[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
John S. wrote:
Then you know what they did to the bodies at that camp. If you know that then you should know that site is full of crap. You realize they burned every body.
And if you actually looked at the site, they explain that nonsense fully. The bodies were supposedly burned using wood on “open air” grates as told by “eye witnesses”.
Here in a simple visual experiment, it takes 135 lbs of wood just to cremate a single 12.5 lb leg of lamb on an open air grate.
Video #23 - http://www.codoh.com/video/onethird.html
Also for a little more reference:
Electric funeral pyres may be the answer to India’s shortage of wood for cremations, but they are not popular. The 21,000 Hindus who die each day consume 18-million pounds of wood, or 560-acres of forest.
[i]A formal Hindu cremation - in which a dead body is burned for more than six hours in a 1m-high open-air pyre - can consume more than 400kg [882 lbs] of wood to reduce the body to ashes[i]
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21892724-1702,00.html
So imagine:
“The ash content of a human body makes up about 5.6% of the body’s weight; given a 132 lb. body, this comes to 7.3 lbs. The ashes from the 875,000 burned bodies would thus have weighed 6,387,500 lbs. The total quantity of ashes - wood ashes plus human ashes - would therefore have weighed almost 4,000 metric tons, or 8.6 million pounds, all of which (according to the witnesses) were then mixed with the soil and thrown back into the pits.”
So you seem to be implying that ALL traces of this crime are “vanished”, but in reality, the cremated remains of 875,000 people is still around 3000 tons – all buried inside the perimeters of the camp.
This capacity crowd times 9 - inside a 22 acre camp
Even more ridiculous is that we are to suppose these people were first buried for a few months before they were all dug back up and burned, and then reburied.
Not only did 3 weeks of ground penetrating radar analysis and core samples not show any mass graves, the radar analysis didn’t even show that the sediment layers had EVER even been disturbed as would if you had just simply dug a hole and filled it back in again.
The whole gist of the challenge is that if the Treblinka story is true, you should have a hard time NOT finding evidence. You should literally be able to stick your hand into the soil anywhere in the camp and pull out evidence.
I find it entirely odd that ANYONE would be offended by such a reasonable request as to find 1% of these astronomical amount of remains and collect $200,000 to boot. [/quote]
Actually If you knew anything about it there where many ditches that where on fire at all times. Like I said do some research.