9/11 - Time to Remember

I was at a football game last night. It’s what we do in the Texas Panhandle - Football Friday Nights.

As is customary at most all footbal games - the National Anthem is played. While I was standing there with my hand over my heart, it hit me. I was overcome with the emotion almost on par with that I felt on 9/11/2001. There was probably a grand total of 500 spectators,players and coaches. The visiting team was still coming on to the field. To a man, each player stopped where he was - removed his helmet and faced the flag which was blowing in the cotton field south of our stadium.

This morning, I turned on the boob tube and came upon the reading of the WTC victims, and the emotion came back. 3000 names to some people, but for the family members of the people to which those names belong - an innocent victim that was lost to the hands of the most vicious killers we’ve seen in years.

You can call it a conspiracy. You can call it oversight by a bumbling beauracracy. You can call it an act of terrorism by fanatics. Regardless of the way you frame it - the events of September 11, 2001 is a tragedy. It was such a traumatic event, that it is remembered by New Yorkers standing in a hole in Battery Park and a bunch of cotton farmers in the Texas Panhandle just wanting to play a little football.

May we NEVER forget.

Memorial video can be viewed if you follow this link:

http://www.gunstuff.com/america-attacked.html

Never forget.

Since this is such a sensitive topic, and one that obviously hits you and most people (myself included) very emotionally, how does it make you feel to see Republicans exploit these events for political gain?

Consider this article, which rather succinctly and persuasively puts forward this idea:

[quote]Vote for Bush or Die
by JUDD LEGUM & DAVID SIROTA

[from the September 27, 2004 issue]

On August 11, John Kerry criticized the Bush Administration for blocking a bipartisan plan to give seniors access to lower-priced prescription drugs from Canada. With almost 80 percent of Medicare recipients supporting Kerry’s position, the Bush campaign was faced with the prospect of defending a politically unpopular position.

That same day, in an interview with the Associated Press, FDA Acting Commissioner Lester Crawford said terrorist “cues from chatter” led him to believe Al Qaeda may try to attack Americans by contaminating imported prescription drugs. Crawford refused to provide any details to substantiate his claims.

Asked about Crawford’s comments, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security was forced to concede, “We have no specific information now about any Al Qaeda threats to our food or drug supply.” The Administration had brazenly used Americans’ justifiable fears of a future terrorist attack to parry a routine criticism of its policies.

How did it come to this?

Crawford’s comments were the latest iteration of a political strategy–hatched in the days after 9/11–that has spiraled out of control. What started as an effort to leverage early support for the President on national security issues has expanded into the politicization of our country’s safety and security infrastructure. That process has damaged the credibility of the federal government and made all Americans less secure.

Revving the Engines

In the weeks following 9/11, President Bush’s popularity–which was languishing at around 50 percent in August 2001–soared to 90 percent. By mid-October 2001, support for Republicans in Congress–which was at just 37 percent in August–had shot up thirty points. After Republicans lost most major 2001 gubernatorial races to Democrats, GOP strategists realized that the key to electoral success was tapping into the post-9/11 fear of terrorism and focusing on security issues.

On January 19, 2002–just nineteen weeks after the 9/11 attacks–Bush’s top political adviser, Karl Rove, told a high-level gathering at the Republican National Committee to “go to the country” and tell the American people they can “trust the Republican Party to do a better job of…protecting America.” Soon afterward, Bush authorized the Republican Party to sell photographs of himself aboard Air Force One, looking concerned and talking on a red telephone to the Vice President on 9/11.

As the 2002 midterm elections neared, White House political director Ken Mehlman developed a secret PowerPoint presentation–which was made public after being dropped in a park–urging Republican candidates to highlight fears of future terrorist attacks. In the most outrageous example, Georgia Senate candidate Saxby Chambliss, who had avoided service in Vietnam, ran campaign commercials drawing parallels between triple amputee Vietnam War veteran Max Cleland and Osama bin Laden.

President Bush reinforced these tactics by barnstorming the country–he made seventeen appearances in the last week of the campaign alone–emphasizing the threat posed by Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein and impugning the security credentials of Democrats. Campaigning in New Jersey in late September, Bush claimed Democrats in the Senate were “not interested in the security of the American people.”

The strategy was successful, and on Election Day 2002, Republicans made significant gains in the House and Senate.

Getting Up to Speed

In January 2003, eager to repeat their success, the Republicans decided to hold their convention in New York City in late August and early September of 2004–the latest date a convention has ever been held. The move insured that Ground Zero would be their backdrop on the eve of the three-year anniversary of 9/11.

And it did not stop there. The Bush team’s first political ads featured grisly images of firefighters carrying flag-draped coffins out of the rubble of the World Trade Center. But the spots backfired after firefighters and 9/11 victims’ families accused the campaign of seeking to exploit the attacks for political gain.

Republicans were forced to adopt alternative tactics, this time through mythmaking. In the spring, Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma told a group of Republicans that “if George Bush loses the election, Osama bin Laden wins the election.” He was echoed by the right-wing media. One nationally syndicated columnist wrote, “Which candidate does our enemy want to lose? George W. Bush.” Fox News pundit Monica Crowley similarly observed, “America’s adversaries want to see John Kerry elected.” Later that month, Republican political operatives commissioned an “independent” poll that purported to find that “60 percent of registered voters believed that terrorists would support John Kerry in this year’s presidential elections.” The poll was so suspect that only the right-wing media reported it. But it helped advance the story.

By May, CNN Justice Department correspondent Kelli Arena “reported” that there was “some speculation that Al Qaeda believes it has a better chance of winning in Iraq if John Kerry is in the White House.”

The Bush campaign, meanwhile, sought to bolster this speculation with a new barrage of campaign advertisements distorting Kerry’s voting record on defense and intelligence issues. All this despite Bush’s January 2002 promise that he had “no ambition whatsoever to use the war [on ‘terrorism’] as a political issue.”

But the images, partisan attacks and myths were not improving the President’s poll numbers fast enough to counterbalance damage brought on by violence in Iraq and a sluggish economy. On May 16, a new Gallup poll showed the President’s job-approval rating had fallen to 46 percent. Days later, as the Abu Ghraib prison scandal was taking its toll on the White House, the media uncovered new information suggesting that responsibility for the scandal reached to top Administration officials.

In short, more was needed.

Overdrive

This is when mounting evidence began to indicate that the timing and substance of the government’s terror warnings were being driven, in part, by political considerations.

On May 26 Attorney General John Ashcroft held a dramatic press conference announcing that Al Qaeda was “almost ready to attack the United States” and had the “specific intention to hit the United States hard.” But Ashcroft did not provide any new or specific information, the Homeland Security Department did not raise the terrorism threat alert level, and a senior Administration official told the New York Times that there was “no real new intelligence” to substantiate the warning.

In July, two days after Kerry selected John Edwards as his running mate, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge held a press conference of his own to say that “Al Qaeda is moving forward with its plans to carry out a large-scale attack in the United States.” Again, he did not elaborate on what was new about his statement and was forced to admit, “We lack precise knowledge about time, place and method of attack.”

That same month, The New Republic reported that top Pakistani security officials were being pressured by the Bush Administration to announce the capture of high-value terrorist targets during the Democratic National Convention. The White House responded with a standard denial, and the rest of the media ultimately brushed it off as an uncorroborated conspiracy theory.

But on July 29, just hours before Kerry’s keynote address, Pakistan announced the capture of Al Qaeda suspect Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani. Curiously, he had been apprehended five days earlier. Even more suspect: The announcement was made at midnight Pakistani time, when most Pakistanis were asleep, but at the perfect time to coincide with America’s prime-time television news schedule.

A few days later–during the period when attention to nominee Kerry would traditionally lead to a bounce in popularity–Ridge announced that he was raising the threat level in New York City, Northern New Jersey and the District of Columbia to “Code Orange.” He claimed the threat level was being raised because of “new and unusually specific information about where Al Qaeda would like to attack.” Undermining his claim that “we don’t do politics in the Department of Homeland Security,” he wove a campaign-style endorsement of the President into his warning: “We must understand that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the President’s leadership in the war against terror,” Ridge declared just a few breaths after invoking frightening images of “explosives,” “weapons of mass destruction” and “biological pathogens.”

But Ridge neglected to mention that most of the information was at least three years old, much of it surveillance data that had been collected before 9/11. Ridge also conceded that New York City–which was already at “Code Orange” before his announcement–would not raise its level of alert.

A week later the right-wing media did its best to deflect the embarrassment by once again dredging up the myth that a vote against Bush is a vote for terrorists. The conservative Washington Times ran a front-page story quoting Bush officials as saying that in the upcoming election, “the view of Al Qaeda is ‘anybody but Bush.’” Again, they provided no proof to back up the claim.

Speaking to voters in Iowa on September 7, Cheney expressed what is now the very public message of the Bush campaign: “It’s absolutely essential that eight weeks from today, on November 2, we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we’ll get hit again. And we’ll be hit in a way that will be devastating.” In other words, vote for us or you’ll die.

The double talk and political opportunism by the Administration on these issues go beyond poor taste. By sending conflicting messages to the public, Administration officials create confusion about what actually poses a threat. Beyond that, each unnecessary warning produces “threat fatigue”–the tendency to ignore warnings when they are repeated–in the American public. That means Americans will become less receptive to truly urgent terrorism warnings when they arise. And if recent polling is any indication, this erosion in public confidence is already occurring. A new survey by Columbia University found that 59 percent of those polled would not evacuate their town immediately if directed to do so by the government.

This is not to imply that the threat of terrorism isn’t real. There is no reason to doubt the staff statement of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission that Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations are “actively striving to attack the United States and inflict mass casualties.” That means the government has a solemn obligation to do whatever is required to protect the American people from this threat.

But there are now justifiable doubts about what is actually dictating our government’s actions. Today critical decisions appear to be guided by political operatives instead of terrorism experts. And in the long run, that has weakened national security–the very issue Republicans want so desperately to call their own.

I didn’t attend this one. I did attend the last two. Last year they had the children of the victims read the names. Very emotional.

How do I feel about the Republicans using this for political advantage? Kind of mixed. I think it is a sign of the times. I guess in the overall picture I think Bush handled the aftermath well. I know they killed thousands of terrorists including much of the leadership. Ultimately I think that is why we have not been attacked. I think a president like Clinton would have launched a few missles and then said “what can we do…invade Afganistan without UN permission, how unthinkable”. I think Kerry is a LOT more like Clinton then Bush could ever be.

Back to the point at hand. Never Forget. Always remember the innocent lives lost and the Brave men who gave their lives so that others may live.

I may not be as good a person as the parents and children of those who were lost that day. They are doing a good job of moving on. I pray for vengence against Al-Queda. I pray for revenge and I pray for victory over those who use the name of God to kill and murder.

So it’s okay that the Bush administration is controlling the public’s fear to help cultivate the sort of attitude you already have: the “if Bush weren’t in office we’d be attacked daily” sort of attitude?

How to you respond to the predicament this sort of thinking necessarily puts you in, then:
It’s because of Bush that we haven’t been attacked yet.

But, if we are attacked, then…
We need Bush in office for stability and strength.

How can Bush lose in this line of thinking?

Side note, you sound more like one of those “eye for an eye” Christians rather than the “turn the other cheek” type…

[quote]Right Side Up wrote:
So it’s okay that the Bush administration is controlling the public’s fear to help cultivate the sort of attitude you already have: the “if Bush weren’t in office we’d be attacked daily” sort of attitude?

How to you respond to the predicament this sort of thinking necessarily puts you in, then:
It’s because of Bush that we haven’t been attacked yet.

But, if we are attacked, then…
We need Bush in office for stability and strength.

How can Bush lose in this line of thinking?

Side note, you sound more like one of those “eye for an eye” Christians rather than the “turn the other cheek” type…[/quote]

I would like to tell you what I think of you for, well, just being you. This tread was meant to reflect, not for you to throw your trash, so I’ll keep my harsh opinions about you to myself in this tread.

Instead, I’ll take the rest of today to reflect on 9/11 and pray for the souls of the departed and their families.

Out.

I got to work this morning and saw no one had lowered the flags to half mast. I couldn’t help but to think that it was a real shame, how easily some people forget.

I took the time to remedy the situation; it needed to be done and the victims deserve that honor. As a T-man I think it was my responsibility, my duty, and a privilege.

“May we never forget.” I remember where I was, what I was doing, and the hours that followed. That day is etched in my mind, as though it were branded with an iron.

Unfortunately Russia has now suffered their own version of 9/11. Today as we reflect on the events that occurred in this country 3 years ago, and we think of those lost in that tragedy, lets think of the innocents killed in that also unforgiveable act.

This is not the day to bring in politics of any sort. Or to ask questions like that. When we ask questions like that, on a day like this WE HAVE forgotten what happened on this day. It is just like as I went and flipped on the other channels, this morning, and no one else was showing the ceremonies, except the cable new networks. The news programs no longer show the scenes the horror, that occured 3 years ago. People want to block, supress, or be reminded, of all that happened 3 years ago. Want to go on life like nothing happened. Or turn back the pages to pre 9/11. ANd in a day like this, watching the ceremonies, we can never forget what happneed. Or can never be caught napping like we were.

It does not matter who is to blame for causing 9/11. We could be critical of this one that person, that leader, or President. But the bottom line is this. Fingers can be pointed in all directions From the President, all the way down. And America was caught napping. Its like many of the 911 commisisoners said, :" The signs were all there. But we just failed to connect all the dots." And especially on a day like today. We as Americans need to be reminded, of who this enemy is. What this enemy is cabable of doing. And relive this day. To really look at the pain, the sorrow, the anguish, in the faces of the people that lost loved ones, fellow workers,
friends, children.

This is also a day I am so saddened of to see how united this country was right after 9/11. And look at it today. For we as a country are not United on this War on teror. And you can say well Bush caused it. Look at him going to Iraq! But do you see the whole picture? Once again I ask you have you forgotten 9/11?

For right after 9/11 it did not maater what race, color, party affiliation we had. We were Americans, And we needed to show these terorists. We mean business. We stood tall and proud. And the terrorists realized they have awaken the sleeping giant. But they tried and tried to break us down. Break down our spriit. Instill so much fear in us, that we would crumble. But still we have not.

But with all this disunity in the country, and this not showing the ceremonies of today on regular TV. Mean Cartoons are more important than showing what happened today? I wonder how many memorial services took place this day across the US? How many people stopped and paused for a moment of silence. Or thought about today…
For more and more I see this country forgetting what happened today. We see it in politics, our COngress, our leaders, and everyday lives. And to that I will say, history repeats itself…

So we can never ever EVER forget what happened today…Ans its time we relived this day all over again. And become united on this War on terror all over again. SO we can make sure 9/11/2001, will never occur again.

JOe

Dennis Woorley song… Have you Forgotten?

I hear people saying we don’t need this war
I say there’s some things worth fighting for
What about our freedom and this piece of ground
We didn’t get to keep 'em by backing down
Now they say we don’t realize the mess we’re getting in
Before you start your preaching let me ask you this my friend

Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn’t worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

They took all the footage off my T.V.
Said it’s too disturbing for you and me
It’ll just breed anger that’s what the experts say
If it was up to me I’d show it everyday
Some say this country’s just out looking for a fight
Well after 9/11 man I’d have to say that’s right

Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn’t worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

Now I’ve been there with the soldiers
Who’ve gone away to war
And you can bet that they remember
Just what they’re fightin’ for

Have you forgotten all the people killed?
Some went down like heros in that Pennsylvania field
Have you forgotten about our Pentagon?
And all the loved ones that we lost and those left to carry on
Don’t you tell me not to worry about bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn’t worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?

Have you forgotten?"

Joe

Ted Olsen, former Solicitor General of the U.S., whose wife, Barbara, died because she was a passenger on the flight that crashed into the Pentagon, gave this speech two months and five days after her passing. It’s long, but worth a read:

November 16, 2001

Federalist Society
15th Annual National Lawyers Convention

As you have been told, the Federalist Society envisions that the Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture each year will address the ideals and principles that the Federalist Society holds dear and that Barbara cherished: limited government, liberty and freedom.

I felt that it would be fitting to inaugurate this series with some words about Barbara, why she died, and how much of her life and death were interwoven with those very principles that will animate the lecture series in her name.

On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson and thousands of other Americans were murdered.

There were victims from other nations that day as well, but they were accidental casualties. Barbara and her fellow Americans were the targets; selected at random to be slaughtered that day precisely because they were Americans.

And the places of their deaths were carefully chosen for what they meant to America, and to the world about Americans, and because they were unique symbols of America’s vitality, prosperity and strength.

The World Trade Center Towers were an emblem of America’s largest and most prosperous city and an internationally recognized symbol of America’s leadership in commerce, free enterprise and international trade.

The Pentagon was an even more fitting target for the perverted minds that planned this day of terror. Construction on it had begun precisely 60 years earlier, on September 11, 1941, as America was awakening to the nightmare of Adolph Hitler and Nazi terror in Europe. Since its construction, the Pentagon has stood for the power, strength and seeming invincibility of a free people. It has been the place from which America, again and again, sent its men and women to fight and die to save not only our own citizens, but millions of others as well, from tyranny, oppression, brutality and murder.

One additional symbol of America, the Capitol I believe, was spared that day only because the brave Americans on that fourth aircraft did what Americans instinctively do when their lives and their country are threatened. They fought. They died, but they saved the lives of countless others and averted an even greater and barely imaginable tragedy.

Barbara Olson had less time, and maybe not as many resources, as the heroes on United Flight 93 that was brought down in Pennsylvania short of its target. But the moment her flight was hijacked, she began to try to save herself and her fellow passengers. She somehow managed (I think she was the only one on that flight to do so) to use a telephone in the airplane to call, not only for help from the outside, but for guidance for herself and the flight crew in the battle that she was already undertaking in her mind. She learned during those two telephone conversations that two passenger jumbo jets had already that morning been turned into instruments of mass murder at the World Trade Center. So she knew the unspeakable horror that she was facing – and I know without the slightest doubt that she died fighting – with her body, her brain and her heart – and not for a moment entertaining the notion that she would not prevail. Barbara died therefore not only because she was an American, but as one more American who refused to surrender to the monstrous evil into whose eyes she and her fellow countrymen stared during those last hideous moments.

September 11, 2001 was unprecedented in our nation’s history. Our country has been attacked before. Our soldiers and innocent citizens have been the victims of terrorism before. But never before in our history have so many civilian citizens, engaged in the routines of their daily lives, who neither individually nor collectively had done anything to provoke the savage attack that they were to experience that day, been brutally murdered for the simple reason that they were Americans, and because they stood, in their countless individual lives, for all the things that America symbolizes.

As President Bush immediately recognized, September 11 was an act of war. But, as he has also explained, it was much more than that. It was also a crime, an act of pure hatred and unmitigated evil. It was a ruthless, brutal, intentionally malignant attack on thousands of innocent persons.

Think of the sick calculation that gave birth to these acts. The victims were persons of all races, backgrounds, religions, ages and qualities. They had one thing in common. They were Americans, Americans who believed in the values that their country stands for: liberty, democracy, freedom and equality. Their lives were cruelly extinguished because they were the living embodiment of the aspirations of most of the world’s peoples. The people who killed them, and who planned their death, hate America and Americans for that very reason. They despise America and the beacon that America holds out to people who are impoverished, enslaved, persecuted and subjugated everywhere in the world. The men who planned the savage acts of September 11 cannot prevail, they cannot even long exist, as long as American ideals continue to inspire the very people they hope to tyrannize and enslave. Hence they have declared war, in fact they have declared hatred, on this country and the values that we hold dearest.

It is a cynical lie that the animals that killed our loved ones two months ago were motivated by Islam, or because this nation of ours is anti-Islamic. Among our most cherished values, enshrined in the First Amendment to our Constitution, is freedom of conscience, liberty of expression and the free exercise of religion. This continent was populated by people who surrendered their homes and crossed a terrifying ocean to reach a rugged and inhospitable frontier in order to escape religious persecution and to seek religious freedom.

From its birth, this nation and the American people have offered sanctuary and shelter to persons of all faiths. Our Constitution – always with the support of our people – has again and again extended its embrace to the unpopular, the unusual, the unconventional and the unorthodox. We protect not only those who will not salute our flag, but those who would spit upon it or burn it. We regularly pledge our allegiance to a constitution that shelters those who refuse to pledge their allegiance to it.

Far from tyrannizing those who worship a particular God or embrace a particular religion, we protect those who worship any God - or no God. Indeed, Americans have defended with their lives persons whose religious convictions preclude them from taking up arms to defend the same Constitution that gives them the right to refrain from defending it.

It is true, I suppose, that there are many in the Middle East who hate this country for its support of Israel. But how tragic and misguided to despise us for extending comfort and defense to a people who have so long, and so recently, been the victims of indescribable ethnic persecution. Nor has America’s support for Israel ever been rooted in or manifested by hostility to the Muslim faith or those who practice it. The terrorists and their apologists have lied about these things, but what is another lie when their goals and tactics are so vastly more evil?

So, while the terrorists of September 11 invoke the name of Islam, that is simply a mask for their hate, envy and despicable ambitions. The terrorists who seek to destroy us do so because America and Americans are everything that their hatred and motives prevent them from being. They are tyrants, and so they hate democracy. They are bigots and religious zealots who persecute Christians and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists and women. So they must hate America because America stands for tolerance and freedom and respect for all races, all religions, and all peoples, regardless of their sex, color, national origin or accent. They are despots who will not permit children to go to school. So they must hate the nation that commits vast resources to the education of its children, and whose Supreme Court has said that free public education cannot even be withheld from those who are in this country illegally.

These terrorists can succeed only through corruption, cruelty and brutality. Thus they hate and must tear down America and its system of laws which shields its people from those malevolent acts. And these terrorists can enslave the people they wish to subjugate only by keeping them poor and destitute, so they must undermine and discredit the one place in all the world that stands the most for the rule of law and individual liberty and that allows its people - and the people who flock here daily by the thousands – the opportunity to rise above all those conditions.

Abraham Lincoln was paraphrasing our declaration of independence when he characterized our nation as having been “conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” That revolutionary document set down our collective belief in unalienable human rights to liberty, freedom and equality, the proposition that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed, the principle that tyrants who would oppress their people are unfit to be rulers of a free people, and the right to the pursuit of happiness. How can these terrorists ever prevail if these American ideals are not only allowed to be expressed, but to succeed so dramatically, and to inspire so many people throughout the world for so many centuries?

The answer is simple, the terrorists of September 11 cannot prevail in a world occupied by the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and its Bill of Rights, the Emancipation Proclamation, the Gettysburg Address, the Statue of Liberty, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the Capitol, the Supreme Court, and the White House. They cannot co-exist with these ideals, these principles, these institutions and these symbols. So they cannot survive, much less prevail, in the same world as America and its people. So they must try to destroy America, and the principles for which it stands.

We do not claim that America has been or is today without imperfections and shortcomings. Our constitution was undeniably flawed at its origin. Implementation of our lofty ideals has never been without error, and some of our mistakes have been shameful. But the course of our history has been constant, if occasionally erratic, progress from the articulation of those lofty ideals to the extension of their reality to all our people - those who were born here and those, from hundreds of diverse cultures, who flock to the American soil because of those principles and the opportunities they promise.

Reflect on the fact that there is no segment or class of the world’s peoples who have exclusive claim on the term “American,” and no segment of the world’s population to whom that claim has been denied. We welcome 100,000 refugees per year into this country. Over 650,000 people immigrated legally to America in the most recent year for which we have reliable statistics. Over 5,000,000 people are in this country today who were so desperate to come here that they did so illegally.

There are more Jews in New York city than in Israel. More Poles in Chicago then any city in the world except Warsaw. America is home to 39 million Irish-Americans, 58 million German-Americans, 39 million Hispanic-Americans and nearly a million Japanese-Americans. And there are seven million Muslims in America, nearly the population of New York City.

How tragic it is that the agents of the September 11th terrorist acts were people whom we welcomed to this country, and to whom we extended all of our freedoms, the protections of all of our laws, and the opportunities this country affords to everyone to travel, work and live. But, we welcome immigrants because nearly all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here to enjoy America’s freedoms, rights, liberties, and the opportunity, denied elsewhere, to pursue happiness and prosperity. People from all places on the globe give our country its identity, its diversity and its strength.

Ronald Reagan often said that “every once in a while, each of us native born Americans should make it a point to have a conversation with someone who is an American by choice.” “A few years back,” he said, “a woman who had fled Poland wrote a letter and said: ‘I love America because people accept me for what I am. They don’t question my ancestry, my faith, my political beliefs . . . . I love America because America trusts me.’”

President Reagan was also fond of quoting from a letter he had received from a man who wrote, “You can go to live in Turkey, but you can’t become a Turk. You can’t go to live in Japan and become Japanese, [and so on for Germany, France, etc.] But . . . Anyone from any corner of the world can come to America and be an American.”

So it is particularly sad and a bitter irony that the 19 savages who took the lives of thousands of Americans on September 11 were able to come here because we welcomed them, and trusted them, and allowed them to learn to fly our airplanes and the freedom to travel. And they took these precious gifts and turned them into instruments of hatred and death. How perverse and twisted. How incredibly sick they must have been - that not one of them had a moment of conscience after all that time in this beautiful and free country. Everywhere they looked they saw Americans and immigrants to America, at work and at play exercising the freedoms and opportunities that this country offers unstintingly to everyone, including them. But their hatred was so intense, their malignancy so advanced, that they never, as far as we know, even for a moment, paused to reconsider the despicable, unconscionable and evil acts they planned to inflict on the people they were walking, working and living amongst.

It has, I suppose, always caused some resentment that we believe so passionately and so unquestioningly that freedom, equality, liberty, democracy and the rule of law are concepts and rights that should belong to all people. But how can that be seen as arrogance, as some have called it? I simply cannot accept that. What can possibly be wrong with the aspiration that moved the founders of this country to believe that people are entitled to self-determination, the right to chose their system of government, the right to freedom within an orderly and secure society, and the maximum liberty to pursue happiness and fulfillment? We know that these are enduring values. We can debate nearly everything else, but we don’t need to debate that. We know that these principles lift everyone up. And we know that these principles are only questioned by those who would seek to advance their own twisted agendas by withholding freedom, liberty and prosperity from others.

We have now been reminded, in the most horrible way, that there are those who not only hate our principles, but who would dedicate their lives - and surrender their lives - to banish those ideals and the incentives they provide for tyrannized and impoverished people everywhere to do what Americans did in 1776.

We have tragically learned again, in the most unthinkable fashion, that our values and our principles are neither self-executing nor self-sustaining, and that we must sacrifice and fight to maintain what our forebears sacrificed and fought to bequeath to us.

And now the rest of the world is learning again that Americans will not flinch from that fight or tire of it. Americans will fight, they will sacrifice, and they will not give up or leave the job unfinished. This war is for all living Americans. It is for the parents, grandparents and great grandparents that fought and sacrificed to come here. And it is for our children and generations to come. And it is for those who choose to become Americans in the future.

America will not lose this war because we cannot tolerate, we cannot contemplate, we cannot even consider that we will lose what centuries of Americans fought to create, improve and maintain. We cannot, and we will not, betray the people who gave us this glorious heritage. We cannot and will not, dishonor or wash away the memories of those who somehow clawed their way out of poverty, tyranny and persecution to come to this country because it was America, and because they were willing to risk death to become Americans, and to give their children and grandchildren the opportunity and freedom and inspiration that makes this place America. Americans could no longer call themselves Americans if they could walk away from that legacy.

People who write regularly for newspapers and who offer opinions on television, or who send advice to us from other parts of the world, sometimes say that America is too rich, lazy, complacent, frightened, soft and enervated to fight this fight. That we have no stamina, strength, will, patience, or steel. That we will collapse.

They are so wrong. We will prevail for the very reason that we have been attacked. Because we are Americans. Because the values that made us free, make us strong; because the principles that made us prosperous, make us creative, resourceful, innovative, determined and fiercely protective of our freedoms, our liberties and our rights to be individuals and to aspire to whatever we choose to be. Those values and those characteristics will lift us and will defeat the black forces who have assaulted our ideals, our country and our people.

The very qualities that bring immigrants and refugees to this country in the thousands every day, made us vulnerable to the attack of September 11, but those are also the qualities that will make us victorious and unvanquished in the end. These dreadful, despicable people have hurt us, but they can never conquer us.

So let me return to Barbara Olson. So many people loved and admired Barbara. But whether you loved and admired her values, her spunk, her energy, her passion, her courage, her unconquerable spirit, or her incredible warmth, whether you knew it or not, underneath it all, you admired and were captivated by Barbara because she was pretty darn close to being a quintessential American.

Barbara was a Texan, from a family whose ancestors came to this country from Germany. She went to the all-American University of Texas and also a Catholic college, St. Thomas in Houston. She became a professional ballet dancer in San Francisco and New York because of the beauty of dance, the rigor of its discipline, and because you have to be extraordinarily tough and ambitious to do it. And Barbara was extraordinarily tough and ambitious.

But she always wanted to be a lawyer and to be involved in politics. In order to afford law school, she invented a career out of whole cloth in Hollywood because that, she determined, was the fastest way to earn the money she needed. It did not matter in the slightest to Barbara that when she went to Hollywood she knew absolutely nothing about the motion picture and television industry. And, in fact, it really didn’t matter because, as she later explained to the unwitting producer who gave her her first job, she was a fast-learner.

And, of course, she succeeded. She turned down the last job she was offered in Hollywood because she had finally earned enough money to go to law school, and they were offering her so much money she did not want to be so tempted to forego her dream to be a lawyer.

She went to Cardozo Law School at Yeshiva University in New York, not necessarily the obvious choice for a blond Catholic girl from Texas. She was even told that she would never fit in, and that she would be miserable. But the people who told her that really did not know Barbara. She thrived at Cardozo as she had thrived at St. Thomas and in the ballet and in Hollywood. She loved the people, the classes, the professors, and she was a huge success, popping up for one reason or another with embarrassing frequency on the cover of Jewish Weekly.

Barbara created a Federalist Society chapter at Cardozo because she believed in the Society’s principles - and it only served to goad her on that almost no one at Cardozo shared her political views.
In her third year of law school, she somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship with the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gusty intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country – because they were terrorists. How Barbara loved to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo!

She turned down jobs with the finest law firms in new York to come to Washington where, it seems, she was always destined ultimately to be. In rapid succession, she succeeded as a lawyer in private practice, as a hot and very successful federal prosecutor, as Deputy General Counsel to the House of Representatives, and as a top Congressional investigator, television personality and lobbyist.

It was typically Barbara that when Al Regnery suggested that she write a book about Hillary Rodham Clinton, she literally jumped at the chance. She told me at the time that she wasn’t sure that she was a writer, but a friend of ours told her that she didn’t have to be a writer to be an author. So, with her legendary energy and limitless self-confidence, she poured herself into the book, finished it in nine months and, against seemingly insurmountable odds, without any previous experience with serious writing, climbed onto the New York Times best seller list during the heaviest competitive time of the year, and stayed there for nine weeks. Ten days ago, her second book, written in about six months and finished just days before her death, opened at number two on the New York Times bestseller list, ahead of Bill O’Reilly, Jack Welch and Tiger Woods. Not bad.

Barbara was everywhere in Washington. A witness for Clarence Thomas at his confirmation, a co-founder of the Independent Women’s Forum, hosting Federalist Society members from all over the country in her home, at the epi-center of the travel office and filegate investigations, and the China campaign contributions investigation, the second-most invited guest on “Larry King Live,” appearing on MSNBC, FOX, “Meet the Press,” “Cross-Fire,” “Geraldo,” “Politically Incorrect,” you name it. Ready to talk about any subject, ready to face down any adversary. She always had an opinion. And she always had that smile.

I could tell you Barbara stories for hours, and I think that you would be glad to listen. But, in short, Barbara partook of everything life gave her. She saw no limits in the people around her and she accepted no limits on what she could accomplish. She could be charming, tough, indefatigable, ferocious and lovable. And all those things at once.

Barbara was Barbara because America, unlike anyplace in the world, gave her the space, freedom, oxygen, encouragement and inspiration to be whatever she wanted to be. Is there any other place on earth where someone could do all these things in forty-five years?

So, sadly, and ironically, Barbara may have been the perfect victim for these wretched, twisted, hateful people. Because she was so thoroughly and hugely an American. And such a symbol of America’s values, ideals, and robust ambition. But she died as she lived. Fighting, believing in herself, and determined to succeed. And, if she was the perfect victim, she is also a perfect symbol of what we are fighting for now and for why we will prevail.

I know, and she knows, that her government and the people of America will win this war, however long it takes, whatever we have to do. We will never, ever forget or flinch. We will prevail for Barbara and all the other Americans we lost on September 11. And for the American spirit for which they stood and their lives embodied. And, most of all, we will defeat these terrorists because Barbara and those other American casualties of September 11, and our forebears, and our children, would never forgive us if we did not.


Beginning in November of 2001, the memorial lecture and a following reception will be held each year at the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention. We envision that the lecture will bring together leaders of the legal and policy worlds in a lively discussion of the ideas that Barbara held most dear. The Federalist Society welcomes contributions to a fund that will support the lecture. Contributions can be directed to the Federalist Society at the following address.

The Federalist Society
Barbara K. Olson Memorial Lecture Fund
1015 Eighteenth Street, N.W.
Suite 425
Washington, D.C. 20036

[quote]jackzepplin wrote:

I would like to tell you what I think of you for, well, just being you. This tread was meant to reflect, not for you to throw your trash, so I’ll keep my harsh opinions about you to myself in this tread.

Instead, I’ll take the rest of today to reflect on 9/11 and pray for the souls of the departed and their families.

Out.[/quote]

I’m a native New Yorker. The attacks strike me very personally. They sadden me as a member of the group being attacked and also as an objective party who is awfully upset at what our world looks like now and what it seems to be moving toward.

9/11 IS a sensitive subject, but that doesn’t stop Bush’s campaign from politicizing it during their convention…in fact making it its theme. If this doesn’t upset you, neither should my post in this thread.

I remember where I was, what I did - unfortunately just days before, I had gone through a very personal tragedy, so what came in as news got kind of washed under in other stuff. Two years later, I reviewed that in my diary and found out that I had a keen interest in what had happened, and how the world had evolved. And, to be honest, I did not like it:

Needless to say, 9/11 was a terrible day. And it will not be forgotten. Whatever some might think on this forum - “we” Europeans felt with you and tried to help out accordingly.

I guess the attack on Afghanistan to get to the Taliban was justified by this - as it tried to root out the network that seemed to be directly responsible for supporting the terrorists; and it was conducted with a broad international backing. In this, I could believe.

Then came the build up to the second war (with all its rightful discussions about its necessity) and, at least in my view, something seemed to be happening in the US that unsettled me: To me, it seemed that the “terror” had entered and massively crept into US culture and policy. Almost every topic or discussion would be somehow attributed to it (a phenomenon very visible on this website). The argument would be: “we have to do everything to thwart another 9/11”. And this is where US policy lost me - because the “everything” started sounding a little bit extreme.
Let’s use a little pop-culture reference (yes, I know this is only TV and hence only partly significant) to illustrate what I mean: Have you seen how easily Jack Bauer in the 24-series killed and tortured people in order to get the “job” done - to ultimately save the country? I would argue that if 9/11 had not occured, this would not have been possible; TV critics and parts of the public would have protested massively to this massive display of unethical behaviour. What had changed? My theory: US culture had changed - fear (terror) had crept in and made people accept extreme measures and breaches of an ethical code of conduct justified, as it was supposed to thwart “the terrorists”.

I understand that it can be argued what is an appropriate measure to counter terrorists - but I would state that you have a better moral foundation if you uphold the values you believed in before your system of belief (and lives) was under attack.

Here, I see the big challenge for US culture - and the real battle that started on that day: Staying true to human rights, civil liberties and a commitment to international solutions to global problems. That is what a war on terror should be about in my view. And this is what I remembered most on that day.

Makkun

PS: To spare me having to answer to flames on that post: I am not apologetic for OBL, Saddam, etc. Terrorists should be fought and properly tried. And - no, I don’t think that violence works as a solution - it can help stop people from doing harm; but it will not help win the hearts and minds of your opponents (and your friends).

Jackzepplin:

Forgive him, he’s just a kid…someday he will understand. We all hope.

Eye for an Eye Chrisitan…you betcha yah.

Your enemy defines the ruthlessness required to defeat him. Our enemy believes that life, in this world, is pre-determined and that a reward awaits them upon their death. That leaves you very little choice. They can not be reasoned with and negotiations are meaningless. They want our death and capitulation. If you do not wish to do so then you must defeat them. They will not surrender so only their death will defeat them.

I think the current administration made the right choice. You don’t negotiate with terrorists. You kill them and take away their ability to make war. I support them doing so because it means I and my family will be safer and my children will not have to endure more war.

The sooner we realize that we are in a total war to the deat the better. Forgiveness has no place in war. Forgiveness is done after your victory is complete and you are secure.

Poet Laureate of the United States Billy Collins wrote the following poem about 9/11:

The Names

Yesterday, I lay awake in the palm of the night.
A soft rain stole in, unhelped by any breeze,
And when I saw the silver glaze on the windows,
I started with A, with Ackerman, as it happened,
Then Baxter and Calabro,
Davis and Eberling, names falling into place
As droplets fell through the dark.
Names printed on the ceiling of the night.
Names slipping around a watery bend.
Twenty-six willows on the banks of a stream.
In the morning, I walked out barefoot
Among thousands of flowers
Heavy with dew like the eyes of tears,
And each had a name ?
Fiori inscribed on a yellow petal
Then Gonzalez and Han, Ishikawa and Jenkins.
Names written in the air
And stitched into the cloth of the day.
A name under a photograph taped to a mailbox.
Monogram on a torn shirt,
I see you spelled out on storefront windows
And on the bright unfurled awnings of this city.
I say the syllables as I turn a corner ?
Kelly and Lee,
Medina, Nardella, and O’Connor.
When I peer into the woods,
I see a thick tangle where letters are hidden
As in a puzzle concocted for children.
Parker and Quigley in the twigs of an ash,
Rizzo, Schubert, Torres, and Upton,
Secrets in the boughs of an ancient maple.
Names written in the pale sky.
Names rising in the updraft amid buildings.
Names silent in stone
Or cried out behind a door.
Names blown over the earth and out to sea.
In the evening ? weakening light, the last swallows.
A boy on a lake lifts his oars.
A woman by a window puts a match to a candle,
And the names are outlined on the rose clouds ?
Vanacore and Wallace,
(let X stand, if it can, for the ones unfound)
Then Young and Ziminsky, the final jolt of Z.
Names etched on the head of a pin.
One name spanning a bridge, another undergoing a tunnel.
A blue name needled into the skin.
Names of citizens, workers, mothers and fathers,
The bright-eyed daughter, the quick son.
Alphabet of names in a green field.
Names in the small tracks of birds.
Names lifted from a hat
Or balanced on the tip of the tongue.
Names wheeled into the dim warehouse of memory.
So many names, there is barely room on the walls of the heart.

RSU,

Republicans exploiting the attacks of 9-11? Utter nonsense.

The attack on 9-11 was one of the most - if the most - important events in our nation’s history. It happened a mere three years ago. It continues to be the most prominent issue of the day.

Democrats think it’s the most important issue, too - that’s why they opted to run a Vietnam veteran in the campaign and focus on his service. Democrats know that in 2004, we will be electing a commander-in-chief as much as a president. The Democrats sold their soul to talk about Kerry’s four months in Vietnam at the exclusion of his 20 years in national politics. Our war - the war against Islamism - is the Democrats’ priority just as much as it is Republicans, else they wouldn’t try to prance around with their newfound sense of valor in a campaign year.

As for exploitation, the Republicans are trying to make the case that Democrats aren’t serious about fighting this war we are in. The constant reminders of September 11 is the way to communicate that not only have the Republicans not forgotten the lessons of that day, they plan on calling evil by its name and prosecuting this war with vigor, rather than triangulation, appeasement, and outright cowardice.

So, in my view, the attack of 9-11 is a perfectly legitimate issue to address in the current presidential campaign. It is one of many, but I can’t think of a priority higher than national security.

Oh, expect for maybe a Department of Wellness and New Age Medicine.

NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik, in a Special Commerative magazine, 9/11 One Year Later, The article is titled, :
“We should have gone to war in 1993.”
…"Kerik says that the U.S. Should have gone to war after the Twin Towes were FIRST attacked on Feb. 26, 1993, a bombing in a parking garage beneath the Center that left 6 dead, and 1,000 injured. "I applaud and commend the President for doing what SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE back in 1993!! In 1993 they bombed the World Tarde Center. People that have associated with that bombing were also linked to people who were on the aircraft in the 2001 attack. “So it shouldn’t have been a big secret that they were going to do this again. I think President Buh is doing EXACTLY what should have bene done nine years ago!”

Now let us look more into this First World Trade Bombing:

For Iraqi involvement in '93 WTC bombing,

See - THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMB: Who is Ramzi Yousef? And Why It Matters - The National Interest, Winter, 1995/96

For Iraqi involvement in:

'95 Bombing of the US training mission for Saudi troops in Riyadh
'96 Attack against the US base in al-Khobar
'98 African embassy bombings
See - http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2001/05/28052001110950.asp

or - http://www.spiritoftruth.org/terror.html


Now consider this:

The February 26, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City occurred on the second anniversary of Kuwait’s liberation from Iraqi occupation by U.S. led forces.

The June 25, 1996 (June 26th, Saudi time) bombing of the Khobar Towers at the Dhahran military base in Saudi Arabia was on the third anniversary of U.S. military strikes against Iraq’s Intelligence headquarters which, in turn, had been retaliation for an Iraqi plot to assassinate George Bush, Sr. in Kuwait during the Spring of 1993.

The August 7, 1998 bombings of US embassies in Tanzania and Kenya occurred on the seventh anniversary of the passing of U.N. resolution 661 that imposed economic sanctions against Iraq for its invasion of Kuwait.

The October 12th, 2000 attack on the USS Cole occurred on the ninth anniversary of when U.N. resolution 715 was passed which set up the UN Special Commission (Unscom) to dismantle Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.

The November 13, 2001 crash of AA Flight 587 into Queens, NYC occurred on the 6th anniversary of the 1995 bombing of the US training mission in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and the fourth anniversary of the conviction of Ramzi Yousef, the Iraqi mastermind behind the World Trade Center bombing in '93. (After Ramzi Yousef was captured, computer files of his were discovered that contained information on bold terrorist plots, including a plan to hijack jetliners and crash them into symbolic U.S. buildings like the CIA headquarters in Virginia. The so-called Project Bojinka is, of course, a profound piece of circumstantial evidence indicating Saddam Hussein, who Ramzi Yousef truly worked for, was ultimately behind 9-11.)

and this

One should also consider that the July 17, 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 occurred on Iraq’s National Day, the most important national holiday in Iraq which celebrates Saddam Hussein’s coming to power. (Also note that, three weeks prior to TWA 800’s destruction, TWA 884 reportedly had some sort of near miss when missile(s) were apparently fired at/near it on the anniversary of the Khobar Towers bombing.)

TWA

http://www.spiritoftruth.org/timeline.htm

No wonder why the NYPD COmmissioner said what he did. And what did Bill Clinton do about it? And of course none of this getting out to the press and media, or squelching…Amazing

Joe