[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Does anybody really believe that 50 years from now it will have made any meaningful difference whatsoever who we elected between now and then? They’re ALL lying loathsome power hungry political whores who will sell their entire immediate family for an election. Every last one of em with a snowballs chance in hell of winning the office of town dog catcher by then. We are reaping what we’ve sown and if it weren’t so heartrendingly tragic it would be pure entertainment.[/quote]
But what about Hope and Change ?
I was told that this president would be different.
I was told that opposing this president was solely based on racism, and that he could never lie to the people.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Shots fired at LAX Airport Terminal 3, shooter had a rifle. Several people hurt and some fatalities. Looks like those gun laws are working just fine. [/quote]
Looks like the same old thing. Another shooting in a “gun free” zone.[/quote]
He got passed security and into the terminal Push. How does a man in camouflage with a rifle get passed the TSA ?
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Shots fired at LAX Airport Terminal 3, shooter had a rifle. Several people hurt and some fatalities. Looks like those gun laws are working just fine. [/quote]
Looks like the same old thing. Another shooting in a “gun free” zone.[/quote]
He got passed security and into the terminal Push. How does a man in camouflage with a rifle get passed the TSA ?[/quote]
You mean these fat and lazy security guards? They are not police.
Through the stroke of a pen, President Obama on Friday used his executive powers to elevate and take control of climate change policies in an attempt to streamline sustainability initiatives ? and potentially skirt legislative oversight and push a federal agenda on states.
And almost all Democrats appointed. 21 of 24 on the Board.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]
I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]
The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]
Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]
He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]
Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]
I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]
The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]
Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]
He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]
Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…
Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]
I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]
The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]
Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]
He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]
Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…
This was the information available at the time, sorta like when people voted thinking they could keep their insurance.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]
I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]
The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]
Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]
He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]
Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…
Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.
Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.
… who died and made you king? ever count up how many people you vilify on this T-Nation forum?
by the way anytime you think you could stand up in person physically or in online debate to this old, scared, piss-ant then you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.
P.S.
I fight plenty for the ones I believe in but you wouldn’t understand since I truly believe you follow a phony to the core political philosophy:
“When asked why Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only sitting African-American U.S. Senator, was not invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the civil rights movement’s march on Washington D.C. , one guest displayed a measure of disdain for the Senator.”
Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.
… who died and made you king? ever count up how many people you vilify on this T-Nation forum?
by the way anytime you think you could stand up in person physically or in online debate to this old, scared, piss-ant then you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.
P.S.
I fight plenty for the ones I believe in but you wouldn’t understand since I truly believe you follow a phony to the core political philosophy:
“When asked why Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only sitting African-American U.S. Senator, was not invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the civil rights movement’s march on Washington D.C. , one guest displayed a measure of disdain for the Senator.”
[/quote]
I don’t vilify anything other than stupidity. If you’re stupid I call you out on it. You get called out a lot. Don’t blame it on me, you get called out by the forum quite often.
And for the last goddamn time why do you make physical threats on an internet forum? You do this over and over to people. Exactly who’s ass are you planning on kicking old man? And how are you planning on setting this up grandpa?
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]
I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]
The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]
Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]
He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]
Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…
Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.
I don’t know in what world you live in, to think you can talk to me like I have no nuts.
You must have hit your head on something bruh.[/quote]
I have nothing against you Max, but you do have a history of being a little off on some of these things. Especially when you’re not linking to sources and just going off hearsay.