I’m late, but come on PX. You gotta admit, the one pic of him posted in this thread, with all 3 heads of his delt popping out like baseballs, is not being a genetic freak in those muscles. He’s clearly injecting some synthol into those bad boys.
It’s ok to admit upon new evidence, and bringing up other pics/vids as proof against doesn’t make sense, because like Whiteflash said about the time frame they were taken.
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]kakno wrote:
[quote]Whelanj wrote:
The man is more to be pitied than ridiculed I would say. Interesting to know that iron means homosexual, but I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that he is homosexual.[/quote]
Fuck. Now we gotta change the name of the brotherhood of iron.
Tattoos and everything, man…[/quote]
Na it doesnt work like that. If it was ‘brotherhood of irons’ then yeah. Iron is meant for one person. [/quote]
WTF? Tony Stark is gay?!
Have we reached page 10 yet ?
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]kakno wrote:
[quote]Whelanj wrote:
The man is more to be pitied than ridiculed I would say. Interesting to know that iron means homosexual, but I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that he is homosexual.[/quote]
Fuck. Now we gotta change the name of the brotherhood of iron.
Tattoos and everything, man…[/quote]
Na it doesnt work like that. If it was ‘brotherhood of irons’ then yeah. Iron is meant for one person. [/quote]
WTF? Tony Stark is gay?![/quote]
‘Iron man’ = not gay. ‘That man is an iron’ = gay. Iron hoof = poof = gay
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
I’m late, but come on PX. You gotta admit, the one pic of him posted in this thread, with all 3 heads of his delt popping out like baseballs, is not being a genetic freak in those muscles. He’s clearly injecting some synthol into those bad boys.
It’s ok to admit upon new evidence, and bringing up other pics/vids as proof against doesn’t make sense, because like Whiteflash said about the time frame they were taken.
[/quote]
The time frame isn’t the issue…and I explained this already. There would be a much larger SIZE discrepancy if this were a matter of filling up a muscle with oil. In his case, there isn’t. It instead looks like a recent injection site but overall, the only “size” difference is likely an oil bolus. There are simply too many pics of him around with the same size only minus a recent injection bolus.
Why would Whiteflash be more credible…about much of anything?
Ok, I know the guy is huge, but why does he still walk like a puffed out teenage skinny kid who thinks he has muscle? He should just relax and let his stature speak for itself. I really think he’s puffin himself up at times. Quit with the Donkey Kong shit and walk normal…lol
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]kakno wrote:
[quote]Whelanj wrote:
The man is more to be pitied than ridiculed I would say. Interesting to know that iron means homosexual, but I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that he is homosexual.[/quote]
Fuck. Now we gotta change the name of the brotherhood of iron.
Tattoos and everything, man…[/quote]
Na it doesnt work like that. If it was ‘brotherhood of irons’ then yeah. Iron is meant for one person. [/quote]
WTF? Tony Stark is gay?![/quote]
‘Iron man’ = not gay. ‘That man is an iron’ = gay. Iron hoof = poof = gay[/quote]
Tony Stark is Iron Man, Iron = gay, iron hoof = poof = gay. Tony Stark is gay.
[quote]FrozenNinja wrote:
Ok, I know the guy is huge, but why does he still walk like a puffed out teenage skinny kid who thinks he has muscle? He should just relax and let his stature speak for itself. I really think he’s puffin himself up at times. Quit with the Donkey Kong shit and walk normal…lol[/quote]
You’re talking about him on an unrelated website because of how he acted. This thread is damn near 10 pages long because of how he acted. If you ask me, how he acts is doing exactly what he wants it to do.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]FrozenNinja wrote:
Ok, I know the guy is huge, but why does he still walk like a puffed out teenage skinny kid who thinks he has muscle? He should just relax and let his stature speak for itself. I really think he’s puffin himself up at times. Quit with the Donkey Kong shit and walk normal…lol[/quote]
You’re talking about him on an unrelated website because of how he acted. This thread is damn near 10 pages long because of how he acted. If you ask me, how he acts is doing exactly what he wants it to do.[/quote]
Dude is playing a caricature, it is a gimmick. That seems to be working. Why does he wear a cammo tank top, bandanna and big gold chain everywhere? its all part of the gimmick, just like what Mr T did and others.
[quote]Kalle wrote:
… just like what Mr T did and others. [/quote]
I lost respect for Mr. T when I found out he was injecting synthol into is mohawk.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]rugggby wrote:
[quote]kakno wrote:
[quote]Whelanj wrote:
The man is more to be pitied than ridiculed I would say. Interesting to know that iron means homosexual, but I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that he is homosexual.[/quote]
Fuck. Now we gotta change the name of the brotherhood of iron.
Tattoos and everything, man…[/quote]
Na it doesnt work like that. If it was ‘brotherhood of irons’ then yeah. Iron is meant for one person. [/quote]
WTF? Tony Stark is gay?![/quote]
‘Iron man’ = not gay. ‘That man is an iron’ = gay. Iron hoof = poof = gay[/quote]
Tony Stark is Iron Man, Iron = gay, iron hoof = poof = gay. Tony Stark is gay.[/quote]
no!!! haha, i dont expect americans to get it, when there are people who live just outside of london who dont have a clue. as far as i know, it was thought up so people could talk about robbing you, infront of you, and you not having a clue about it.
[quote]krebcycle wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
No way are his traps built through lifting and gear alone. Its impossible for them to get that big so out of proportion to the rest of his body. It has to be synthol, as well as a lot of gear. [/quote]
How is it impossible for one body part to ‘get out of proportion to the rest of his body’? I see plenty of people in the gym everyday that have massively developed anterior musculature but from the back they have nothing. Also what about all the people that neglect their legs? [/quote]
Because its impossible to isolate the traps in the way it is possible to isolate other muscle groups. Ever wonder why you never see a “trap machine” at any gym? You have to bring other musculature into the picture just to perform the lifts that work the traps.
Its not the same as the divide between legs and upper body by any stretch. Of course in those cases you can create imbalances. But even then, there are limits. That’s why its damn near impossible for MOST to build impressive upper bodies without squats and deadlifts. The body grows in proportion. Steroids of course alter this limit to some degree, but not enough to generate a freakish build with the obviously ridiculously out of proportion musculature like this guy has.
Will this affect him? I think he could care less, the movie I saw him in he was brought in as a “freak” character, and to 99% of people who see him, they won’t even know what synthol is, they will just see a “freakishly big dude”
It was a great movie by the way, its called Dead man running. When I first saw the character, I thought he was CGI he looks that ridiculous. He still gets his ass handed to him though lol.
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]krebcycle wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
No way are his traps built through lifting and gear alone. Its impossible for them to get that big so out of proportion to the rest of his body. It has to be synthol, as well as a lot of gear. [/quote]
How is it impossible for one body part to ‘get out of proportion to the rest of his body’? I see plenty of people in the gym everyday that have massively developed anterior musculature but from the back they have nothing. Also what about all the people that neglect their legs? [/quote]
Because its impossible to isolate the traps in the way it is possible to isolate other muscle groups. Ever wonder why you never see a “trap machine” at any gym? You have to bring other musculature into the picture just to perform the lifts that work the traps.[/quote]
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?
Then it sounds like he is “mission accomplished”.
He is awkwardly built, but most people won’t know the difference anyway and he might as well be Ronnie Coleman to the other Asian people in that vid clip.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?[quote]
Thank you. You saved me the trouble of having to explain this. And yes, people CAN have freakish traps. I see it all the time. Skinny guys with long gorilla arms and traps up to their ears. I don’t even directly work my traps and have bigger traps than 99% of the guys posting on here, so I could easily seeing someone who has the same genetic predisposition as me easily letting them get out of proportion.
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
And yes, people CAN have freakish traps. I see it all the time. Skinny guys with long gorilla arms and traps up to their ears.
[/quote]
There are these two new guys at my gym like this. They are definitely quite a bit smaller than me but have awesome traps… It makes me jelly cause my traps are so weak. They’re one of my weak points that I’m trying to bring up lately… So jelly
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?[/quote]
Thank you. You saved me the trouble of having to explain this. And yes, people CAN have freakish traps. I see it all the time. Skinny guys with long gorilla arms and traps up to their ears. I don’t even directly work my traps and have bigger traps than 99% of the guys posting on here, so I could easily seeing someone who has the same genetic predisposition as me easily letting them get out of proportion. [/quote]
I even posted pics of myself to show this and mentioned that I had to back off training them but that apparently wasn’t enough.
If I wanted, my traps would dominate everything on my shoulder girdle. This guy seems to be the same as far as his genetics there…plus the way he stands and flexes constantly to look “gorilla big” causes them to stand out even more.
He is a guy with good shoulder genetics who apparently only trains shoulders and arms at the expense of other muscle groups. This is NOT impossible and recent injection bolus but no extreme size increase does NOT indicate synthol use.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]krebcycle wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
No way are his traps built through lifting and gear alone. Its impossible for them to get that big so out of proportion to the rest of his body. It has to be synthol, as well as a lot of gear. [/quote]
How is it impossible for one body part to ‘get out of proportion to the rest of his body’? I see plenty of people in the gym everyday that have massively developed anterior musculature but from the back they have nothing. Also what about all the people that neglect their legs? [/quote]
Because its impossible to isolate the traps in the way it is possible to isolate other muscle groups. Ever wonder why you never see a “trap machine” at any gym? You have to bring other musculature into the picture just to perform the lifts that work the traps.[/quote]
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?
Then it sounds like he is “mission accomplished”.
He is awkwardly built, but most people won’t know the difference anyway and he might as well be Ronnie Coleman to the other Asian people in that vid clip.[/quote]
Yeah, because shrugs only target the traps. A shrug machine is not a trap machine, its a fucking shrug machine.
You said yourself, your forearms are involved in the movement. Try shrugging a heavy weight at the limit of your grip strength and see which is the most activated musculature.
There are plenty of people with large traps, but there are virtually no bodybuilders that have traps like his.
And everyone who is so convinced they do, go shrug some heavy ass weight for two years, and lets see if your traps get too freaky.
I’m not up to speed on Synthol but I’ve gathered that it enhances muscle and makes it larger.
What’s the problem with that? I know there are members on this site that you roids. Some of you are even guilty of using the createenz. But either way, you have to put in a lot of work to build a foundation otherwise creatine or anything else you’re using isn’t doing much good.
So why are there so many people comming down on this dude? Insults are flying that he’s gay amongst others. Just curious as to why. Is he cheating? Does he have an unfair advantage over the other Mr.T contestants?
Bottom line, the guy is corny but he’s put work in at the gym and trying to make some money from it. Leave him alone, go hit the weights yourself and show how its done or STFU.
Now if we can all get back to making fun of his character, that’d be nice. Good lolz to be had there!
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]krebcycle wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
No way are his traps built through lifting and gear alone. Its impossible for them to get that big so out of proportion to the rest of his body. It has to be synthol, as well as a lot of gear. [/quote]
How is it impossible for one body part to ‘get out of proportion to the rest of his body’? I see plenty of people in the gym everyday that have massively developed anterior musculature but from the back they have nothing. Also what about all the people that neglect their legs? [/quote]
Because its impossible to isolate the traps in the way it is possible to isolate other muscle groups. Ever wonder why you never see a “trap machine” at any gym? You have to bring other musculature into the picture just to perform the lifts that work the traps.[/quote]
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?
Then it sounds like he is “mission accomplished”.
He is awkwardly built, but most people won’t know the difference anyway and he might as well be Ronnie Coleman to the other Asian people in that vid clip.[/quote]
Yeah, because shrugs only target the traps. A shrug machine is not a trap machine, its a fucking shrug machine.
You said yourself, your forearms are involved in the movement. Try shrugging a heavy weight at the limit of your grip strength and see which is the most activated musculature.
There are plenty of people with large traps, but there are virtually no bodybuilders that have traps like his.
And everyone who is so convinced they do, go shrug some heavy ass weight for two years, and lets see if your traps get too freaky.[/quote]
I use straps when I’m at my grip limit because I want to focus on the traps. You should give it a try next time.
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
[quote]krebcycle wrote:
[quote]MassiveGuns wrote:
No way are his traps built through lifting and gear alone. Its impossible for them to get that big so out of proportion to the rest of his body. It has to be synthol, as well as a lot of gear. [/quote]
How is it impossible for one body part to ‘get out of proportion to the rest of his body’? I see plenty of people in the gym everyday that have massively developed anterior musculature but from the back they have nothing. Also what about all the people that neglect their legs? [/quote]
Because its impossible to isolate the traps in the way it is possible to isolate other muscle groups. Ever wonder why you never see a “trap machine” at any gym? You have to bring other musculature into the picture just to perform the lifts that work the traps.[/quote]
I have a “trap machine” at my gym called a SHRUG MACHINE. It is made by Hammer Strength and shrugs even with a barbell don’t involve other muscle groups to the degree that they would reach full development from that exercise. Your forearms get more of a workout but that is about it with most force being directed right at the traps.
So no, what you just wrote is bullshit and it is possible to train your traps at the exclusion of other body parts.
Why speak on things you clearly have no clue about?
Then it sounds like he is “mission accomplished”.
He is awkwardly built, but most people won’t know the difference anyway and he might as well be Ronnie Coleman to the other Asian people in that vid clip.[/quote]
Yeah, because shrugs only target the traps. A shrug machine is not a trap machine, its a fucking shrug machine.
You said yourself, your forearms are involved in the movement. Try shrugging a heavy weight at the limit of your grip strength and see which is the most activated musculature.
[/quote]
Good Lord.