrand Russell, A Free Man’s Worship).
[The naturalist/atheist] can stand up to the uncaring cosmos and shake his fists in despair, asserting his own meaning, but for some reason, Cho Seung-Hui cannot do the same. Seung-Hui looked into the ‘gate of darkness’ and saw that omnipotent matter rolls on its way, making Cho’s life ultimately meaningless, and so he acted upon this situation. [What’s the naturalist’s/atheist’s] beef with [their] own worldview?"
[The atheist/naturalist] "need to repeat this before they go to bed: ‘A meat bag killed meat bags. A certain collection of chemicals killed other collections of chemicals. An animal killed other animals.’ They should not only cling to Darwin to ‘fit in’ in the Science classroom, but Darwinism should be applied to ‘times like this.’ Thus Richard Rorty,
‘The idea that one species of organism is, unlike all the others, oriented not just toward its own increated prosperity but toward Truth, is as un-Darwinian as the idea that every human being has a built-in moral compass–a conscience that swings free of both social history and individual luck’ (Richard Rorty, Untruth and Consequences, The New Republic, July 31, 1995, pp. 32-36).
"Furthermore, it’s at times like this when we must strengthen our resolve. Be consistent with our beliefs. Try to think like Momma Nature. Ultimately, no one cares about the victims. Ultimately, what Seung-Hui did, was not objectively, morally wrong. The grand Imperson doesn’t have ‘moral obligations.’ We make them up! So, that what Seung-Hui did is called ‘wrong,’ is actually fantasy. It’s made up. Reject Christianity and its story of the world, you must invent your own story. There is no grand meta-narrative, there’s millions of subjective autobiographies. Windowless monads, without any pre-established harmony. And thus we need to not only affirm this worldview while engaged in polemical debate, but we must hold it when we face ‘times like this.’ We must not cheer the proclamations of the materialist worldview when we are detached from the issues of life, but when we run smack dab into them. Thus materialist Richard Vitzthum:
'Human thought and feeling is the most complex, versatile, adaptive, sensitive, perceptive, creative, purposeful, and voluntaristic product of terrestrial evolution and perhaps cosmic evolution as a whole… It creates all the value and meaning that humans find inside or outside of themselves. The material order outside of human self-enclosure and self-definition is empty of human value and meaning, consisting as it does of an aimless interplay of natural process dictated by invariable physical laws. Its amoral indiscriminateness contrasts sharply with the human compulsion to discriminate and judge. This compulsion evolved from the billions of years of biological adaptation to earth’s environment that transformed simple cells into multicelled animals.
Human thought and feeling is a material offshoot of this very indiscriminateness. It consists of neural events that individually are insensitive, unthinking, and unfeeling as all other basic chemical reactions but that collectively are capable of processing raw electromagnetic signals into emotional and intellectual information. Although the process is not yet well understood, it may consist of computation that mathematically measure incoming arrays of signals against synaptic weightings in the brain’s neural networks…’ (Richard C. Vitzthum’s ‘Materialism: An Affirmative History And Definition,’ Prometheus Books, 1995, pp. 230-232).
So you feel upset about this whole Virginia Tech thing because your individually unfeeling neurons went snap, crackle, and pop. This whole thing wasn’t really wrong. You just had some electromagnetic signals which operate according to laws of physics and biology give of certain physical impulses in yoru body.
These are not right, wrong, or meaningful. It’s the way it is. Seung-Hui had his own electromagnetic signals go off in his head, the results of which ended in what happened in Virginia. And, when the victims died, what happened on [the atheist/materialist/naturalist] worldview?
Well, electromagnetic signals ceased to ‘go off.’ And, all of this was set in motion eons ago by unfeeling and unthinking physical processes. No purpose for it. That’s the way the cookie crumbles. It’s no different than the erosion of the beach cliffs here in Southern California which were also brought about by prior unthinking and unfeeling processes. Cliffs erode, people erode.
Sometimes they take more sand with them than other times. Oh well. THIS IS THE GRAND AND GLORIOUS WORLD VIEW OF THE ATHEIST."