Haha man trust me I have no problem when it comes to getting laid and I do have a drink every once in awhile, I dont know you as a person but by the way you communicate on here it sounds like you might need to take your own advice or maybe someone just shit in your wheaties yesterday and today, if you dont like the topic of the thread why even check it out
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
You can’t use correct fucking punctuation, but you’re saying that you’re too eloquent at the same time? Really?
If all my cocksucking has taught me anything it’s that if you’re gonna do something do it right.[/quote]
dude, cock sucking is two words… :S
but yes I have seen the error of my ways, I shall forever more use correct punctuation. Thank you for the the valid point, and clearly true example.
P.S.
Is Fucktard two words too?
I know douche bag is.
[quote]trojapa wrote:
that’s pretty damn wild, but if he knew beforehand he should’ve laid it down on youtube before everything went down.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
No. There is a large difference between average people debating politics on a message board and Alex Jones conspiracy theorists blurting out half-cocked theories about how the government is really trying to kill us all.
[/quote]
the government doesn’t want to kill us all, it just wants complete control over every facet of our lives.
besides if the government killed everyone, who would it tax?
yeah the guy should have maybe done something before hand but at the time he was also running for governor of Nevada so he probably thought the guy was full of crap and if he actually put something out I dont really think anyone would have taken him seriously
[quote]trojapa wrote:
yeah the guy should have maybe done something before hand but at the time he was also running for governor of Nevada so he probably thought the guy was full of crap and if he actually put something out I dont really think anyone would have taken him seriously[/quote]
yep, shouting conspiracies is a bad idea when trying to get elected for anything.
9/11 was an inside job purpatrated by our gov.The trade centers werent knocked down they were brought down.Look up videos of wtc 7.
Also google that the trade centers where completly shut down the wknd before 9/11 for a “security” upgrade.There were people in and out of the buildings all wknd that wouldnt have been otherwise.
Anyone who doesnt find is strange that the buildings fell straight down and that the I beam supports at ground level were cut at 45 degree angles.
Also, when the people on flight 93 called there loved ones many of them introduced themselves with first and last names, if you called your mom or wife would you say hi this is blah blah blah first and last name.
Inside job.
The main things that raise my suspicion are: where the hell did evidence of the “plane” that struck the pentagon go(government claimed a Boeing 757 struck the pentagon… I don’t remember seeing evidence of any plane on the news), why were none of the numerous videos from surveillance cameras ever released(except one that was grainy and showed a object, that appeared to be too damn small to be a 757)that were lined up and able to record what struck the pentagon, and then there is tower 7.
I’m not saying I believe it was an inside job, just that I don’t believe some of the BS the government fed us.
For the people that want to believe it’s a conspiracy, go watch Pentagon Strike. It raises some interesting questions, just look past the homers saying it sounded like a missile. http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/
Something really stinks about the whole 911 incident. Who else would do it on THAT exact date? We “needed” a new Pearl Harbor to kick the Bush Inc. War Machine into overdrive.
The WTT was in our face, no getting around that spectacle. Flight 93 and the Pentagon crash were all but swept under the carpet. The Pentagon site had jack shit for and discernable plane wreckage. It looked more like a cruise missile strike to be. Flight 93 was more than likely shot down and mainly disentegrated in air.
I think that more people should talk about it, but 99% of people I bring it up to disagree. My faith in the US government went down the tubes with the JFK assassination that I went through as a kid.
If you haven’t seen the Loose Change series of films, you really should and they’re free online. That is the best thing I’ve seen on the 911 conspiract to date.
BG
[quote]Mhatch wrote:
The main things that raise my suspicion are: where the hell did evidence of the “plane” that struck the pentagon go(government claimed a Boeing 757 struck the pentagon… I don’t remember seeing evidence of any plane on the news), why were none of the numerous videos from surveillance cameras ever released(except one that was grainy and showed a object, that appeared to be too damn small to be a 757)that were lined up and able to record what struck the pentagon, and then there is tower 7.
I’m not saying I believe it was an inside job, just that I don’t believe some of the BS the government fed us.
For the people that want to believe it’s a conspiracy, go watch Pentagon Strike. It raises some interesting questions, just look past the homers saying it sounded like a missile. http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/[/quote]
yeah that and the fact that the part of the pentagon that got hit was closed off for remodeling and no one was there when the plane struck.
yeah that and the fact that the part of the pentagon that got hit was closed off for remodeling and no one was there when the plane struck
I don’t buy into conspiracy theories.
But I’m very troubled by the official explanation of the engineering failures that led to the collapse of both Towers and building 7. The official explanation or “pancake theory” of the collapse of the twin towers seems next to impossible. The buildings collapsed at very close to the rate of gravity. That is next to impossible considering all the resistance provided by concrete and steel that was completely undamaged by the fires. Beyond that, the Towers were engineered to fall apart in sections in case of catastrophic damage…the upper most part of the Towers should have come down, not the sections beneath it that were undamaged by fire.
The collapse Building 7 is completely unexplainable. Many steel framed skyscrapers have suffered fire damage well beyond what building 7 did, yet none have ever collapsed.
I don’t believe in conspiracy theories. Yet it is very true that Pearle of Fox news and the American Enterprise institute wrote that we needed a Pearl Harbor like event to invade Iraq. It is ridiculous to believe the Bush excuse that 9 months was not enough time to have accountability for National Security on 9-11-01. ( months is nearly 20% of his term. The fact is, Cheney was VP of Halliburton and had a good understanding of Islamic terror prior to entering the White House. Further, terror czar Richard Clarke had his “hair on fire” from the increase in terror chatter in June, July, and August of 2001…but Rice refused to meet with him.
I don’t believe in conspiracy theories. I don’t believe they wired the WTC for implosion. But did they let it happen…I hope not, but I dunno.
when I first saw it my gut reaction was “wow that looked like a controlled demolition” and I have learned over the years to trust my gut. But what do I know, everyone will tell me I’m wrong anyway because they know better.
Its unfortunate that alot of people feel the way I do which is that 9/11 was an inside but they will never speak up about it because its unamerican.
I dont see how building 7 is completely unexplainable. People heard explosions going off all over and it looked exactly like a controlled demolition, I dont see how it could have fallen like that from a fire. And I know what you mean horsepuss, I’ve brought up the 9/11 deal to a bunch of people and they look at me like what the fuck are you talking about.
I dont know how some people just settle with the expinations that they are given when it obviously looks like something else has happened.
I know these people in this clip are a little out of line with how they asks the questions but I wonder why Maher cant give him an explination and again they’re called insane because they think there’s more to the story
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Something to consider:
- 70% of the family members questions about 9/11 were not answered during the commission hearings
- We only have a few frames of what is suppose to be a plane hitting the pentagon yet the FBI seized tapes from nearby Hotels of what would clearly show what hit the pentagon, why haven’t they been released?
- 8 years later why has no one been punished for the countless mistakes that occurred that day?
[quote]jahall wrote:
I heard on a hip-hop station in Alabama that George Bush had weather machines that caused katrina… Can anyone confirm this? [/quote]
Really? I heard that Navy Seals actually blew up the levees.
Ya know In my opinion the government that couldnt keep the fact that clinton got a blowjob in the oval office a secret would never be able to pull off something as elaborate as this without it getting out at some point.
Maybe it wasn’t an inside job, but the government (maybe not the majority, but the few higher ups) had at least some prior knowledge as to what was happening. Do you honestly think that with the amount of satellites and all the technology that America and Canada has that Osama is still managing to escape from them, if you give me 8 years and half the resources which the people looking for Osama have, I guarantee I can find any human being on this planet. Honestly if you want to keep throwing out the fact that how could they have kept this secret, then here are 40 reasons please try and explain everyone to me THE TOP 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story - 911Truth.Org and if you still want to throw out, but how could it be kept a secret look at 14 C.