[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
The leading Republican candidate for the 2016 race being embroiled in a HUGE political retribution scandal probably doesn’t have any place on a forum for Politics…[/quote]
just lol.
Do you work for MSNBC now?
First off, “leading” is a strong assumption seeing as we are 2 years out. Second “huge political retribution”? lmao… A traffic jam is now HUGE political retribution, but IRS partisan targeting is “fiction”? Blaming dead American’s on a youtube video is apparently just normal operating procedure then? Escalated use of drones to execute American Citizens without due process, who gives a shit, TRAFFIC JAM. And lets forget about the whole Snowden thing… I mean, we have a TRAFFIC JAM to pander our partisan feathers about. [/quote]
Yes all polls I have read show him in the lead. relevant or not, it is a factual statement.
Perhaps you would have been less confused if i had said Huge Scandal that is rooted in Political Retribution? The traffic jam was not huge, the fact that it was used to punish a mayor IS a huge scandal, IMO.
it’s funny you’ve spent two posts talking about it now in the span of 3 minutes, but nah…it would be a short thread…
“I dont give a shit about this so much im just gonna keep talking about it”
–Counting Beans
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Yes all polls I have read show him in the lead. relevant or not, it is a factual statement.[/quote]
I said strong assumption. Read it slowly, it shouldn’t be a problem for you.
Okay, if a traffic jam, where nobody died, is a huge scandal in your world, fine. You should look into a career in national media.
[quote]it’s funny you’ve spent two posts talking about it now in the span of 3 minutes, but nah…it would be a short thread…
“I dont give a shit about this so much im just gonna keep talking about it”
–Counting Beans
LOL my god this forum is so fucking idiotic[/quote]
So… You ask if a topic has been discussed, get a response about it, and then toss dat ad hom…
For someone who thinks this “forum is fucking idiotic” you sure keep coming back, and just can’t help but have those strong ad homz as assertions/rebuttals.
It’s funny I only come back when weightlifting is not a huge factor in my life for whatever reason. Looks like I am in great company LOL
I like to come in here and blow off steam. The majority of this subforum make me wonder how they can manage to dress themselves and turn on a computer without drooling on it every day. It is a bit like going to the zoo
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
And maybe I’m missing it but is there really no thread for the Chris Christie bridge scandal? Please tell me I am just missing it LOL[/quote]
You can always start that thread and the one about Justin Biebers DUI since you think its important we discuss everything that headlines major news sites.[/quote]
The leading Republican candidate for the 2016
[/quote]
This is the process to become a leading candidate
Announce desire to run
Get nominated
Become candidate
Display more favorable polls than other candidates
But you’re probably right Beans, a governor who would be the next candidate to lead the free world if elections were happening today who ALLEGEDLY intentionally disrupted the lives of hundreds of thousands of people for a petty political payback has no place on a Politics forum. Great contribution to the thread.
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
And maybe I’m missing it but is there really no thread for the Chris Christie bridge scandal? Please tell me I am just missing it LOL[/quote]
You can always start that thread and the one about Justin Biebers DUI since you think its important we discuss everything that headlines major news sites.[/quote]
The leading Republican candidate for the 2016
[/quote]
This is the process to become a leading candidate
Announce desire to run
Get nominated
Become candidate
Display more favorable polls than other candidates
Wow, look at all this Political talk on a …gasp…POLITICS FORUM!!!
You’re right though, its just a leading headline on a major news organization. Nothing to do with politics at all. Such little consequence that you’ve actually posted twice about it now in a gasp POLITICS FORUM!!!
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
Great contribution to the thread.[/quote]
Coming from you,[/quote]
Umm yess…i am the one that said it, dumbass
[quote]
who literally can’t help but stampede through a thread [/quote]
does the word ‘literally’ mean what you think it does? So I am literally stampeding? Or do you mean ‘figuatively’? I literally figuratively think you talk out of your ass…not that I think you stand on your head and flap your butt cheeks or anything…
[quote]
You, quite literally troll a forum on the internet, and turn around and insult others…[/quote]
ah, so you DO know what it means.
[quote]
Priceless. [/quote]
Is that literally priceless, or figuratively priceless?
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…[/quote]
It must be mandatory furlough day in government land, glad you could enjoy that 3 day weekend.
And I suppose you still cling to the notion that the President finds out about all his scandals “just like the rest of you did, on TV”.
He is either the least plugged in president in history, or lying.
You also probably believe that Mr. Olympia contestants don’t do steroids because “you never saw them inject.”
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…[/quote]
It must be mandatory furlough day in government land, glad you could enjoy that 3 day weekend.
And I suppose you still cling to the notion that the President finds out about all his scandals “just like the rest of you did, on TV”.
He is either the least plugged in president in history, or lying.
You also probably believe that Mr. Olympia contestants don’t do steroids because “you never saw them inject.”
I’ll wait.[/quote]
Move those goal posts fatty…
You’ve now moved from “Didn’t Obama admit that he sicced the IRS on the political opponents” to well I’m sure he knew about it…oir maybe he’s lying…or blah blah blah blah blah
Who cares that they have already investigated this and were unable to show, at all, any link to the President…it’s what i THINK might have happened that’s important.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…[/quote]
It must be mandatory furlough day in government land, glad you could enjoy that 3 day weekend.
And I suppose you still cling to the notion that the President finds out about all his scandals “just like the rest of you did, on TV”.
He is either the least plugged in president in history, or lying.
You also probably believe that Mr. Olympia contestants don’t do steroids because “you never saw them inject.”
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…[/quote]
It must be mandatory furlough day in government land, glad you could enjoy that 3 day weekend.
And I suppose you still cling to the notion that the President finds out about all his scandals “just like the rest of you did, on TV”.
He is either the least plugged in president in history, or lying.
You also probably believe that Mr. Olympia contestants don’t do steroids because “you never saw them inject.”
I’ll wait.[/quote]
Move those goal posts fatty…
moron
[/quote]
Oh the delicious irony.[/quote]
hahahahaahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaha
Just remember “Obama sicced the IRS on his political enemies” and you believed it despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
Meh. That pales in comparison to Obama siccing the IRS on his political enemies.[/quote]
yeah I always preferred the fiction section of the bookstore too…[/quote]
Huh?
Did they not admit to it?[/quote]
Read the initial post S-L-O-W-L-Y (which I’m sure won’t be a problem for you). Now, please show me evidence that “Obama sicced the IRS on political enemies”. Keep in mind that it needs to be shown that Obama is siccing, not that the IRS did such and such. I’ll wait…[/quote]
It must be mandatory furlough day in government land, glad you could enjoy that 3 day weekend.
And I suppose you still cling to the notion that the President finds out about all his scandals “just like the rest of you did, on TV”.
He is either the least plugged in president in history, or lying.
You also probably believe that Mr. Olympia contestants don’t do steroids because “you never saw them inject.”
I’ll wait.[/quote]
Move those goal posts fatty…
moron
[/quote]
Oh the delicious irony.[/quote]
hahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahahhaha
Just remember “Obama sicced the IRS on his political enemies” and you believed it despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Does Christie not have the same out that Obama used? “I did not have sexual relations with that Government agency/Bridge.”[/quote]
I don’t even have to read the article to answer the question in the headline…
Christie has a “R” next to his name, so the press actually does their job when covering a story, and in certain cases, goes over and above doing it.
Outside of Fox, who plays it fast and loose with too much partisan talking points, no one takes those with the letter “D” next to their name to task in the same manor.
It is just current culture, I’m sure it will swing eventually.
Does Christie not have the same out that Obama used? “I did not have sexual relations with that Government agency/Bridge.”[/quote]
I don’t even have to read the article to answer the question in the headline…
Christie has a “R” next to his name, so the press actually does their job when covering a story, and in certain cases, goes over and above doing it.
Outside of Fox, who plays it fast and loose with too much partisan talking points, no one takes those with the letter “D” next to their name to task in the same manor.
It is just current culture, I’m sure it will swing eventually. [/quote]
But you need to show me where Christie himself actually had sex with that bridge.
Go ahead, read it again slowly, I will wait.
In the meantime, I will go to the fiction section in the bookstore, and read religious books which allow me to grow a beard in the military because of my deeply held religious beliefs.
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
But you’re probably right Beans, a governor who would be the next candidate to lead the free world if elections were happening today who ALLEGEDLY intentionally disrupted the lives of hundreds of thousands of people for a petty political payback has no place on a Politics forum. Great contribution to the thread.
Idiot[/quote]
Conversely, one of the “leading” candidates for the democrats was involved in the Benghazi “scandal” where people died and it is largely ignored by the MSM. Or called a witch hunt…
Does Christie not have the same out that Obama used? “I did not have sexual relations with that Government agency/Bridge.”[/quote]
I don’t even have to read the article to answer the question in the headline…
Christie has a “R” next to his name, so the press actually does their job when covering a story, and in certain cases, goes over and above doing it.
Outside of Fox, who plays it fast and loose with too much partisan talking points, no one takes those with the letter “D” next to their name to task in the same manor.
It is just current culture, I’m sure it will swing eventually. [/quote]
[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
But you’re probably right Beans, a governor who would be the next candidate to lead the free world if elections were happening today who ALLEGEDLY intentionally disrupted the lives of hundreds of thousands of people for a petty political payback has no place on a Politics forum. Great contribution to the thread.
Idiot[/quote]
Conversely, one of the “leading” candidates for the democrats was involved in the Benghazi “scandal” where people died and it is largely ignored by the MSM. Or called a witch hunt… [/quote]
No no no.
Highway traffic MUST be worse than 4 Americans dying.