I’m starting to lean towards you being a troll.
That, or you are one nutty nutty turnip.
I’m starting to lean towards you being a troll.
That, or you are one nutty nutty turnip.
And hey, instead of writing some cheesy vampire/Gothic piece of shit like you are what about something like Dexter but where the main character hunts hunters?
He could go after those that hunt water fowl and you could call it Duckster.
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
Those that kill animals for any reason, should be killed themselves.[/quote]
<—
[quote]Nards wrote:
And hey, instead of writing some cheesy vampire/Gothic piece of shit like you are what about something like Dexter but where the main character hunts hunters?
He could go after those that hunt water fowl and you could call it Duckster.[/quote]
My book has absolutely nothing to do with vampires or goth in anyway shape or form.
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Vicomte wrote:
[quote]forkknifespoon wrote:
[quote]Ratchet wrote:
your dogs ears are huge compared to his head, cute, but thats the first thing i noticed… [/quote]
Yeah, he was only 3-4 months old in those pictures. I’ve been told it will take him about 2 years to reach full size. He still looks like a big dumb puppy, his ears are too big, tail too long, and paws so big he trips over all sorts of things.
I’m kind of surprised how few animal pictures are in this thread, I think in years back they went over a little better.
On the issue of animal cruelty. I’m a hunter, and I’ve never had much of a problem killing animals, but there is a big difference between shooting something with a high-powered rifle, and throwing rocks at a dog that’s chained up outside in the middle of winter. Personally, I dream of the day when I could own a cabin somewhere and have a couple freezers stocked with fresh kills.[/quote]
Throwing rocks that hurt = wrong
Blowing something’s head off causing death = okay
Hypocrisy FTW!!![/quote]
Welcome to the thought process of hunters. they find reasons to justify murder. “oh, we are controlling population” sure you are buddy. we don’t go to africa and thin out over crowded humans or china, now do we, but its ok to do that with animals?[/quote]
You live in Ma, correct?
What’s the status on the White Tail population there?
In Pa. they’re like rats. Big rats. Rats that decide to commit suicide by jumping in front of automobiles every day and I get to see them in the road as I go to work. Sometimes, they’re in pieces.
Have you ever seen what they can do to a car when they’re hit? How about the possibility of killing the driver?
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
Awwww fuck…hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnr… must resist…MUST RESIST!!!
[quote]imhungry wrote:
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
[/quote]
It IS the answer.
![]()
[quote]Stern wrote:
Awwww fuck…hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnr… must resist…MUST RESIST!!![/quote]
uses peer pressure
You HAVE to post, Stern. Otherwise, people will think you’re weird.
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Awwww fuck…hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnr… must resist…MUST RESIST!!![/quote]
uses peer pressure
You HAVE to post, Stern. Otherwise, people will think you’re weird.
[/quote]
nooooo lol you can’t make me!!!
looks away
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
[/quote]
It IS the answer.
:)[/quote]
I KNOW that and YOU know that… but…
[quote]Stern wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Awwww fuck…hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnr… must resist…MUST RESIST!!![/quote]
uses peer pressure
You HAVE to post, Stern. Otherwise, people will think you’re weird.
[/quote]
nooooo lol you can’t make me!!!
looks away
[/quote]
I’ll tell everyone not to like you, if you don’t!
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Awwww fuck…hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnr… must resist…MUST RESIST!!![/quote]
uses peer pressure
You HAVE to post, Stern. Otherwise, people will think you’re weird.
[/quote]
nooooo lol you can’t make me!!!
looks away
[/quote]
I’ll tell everyone not to like you, if you don’t!
[/quote]
Bah, IMPOSSIBLAY!!
But seriously, how can you debate with that? =/
In fact, I’m just gonna drop this here as I feel it’s somewhat relevant…(and you know how much I love my photoshop ^^)
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
[/quote]
It IS the answer.
:)[/quote]
I KNOW that and YOU know that… but…[/quote]
…you need a hunting partner? Ok, I’m down. Let’s go “thin the herd”
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
[/quote]
It IS the answer.
:)[/quote]
I KNOW that and YOU know that… but…[/quote]
…you need a hunting partner? Ok, I’m down. Let’s go “thin the herd”[/quote]
You going Vampire hunting?
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
[quote]inkaddict wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
If hunting isn’t the answer, then, what is?
[/quote]
It IS the answer.
:)[/quote]
I KNOW that and YOU know that… but…[/quote]
…you need a hunting partner? Ok, I’m down. Let’s go “thin the herd”[/quote]
Sure!
Hell, all you really need is a car with a steel bumper.
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Vicomte wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Ooh interesting debate.
For clarification Vicomte, and let’s just remove the cute doggy from the scenario for the moment and focus on the deer, are you suggesting that the following two hunters are fundamentally the same?
Hunter Bill who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before getting a clean kill whereupon, with pride, they return home; gut, skin and share their bounty across the dinner table with the rest of the family.
Hunter Dave who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before purposefully shooting a deer in the ass and then tracking it to the spot where it lies lamed. There they poke it with sharp sticks till it’s bleeding profusely and before it’s dead they hang it from a tree and watch as the life ebbs out of it’s twitching body. Proud, they return home empty handed and show pictures to their mates of their handiwork.
One of the above hunters is following a primal tradition that some would argue played a major role in the evolution of our species. The other is doing nothing of the sort.
It’s all about motive. The hunter who hunts for food, the sadist who goes out to cause suffering just for the sake of suffering and the merciful who puts down an animal who is surely suffering are all entirely different entities. I would say the differences here are hardly arbitrary.
[/quote]
I already ran this thing out in the other animal thread, so I’ll keep this brief.
We’re talking about torturing versus killing an animal, not torturing/killing versus killing.
Now, while their may be differences in the motives of the humans in question, to the deer, motive is completely irrelevant. The deer is having a fucked day no matter what.
Ignoring the motives (which, again, have absolutely no relevance to the deer), I’m saying killing is worse than torture that does not result in death, as they are both unnecessary in this modern day and age. Difference being hunting is considered socially acceptable, whereas torture is not. Either way, still fucking sucks for the deer.
Does that make sense? I really don’t have the energy.[/quote]
Hunting is socially acceptable cause of the mistaken belief that humans are superior to animals. its not socially acceptable to me and never will be. its murder, simple as that. [/quote]
Then I’m a serial killer. ![]()
…and your an idiot

[quote]gonepostal wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Vicomte wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Ooh interesting debate.
For clarification Vicomte, and let’s just remove the cute doggy from the scenario for the moment and focus on the deer, are you suggesting that the following two hunters are fundamentally the same?
Hunter Bill who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before getting a clean kill whereupon, with pride, they return home; gut, skin and share their bounty across the dinner table with the rest of the family.
Hunter Dave who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before purposefully shooting a deer in the ass and then tracking it to the spot where it lies lamed. There they poke it with sharp sticks till it’s bleeding profusely and before it’s dead they hang it from a tree and watch as the life ebbs out of it’s twitching body. Proud, they return home empty handed and show pictures to their mates of their handiwork.
One of the above hunters is following a primal tradition that some would argue played a major role in the evolution of our species. The other is doing nothing of the sort.
It’s all about motive. The hunter who hunts for food, the sadist who goes out to cause suffering just for the sake of suffering and the merciful who puts down an animal who is surely suffering are all entirely different entities. I would say the differences here are hardly arbitrary.
[/quote]
I already ran this thing out in the other animal thread, so I’ll keep this brief.
We’re talking about torturing versus killing an animal, not torturing/killing versus killing.
Now, while their may be differences in the motives of the humans in question, to the deer, motive is completely irrelevant. The deer is having a fucked day no matter what.
Ignoring the motives (which, again, have absolutely no relevance to the deer), I’m saying killing is worse than torture that does not result in death, as they are both unnecessary in this modern day and age. Difference being hunting is considered socially acceptable, whereas torture is not. Either way, still fucking sucks for the deer.
Does that make sense? I really don’t have the energy.[/quote]
Hunting is socially acceptable cause of the mistaken belief that humans are superior to animals. its not socially acceptable to me and never will be. its murder, simple as that. [/quote]
Then I’m a serial killer. ![]()
…and your an idiot
[/quote]
Amen to that!
Attached picture of new puppy (9 weeks old in pic) provided. Pure bred German Sheppard and so far he’s probably the most awesome thing I’ve ever seen. Taking him to some puppy socialization and basic training classes later. Can’t freaking wait
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Vicomte wrote:
[quote]Stern wrote:
Ooh interesting debate.
For clarification Vicomte, and let’s just remove the cute doggy from the scenario for the moment and focus on the deer, are you suggesting that the following two hunters are fundamentally the same?
Hunter Bill who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before getting a clean kill whereupon, with pride, they return home; gut, skin and share their bounty across the dinner table with the rest of the family.
Hunter Dave who goes out with his son and waits/stalks patiently before purposefully shooting a deer in the ass and then tracking it to the spot where it lies lamed. There they poke it with sharp sticks till it’s bleeding profusely and before it’s dead they hang it from a tree and watch as the life ebbs out of it’s twitching body. Proud, they return home empty handed and show pictures to their mates of their handiwork.
One of the above hunters is following a primal tradition that some would argue played a major role in the evolution of our species. The other is doing nothing of the sort.
It’s all about motive. The hunter who hunts for food, the sadist who goes out to cause suffering just for the sake of suffering and the merciful who puts down an animal who is surely suffering are all entirely different entities. I would say the differences here are hardly arbitrary.
[/quote]
I already ran this thing out in the other animal thread, so I’ll keep this brief.
We’re talking about torturing versus killing an animal, not torturing/killing versus killing.
Now, while their may be differences in the motives of the humans in question, to the deer, motive is completely irrelevant. The deer is having a fucked day no matter what.
Ignoring the motives (which, again, have absolutely no relevance to the deer), I’m saying killing is worse than torture that does not result in death, as they are both unnecessary in this modern day and age. Difference being hunting is considered socially acceptable, whereas torture is not. Either way, still fucking sucks for the deer.
Does that make sense? I really don’t have the energy.[/quote]
Hunting is socially acceptable cause of the mistaken belief that humans are superior to animals. its not socially acceptable to me and never will be. its murder, simple as that. [/quote]
do you eat meat?
[quote]Jereth127 wrote:
We recently got a German Sheppard puppy and have a very big Lab/Boxer mix. Ben(the Lab/boxer) is probably the gentlest and most affectionate dog you will ever meet. He’s never had any type of training but if you give him a treat he comes up and gently removes it from your hand. Real big wuss as well, he’s terrfied of the dark.
Attached picture of new puppy (9 weeks old in pic) provided. Pure bred German Sheppard and so far he’s probably the most awesome thing I’ve ever seen. Taking him to some puppy socialization and basic training classes later. Can’t freaking wait[/quote]
He is seriously cute ^^