And why doesn’t this surprise me? Think they would ever delete websites of disgraced conservatives?
[quote]Bauber wrote:
And why doesn’t this surprise me? Think they would ever delete websites of disgraced conservatives? [/quote]
democrats, never…republicans, of course.
[quote]Bauber wrote:
And why doesn’t this surprise me? Think they would ever delete websites of disgraced conservatives? [/quote]
Things are getting good here, some people feel these 3 might flip and cooperate with the Feds, for some hope of a lighter sentence.
They got cocky with their super majority, which is now gone.
On the whole, the data showed that circumcised men were 11% less likely to develop prostate cancer. Men who were circumcised as infants were 14% less at risk than others. But for men circumcised over the age of 35, the risk dropped by no less than 45%.
The researchers point out that prostate cancer is rare among Jewish or Muslim men, the vast majority of whom are circumcised.
More surprising, however, were the findings related to the study’s 178 black men (78% of whom were of Haitian origin). The 30% of the black study participants who were circumcised were 60% less likely to have prostate cancer. The researchers noted that ethnic origin – along with age and family history – is a significant factor in determining an individual’s risk for prostate cancer, and that black men are generally more likely to develop the disease than those from other ethnic groups.
http://news.yahoo.com/adult-circumcision-could-potentially-halve-risk-prostate-cancer-095539356.html
BMW Blocks Hydrant, Boston Firefighters Go Right Through It
Woman throws shoe at Hillary Clinton at a speech in Las Vegas…
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/object-thrown-hillary-clinton-speech-23280934
This would be awkward except for the fact most Dems have no shame.
Take a look what’s inside Jay Carney’s kitchen.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Think Tank Employees Tend to Support Democrats
A U.S. News analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan organization that tracks money in politics, suggests that employees at all but the most conservative organizations gave far more financial support to Democrats than Republicans over the last four election cycles.
Wait, you’re telling me the most informed Americans are inclined to give monetary support to… Oh. [/quote]
Doers vs. “thinkers”.
[/quote]
Typical anti-intellectual rubbish from someone with an inferiority complex. There are plenty of doers employed at the think tanks in that list, unless you are disregarding former policy makers, diplomats, intelligence analysts and military officers, professions that many academics held before entering academia.
[/quote]
Typical elitist rubbish from someone with a superiority complex. The notion that certain people will be drawn to certain fields has as much validity as the implications your original post on the topic do. [/quote]
If you call me an elitist enough times does it make me one? You and Goebbels would get along in that regard. What does your last sentence entail in regards to our discussion? It doesn’t change the fact that cwill1973 has demonstrated zero knowledge of beltway think tanks or their employees.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
This would be awkward except for the fact most Dems have no shame.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/08/men-on-wendy-davis-texas-senate-staff-outearned-women/[/quote]
So Davis’s campaign employed more men, and they somehow had higher total earnings than their numerically inferior female counterparts? What a blow to gender equlity. Still the best candidate for Texas governor. Have you heard Rick Perry speak? Even a large body of Aggies think he’s an imbecile. I reside in the Austin metropolitan area though, so I admittedly must have contracted “liberalism”.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Think Tank Employees Tend to Support Democrats
A U.S. News analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan organization that tracks money in politics, suggests that employees at all but the most conservative organizations gave far more financial support to Democrats than Republicans over the last four election cycles.
Wait, you’re telling me the most informed Americans are inclined to give monetary support to… Oh. [/quote]
Doers vs. “thinkers”.
[/quote]
Typical anti-intellectual rubbish from someone with an inferiority complex. There are plenty of doers employed at the think tanks in that list, unless you are disregarding former policy makers, diplomats, intelligence analysts and military officers, professions that many academics held before entering academia.
[/quote]
Typical elitist rubbish from someone with a superiority complex. The notion that certain people will be drawn to certain fields has as much validity as the implications your original post on the topic do. [/quote]
If you call me an elitist enough times does it make me one? You and Goebbels would get along in that regard. What does your last sentence entail in regards to our discussion? It doesn’t change the fact that cwill1973 has demonstrated zero knowledge of beltway think tanks or their employees.[/quote]
That’s funny considering I’m a member of a national foreign relations committee and listen to speakers every month including Ambassadors, FSO’s, military leaders, among many others. In fact I will be listening to and asking questions of Pakistani Ambassador Husain Haqqani next month. I just happen to think the Neville Chamberlain’s of the world have been, and always will be, wrong.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
This would be awkward except for the fact most Dems have no shame.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/08/men-on-wendy-davis-texas-senate-staff-outearned-women/[/quote]
So Davis’s campaign employed more men, and they somehow had higher total earnings than their numerically inferior female counterparts? What a blow to gender equlity. Still the best candidate for Texas governor. Have you heard Rick Perry speak? Even a large body of Aggies think he’s an imbecile. I reside in the Austin metropolitan area though, so I admittedly must have contracted “liberalism”.[/quote]
Perhaps you missed the part where Davis paid her male chief of staff $2K more per month than his female counterpart. Actually, I’m sure you just glossed over that since it doesn’t jive with your faulty left wing ideology.
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
This would be awkward except for the fact most Dems have no shame.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/08/men-on-wendy-davis-texas-senate-staff-outearned-women/[/quote]
So Davis’s campaign employed more men, and they somehow had higher total earnings than their numerically inferior female counterparts? What a blow to gender equlity. Still the best candidate for Texas governor. Have you heard Rick Perry speak? Even a large body of Aggies think he’s an imbecile. I reside in the Austin metropolitan area though, so I admittedly must have contracted “liberalism”.[/quote]
You also seem to be somewhat ungrateful about your beloved Liberalism, it is the reason why Texas is doing much better with jobs and economy than other places, with Austin becoming the new Silicon Valley.
From the UCLA Anderson Report:
"From December 1993 through December 2013, Los Angeles failed to produce any new jobs. Thatâ??s â??any.â??
Zip. Nada. As in none.
In fact, we lost 3.1 percent of our jobs, ranking Los Angeles dead last in job growth among the top 32 largest metropolitan areas in the United States.
Worse than Cleveland.
Worse than Detroit.
Thatâ??s 23 consecutive years of failure. Would Lakers fans put up with a record like that?"
As far as Rick Perry, I have no issue with what he says compared to what he is doing. Most politicians are full of shit anyway, so a wise one is a silent one.
New figures by the Congressional Budget Office released on Monday reveal that over the next 10 years the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio will double to 78%.
Worst possible way to lose $1 million bucks.
4.2 billion in tax returns go to illegal immigrants.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
4.2 billion in tax returns go to illegal immigrants.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/tax-credits-for-illegal-immigrants/[/quote]
This is why we need to scrap the income tax as well as the IRS and move to the FairTax. That way we can collect taxes from illegals but because they are not legal residents they will not receive the prebate.