I am currently being amazed by how unlike the majority of info I read my current response to Boldenone Undecyclenate is. I never understood why Ganabol, Equigan, EQ is dosed so low but I have strong suspicion that most people are massively misusing an otherwise very productive steroid.
Remember that B.U. was originally derived out of an attempt to make an injectable form of Dianabol. And I think the reason why such misuse is so widespread is people want a Tren like response from a drug that simply was never intended to deliver.
Now most users cycle length w/ B.U. is correctly applied I think. I urge everyone to re-think they’re entire approach to steroids. Maybe, just maybe, almost everyone is wrong in they’re conclusion that a steroid must deliver massive gains quickly and if it doesn’t the correct thing to do is use rediculously high doses.
Also remember that vets prescribe 1.1mg per kg of bodyweight for a freakin adult elephant. Definitely a point to ponder. Talk amongst yourselves…
I always laugh when I see the physiques of those who massively overdose and they’re lack of pro level mass/cuts. Even slowly committing suicide won’t make a body what is just doesn’t have the genetics to become.
[quote]FortDodge wrote:
I always laugh when I see the physiques of those who massively overdose and they’re lack of pro level mass/cuts. Even slowly committing suicide won’t make a body what is just doesn’t have the genetics to become. [/quote]
deca is a long estered nandrolone (a 19-Nor) and EQ is a test derivative (like you said an estered version of dbol) so structurally it is very different and works in different ways.
they both give similar gains and work over a long period of time because of the long ester but they are very different drugs with very different side effects.
to assume otherwise shows you really don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.
NO ass-umption was made that’s why I ask questions. The basic physiology of the HPTA applies regardless of the half-life of whatever or how many drugs you use.
Next I’d like the gurus to tell me who originally developed Boldenone Undecyclenate? I do know that the original intent had absolutely nothing to do “Equines”. The word Equipoise means balance, as in hormonal balance in this case.
No, respects was intended to means catagories of evaluation, e.g., amt of water retained, degree of anabolic vs androgenic, estrogen conversion, etc., aka RESPECTS.
[quote]FortDodge wrote:
NO ass-umption was made that’s why I ask questions. The basic physiology of the HPTA applies regardless of the half-life of whatever or how many drugs you use.
Next I’d like the gurus to tell me who originally developed Boldenone Undecyclenate? I do know that the original intent had absolutely nothing to do “Equines”. The word Equipoise means balance, as in hormonal balance in this case.[/quote]
Are you just trying to sound smart or “edgy?”
I really can’t figure it out. WTF are you trying to say with this post?
And what’s with calling out the “gurus” (whoever the hell they are)?
I’d also like to know the kinds of strength gains others have obtained from EQ. Anyone know of what kind of effect EQ would have on my powerlifting totals?
This reminds of this fatass punk I live near. This obese buttface loser couldn’t squat half his own obese girth besides thinkin “Imagine how much I could lifT”. Talk about a delusional fantasy world. Maybe he’ll show up @ the state meet in Aug. I doubt it.
