[quote]Perlenbacher15 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]magick wrote:
I never read the book, but I did hear of the story you mentioned in #1. I don’t know why Eastwood chose to change it. I think the reality would have suited the film and its tone better.
And just to be a film nazi- the mother actually hands the kid some kind of grenade. The kid runs towards the convoy and then Kyle shoots him. The mother then, inexplicably imo and totally ruining any sense of realism, picks up the fucking grenade and attempts to throw it. Instead of either running grief-stricken towards the kid or running away because she knows there’s someone out there who just shot the kid.
… What?
[/quote]
You do realize that that might not be his mother. Or the fact that many of the radicals are bat shit fucking crazy right. [/quote]
This is why people are calling it propoganda, they wanted to portray it as a black/white good v evil opening scene where a mother sends her child to kill troops. In reality there was no kid. Just like there was no sniper, or seals killed finding the sniper, or seals killed after being ambushed by him.
Also in the film he says it was the kids mother, cementing that black/white thing in the viewers mind. Using something that never happened to create a different narrative.
It has been changed so much that it bears no resemblance to the real story.
Another example is that Kyle never second guessed himself or had a moral dilema, he said in his book he was glad he killed all those “savages” and has no regrets at all. In the film he is constantly having moral quandaries looking through his scope.
[/quote]
I understand your complaints, as an avid reader I struggle enjoying movies that originate from a book. I finally learned to just ignore it and enjoy the ride, stop trying to look for differences in the story telling.