[quote]TomFoolery wrote:
What happens if we all get on the internet at once and type pressure cooker in to google?[/quote]
That would be some good ole fashioned Tom Foolery.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
That is very cool.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
If that is real that is sick! Haha
I’m curious about the intersection cameras that are becoming so prevalent. So many times I’ve barely slowed down to make a right hand turn at a red light. I realize too late to stop and look up to see cameras every where. Not once have I received a ticket. It just so happens I don’t have a front license plate. I never got around to putting it on and it doesn’t seem to be something cops notice.
So my question is, do those intersection cameras get you from the front or the back? If it’s from the front, that explains a lot.
[quote]StevenF wrote:
I won’t even jerk off in front of the laptop without covering the webcam on top of it first. Well sometimes I don’t mind. [/quote]
No! Don’t say that! It ain’t like you say it is! Nuh uh! No siree!
Also, I get pelted with this topic by my ignorant, self-righteous, social sect suck ups of coworkers who haven’t anything better to do but talk down to me with a condescending pretense.
I mean, granted, there is indeed something fishy going on, but what in the actual fuck would convince a middle aged man that he should spew “Jay Z gives the government drugs man! I’m telling you!”, then have the audacity to go home to his shitty wife and kiss her on the lips.
I believe there isn’t anything better to do in this world right now than to do what you want, with the intent driven inward, on yourself and what you’ve set out to do. I was told believing that sentiment and living life that way is naive, because I’m still getting ‘fucked’ by the government. Middle aged men have such horrible mindsets. I honestly believe baby boomers fucked up the world. Half of them flatter themselves with half-witted, poorly backed up, patronizing speech that honestly makes me want to kill myself.
Bout time I rub one out and have me a sleeperoo, eh? Covers webcam
/end rant
Crazy when I zoomed in randomly, it zoomed straight to the guy with the beard and doo rag, that looked like the “shoe bomber”.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[/quote]
It’s real! It’s just the Ilerminaty!!
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[/quote]
It’s real! It’s just the Ilerminaty!![/quote]
Looks like Vinny didn’t clean his bilderberg lettuce tonight
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[/quote]
It’s real! It’s just the Ilerminaty!![/quote]
Looks like Vinny didn’t clean his bilderberg lettuce tonight[/quote]
What’s bilderberg again?
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[/quote]
It’s real! It’s just the Ilerminaty!![/quote]
Looks like Vinny didn’t clean his bilderberg lettuce tonight[/quote]
What’s bilderberg again?[/quote]
The ones in control of all the money. Pulling just about every string.
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]strongmanvinny wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Something I received in an email. Am not vouching for its authenticity. Did not research or Snopes it.
But relevant to the topic:
WHAT WILL THINGS BE LIKE IN ANOTHER FEW YEARS? ? ?
“This picture was taken with a 70,000 x 30,000 pixel camera (2100 MegaPixels.) These cameras are not sold to the public and are being installed in strategic locations. It can identify a face in a multitude of people. Place the cursor in the mass of people and double-click about four times (or ‘finger-spread’ on a device.) Scary sharp” or use the “zoom slide” at the top left corner of the picture. It may take a few seconds for your merely consumer-level computer to do the zoom…
Pretty sure it’s fake…
[/quote]
It’s real! It’s just the Ilerminaty!![/quote]
Looks like Vinny didn’t clean his bilderberg lettuce tonight[/quote]
What’s bilderberg again?[/quote]
The ones in control of all the money. Pulling just about every string.[/quote]
Sort of a whoo’s whooo of the corporate oligarchy.
[quote]TomFoolery wrote:
What happens if we all get on the internet at once and type pressure cooker in to google?[/quote]
The world will implode…
Varq, I have traveled to over 20 something countries, sadly my only stint in Japan was a layover. I feel like after reading what you wrote I need to check it out.
As for the OT, who cares, none of us are really all that interesting or special anyways so does it matter what they see?
[quote]Waittz wrote:
Varq, I have traveled to over 20 something countries, sadly my only stint in Japan was a layover. I feel like after reading what you wrote I need to check it out. [/quote]
Go check out the “Japanese Men Refuse to Leave Their Rooms” thread. Lots of good info there.
The discussion has moved beyond this by now, but because this happened in my neck of the woods and it’s been all over the local news, I thought I’d clarify…
[quote]stokes1989 wrote:
So has anybody else read the article about how a husband and wife were browsing the internet. Thw wife was looking at pressure cookers, and in the same timeframe the husband was looking at backpacks. Well apparently the government responded to this by sending an Anti-Terrorism task force to their door-step.[/quote]
This is 100% incorrect. Sure didn’t stop the news from making that kind of headline though. Shocker, there.
The guy searched for “pressure cooker bomb” and “backpack” at work, on his work computer. He was fired two months ago, and when the company (a wholesaler of video surveillance and electronic equipment) came upon his work-computer search history, they contacted local police. There was some questioning, but no charges, no arrest, and no crime.
This particular case had nothing at all to do with Big Brother watching. It was a dude, at work, looking up stuff he shouldn’t have been looking up, on company time, and the consequences that followed.
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
The discussion has moved beyond this by now, but because this happened in my neck of the woods and it’s been all over the local news, I thought I’d clarify…
[quote]stokes1989 wrote:
So has anybody else read the article about how a husband and wife were browsing the internet. Thw wife was looking at pressure cookers, and in the same timeframe the husband was looking at backpacks. Well apparently the government responded to this by sending an Anti-Terrorism task force to their door-step.[/quote]
This is 100% incorrect. Sure didn’t stop the news from making that kind of headline though. Shocker, there.
The guy searched for “pressure cooker bomb” and “backpack” at work, on his work computer. He was fired two months ago, and when the company (a wholesaler of video surveillance and electronic equipment) came upon his work-computer search history, they contacted local police. There was some questioning, but no charges, no arrest, and no crime.
This particular case had nothing at all to do with Big Brother watching. It was a dude, at work, looking up stuff he shouldn’t have been looking up, on company time, and the consequences that followed.[/quote]
BULLSHIT.
We know you work with “them” and “they”…and maybe even “those”…which is fucking scary.
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Totenkopf wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Gettnitdone wrote:
If you don’t like the stuff your government does, why don’t you just pack up and move to another country? Since this is about the US, I’ll say that In every country I have been to, I have always met at least one American ex-pat.
[/quote]
Funny, in every country I’ve ever even to, I’ve met a good number of Kiwi expats. They all tell me the same thing: “yeh, New Zealand’s beautiful and all, but it’s boring as shit!”
One bloke said to me, “you’ve 'eard that there are three times as many sheep in New Zealand as there are people, right? Know why that’s so? 'Cos the sheep can’t get passports.”
Seriously, though, I escaped back in the nineties, at the beginning of the reign of George I, and returned at the end of the reign of George II, nearly two decades later. I did not find the place to have improved much in my absence. Perhaps it’s time for another move. [/quote]
You’d probably move back to Japan? TBH, I’d like to move to Finland or Norway.[/quote]
FINLAND?? As a native Swede, I have issues with both Norway and Finland… but FINLAND??
[/quote]
Whats wrong with Finland? I wouldn’t mind moving to any Scandinavian country actually, lol. I should have just said that.[/quote]
Nothing wrong with Finland per say… but comparatively, if you went to Soumi(Finland) over Sweden(fine Denmark too, actually even more so than Sweden because it has less immigrants)… boy… did you fuck up.
Go to Sweden, Malmo or Stockholm for one or two days, and come back to this thread and tell me if you ever want to leave(yes i’m reasoning strictly using my ah-ha).[/quote]
Lol, You have to be more specific, friend. I only know about these countries from TV and what I read. I dont know the real indepth culture from someone with first hand experience.
[quote]Chris Colucci wrote:
[…]It was a dude, at work, looking up stuff he shouldn’t have been looking up, on company time, and the consequences that followed.[/quote]
Aside from stealing some company time -which isn’t really a biggy:
Why can’t someone google “pressure cooker bomb” and “backpack”?
Could someone point out a compilation, deemed suitable by the government, of forbidden words one shouldn’t type in?
What “consequences” should follow for these unquestionably sinful letter arrangements:
“snorting coke” and “hiring escort”
“pan cake” and “recipe”
“assault rifle” and “school”
“haircut” and “fabulous”
“masturbation” and “sexy nun”
“barbell” and “retard strength”