And In Other News

VTBalla34 · November 2, 2013, 4:30pm

[quote]H factor wrote:

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

LOL I was reading something else dumb he wrote the other day and was reminded of that thread. I couldn’t remember at the time though what thread it was in. Great bump!

zecarlo · November 2, 2013, 4:37pm

[quote]H factor wrote:
And for the last goddamn time why do you make physical threats on an internet forum? You do this over and over to people. Exactly who’s ass are you planning on kicking old man? And how are you planning on setting this up grandpa? [/quote]

Again, the Overfiend (his other internet alter ego), did the same thing. Whenever he was given the opportunity to actually make good on his threats he never did. I’m still waiting for CDog to follow through with his lawsuit against me.

conservativedog · November 2, 2013, 8:55pm

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

… who died and made you king? ever count up how many people you vilify on this T-Nation forum?

by the way anytime you think you could stand up in person physically or in online debate to this old, scared, piss-ant then you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.

P.S.

I fight plenty for the ones I believe in but you wouldn’t understand since I truly believe you follow a phony to the core political philosophy:

“When asked why Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only sitting African-American U.S. Senator, was not invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the civil rights movement’s march on Washington D.C. , one guest displayed a measure of disdain for the Senator.”

[/quote]

I don’t vilify anything other than stupidity. If you’re stupid I call you out on it. You get called out a lot. Don’t blame it on me, you get called out by the forum quite often.

And for the last goddamn time why do you make physical threats on an internet forum? You do this over and over to people. Exactly who’s ass are you planning on kicking old man? And how are you planning on setting this up grandpa? [/quote]

it’s apparent you’ve got me all figured out. lol

count the number of times i’ve been called out, lol. you and zecarlo take a couple of days to tally your rebuttals and that adds up to about six or seven between you. lol

P.S.

here’s a pointer: (and the reason one would tend to disqualify your rebuttal identical to your turd worshiping brother zecarlo) : reply point by point, rather than blanket name calling to what i actually post. that’s how us granpa’s who have been lifting for decades did it in the old days. our difference lies in my posts consist of “whole foods” while yours is all “supplemental.” it is a big difference in online forums as well as in real life diet.

H_factor · November 2, 2013, 9:40pm

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

… who died and made you king? ever count up how many people you vilify on this T-Nation forum?

by the way anytime you think you could stand up in person physically or in online debate to this old, scared, piss-ant then you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.

P.S.

I fight plenty for the ones I believe in but you wouldn’t understand since I truly believe you follow a phony to the core political philosophy:

“When asked why Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), the only sitting African-American U.S. Senator, was not invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the civil rights movement’s march on Washington D.C. , one guest displayed a measure of disdain for the Senator.”

[/quote]

I don’t vilify anything other than stupidity. If you’re stupid I call you out on it. You get called out a lot. Don’t blame it on me, you get called out by the forum quite often.

And for the last goddamn time why do you make physical threats on an internet forum? You do this over and over to people. Exactly who’s ass are you planning on kicking old man? And how are you planning on setting this up grandpa? [/quote]

it’s apparent you’ve got me all figured out. lol

count the number of times i’ve been called out, lol. you and zecarlo take a couple of days to tally your rebuttals and that adds up to about six or seven between you. lol

P.S.

here’s a pointer: (and the reason one would tend to disqualify your rebuttal identical to your turd worshiping brother zecarlo) : reply point by point, rather than blanket name calling to what i actually post. that’s how us granpa’s who have been lifting for decades did it in the old days. our difference lies in my posts consist of “whole foods” while yours is all “supplemental.” it is a big difference in online forums as well as in real life diet.
[/quote]

I’m not going to count the number of times you’ve been called out recently, but how about I do this:

Aragorn: "When was the last time you started a thread–or made a contribution to a thread–that wasn’t based on race?

This is tiring, old schtick."

countingbeans: "This.

Your points (if there are any) are lost due to this BS."

Blue collar: X3

Jlabs: “As soon as I read the title I knew it was a conservativedog race thread, I just knew it. Who fucking cares.”

Orion: "You know, no matter how racist or James Bondian you might be, you know that I will shit on you sideways if you post something idiotic, right?

So, if you are so inclined to post something in that general area, it would not hurt to put a bit of thought into it.

Just saying."

So none of those people are me or z, and that was the FIRST PAGE of one of your recent posts. I didn’t feel the need to count the others. I don’t feel the need to come up with some moronic lifting correlation to prove it’s not just me, I’ll just post other people’s words from your “works.” You aren’t called out by “liberals” or the PC police or anything like that on this forum, you’re essentially called out by everyone because you’re as predictable as it comes. And yet you still drop your little racist sprinkles around even in threads where NO ONE is discussing race. You’ll drop by to say wait a second, why aren’t we pissed off at black people?

Troll on my man, troll on.

conservativedog · November 2, 2013, 10:23pm

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

Again, the Overfiend (his other internet alter ego), did the same thing. Whenever he was given the opportunity to actually make good on his threats he never did. I’m still waiting for CDog to follow through with his lawsuit against me. [/quote]

…more rachel maddow tactics (continues a lie enough times so those just tuning in take it as truth)

nowhere in my posts do i threaten to follow through with a lawsuit. i believe i stated that if you continued to accuse me of saying things i never said that at some forward point it could be financially rewarding. reread the post you dolt and then quote me correctly. what a simple requirement.

[quote]H factor wrote:
And for the last goddamn time why do you make physical threats on an internet forum? You do this over and over to people. Exactly who’s ass are you planning on kicking old man? And how are you planning on setting this up grandpa? [/quote]

dear H factless no one made any physical threats. when your hate juices commence to flowing you are unable to understand what you read. in another post you referred to me as an old, scared, piss-ant grandpa. then i replied.

HOW DO YOU MISCONSTRUE MY REPLY? it is below for all to reread.

i replied: “anytime you think you could stand up in person physically or in online debate to this old, scared, piss-ant then you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.”

I"LL REPEAT IT BECAUSE YOU ARE A CRETIN… “you should wake the fuck up from your somnolent dream and bow down with an apology.” is that the physical threat you misread?

in a sport that is not measured in weeks and months but years and decades i’ll put my “old” abilities to most challenges.

FOR A FINAL TIME:

DEAR two or three of you blockheads who are truly the biggest dolts i have ever encountered,

no one here is being racist and if every post doesn’t meet your high level of esteem than perhaps you should learn to be “tolerant” with those who think different than you.

if any one of you want to pick through my posts and find me making a serious racist argument, have at it. post your definition of racist then do your best to identify my posts that meet the serious accusation of being a racist.

also…when you were eleven did you by chance have owls deliver a huge amount of letters, but your evil aunt and uncle you lived with wouldn’t let you have them… and then on your birthday a giant knocked on your door and told you to fight against perceived racism on an online forum full of men that inject steroids on a weekly basis and lift huge amounts of weight into their 50’s and beyond?

conservativedog · November 3, 2013, 1:33am

[quote]H factless wrote:
I’m not going to count the number of times you’ve been called out recently, but how about I do this:

Aragorn: "When was the last time you started a thread–or made a contribution to a thread–that wasn’t based on race?

This is tiring, old schtick."

countingbeans: "This.

Your points (if there are any) are lost due to this BS."

Blue collar: X3

Jlabs: “As soon as I read the title I knew it was a conservativedog race thread, I just knew it. Who fucking cares.”

Orion: "You know, no matter how racist or James Bondian you might be, you know that I will shit on you sideways if you post something idiotic, right?

So, if you are so inclined to post something in that general area, it would not hurt to put a bit of thought into it.

Just saying."

So none of those people are me or z, and that was the FIRST PAGE of one of your recent posts. I didn’t feel the need to count the others. I don’t feel the need to come up with some moronic lifting correlation to prove it’s not just me, I’ll just post other people’s words from your “works.” You aren’t called out by “liberals” or the PC police or anything like that on this forum, you’re essentially called out by everyone because you’re as predictable as it comes. And yet you still drop your little racist sprinkles around even in threads where NO ONE is discussing race. You’ll drop by to say wait a second, why aren’t we pissed off at black people?

Troll on my man, troll on. [/quote]

here’s a link to what you refer to, so there is no mistaking those quotes or in what context they were written: from a 9-28-13 post in which i asked “Why Isn’t This National News” then posted the local news story:

“…an African American man had more than 100 rounds of ammunition when he started shooting at people who were standing outside at a law firm and a shopping center. Faust, who is black, picked out his victims based on their race, according to indictments. The documents didn’t specify why Faust wanted to shoot white people”

[quote]H factless wrote:
I don’t feel the need to come up with some moronic lifting correlation to prove it’s not just me, I’ll just post other people’s words from your “works.” And yet you still drop your little racist sprinkles around even in threads where NO ONE is discussing race. You’ll drop by to say wait a second, why aren’t we pissed off at black people?

[/quote]

you don’t count any other posts because you are wishing to create the illusion that out of my 1150 posts on T-Nation i make it a weekly goal to agitate with race baiting. that is a bald faced lie and is no different then your reacharound buddy zecarlo’s hounding decoy posts.

my posts when race related ask the question why is the media unaccountable for sensationalizing the insignificant few in number stories of white on black crime 24/7 for as long as a year, but smothering and keeping on a local not national level the HUGE number of black on white crimes. google black on white crime if you doubt this.

someone commented to the effect “who gives a shit” or bumped arargorn negative post in “Why Isn’t This National News.” that does not equate into what you are trying to communicate.

my posts are not racist and i don’t care that you disagree with me. happy lifting.

P.S.

when you were eleven did you by chance have owls deliver a huge amount of letters, but your evil aunt and uncle you lived with wouldn’t let you have them… and then on your birthday a giant knocked on your door and told you to fight against perceived racism on an online forum full of men that inject steroids on a weekly basis and lift huge amounts of weight into their 50’s and beyond?

zecarlo · November 3, 2013, 2:27pm

Another Overfiend fact: The longer an Overfiend post is, the dumber it is.

Also, there is the inevitable backpedaling after he makes a threat.

H_factor · November 3, 2013, 5:08pm

Lol at providing a link for “context” of everyone calling you annoying. Now instead of looking at my post they can see the waste of space thread it came from. Why not bump your favorite black people thread? That’s another classic c-dog.

Does the hatred for black people get stronger with each injection? “Give me that needle…yeah, FUCK YOU PROFESSOR X! 50 years old, still injecting, still lifting, and still have time to ruin PWI! Old age ain’t slowing me down.” A true role model for today’s kids.

MaximusB · November 3, 2013, 5:27pm

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]

I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]

The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]

Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]

He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]

Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

I don’t know in what world you live in, to think you can talk to me like I have no nuts.

You must have hit your head on something bruh.[/quote]

I have nothing against you Max, but you do have a history of being a little off on some of these things. Especially when you’re not linking to sources and just going off hearsay. [/quote]

There is a big difference between saying “I have a long history of being full of absolute shit” and “being a little off.”

Keep in mind the shit you say as well.

MaximusB · November 3, 2013, 5:45pm

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

LOL I was reading something else dumb he wrote the other day and was reminded of that thread. I couldn’t remember at the time though what thread it was in. Great bump! [/quote]

Rather interesting you seem so interested in me Nathan.

You come off like a jealous ex-girlfriend.

If you want to discuss dumb things said, we can talk about Obama’s promise that you can keep your healthcare plan if you like it. For 4 fucking years we heard it, over and over, turns out that shit was a lie.

Maybe you should go help out your boy, rather than stalk me.

H_factor · November 3, 2013, 6:14pm

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]

I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]

The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]

Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]

He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]

Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

I don’t know in what world you live in, to think you can talk to me like I have no nuts.

You must have hit your head on something bruh.[/quote]

I have nothing against you Max, but you do have a history of being a little off on some of these things. Especially when you’re not linking to sources and just going off hearsay. [/quote]

There is a big difference between saying “I have a long history of being full of absolute shit” and “being a little off.”

Keep in mind the shit you say as well.[/quote]

I probably used too strong a language Max and I apologize. I just don’t know why you don’t provide sources most of the time. I mean a quick google search can link to articles that will provide at least a backing for what you’re saying.

Like the case of your accountant I mean that was EASILY verifiable as malarkey man. All SMH had to do was a google search and you could see your accountant didn’t know what the hell he was talking about.

And then saying well Obama was off as well isn’t really a good arguing method. It’s just an attempt to distract from you being off on something by saying “well the President was off as well, remember when he said 57 states?!”

MaximusB · November 4, 2013, 2:26am

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The shooter turns out to be a TSA employee.[/quote]

I am wondering if they ran criminal background checks on the TSA agents.
[/quote]

The media is reporting the shooter had strong anti-government literature on him, yet he worked for them. Weird.[/quote]

Lets go all tin foil hat right now. This is an Obama plant to get the discussion back on assault weapons, and off the Healthcare.gov website.
[/quote]

He managed to get a rifle into the terminal area, you ain’t hiding that thing in your shoe. [/quote]

Weird, the article I read does not mention that he as a TSA employee, nor was he “inside the terminal” (he was actually at the checkpoint)…Could Maxipad possibly be wrong about a matter of national news? That would truly be a first, and I for one would be shocked…

Maximus has a long history of being absolutely full of shit so best to take most of what he says as “fact” with a grain of salt. This example is always good for a chuckle. He may be right, but most of what he provides as evidence definitely needs to be verified as he has a tendency to “hear something” and then think it absolutely must be correct. Especially if it’s about California…he has a special tendency for being wrong about the state he lives in.

http://tnation.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/world_news_war/bill_maher_may_leave_california?id=5579798&pageNo=0[/quote]

I don’t know in what world you live in, to think you can talk to me like I have no nuts.

You must have hit your head on something bruh.[/quote]

I have nothing against you Max, but you do have a history of being a little off on some of these things. Especially when you’re not linking to sources and just going off hearsay. [/quote]

There is a big difference between saying “I have a long history of being full of absolute shit” and “being a little off.”

Keep in mind the shit you say as well.[/quote]

I probably used too strong a language Max and I apologize. I just don’t know why you don’t provide sources most of the time. I mean a quick google search can link to articles that will provide at least a backing for what you’re saying.

Like the case of your accountant I mean that was EASILY verifiable as malarkey man. All SMH had to do was a google search and you could see your accountant didn’t know what the hell he was talking about.

And then saying well Obama was off as well isn’t really a good arguing method. It’s just an attempt to distract from you being off on something by saying “well the President was off as well, remember when he said 57 states?!”

[/quote]

Most of the time I provide links to articles, I did not in the case of my conversation with my accountant because how the hell could I. If you accuse me of quoting hearsay, well maybe that’s the information given at the time. If later it turns out to be inaccurate, and you want to chew my ass for that, go ahead. My reference to Obama was exactly that, his statement was sure as fuck not accurate, it only took years to find out. In his case, it’s even worse, because he was willfully lying.

As far as the validity of my accountant’s comment, I’m sure he was going for shock value, but his premise was not from another universe.

"In 2010, nearly three of every four dollars of California’s revenue from personal income taxes came from the top 10 percent of its income earners, according to the state’s tax agency.

The top 1 percent of income earners provided 40.9 percent of the state’s revenue from personal income taxes in 2010, down from 48.1 percent before the recession of 2007-2009."

These numbers are now even more skewed because of Prop 30, so the rich are paying even more.

H_factor · November 4, 2013, 2:54am

The problem with the case of your accountant was it was crap, it was easily verifiable as crap, and you stood by it despite being shown it was crap. AND IT WASN’T that hard for you look him up on it especially when it sounded so astounding.

The problem was not with your accountant man, the issue was with you. People have a long history of being full of crap and saying stuff they’ve heard and parroting it as fact. In the age of the internet it’s easier than ever to prove these people wrong or when you hear something funny dig around to see if it makes sense. That’s literally all SMH did…he heard a fact that sounded like BS and quickly verified that it was.

Seriously your stock response to anything in this day and age with partisan politics should be “that’s shit.” Or at the very least that doesn’t tell the whole story. Both sides are going to be feeding the fish lines of party drivel so they can take it out and test drive it. 47%. You can keep your own insurance. You gotta look politicians (and people who spout the drivel) up on this and it’s super easy to do so.

VTBalla34 · November 4, 2013, 6:33am

Quick, somebody go find me an internet meme related to stalking someone in a public forum!!!

dmaddox · November 4, 2013, 9:12pm

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Quick, somebody go find me an internet meme related to stalking someone in a public forum!!![/quote]

How about this one?

MaximusB · November 4, 2013, 10:56pm

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Quick, somebody go find me an internet meme related to stalking someone in a public forum!!![/quote]

Sorry Nathan, but out of all the things I encounter during the day, the thought of your bald krusty head ranks up there with ironing my shoe laces.

MaximusB · November 4, 2013, 11:28pm

[quote]H factor wrote:
The problem with the case of your accountant was it was crap, it was easily verifiable as crap, and you stood by it despite being shown it was crap. AND IT WASN’T that hard for you look him up on it especially when it sounded so astounding.

The problem was not with your accountant man, the issue was with you. People have a long history of being full of crap and saying stuff they’ve heard and parroting it as fact. In the age of the internet it’s easier than ever to prove these people wrong or when you hear something funny dig around to see if it makes sense. That’s literally all SMH did…he heard a fact that sounded like BS and quickly verified that it was.

Seriously your stock response to anything in this day and age with partisan politics should be “that’s shit.” Or at the very least that doesn’t tell the whole story. Both sides are going to be feeding the fish lines of party drivel so they can take it out and test drive it. 47%. You can keep your own insurance. You gotta look politicians (and people who spout the drivel) up on this and it’s super easy to do so. [/quote]

Who said it was my job to prove my accountant wrong ? The guy is doing my taxes, why the fuck would I bother ? If SMH has a problem with the veracity of the statements made in our conversation, let him look it up.

Don’t tell me what I should or should not say with partisan politics. There is no one in these forums hearing that noise. If you don’t like what people say, don’t read it.

Other than the usual friendly verbal jab back and forth with people, I don’t tell people what to say or do, nor do I want to.

VTBalla34 · November 5, 2013, 12:03am

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Quick, somebody go find me an internet meme related to stalking someone in a public forum!!![/quote]

How about this one?[/quote]

You’ve made pretty good progress man, good job!

H_factor · November 5, 2013, 12:52am

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:
The problem with the case of your accountant was it was crap, it was easily verifiable as crap, and you stood by it despite being shown it was crap. AND IT WASN’T that hard for you look him up on it especially when it sounded so astounding.

The problem was not with your accountant man, the issue was with you. People have a long history of being full of crap and saying stuff they’ve heard and parroting it as fact. In the age of the internet it’s easier than ever to prove these people wrong or when you hear something funny dig around to see if it makes sense. That’s literally all SMH did…he heard a fact that sounded like BS and quickly verified that it was.

Seriously your stock response to anything in this day and age with partisan politics should be “that’s shit.” Or at the very least that doesn’t tell the whole story. Both sides are going to be feeding the fish lines of party drivel so they can take it out and test drive it. 47%. You can keep your own insurance. You gotta look politicians (and people who spout the drivel) up on this and it’s super easy to do so. [/quote]

Who said it was my job to prove my accountant wrong ? The guy is doing my taxes, why the fuck would I bother ? If SMH has a problem with the veracity of the statements made in our conversation, let him look it up.

Don’t tell me what I should or should not say with partisan politics. There is no one in these forums hearing that noise. If you don’t like what people say, don’t read it.

Other than the usual friendly verbal jab back and forth with people, I don’t tell people what to say or do, nor do I want to. [/quote]

Then we will have a hard time having meaningful discussion. It was not your job to prove your accountant wrong…but you trumpeted his words as fact. People will then call YOU out, not your accountant. Your the one posting on here, not him.

I won’t tell you what to say fine, but if you post bullshit and you get called out for bullshit don’t react negatively. You choose not to look things up and said it wasn’t your job and that’s fine if you want to take that stance…but when someone like SMH calls you out on it then be prepared for that.

You can’t sit here on the one hand and say it isn’t your job to look up facts you present, and then complain when people say you have a history of being wrong on a lot of things.

MaximusB · November 5, 2013, 4:19am