Annoyed of My Abs (Kind of)

I’m guessing that what he means is some having big bellies, which is unlikely to related to ab work or lack thereof, or have an unappealing linea alba pattern, which also has nothing to do with ab work.

Boyer Coe, due to genetics, had a monoab. Not only no six-pack, but not even a two-pack: just an unmarked single sheet of muscle. Ab work or lack thereof was not to blame.

But a novice or someone who hasn’t thought about things or has somehow gotten mistaken may assume that any of these have “shitty midsections” and assume this is due to no or poor ab work.

You are right of course that when someone is training hard overall, genetics is far and away the prime determinant of midsection appearance (if I understand your intent correctly) along of course with diet and not being or being only minimally adversely affects by drugs causing bloated belly; and that working hard in all the rest of one’s lifting can for many be all the ab work needed.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
I’m guessing that what he means is some having big bellies, which is unlikely to related to ab work or lack thereof, or have an unappealing linea alba pattern, which also has nothing to do with ab work.

Boyer Coe, due to genetics, had a monoab. Not only no six-pack, but not even a two-pack: just an unmarked single sheet of muscle. Ab work or lack thereof was not to blame.

But a novice or someone who hasn’t thought about things or has somehow gotten mistaken may assume that any of these have “shitty midsections” and assume this is due to no or poor ab work.

You are right of course that when someone is training hard overall, genetics is far and away the prime determinant of midsection appearance (if I understand your intent correctly) along of course with diet and not being or being only minimally adversely affects by drugs causing bloated belly; and that working hard in all the rest of one’s lifting can for many be all the ab work needed.[/quote]

No argument there. Well stated.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
FightingScott wrote:
And if you haven’t noticed, there are plenty of pros who have big, impressive physiques and shitty midsections.

Is it likely that the reason is that these pros forgot to do ab work?

What equals a “shitty” midsection?

Dexter Jackson does NO direct ab work at all. NONE. [/quote]

Surely you can build strong, defined abs without but do bodybuilders leave direct ab work out? I doubt it.

It is like the guys saying curls are useless…well who knows - they might be - but i bet most bodybuilders do them.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Dexter Jackson does NO direct ab work at all. NONE. [/quote]

I think its safe to say that Dexter is an anomaly as far as not training abs are concerned and in fact even he had to get on the crunch horse in prep for this years Olympia:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_9_26/ai_n30932591

Excerpt:

Least-favorite exercise I had to train abs this year, so that was rough. I never did that before at all, period. I’m getting older, and my trainer, Joe McNeal, is the type of person that is very hard. I’m hard on myself, but he’ll tell it like it is, which you need in your corner. He studies pictures like no other. After looking at the other guys at the Olympia and my past photos next to each other, he felt that my abs could have been a little deeper. So, as he did my schedule this year, my workout regimen and what have you, he included ab work.

I don’t know the answer to this, not currently following pro bb’ing, so it’s not a rhetorical question but actually asking you:

So, did this make a big difference to his abs? Or in his own particular case did his abs also look great before and at best are a little better now or is it uncertain if they even are?

My point, incidentally, wasn’t that I was saying most pro bb’ers don’t do abs. Not so. My point was that an argument that the explanation for a given pro’s midsection not being the way a given person thinks it should be is generally not going to be that he should have worked abs more or better.

Whoever the poster was criticizing, most likely he was working his abs harder and better than a whole lot of folk that the poster thinks have great midsections. That was my point.

But I also recognize and agree with Professor X’s point that a given person may not need direct ab work at all to look great in that regard.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
What the hell ever happened to guys wanting big chest arms and shoulders?

No, it’s the dinky little girly like…abs.

Makes me sick sometimes.[/quote]

Don’t forget huge back, legs, and traps.

[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
I don’t know the answer to this, not currently following pro bb’ing, so it’s not a rhetorical question but actually asking you:

So, did this make a big difference to his abs? Or in his own particular case did his abs also look great before and at best are a little better now or is it uncertain if they even are?

My point, incidentally, wasn’t that I was saying most pro bb’ers don’t do abs. Not so. My point was that an argument that the explanation for a given pro’s midsection not being the way a given person thinks it should be is generally not going to be that he should have worked abs more or better.

Whoever the poster was criticizing, most likely he was working his abs harder and better than a whole lot of folk that the poster thinks have great midsections. That was my point.

But I also recognize and agree with Professor X’s point that a given person may not need direct ab work at all to look great in that regard.[/quote]

Bill, I think Dexter’s midsection would have blown everybody away as it always does - with or without the additional ab-specific training. That’s just the way he is put together.

My point is more that there is this odd thing going on this site; the notion of not doing direct biceps work is being ridiculed in every second thread but at the same time direct ab work is being branded as completely unnecessary.

Disregarding that diet is the key factor in making your midsection visible, I think its absurd to claim that targeting your abs with specific exercises will not go some way to make them “thicker”.

I agree of course that no amount of ab-work will make you look like Lee Priest or Dexter Jackson unless you won the lottery the day they handed out genes.

“Have you ever seen a pro-bb’er with great biceps not doing isolated bicep work?” - no, but I also haven’t seen a pro-bb’er with great midsection not paying his (or her) dues to the holy crunch.

[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
What the hell ever happened to guys wanting big chest arms and shoulders?

No, it’s the dinky little girly like…abs.

Makes me sick sometimes.

women, they love the abzzz [/quote]

fuck women lol not trying to pick on u or anything but the whole women want or like this crap, who cares, find a women who likes u for u and do what u want to do. I dont do things just so women like them

[quote]winkel wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
I don’t know the answer to this, not currently following pro bb’ing, so it’s not a rhetorical question but actually asking you:

So, did this make a big difference to his abs? Or in his own particular case did his abs also look great before and at best are a little better now or is it uncertain if they even are?

My point, incidentally, wasn’t that I was saying most pro bb’ers don’t do abs. Not so. My point was that an argument that the explanation for a given pro’s midsection not being the way a given person thinks it should be is generally not going to be that he should have worked abs more or better.

Whoever the poster was criticizing, most likely he was working his abs harder and better than a whole lot of folk that the poster thinks have great midsections. That was my point.

But I also recognize and agree with Professor X’s point that a given person may not need direct ab work at all to look great in that regard.

Bill, I think Dexter’s midsection would have blown everybody away as it always does - with or without the additional ab-specific training. That’s just the way he is put together.

My point is more that there is this odd thing going on this site; the notion of not doing direct biceps work is being ridiculed in every second thread but at the same time direct ab work is being branded as completely unnecessary.

Disregarding that diet is the key factor in making your midsection visible, I think its absurd to claim that targeting your abs with specific exercises will not go some way to make them “thicker”.

I agree of course that no amount of ab-work will make you look like Lee Priest or Dexter Jackson unless you won the lottery the day they handed out genes.

“Have you ever seen a pro-bb’er with great biceps not doing isolated bicep work?” - no, but I also haven’t seen a pro-bb’er with great midsection not paying his (or her) dues to the holy crunch.
[/quote]

I think you are blatantly missing the point that really large bodybuilders DO NOT WANT A THICKER MID SECTION. That is why many will avoid training their obliques with heavy weight and why many will simply go with the development they have from training everything else so their waist doesn’t get any bigger when it comes to abs.

You see obese people jumping on these twisting oblique machines as if they don’t get that building up those muscles without losing all of the fat they are carrying will simply make their waist look thicker.

If someone is training heavy enough to even build over 200lbs of lean body mass, they have well developed abs. They aid in stabilization during nearly every other movement.

You won’t be doing heavy pressdowns for triceps without strong abs, so NO, they are NOT just like biceps.

Whether you individually need to work your abs more is an individual matter based on how well they adapt to other training. If you need to work them more, then do. Everyone doesn’t.

This is bodybuilding. People want a small waist. They don’t want small arms.

While no one is implying that no one needs to train abs, when discussing someone who is truly extremely built, it would be rare to find one who had truly weak ab development as well.

Many pros do train abs on a regular basis and many will also back off from training them until right before a contest.

[quote]

Many pros do train abs on a regular basis and many will also back off from training them until right before a contest.[/quote]

Right on the money. The need for training abs is individual which is why absolutes such as “this works” or “that doesn’t work” should be avoided. Anyway most of this is anecdotal and based on our personal experience which we then apply to the whole world as a fact. Exceptions are those with coaching experience like CT and maybe u Prof X - who should be able to see both sides of the coin.

Should the muscular guy at 15% bodyfat do abs? Well, that will be his personal choice. It will be some time before he can see them and given proper training he will have some level of development already.

Should the OP, who is lean and annoyed about his abs, do it? Certainly. He will probably get a great (visible) reward out of it.

and by the way - u dont get a big waist from training abs.