9/11 Is Not Earth Day!

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
orion wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:
orion wrote:
Chushin wrote:
orion wrote:

Look, either half of Germany went hardcore sociopath on us because of mysterious cosmic rays in early 1930 or it can happen anywhere, anytime.

Nah, it’s all about culture and values.

It happened in Germany and Austria for a reason.

You yourself are, to this very day, a walking testament to the arrogant, elitist, superiority-complex-tainted elements of the Germanic psyche that made it possible.

Fortunately, SOME Germans and Austrians have learned something from their countries’ past behavior.

And it is NOT that arrogance of a different flavor is the answer.

But Darling I am not an apologist for state mass murder.

Oh, but you are!

You compare moral positions which are not even apposite in order to buttress your ideology that morality has not absolutes.
There is no comparison to be made with Germans and Austrians in WWII–many of whom volunteered to execute their nations’ explicitly stated objective to murder, by the tens of thousands, unarmed innocents–with US forces which take pains in combat to spare innocents.

Yes, yes, yes…I understand your pathetic plaint that it makes no difference to the innocent dead why the bombs fell or for whom they were intended. But it should make a difference to those who presume to judge. And an amoral judge you are, who allows for the moral equivalency of those who murder for ideology, and those who abhor it. Remember: you agreed, about two years ago, that “some bastards need bombing,” but when challenged you could not produce criteria for that distinction. You cannot pretend to occupy a higher moral plane after expressing your confused moral state.

And please, do not bother to answer me. You have nothing to say, especially if it is rooted in that crap from the Austrian School Of Crappy Ideology.

And again:

What I have learned from WWII is that using killing to spread your ideology will not do.

What people like you have learned is to make up new flimsy excuses for mass murder and claim that they are entirely different from all the BS that was spouted before by anyone elsw to justify mass murder, torture and the destruction of freedom.

Now I even do agree that my stance is an ideological one, but so is yours and it is far closer to that of the Nazis, if we have to drag them into this.

Noone cares whether you killed him in the name of racial purity or the spreading of freedom.

They are completely unable to care, dead as they are.

Plus, the “oh but you do”! is completely nonsense." I do not advocate state mass murder period. Even if I though that the Nazis had been just swell I would not advocate murder unless I called for doing it all over again.

You on the other hand justify murder that goes on right now.

I point out that you and I are both capable of making judgments without offering inapposite comparisons.
I am not justifying any murder any more than you.

You, however, are offering an apologia for Nazis–“everyone is like this!”–especially Americans, it would seem.
It is a necessity of (some) Europeans-left or right–to find moral flaws in others, and inflate or distort them, in order to exculpate themselves from the Nazi ideology of contorted morality and murder. This is moral inversion, rampant. (Witness Ephrem, above.) Or the exculpation may be expressed in your contention that Fascist murder can occur anywhere, anytime. Not so; any reader of the German Enlightenment and its denouement, would understand otherwise.

(Perhaps this is a perspective that you, and possibly Ephrem, cannot enjoy, since you are not exposed to travel outside the confines–intellectual and moral, not geographic–of your Continent.)

To be clear, in a thread about 9/11, the murderers on the three airplanes were not brave; they were cowards attacking unarmed civilians. They were not reasonable, offering negotiations; they were fanatics only, motivated to kill the innocent to make some ideologic point. Their objective was murder of innocents. Period.

Perhaps it would suit your particular ideology, orion, that the US should have allowed Al Qaeda to continue to murder our citizens, a few thousand at a time, untroubled by any attempt at defense in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Perhaps you think that the US should not protect its citizens, in order to avoid what you call “mass murder right now.” That perverse apology is the apex of moral inversion, wherein innocents are killed, in mass, because of a lack of will to defend them. [/quote]

There is no apology for Nazi-ism, there does not need to be one.

It is a combination of militarism, some sort of belief that you are a special people/nation/religion and that is usually enough for a few hardcore ideologues to drag a nation into war.

The only thing that makes them special is the industrial killing of their victims, but the Tutsis and Hutis managed to get into the hundreds of thousands with machetes.

The very idea that the Nazis were somehow especially evil denies the fact that comparable atrocities have been committed again and again and again, as they are now in the name of spreading freedom and democracy.

I would go as far as claiming that this is the natural order of things, it is rare that such a war is not going on somwhere.

[quote]Chushin wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:

I point out that you and I are both capable of making judgments without offering inapposite comparisons.
I am not justifying any murder any more than you.

You, however, are offering an apologia for Nazis–“everyone is like this!”–especially Americans, it would seem.
It is a necessity of (some) Europeans-left or right–to find moral flaws in others, and inflate or distort them, in order to exculpate themselves from the Nazi ideology of contorted morality and murder. This is moral inversion, rampant. (Witness Ephrem, above.) Or the exculpation may be expressed in your contention that Fascist murder can occur anywhere, anytime. Not so; any reader of the German Enlightenment and its denouement, would understand otherwise.

(Perhaps this is a perspective that you, and possibly Ephrem, cannot enjoy, since you are not exposed to travel outside the confines–intellectual and moral, not geographic–of your Continent.)

To be clear, in a thread about 9/11, the murderers on the three airplanes were not brave; they were cowards attacking unarmed civilians. They were not reasonable, offering negotiations; they were fanatics only, motivated to kill the innocent to make some ideologic point. Their objective was murder of innocents. Period.

Perhaps it would suit your particular ideology, orion, that the US should have allowed Al Qaeda to continue to murder our citizens, a few thousand at a time, untroubled by any attempt at defense in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Perhaps you think that the US should not protect its citizens, in order to avoid what you call “mass murder right now.” That perverse apology is the apex of moral inversion, wherein innocents are killed, in mass, because of a lack of will to defend them.

Damn shame, really.

I mean that he’s too blinded by his bigotry and bias to appreciate the eloquence, accuracy and truth in what you wrote above.

But I guess the trauma of having murderers for grandfathers can lead to some pretty extreme views…

Anyway, get back to your overly-proud efforts at world domination! :slight_smile:
[/quote]

And maybe you are just too daft to notice the ignorance and stupidity of that claim.

I am ze descendant of ze bad, bad Nazis, Ephrem however is a descendant of a nation that was occupied by them and was one of the few countries that actively sabotaged official attempts to extradite Jews to the Nazis.

So he and I are apologists for Nazi crimes for the exact same reasons?

Whether we are left or right, Austrians or from the Netherlands, descendants of Nazis or their victims, we all think the US has lost it because we cannot deal with our Nazi past?

Hey, now that it has been explained to me with so much “accuracy and truth”, well yes I think it is extreme horse shit for so blatantly obvious reasons that I am actually concerned for your ability to reason if you take it seriously.

Now here is my anti thesis:

Calling everyone a Nazi, no matter where he comes from or stands politically who opposes state sponsored mass murder by the US really helps to avoid taking a long hard look in the mirror.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
orion wrote:

…The very idea that the Nazis were somehow especially evil denies the fact that comparable atrocities have been committed again and again and again, as they are now in the name of spreading freedom and democracy.

Likewise the sky is green.

[/quote]

Excuse me, I forget that you come from a country where a president can start a war which he is forbidden to do for excellent reasons c by calling it a “police action” or “humanitarian intervention.”

So yes, when a president says the sky is magenta, guess what, for you it apparently is .

Interesting story really, your founders were concerned that a president could start wars in order to divert attention from interior problems or to grab power which is why congress declares wars, if they are declared.

Good thing they did, who knows what might possibly have happened?

Wake up, honeybun, it is not mud relocation device it is a SPADE and I will call it what it is.

…your welcome. Now if only the USA would do the same…

…you probably don’t realise that a european is exposed from birth to many, many different cultures and languages compared to the average american. We are therefore better at accepting differences and do not need to maintain the illusion that we’re somehow better than the rest [i’m not sure about the french though]…

…it’s disconcerting to see the people of the most powerful nation to date squander every bit of goodwill it had in the world, for nothing more than profit, under the guise of moral superiority, and remain blind to the obvious similarities our past has to offer…

…as long as you believe that the actions by asshole suicide bombers are unprovoked, as if america’s hands are not sullied by shady deals and handshakes with dictators and military regimes, this won’t stop. You’ll be doomed to repeat history’s mistakes. Good night.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
ephrem wrote:
Chushin wrote:But thanks sincerely for doing your best to stay out of my country.

… Now if only the USA would do the same…

Yeah, we should have. Especially in 1944 and 1945.[/quote]

…your presumption that the USA maintains a similar moral foothold today is disrespectful to say the least…

[quote]pushharder wrote:
ephrem wrote:
Chushin wrote:But thanks sincerely for doing your best to stay out of my country.

… Now if only the USA would do the same…

Yeah, we should have. Especially in 1944 and 1945.[/quote]

No, especially in 1916-1918.

Then you could have stayed home later too.

But you just had to make the world “safe for democracy”.

That worked out well, didn’t it?

[quote]ephrem wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:(Perhaps this is a perspective that you, and possibly Ephrem, cannot enjoy, since you are not exposed to travel outside the confines–intellectual and moral, not geographic–of your Continent.)

…you probably don’t realise that a european is exposed from birth to many, many different cultures and languages compared to the average american. We are therefore better at accepting differences and do not need to maintain the illusion that we’re somehow better than the rest [i’m not sure about the french though]…

…it’s disconcerting to see the people of the most powerful nation to date squander every bit of goodwill it had in the world, for nothing more than profit, under the guise of moral superiority, and remain blind to the obvious similarities our past has to offer…

…as long as you believe that the actions by asshole suicide bombers are unprovoked, as if america’s hands are not sullied by shady deals and handshakes with dictators and military regimes, this won’t stop. You’ll be doomed to repeat history’s mistakes. Good night.
[/quote]

Funny to hear a Dutch person talk about history and imperialism and consequences… Too much time ordering off the menu at the Bulldog in Amsterdam eh bro?

Just a question, was Theo Van Gogh’s decapitation by a muslim fanatic your country imported and and subsidized a result of the same policies you are so critical of?

Extra credit question: What’s up with the Euro’s bending over backwards to radical islam? You folks are getting prison love on a regular basis from those folks. Schools open, educate me.

[quote]ephrem wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:(Perhaps this is a perspective that you, and possibly Ephrem, cannot enjoy, since you are not exposed to travel outside the confines–intellectual and moral, not geographic–of your Continent.)

…you probably don’t realise that a european is exposed from birth to many, many different cultures and languages compared to the average american. We are therefore better at accepting differences and do not need to maintain the illusion that we’re somehow better than the rest [i’m not sure about the french though]…


[/quote]

And this is where you are wrong.

(Not in the generalization about the French. What is it that my Montana friend said about Europe? The German thinks he commands the place, the Frenchman thinks he has been deprived of his rightful place, the Englishman thinks that he owns the place, and the American? He doesn’t give a god-damn what anyone thinks.)

You are wrong, and, although I do not intend to personally insult you, ephrem (because very often you write reasonably), but you display here the blinded, fettered and confined group-think that afflicts Western Europe.

I will quote the Duke of Wellington, “If I were born in a barn that would not make me a horse.” Just being born in Europe, proximate to language and “culture” does not mean that one actually has original and creative thought, leave alone independent opinion, and something called tolerance. If you need proof, cast your gaze south across the border, the land of Welington’s triumph, where the 2 dominant cultures cannot tolerate each other after 179 years of union. Or look into the recent history of just about any national minority, from Basque, to Catalan, to Northern League, to …

Chushin above makes a joke about his own experience, but it is not at all unusual. Where I work, I am compelled to use a special phone to translate among ninety–yes, 90–languages and dialects common within a 25 mile radius. (Oh, that’s 40 km.) And let me guarantee you, that each community wants to preserve what they value most and contribute it to the American culture.

What marks the US, I contend, is tolerance, and conflicts, and resolutions, and intolerance…and progress. What my extended stay in Europe taught me–what characterized Western Europe–is intolerance, the selected burial of history for the “sake of the polity,” and a relentless, soul-less homogenization of culture, and self-exculpatory amorality, directed from Brussels and Paris and Berlin, by a coven of “wise men:” soi-disant intellectuals, bureaucrats and hangers-on.

Yes, I know, that is what you think of the US: soul-less and homogenized. Maybe so, but not if you attend Chushin’s family reunion, or if you care to browse through a bookstore. There is no culture more self-examining, self-critical and self-damning and regretful. If there be a European history as self-critical in the last 30 years–please, do recommend it to me. Shame is as American, and as public, as patriotism.

If you, or Cockney Blue above in a typical condescension, see patriotism as an immature and evil attribute, you have skimmed the only most superficial layers of American thought; you do not understand the public psychic turbulence that is our historical heritage, celebrated here only modestly.