And We Were All Overreacting Over BLM?

You can add phrenology to that.

2 Likes

Where the message comes from matters. In this case a poster who has a well known history of making blatantly racist and antisemitic posts on here, and who is citing articles from a laughable website (see dcb’s post).

Bingo. There’s also the fact that John D. Rockefeller wasn’t Jewish which is why I asked him to expound on him.

I’ll take a piss on antisemitism when it pops up.

1 Like

Whether you agree with the website you referred to or not, is of little matter, especially as the discussion of the Nazi collaboration came from the second website, and not the one you refer too. You really are not as smart as you think you are.

Once again from the second website unrelated to the first

" This was exposed in 1942 by Sen. Harry Truman’s investigating committee, and President Roosevelt took hundreds of legal measures during the war to stop the Standard-I.G. Farben cartel from supplying the enemy war machine. In 1940-41, I.G. Farben built a gigantic factory at Auschwitz in Poland, to utilize the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal."

Apparently you think, the senate investigating committee, Harry Truman, and President Roosevelt
are not reliable enough to provide evidence of the Rockerfeller’s collaboration?

Z, I hope your are not saying that I have said Jewish people in general are behind every evil(or any particular evil for that matter). I have clearly stated from the beginning that I don’t.

You just don’t get it. I wasn’t saying you were wrong about the Rockefeller’s. I was pointing out that since they aren’t Jewish, they don’t really back up the anti-Semitic point you were making.

Yes, the Rockefeller’s, Henry Ford, Charles, Lindbergh and others did some pretty bad shit back in the day related to being anti-Semitic, eugenics etc.

Saying Jewish people at all is the problem.

Z, So your basically saying any discussion of powerful, and influential Jewish identifying elite, in an historical context is anti semetic? That differentiating between them and the average everyday person of Jewish descent or faith does not matter, it automatically is an attack on Jews as a whole?

If so I think you are the one being anti semetic.

Jews are not a monolithic block of people, any more than Christians, Muslims, or any other religion for that matter.

If I criticise mainland Chinese govt, individual leaders or policies do you think I am criticising all people of Chinese ethnicity? I bet you don’t, so stop being intellectual lazy and inconsistent.

I should have written more clearly, that i was not keeping up with the current conversation. Rather than not agreeing or not understanding your clarifying statement re Eugenics.

@Californiagrown
Got it. I was just making a general statement, unrelated to specific topic/poster.

Maybe l will go back and read upthread.

Speaking of anti-Semitism, Arnold compares the riot at the Capital with Kristallnacht in new video:

Arnold put his money on the line and had a positive impact on the election in Georgia:

1 Like

Unreal, I am well aware you are Jewish. If you haven’t realised already over the years I have a lot of respect for your input, I think you are a good person.

I appreciate your response is amusing, humorous and sarcastic. But what is your point if any beyond that?

Wait, are you trying to say that the proper way to influence policy and our democratic government is through putting your time and money on the line?

Huh, there’s food for thought.

1 Like

Maybe you should have been more clear about that at the time of phrasing your questions. I can’t read your mind.

More like ā€œMuh time.ā€ As in it’s wasted with you. A lot of times I’ve debated these with others and with you.

If it makes you feel better just say George Soros told me to do it.

Your a bit of a dick then, because you took the time to answer me.

Like the saying goes, facts don’t care about feelings, they are irrelevant.

Online I can be I suppose. But I’m not bigoted online or off. Like I said you responded to something I didn’t even post to you. It’s really not that big a deal is it?

I don’t mind facts I’ve corrected yours many times. I’m sure I’ll feel like debating the horrors of minorities and immigrants again with you sometime. Hang tight and fight with others until then ok?

No you haven’t, you’ve just disagreed with me using opinions, not facts.

You have a pretty poor memory of earlier debates then. Maybe that’s why you’re shocked I don’t want to bang my head against the wall again.

Besides I’m trying to figure out how to be part of the Arcturian council from your favorite website. Shit sounds cool.

2 Likes

That again is your opinion not a fact.

You’re better off not doing that.