Alpha Male Fashion

Off Topic
421

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I was very careful not to say that I was especially intelligent. All I said was I feel confident that I’m above the average dingbat wandering the streets. I don’t feel any need to convince you of anything or tell you what I have done. I just read your post in the Non Douche Watch thread and so far all you’ve done is demonstrated the Dunning-Kruger effect. You need to learn your limitations.[/quote]

Oh my goodness. WOW.

Your mom, at IQ - was it 130? Is two standard deviations below you? Hold on, this is the internet, so we can find out quick-quick. . . Ah, here it is:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No, I don’t have some kind of Norman Bates thing going on. I think you’ve misunderstood my post. My mother was a smart woman but still around two standard deviations below me - ie, I had some level of respect for her achievements and intelligence but she wasn’t really anywhere near as smart as some of the smartest men I’ve known.[/quote]

And also this of course:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Was not a mommy’s boy. I’ve been working since I was 15. As soon as I finished school I went overseas and moved out when I came back. I moved back in for a couple of months a few years ago to take care of her in the final stages of her cancer. As I said, you guys are drawing an odd conclusion from what I said about her intelligence. I inherited whatever extra grey matter I have from her side of the family. That was part of my point.

Outside my family I haven’t come across too many very smart women. Even the high achievers like my neighbour who scored 99 on her HSC and is now an in house lawyer for a major corporation is thick as shit when it comes to stuff like lateral thinking, original thought, imagination and wisdom. She’s basically successful because she worked her arse off but it’s just rote learning. At a guess I’d say her IQ is maybe 115 or so. Met a couple of clever ladies at university but they were extremely plain and socially awkward and so on.[/quote]

And then of course this from the first page:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
4. Now this one will make me sound like a narcissist but it’s true: I am superior to most other men. I consider myself kind of a self made aristocrat. I’m smarter than other guys; more mentally tough; have more balls etc. I have better taste; more knowledge etc. I naturally dress better because basically I am better. Okay, yes and I’m a narcissist. But if you don’t like yourself and believe yourself to be superior then other people(especially women) will not see you as a high value man.
[/quote]

This Dunning-Kruger effect - are you sure you understand what it means? Because frankly I’d put my money on Powerpuff.

422

Adding a pic to my avatar in order to ask why a man-among-men like yourself doesn’t have any photos up. I’m curious about that. Many of the men here post pics though they are in beginning stages or have been injured and lost ground. But not you! Por que no?

423

SexMachine should make a “How to Alpha on forums” video. I’m sure it would be similar to this:

424

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
Adding a pic to my avatar in order to ask why a man-among-men like yourself doesn’t have any photos up. I’m curious about that. Many of the men here post pics though they are in beginning stages or have been injured and lost ground. But not you! Por que no?[/quote]

You added a picture of yourself because of what I said? You must be very insecure. But I can’t really see you properly babe. Take one in your swimsuit. Bright lights. Don’t be shy now.

425

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I was very careful not to say that I was especially intelligent. All I said was I feel confident that I’m above the average dingbat wandering the streets. I don’t feel any need to convince you of anything or tell you what I have done. I just read your post in the Non Douche Watch thread and so far all you’ve done is demonstrated the Dunning-Kruger effect. You need to learn your limitations.[/quote]

Oh my goodness. WOW.

Your mom, at IQ - was it 130? Is two standard deviations below you? Hold on, this is the internet, so we can find out quick-quick. . . Ah, here it is:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No, I don’t have some kind of Norman Bates thing going on. I think you’ve misunderstood my post. My mother was a smart woman but still around two standard deviations below me - ie, I had some level of respect for her achievements and intelligence but she wasn’t really anywhere near as smart as some of the smartest men I’ve known.[/quote]

And also this of course:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Was not a mommy’s boy. I’ve been working since I was 15. As soon as I finished school I went overseas and moved out when I came back. I moved back in for a couple of months a few years ago to take care of her in the final stages of her cancer. As I said, you guys are drawing an odd conclusion from what I said about her intelligence. I inherited whatever extra grey matter I have from her side of the family. That was part of my point.

Outside my family I haven’t come across too many very smart women. Even the high achievers like my neighbour who scored 99 on her HSC and is now an in house lawyer for a major corporation is thick as shit when it comes to stuff like lateral thinking, original thought, imagination and wisdom. She’s basically successful because she worked her arse off but it’s just rote learning. At a guess I’d say her IQ is maybe 115 or so. Met a couple of clever ladies at university but they were extremely plain and socially awkward and so on.[/quote]

And then of course this from the first page:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
4. Now this one will make me sound like a narcissist but it’s true: I am superior to most other men. I consider myself kind of a self made aristocrat. I’m smarter than other guys; more mentally tough; have more balls etc. I have better taste; more knowledge etc. I naturally dress better because basically I am better. Okay, yes and I’m a narcissist. But if you don’t like yourself and believe yourself to be superior then other people(especially women) will not see you as a high value man.
[/quote]

This Dunning-Kruger effect - are you sure you understand what it means? Because frankly I’d put my money on Powerpuff. [/quote]

I didn’t volunteer that information. I stated it by way of explanation as someone misinterpreted my comment to mean sonething weird like an Oedipus complex or something. Hey, why don’t you run along now and find someone else to bother okay?

426

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
Adding a pic to my avatar in order to ask why a man-among-men like yourself doesn’t have any photos up. I’m curious about that. Many of the men here post pics though they are in beginning stages or have been injured and lost ground. But not you! Por que no?[/quote]

You added a picture of yourself because of what I said? You must be very insecure. But I can’t really see you properly babe. Take one in your swimsuit. Bright lights. Don’t be shy now.[/quote]

No, she is calling you out and you are deflecting. It’s hard being an Alpha Male hunh?

427

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I was very careful not to say that I was especially intelligent. All I said was I feel confident that I’m above the average dingbat wandering the streets. I don’t feel any need to convince you of anything or tell you what I have done. I just read your post in the Non Douche Watch thread and so far all you’ve done is demonstrated the Dunning-Kruger effect. You need to learn your limitations.[/quote]

Oh my goodness. WOW.

Your mom, at IQ - was it 130? Is two standard deviations below you? Hold on, this is the internet, so we can find out quick-quick. . . Ah, here it is:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No, I don’t have some kind of Norman Bates thing going on. I think you’ve misunderstood my post. My mother was a smart woman but still around two standard deviations below me - ie, I had some level of respect for her achievements and intelligence but she wasn’t really anywhere near as smart as some of the smartest men I’ve known.[/quote]

And also this of course:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Was not a mommy’s boy. I’ve been working since I was 15. As soon as I finished school I went overseas and moved out when I came back. I moved back in for a couple of months a few years ago to take care of her in the final stages of her cancer. As I said, you guys are drawing an odd conclusion from what I said about her intelligence. I inherited whatever extra grey matter I have from her side of the family. That was part of my point.

Outside my family I haven’t come across too many very smart women. Even the high achievers like my neighbour who scored 99 on her HSC and is now an in house lawyer for a major corporation is thick as shit when it comes to stuff like lateral thinking, original thought, imagination and wisdom. She’s basically successful because she worked her arse off but it’s just rote learning. At a guess I’d say her IQ is maybe 115 or so. Met a couple of clever ladies at university but they were extremely plain and socially awkward and so on.[/quote]

And then of course this from the first page:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
4. Now this one will make me sound like a narcissist but it’s true: I am superior to most other men. I consider myself kind of a self made aristocrat. I’m smarter than other guys; more mentally tough; have more balls etc. I have better taste; more knowledge etc. I naturally dress better because basically I am better. Okay, yes and I’m a narcissist. But if you don’t like yourself and believe yourself to be superior then other people(especially women) will not see you as a high value man.
[/quote]

This Dunning-Kruger effect - are you sure you understand what it means? Because frankly I’d put my money on Powerpuff. [/quote]

I didn’t volunteer that information. I stated it by way of explanation as someone misinterpreted my comment to mean sonething weird like an Oedipus complex or something. Hey, why don’t you run along now and find someone else to bother okay?
[/quote]

I realized that I forgot this gem:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
When I was young and stupid I thought I’d find a woman I actually wanted to marry and live with at university. But when I met all these “smart” women I realised that they’re unicorns. The smartest woman I’ve known was my mother. Her IQ was around 140. My maternal grandmother’s IQ was around 160 apparently. You just do not find a stable, sexually attractive woman with high intelligence. They just do not exist. But now I’ve come to thank my lucky stars because it makes it so much easier to get their panties off.[/quote]

YOU are a lovely human being altogether, are you not?

Say, can we see that Rolex up against the TNation screen? Here is mine - it’s an Oyster Perpetual. I don’t wear it much because I find it overly showy and that’s not the image I want to project, but there it is.

Yours?

428

[quote]Captnoblivious wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
Adding a pic to my avatar in order to ask why a man-among-men like yourself doesn’t have any photos up. I’m curious about that. Many of the men here post pics though they are in beginning stages or have been injured and lost ground. But not you! Por que no?[/quote]

You added a picture of yourself because of what I said? You must be very insecure. But I can’t really see you properly babe. Take one in your swimsuit. Bright lights. Don’t be shy now.[/quote]

No, she is calling you out and you are deflecting. It’s hard being an Alpha Male hunh?
[/quote]

Calling me out for what? I have already said I’m not a bber or a strength athlete. So there’s nothing to call out. But if Emily wants to play strip tease with me she’ll have to post more than a blurry silhouette in a tutu and fedora. I mean I’m flattered that she went to all the trouble just for me but I just can’t see anything in that photo. She needs to post a proper photo before I can decide if I want to play with her.

429

2448×3264 805 KB

Emily, I’m very impressed with your watch and the lovely photo of yourself you took just for me but I’m just not interested okay? I don’t really understand this call out game either. You call someone out for not having the body of a bodybuilder when they clearly said they do not have the body of a bodybuilder. You post a blurry picture of yourself then a picture of your watch and call me out for not really owning the watch I’ve already posted myself wearing. Well, it’s been fun but I think I’d like to, you know…stop replying to you now.

430

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, I’m very impressed with your watch and the lovely photo of yourself you took just for me but I’m just not interested okay? I don’t really understand this call out game either. You call someone out for not having the body of a bodybuilder when they clearly said they do not have the body of a bodybuilder. You post a blurry picture of yourself then a picture of your watch and call me out for not really owning the watch I’ve already posted myself wearing. Well, it’s been fun but I think I’d like to, you know…stop replying to you now. [/quote]

Well, color me surprised - I thought you were a liar through and through. My apologies, and no worries about your lack of interest, my heart will mend in time.

As for the photos, while you have said that you don’t BB, your claims that you can walk into a bar, gain the attention of the highest value woman present, earn her copulatory gaze (lol) and so on, suggests that you cut a fine figure nonetheless. One eventually wonders why the secrecy. The photo of me is one of several I’ve posted in the past, some close enough and clear enough to show my incredible shin development or lagging armpits. But blurry is fine for a pic simply meant to show that I am not a fabrication.

431

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, I’m very impressed with your watch and the lovely photo of yourself you took just for me but I’m just not interested okay? I don’t really understand this call out game either. You call someone out for not having the body of a bodybuilder when they clearly said they do not have the body of a bodybuilder. You post a blurry picture of yourself then a picture of your watch and call me out for not really owning the watch I’ve already posted myself wearing. Well, it’s been fun but I think I’d like to, you know…stop replying to you now. [/quote]

Although looking back, that’s not the watch you’ve already posted yourself wearing. That one had a blue face.

432

Emily, do I really have to explain women to you? Confident women who aren’t insecure like you do that to heaps of guys. Because they like being hit on; because they want to test him etc. It doesn’t mean a whole lot and happens to lots of guys. And having the biggest muscle dysmorphia case has little to do with it. In fact guys like that are often insecure themselves. Their body language, tone of voice, posture, behaviour etc is like a big red sign saying Loser. Some of the guys I know who are most successful with women are skinny little runts.

433

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, I’m very impressed with your watch and the lovely photo of yourself you took just for me but I’m just not interested okay? I don’t really understand this call out game either. You call someone out for not having the body of a bodybuilder when they clearly said they do not have the body of a bodybuilder. You post a blurry picture of yourself then a picture of your watch and call me out for not really owning the watch I’ve already posted myself wearing. Well, it’s been fun but I think I’d like to, you know…stop replying to you now. [/quote]

Although looking back, that’s not the watch you’ve already posted yourself wearing. That one had a blue face. [/quote]

No it was red.

434

SexMachine is in his glory with this thread. All that attention! Ooooh, the goosebumps!

435

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, do I really have to explain women to you? Confident women who aren’t insecure like you do that to heaps of guys. Because they like being hit on; because they want to test him etc. It doesn’t mean a whole lot and happens to lots of guys. And having the biggest muscle dysmorphia case has little to do with it. In fact guys like that are often insecure themselves. Their body language, tone of voice, posture, behaviour etc is like a big red sign saying Loser. Some of the guys I know who are most successful with women are skinny little runts.[/quote]

Would you consider yourself successful SM? :slight_smile:

436

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]CLUNK wrote:

Not necessarily so. The combat boot is made for long treks.

[/quote]

Combat boots are designed for harsh terrains and climates. You need them for protection and the downside is when you have to march long distances your feet get covered in blisters.

[/quote]

Huh? You can get blisters walking a long distance in a pair of Nike’s… I’ve marched 15+ miles in combat boots with zero issue. [/quote]

Okay, try marching fifteen miles in riding boots and get back to me. They’re not the same. And Nikes are going to be way gentler on your feet than combat boots. My point stands.
[/quote]

Ah, no. You are wrong about combat boots.

437

[quote]wiggyadam wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, do I really have to explain women to you? Confident women who aren’t insecure like you do that to heaps of guys. Because they like being hit on; because they want to test him etc. It doesn’t mean a whole lot and happens to lots of guys. And having the biggest muscle dysmorphia case has little to do with it. In fact guys like that are often insecure themselves. Their body language, tone of voice, posture, behaviour etc is like a big red sign saying Loser. Some of the guys I know who are most successful with women are skinny little runts.[/quote]

Would you consider yourself successful SM? :)[/quote]

No. And I also have difficulty maintaining longterm interest because I’m not an Alpha Male as I keep saying. I just understand social dynamics and psychology a lot better than I did when I was younger. Do you consider yourself successful? Do not evade the question.

438

Theory: SM works at Zales.

439

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]wiggyadam wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Emily, do I really have to explain women to you? Confident women who aren’t insecure like you do that to heaps of guys. Because they like being hit on; because they want to test him etc. It doesn’t mean a whole lot and happens to lots of guys. And having the biggest muscle dysmorphia case has little to do with it. In fact guys like that are often insecure themselves. Their body language, tone of voice, posture, behaviour etc is like a big red sign saying Loser. Some of the guys I know who are most successful with women are skinny little runts.[/quote]

Would you consider yourself successful SM? :)[/quote]

No. And I also have difficulty maintaining longterm interest because I’m not an Alpha Male as I keep saying. I just understand social dynamics and psychology a lot better than I did when I was younger. Do you consider yourself successful? Do not evade the question.
[/quote]

Success is an illusion, much like the character you portray on this website.

440

Nice dodge. Now I’ll explain why I’m not successful but I think it will be way over the heads of most of you. Up until recently I was pretty much like everyone else. But I’ve had a profound awakening and see things and approach things and want things completely differently now.

I didn’t really analyse this stuff till recently but everyone knows some of it instinctively. In every relationship there’s a power disparity with one person juggling to stay in the game and keep their partner interested. It’s pretty much always the guy in the beginning and then either he slips into the subordinate position and then gets dumped. If the woman stays in the subordinate position the guy loses interest and dumps her. Or if he’s a scumbag and a loser he loses respect for her and starts abusing her. I’m not a creep. Not that kind anyway.

In all of my relationships, same as everyone else, I followed this pattern. The girls who dumped me were the ones I really liked or thought I did at the time and the ones I didn’t like I dumped. Now the normal emotional response that everyone goes through is to be hurt and believe that I wasn’t “high value” enough for the few girls I would’ve liked to stay with at the time. Part of my awakening was to realise that it has nothing to do with my value or theirs and that I can manipulate the situation in order to remain dominant. Then I also realised that when this happens;

A. I no longer like her

And

B. I no longer feel that I’m not “valuable” enough. For anyone.

This resulted in quite a significant change in my whole outlook. I no longer know what if anything I want. Sex alone doesn’t satisfy me. I can’t form any kind of emotional intimacy with anyone. And I very may actually totally lose interest. I still have sexual needs like anyone else but I approach things very cynically. When I’m “interested” in a woman now it’s because there’s something intriguing about her character and I feel more like a curious scientist rather than a lover.

So am I good at “game”? Pick up artists are losers. There’s nothing satisfying or cool about getting laid lots of times. I don’t believe fairy tale rubbish about perfect marriages. I don’t even like a woman who doesn’t leave first thing in the morning. And if she leaves a smell in the bathroom or anything else earthy, gross and real I no longer desire her. So being good at game? I suppose so. But I’m certainly not what they think I am not what they think is “high value” and if they knew what I was thinking they’do be totally creeped out. Of course this mindset also gives you a huge confidence boast in that you really don’t care. Take it or leave it. And that goes with every woman on the planet.

So no, I’m not “successful” in any sense you mean. Am I a creep? Probably. But I harbour no malice or bad intentions. I guess at the end of the day I’m still interested in the same thing as everyone else; emotional intimacy, companionship and sex. Only I know I can never really feel it because essentially I’ve become a nihilist. Have I slipped into moral nihilism? A little bit yes but I’m really not looking to hurt anyone. I actually like to make people feel good about themselves. I know that’s an alien concept for some of you guys. But maybe you’re starting to pick up on the fact that I really don’t care.

I still look to people in happy marriages, like my cousin who’s just had a baby and is over the moon, and really wish I could have a relationship like that but I’m a total cynic now. I know for sure that it’s impossible for me. But I’m still having fun and enjoying myself. Well, it’s a shame there’s no one here who can discuss these kinds of things. And it can give you a big ego when you’re playing your own little game that no one else could even comprehend. I guess that’s why I feel elite. In a game with only one player I’m always the winner.