9/11 is NOT a Conspiracy!

[quote]Slayers wrote:
nik133 wrote:
Banadana and passport here: http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Explosion sound of 9/11 side by side with demolition sound right here: Lowry Bridge Demolition - YouTube

There were thousands of reports from firefighters, police and news members if you just youtube secondary explosions 9/11, you will find plenty of videos stating that there was secondary explosions.

Did you know that 6 weeks before the attack Larry Silverstein signed a 3.2 billion dollar lease on the entire WTC complex for 99 years, included in the lease is a 3.5 billion dollar insurance policy specifically covering acts of terrorism? Did you know that on september 6th 2001 3150 put options (A bet that the stock will fall) on United Airline which is more then 4x the daily average of Put Options on UA?

Did you know that over 27000 Put Options were placed on Boeing on September 7th, more then 5x the daily average? Did you know that on September 10th 2001 4500 put options were placed on American Airlines almost 11x the daily average? So as you can see many people profited just from the attacks that took place on 9/11, not even talking about the wars that took place afterwards.

Mufasa I’m glad you are so curious, maybe we could get another investigation to get some real answers :). Vegita if I were you I would just ignore Fighting because clearly he can’t make a point without resorting to name calling and swearing, it isn’t even worth it to give him a dignify his close minded way of thinking with a response.

As for Mufasa, Slayer and Tom, thanks for participating in this discussion civilly with an open mind!

You might want to read that site again the Bananda was found at the site of flight 93 in PA which they had also found body’s and clothing.

The passport has been rebunked already in the 9/11 hearings. The 9/11 hearings had found that that passport was tampered with to make it look the way it did.

That site also talks about some tests they did with samples they got from the site and what they found on the samples. That is also hard to believe since the first sample was said as coming from a person walking the streets after the first building came down.

That is kinda hard when the police had evacuated everyone for 2-3 blocks so to get that sample is not going to happen. The other samples are not really said where they came from but why are they sent to Denmark? Why not done at 1 of the thousands or schools or labs in the US?

As for Silverman well lets see in the 90’s they were bombed so maybe at the point he signed the new contract was when he was able to sign it. And they said they would one day bring down the WTC so why not get the insurance you own the lease for 99 years thats alot of years to hope it never gets attacked again.

[/quote]

I’ll leave at at this, you have made your points and I mine. However I hope that we can agree that there are an incredible amount of coincidences that happened around that day and it is our duty to question the government unless we believe what they say 100%.

I urge everyone again to stop responding to Fighting as he isn’t making any points just criticizing us without any facts, he is simply here to stir things up, not to have a discussion.

We can agree that there are things that happened that day that never should have happened.

And like I said I don’t want to argue about it or even care what people think about it but I does bother me to think that so many people think that we did it to ourselves when it was American men and women dying not soldiers that were dying.

I lost friends that day and people I had worked with a number of times so that makes it hard to see stuff that can smear good names of people.

But your right when we stop asking questions to the government is when we are all doomed.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
nik133 wrote:

I urge everyone again to stop responding to Fighting as he isn’t making any points just criticizing us without any facts, he is simply here to stir things up, not to have a discussion.

I’d rather have a discussion over whether Elvis is still alive… or maybe whether or not the lunar landings really happened. You know, other shit that you people believe. [/quote]

Very good point Irish. I like nut cases who can talk about a myriad of things that could never have possibly happened.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
nik133 wrote:

I urge everyone again to stop responding to Fighting as he isn’t making any points just criticizing us without any facts, he is simply here to stir things up, not to have a discussion.

I’d rather have a discussion over whether Elvis is still alive… or maybe whether or not the lunar landings really happened. You know, other shit that you people believe.

Very good point Irish. I like nut cases who can talk about a myriad of things that could never have possibly happened.

[/quote]

ZEB, sometimes you are just so mentally retarded, seriously. See I can call names with absolutely no evedince or facts or even a point also isn’t it fun.

V

[quote]Slayers wrote:
We can agree that there are things that happened that day that never should have happened.

And like I said I don’t want to argue about it or even care what people think about it but I does bother me to think that so many people think that we did it to ourselves when it was American men and women dying not soldiers that were dying.

I lost friends that day and people I had worked with a number of times so that makes it hard to see stuff that can smear good names of people.

But your right when we stop asking questions to the government is when we are all doomed. [/quote]

I’m very sorry to hear that, my condolences, but like I said American government will lie to go to war just look at the Gulf of Tonkin incident that lead to the war in Vietnam and over 58000 Americans died for what has come out now as a lie. I just hope that you have tried to take in the info critically. If you do have time I suggest watching Loose Change as it is a great film with a lot of good facts. I realize it is a touchy subject, but we should be the voice for those that no longer have one and demand answers from the government as to what happened on that day.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
nik133 wrote:

I urge everyone again to stop responding to Fighting as he isn’t making any points just criticizing us without any facts, he is simply here to stir things up, not to have a discussion.

I’d rather have a discussion over whether Elvis is still alive… or maybe whether or not the lunar landings really happened. You know, other shit that you people believe. [/quote]

Hahahaha! What are some other good ones?

[quote]Vegita wrote:
tom63 wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
I never understand why it’s hard to believe that a jet hitting a building going very fucking fast and loaded up with fuel could take down a tall building.

It’s so funny, but this shit is so sad. As a guy that knows firefighters who worked pulling the rubble out, and the dead bodies, and knew people that died in it… you conspiracy fucks just amaze me.

I just yesterday asked one of the smartest guys I know with metal materials science etc. about this. I know I pissed him off a little, since he to lost freinds. But he gave me a great explanation.

Basically, it is what you said. Suddenly tons of jet fuel ignites , the sudden blast furnace effect, like a Bessemer furnace, will cause the metal to weaken, that with the overall weight will cause a sudden collapse.

It’s not rocket science, but I was told this by an actual rocket scientist. As in chief materials science for a rocket company. He now makes some of the best knives anywhere and probably knows more about metal etc. than anyone I know.

He also pointed out that there were sudden, collapsing buildings in the LA earthquakes, but the loons missed that incident.

To some it up, large jet weighing over 100,000 tons crashes into a building with 50,000 gallons of jet fuel, and bad thing will happen.

Tom, why are you ignoring me? Building 7 please? No airplanes, no jet fuel, yet still a total collapse? And an earthquake? Did you really just suggest that because an earthquake can topple a building, then we should believe a fire can also? They aren’t even similar.

V[/quote]

The building 7 stuff has been debunked fairly well. Check out the Popular Mechanics article.

It seems there was more damage than some initially said, because they made a mistake. Check out what Slayers wrote about some of the firemen testified to. The whackos always leave out stuff that does not prove their point.

[quote]Slayers wrote:
nik133 wrote:
There is no discussion here, all you have is the people who believe the government about 9/11 (since they have never lied before), who go around and around in circles, meanwhile the people who don’t believe the official 9/11 story continually bring up new facts that are ignored. I will pose to you a question, since clearly all of you that believe the official story have all these expert friends who can explain these things:

  1. Why were the terrorist’s bandanas and passports found, yet the black boxes not recovered? How is it possible for paper and string to survive a fire and not a box made out of the strongest material?

  2. WTC 7? Don’t talk to me about fires burning inside because you clearly have a building that I posted a picture of with a much worse fire raging that did not collapse?

  3. Why do we only have a few shots of what is suppose to be a plane hitting the Pentagon, when it is the most widely CCTV monitored building in the world? Why did the FBI minutes after the crash confiscate tapes from hotels nearby that would prove what truly hit the Pentagon? How can the US not secure and make sure that the Pentagon was not hit when it occured almost an hour after the first plane hit the towers?

  4. Why is the exact same sound produced at a demolition video where a bridge is blown up and it is echoed at 9/11? What is that sound?

I look forward to hearing from you guys and your experts!

#1 I have never seen any report other then the page you posted saying that they had found any clothing from the planes at WTC. If they have said it I will give you that that would be a smoking gun and I would also question it too. But I find it hard to believe to you could tell me after thousands of people were around the Towers that it was from someone on 1 of the planes.

#2 building #7 was on fire since after the second crash and had burned unchecked the hole time due to man power issues. When the towers came down there was damage to building #7 at the support structures making them weak. There were no FDNY personal allowed to do anything with building #7 they had a feeling it was going to come down and did not want to risk anything so they just let it go.

#3 You are correct there are tons of camera’s at Pentagon but must are pointed where they would think that cars or people would enter the grounds. Never at anytime did anyone even think that it was possible for a plane to come crashing in to the building. So there are hole in the security as there is in any security.

#4 What sounds are you talking about a video from you tube? All of the firefighters I have talked to say at no point did they hear anything that sounded like demo. There were sounds of the floors coming down and windows being blown out from the air pressure changes but not demo.

If you want to question my experience with Demo I have been in fires at construction sites where blast caps were stored and they make a hell of a noise when they get hot and go off. So the sounds that were heard at the towers were not blast from a demo job.

Also if it was demo why where the people putting in the explosives never seen doing it?
Why did they plant them on upper floors not knowing how it would come down?

I am not hear to argue points with people there are great things to read about it that might swing you one way or another but sometimes some of the reading is just way to far in left field. [/quote]

Great points from an actual expert, not some guy selling dvds.

[quote]tom63 wrote:
Slayers wrote:
nik133 wrote:
There is no discussion here, all you have is the people who believe the government about 9/11 (since they have never lied before), who go around and around in circles, meanwhile the people who don’t believe the official 9/11 story continually bring up new facts that are ignored. I will pose to you a question, since clearly all of you that believe the official story have all these expert friends who can explain these things:

  1. Why were the terrorist’s bandanas and passports found, yet the black boxes not recovered? How is it possible for paper and string to survive a fire and not a box made out of the strongest material?

  2. WTC 7? Don’t talk to me about fires burning inside because you clearly have a building that I posted a picture of with a much worse fire raging that did not collapse?

  3. Why do we only have a few shots of what is suppose to be a plane hitting the Pentagon, when it is the most widely CCTV monitored building in the world? Why did the FBI minutes after the crash confiscate tapes from hotels nearby that would prove what truly hit the Pentagon? How can the US not secure and make sure that the Pentagon was not hit when it occured almost an hour after the first plane hit the towers?

  4. Why is the exact same sound produced at a demolition video where a bridge is blown up and it is echoed at 9/11? What is that sound?

I look forward to hearing from you guys and your experts!

#1 I have never seen any report other then the page you posted saying that they had found any clothing from the planes at WTC. If they have said it I will give you that that would be a smoking gun and I would also question it too. But I find it hard to believe to you could tell me after thousands of people were around the Towers that it was from someone on 1 of the planes.

#2 building #7 was on fire since after the second crash and had burned unchecked the hole time due to man power issues. When the towers came down there was damage to building #7 at the support structures making them weak. There were no FDNY personal allowed to do anything with building #7 they had a feeling it was going to come down and did not want to risk anything so they just let it go.

#3 You are correct there are tons of camera’s at Pentagon but must are pointed where they would think that cars or people would enter the grounds. Never at anytime did anyone even think that it was possible for a plane to come crashing in to the building. So there are hole in the security as there is in any security.

#4 What sounds are you talking about a video from you tube? All of the firefighters I have talked to say at no point did they hear anything that sounded like demo. There were sounds of the floors coming down and windows being blown out from the air pressure changes but not demo.

If you want to question my experience with Demo I have been in fires at construction sites where blast caps were stored and they make a hell of a noise when they get hot and go off. So the sounds that were heard at the towers were not blast from a demo job.

Also if it was demo why where the people putting in the explosives never seen doing it?
Why did they plant them on upper floors not knowing how it would come down?

I am not hear to argue points with people there are great things to read about it that might swing you one way or another but sometimes some of the reading is just way to far in left field.

Great points from an actual expert, not some guy selling dvds.[/quote]

Actually to be honest he didn’t cover why the black boxes weren’t recovered and why that video of a demolition has the exact same sound as an explosion from 9/11, but I’m sure you will Tom? Look forward to hearing you try to squirm your way out of explaining this one! But I guess an American Intelligence General saying 9/11 was a fraud (Albert Stubblebine)- YouTube can’t be talked about here because he is just trying to sell his DVD ;).

[quote]Slayers wrote:
So you are going to say that since Bush sat in a class for 5-10 mins after he was told a plane was high jacked in NY that he knows about it? [/quote]

No, I am not saying that. Bush’s life was in danger. It was in danger more than 5 minutes. Does the fact that the Secret Service failed to do their sworn duty cause reasonable suspicion that the government knew more than they are admitting they knew? Yes, it does. If you were informed on the events you so conveniently summarize, you would know it also.

[quote]
Well lets think about that for a min there plane is in NY president is in FL. Last time I flew from NY to FL it took 2 hours so why rush him out of the building if there is only 1 plane at that time which was what both the Secret Service and Military had been told about then it would seem that he has 1hr 50min before he needs to be rushed to safety. [/quote]

Why use a Strawman argument? I have stated facts. What you are stating is conjecture based on a Strawman argument. The Secret Service is sworn to wisk the president away to safety anytime there is the slightest hint of danger.

Nonetheless, I will bite. Since you used a Strawman, zero sources, and tons of conjecture to posit your argument, I will not provide sources, but I will provide facts.

The Secret Service are held to a strict standard when it comes to protecting the president. After the assassination of President William McKinley in 1901, Congress directed the Secret Service to protect the President of the United States. Protection remains the primary mission of the United States Secret Service.

In 1998, Clinton issued Presidential Decision Directive 62. A portion of PDD-62, which is a classified document, deals with the coordination of Federal anti-terrorism and counter-terrorism assets for events of national interest. When an event is designated a National Special Security Event, the Secret Service assumes its mandated role as the lead agency for the design and implementation of the operational security plan.

9/11 - Possible terrorist incident against President Bush early in the morning at his hotel resort in Florida.

[quote]
“At about 6 a.m. Sept. 11, Longboat Key Fire Marshall Carroll Mooneyhan was at the front desk of the Colony Beach & Tennis Resort as Bush prepared for his morning jog. From that vantage point, Mooneyhan overheard a strange exchange between a Colony receptionist and security guard.
A van occupied by men of Middle Eastern descent had pulled up to the Colony stating they had a â??poolsideâ?? interview with the president, Mooneyhan said. The self-proclaimed reporters then asked for a Secret Service agent by name. Guards from security relayed the request to the receptionist, who had not heard of either the agent or plans for an interview, Mooneyhan said.
The receptionist gave the phone over to a nearby Secret Service agent, who said the same thing â?? no one knew of an agent by that name or of any poolside interview.
The agent told the occupants of the van to contact the presidentâ??s public relations office in Washington, D. C., and turned them away from the premises, Mooneyhan said.” [/quote]

9/11 (8:52 am) - President Bush arrives at Booker Elementary school in Sarasota, FL and is told by his staff that a small, twin-engine plane crashed into the WTC and assumes it’s just an accident and thinks the pilot “must have had a heart attack.”

9/11 (8:55 am) - President Bush goes into a holding room inside Booker Elementary to speak with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice who tells him it was a commercial plane that crashed into the WTC.

9/11 (9:02 am?*) - Even after being told that a commercial plane hit the WTC and apparently never getting in contact with the FAA or NORAD about the previous two hijackings, Bush continues on with his scheduled classroom reading event.

9/11 (9:07 am) - Chief of Staff Andrew Card whispers in Bush’s hear that a second plane has hit the WTC and that America is under attack and then immediately walks away from the president without waiting for any kind of response and President Bush doesn’t look at or even respond to Card after receiving supposedly horrible surprising news.

9/11 (9:08 am*) - President Bush picks up a book after he is just told that his country is under attack and begins to read with 2nd graders for 7 to 11 minutes and after finishing the reading lesson, Bush then takes a few questions from the children before he leaves the classroom.

9/11 (9:31 am) - President Bush is still at the elementary school approx. 25 minutes after being told America’s under attack and gives his first speech of the day there at exactly the same time he was scheduled to make a speech at the school. Bush explains to a room jammed packed with reporters and journalists, teachers and parents, and children and as the back drop to his 9:30am speech and explains to them “America is under attack.”

9/11 (9:34 am) - President Bush leaves Booker Elementary school, he is never evacuated by the Secret Service even though a terrorist attack is happening.

Minutes after the motorcade pulled away from Booker Elementary, a THIRD plane struck another building; The Pentagon at 9:37am.

The secret service never acted to protect the president. This was a dereliction of duty, unless there was reason not to think his life was in danger.

On the other side of the coin:

  1. 9:30 a.m.: The Secretary of State Colin Powell in Lima, Peru abruptly ended his breakfast with the Peruvian president after getting word of the second strike on the trade center and made plans to return to Washington. “Get the plane,” he told an assistant. “Go tell them we’re leaving.” He had a seven-hour flight, with poor phone connections, ahead of him.

9:30 a.m.: United Airlines begins landing all of its flights inside the United States.

  1. 9:32 a.m.: Secret Service agents burst into Cheney’s White House office. They carry him under his arms – nearly lifting him off the ground – and take him to the security of the underground bunker in the White House basement.

9:32 a.m.: The New York Stock Exchange closed.

  1. 9:35 a.m.: United Airlines Flight 93 goes off course near Cleveland, Ohio where it makes a 135 degree turn, and is now headed to the southeast. United Airlines Flight 93 is 375 miles from Newark, New Jersey and 280 miles from where it was now headed, Washington D.C.

Even though the Country was under attack, the president was in an advertised location, and there was no way of knowing when or where the next strike may occur, and the president was 4 miles away from the nearest airport, the Secret Service did not do their job.

[quote]
Can 3 planes be flown by 1 pilot? Well in the times of computers and other things yes the military does missile testing all the time with Drones which are older jets being controlled by a pilot in some building miles away from it and they can control more then one drone. [/quote]

With this type of logic and argument, there is no wonder why it amazes that I am called a conspiracy theorist for questioning the government’s official story.

[quote]
There is a great show on History Chanel right now called Life After People. They had schools and experts look into what is going to happen to the tall standing building in America when no one is going do the maintence on them and they all say that with with metal getting weaker and the weight on upper floors growing from rain and other things that they will collapse on to each other. That is what happened at the Towers weak steal from fires and weight from water collapsed the floors and they were built to only handle certain weight when it is doubled they fail. [/quote]

I saw life after people. It is fiction. I don’t recall it being based on any science, but it is presented as fact.

Since you brought up Concrete, I have attached a couple images. First, images of what concrete looks like when it pancakes.

More pancaked concrete from a building.

This is 9/11 concrete.

[quote]nik133 wrote:
tom63 wrote:
Slayers wrote:
nik133 wrote:
There is no discussion here, all you have is the people who believe the government about 9/11 (since they have never lied before), who go around and around in circles, meanwhile the people who don’t believe the official 9/11 story continually bring up new facts that are ignored. I will pose to you a question, since clearly all of you that believe the official story have all these expert friends who can explain these things:

  1. Why were the terrorist’s bandanas and passports found, yet the black boxes not recovered? How is it possible for paper and string to survive a fire and not a box made out of the strongest material?

  2. WTC 7? Don’t talk to me about fires burning inside because you clearly have a building that I posted a picture of with a much worse fire raging that did not collapse?

  3. Why do we only have a few shots of what is suppose to be a plane hitting the Pentagon, when it is the most widely CCTV monitored building in the world? Why did the FBI minutes after the crash confiscate tapes from hotels nearby that would prove what truly hit the Pentagon? How can the US not secure and make sure that the Pentagon was not hit when it occured almost an hour after the first plane hit the towers?

  4. Why is the exact same sound produced at a demolition video where a bridge is blown up and it is echoed at 9/11? What is that sound?

I look forward to hearing from you guys and your experts!

#1 I have never seen any report other then the page you posted saying that they had found any clothing from the planes at WTC. If they have said it I will give you that that would be a smoking gun and I would also question it too. But I find it hard to believe to you could tell me after thousands of people were around the Towers that it was from someone on 1 of the planes.

#2 building #7 was on fire since after the second crash and had burned unchecked the hole time due to man power issues. When the towers came down there was damage to building #7 at the support structures making them weak. There were no FDNY personal allowed to do anything with building #7 they had a feeling it was going to come down and did not want to risk anything so they just let it go.

#3 You are correct there are tons of camera’s at Pentagon but must are pointed where they would think that cars or people would enter the grounds. Never at anytime did anyone even think that it was possible for a plane to come crashing in to the building. So there are hole in the security as there is in any security.

#4 What sounds are you talking about a video from you tube? All of the firefighters I have talked to say at no point did they hear anything that sounded like demo. There were sounds of the floors coming down and windows being blown out from the air pressure changes but not demo.

If you want to question my experience with Demo I have been in fires at construction sites where blast caps were stored and they make a hell of a noise when they get hot and go off. So the sounds that were heard at the towers were not blast from a demo job.

Also if it was demo why where the people putting in the explosives never seen doing it?
Why did they plant them on upper floors not knowing how it would come down?

I am not hear to argue points with people there are great things to read about it that might swing you one way or another but sometimes some of the reading is just way to far in left field.

Great points from an actual expert, not some guy selling dvds.

Actually to be honest he didn’t cover why the black boxes weren’t recovered and why that video of a demolition has the exact same sound as an explosion from 9/11, but I’m sure you will Tom? Look forward to hearing you try to squirm your way out of explaining this one! But I guess an American Intelligence General saying 9/11 was a fraud (Albert Stubblebine)- YouTube can’t be talked about here because he is just trying to sell his DVD ;).[/quote]

It’s not squirming my way out of it. I don’t have to prove anything to you, because you don’t care about any evidence you are presented with that contradicts what you want to believe.

So a video posted on youtube has some sounds that sound like explosions, but firemen who were there that report there was no explosion like noise are not to be believed?

So some rocket scientist I know explains to me hows and whys of , oh, 50,000 TONS of jet fuel suddenly igniting with the weight of the jet also there causing some collapse and he’s just a shill or something?

Did you read the article I linked in it’s entirety? Or do you want to be a conspiracy loon? Because I might not the answer does not make the loons right. There are plenty of experts that say guys like you are wrong and have explained why, but you don’t want to listen.

Stop by my town and I’ll introduce you to a guy who thinks the local farmers and government are conspiring against him to pollute his drinking water. The same guy who built his septic tank over a well that was drilled to shallow.

Have fun hanging out with Alex Jones imagining that everyone is out to get you.

[quote]tom63 wrote:
And you will see that I talked to a guy who works with metal, was chief materials scientist for a rocket company, ie, a rocket scientist, and he said it’s not possible that the events stated happened that way, they did happen that way.[/quote]

Can you ask your friend to explain how jet fuel caused molten metal to be extracted from the bottom of ground zero up to 6 weeks after the plane collision? please refer to photo, and video. I suppose your friend explained that the fuel burned up on impact as well. The official 9/11 report states the fuel burned on impact, which was the giant fireballs that were observed on impact.

http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/red_hot_ground_zero_low_quality.wmv

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
I’m curious…

What was supposed to have hit the Pentagon?

Mufasa[/quote]

A plane was supposed to have hit the Pentagon on 9/11, 2001.

[quote]tom63 wrote:
He has friends that are actual SEAls etc. guys that work with bombs. He works with metal. Developed one fantastic weapons lube. the stuff will protect metal at 500 degrees and for some time at 600. It will prevent corrosion in boiling seawater for 30 minutes.

He’s a smart fellow, and thinks this conspiracy stuff is silly. And as Mufasa said, you and your friends are finding snippets to prove your point, but poo pooing experts that say you are wrong.[/quote]

What a coincidence, the guy in the video link is also an ex-Seal Demolition expert, a smart guy, and in fact used to be a politician.

http://www.break.com/usercontent/2008/4/Jesse-Ventura-Debates-the-9-11-Conspiracy-Theory-484873.html

[quote]tom63 wrote:
nik133 wrote:
tom63 wrote:
Slayers wrote:
nik133 wrote:
There is no discussion here, all you have is the people who believe the government about 9/11 (since they have never lied before), who go around and around in circles, meanwhile the people who don’t believe the official 9/11 story continually bring up new facts that are ignored. I will pose to you a question, since clearly all of you that believe the official story have all these expert friends who can explain these things:

  1. Why were the terrorist’s bandanas and passports found, yet the black boxes not recovered? How is it possible for paper and string to survive a fire and not a box made out of the strongest material?

  2. WTC 7? Don’t talk to me about fires burning inside because you clearly have a building that I posted a picture of with a much worse fire raging that did not collapse?

  3. Why do we only have a few shots of what is suppose to be a plane hitting the Pentagon, when it is the most widely CCTV monitored building in the world? Why did the FBI minutes after the crash confiscate tapes from hotels nearby that would prove what truly hit the Pentagon? How can the US not secure and make sure that the Pentagon was not hit when it occured almost an hour after the first plane hit the towers?

  4. Why is the exact same sound produced at a demolition video where a bridge is blown up and it is echoed at 9/11? What is that sound?

I look forward to hearing from you guys and your experts!

#1 I have never seen any report other then the page you posted saying that they had found any clothing from the planes at WTC. If they have said it I will give you that that would be a smoking gun and I would also question it too. But I find it hard to believe to you could tell me after thousands of people were around the Towers that it was from someone on 1 of the planes.

#2 building #7 was on fire since after the second crash and had burned unchecked the hole time due to man power issues. When the towers came down there was damage to building #7 at the support structures making them weak. There were no FDNY personal allowed to do anything with building #7 they had a feeling it was going to come down and did not want to risk anything so they just let it go.

#3 You are correct there are tons of camera’s at Pentagon but must are pointed where they would think that cars or people would enter the grounds. Never at anytime did anyone even think that it was possible for a plane to come crashing in to the building. So there are hole in the security as there is in any security.

#4 What sounds are you talking about a video from you tube? All of the firefighters I have talked to say at no point did they hear anything that sounded like demo. There were sounds of the floors coming down and windows being blown out from the air pressure changes but not demo.

If you want to question my experience with Demo I have been in fires at construction sites where blast caps were stored and they make a hell of a noise when they get hot and go off. So the sounds that were heard at the towers were not blast from a demo job.

Also if it was demo why where the people putting in the explosives never seen doing it?
Why did they plant them on upper floors not knowing how it would come down?

I am not hear to argue points with people there are great things to read about it that might swing you one way or another but sometimes some of the reading is just way to far in left field.

Great points from an actual expert, not some guy selling dvds.

Actually to be honest he didn’t cover why the black boxes weren’t recovered and why that video of a demolition has the exact same sound as an explosion from 9/11, but I’m sure you will Tom? Look forward to hearing you try to squirm your way out of explaining this one! But I guess an American Intelligence General saying 9/11 was a fraud (Albert Stubblebine)- YouTube can’t be talked about here because he is just trying to sell his DVD ;).

It’s not squirming my way out of it. I don’t have to prove anything to you, because you don’t care about any evidence you are presented with that contradicts what you want to believe.

So a video posted on youtube has some sounds that sound like explosions, but firemen who were there that report there was no explosion like noise are not to be believed?

So some rocket scientist I know explains to me hows and whys of , oh, 50,000 TONS of jet fuel suddenly igniting with the weight of the jet also there causing some collapse and he’s just a shill or something?

Did you read the article I linked in it’s entirety? Or do you want to be a conspiracy loon? Because I might not the answer does not make the loons right. There are plenty of experts that say guys like you are wrong and have explained why, but you don’t want to listen.

Stop by my town and I’ll introduce you to a guy who thinks the local farmers and government are conspiring against him to pollute his drinking water. The same guy who built his septic tank over a well that was drilled to shallow.

Have fun hanging out with Alex Jones imagining that everyone is out to get you.[/quote]

I will have fun hanging out with a man who predicted 9/11, Obama’s true intentions and the Swine Flu epidemic. You can have fun believing the government who has continually lied to you to get what they wanted, drink up from the chlorine, sorry I meant to say water. BTW Pea you pwn!!!

[quote]tom63 wrote:

It’s not squirming my way out of it. I don’t have to prove anything to you, because you don’t care about any evidence you are presented with that contradicts what you want to believe.

So a video posted on youtube has some sounds that sound like explosions, but firemen who were there that report there was no explosion like noise are not to be believed?

So some rocket scientist I know explains to me hows and whys of , oh, 50,000 TONS of jet fuel suddenly igniting with the weight of the jet also there causing some collapse and he’s just a shill or something?

Did you read the article I linked in it’s entirety? Or do you want to be a conspiracy loon? Because I might not the answer does not make the loons right. There are plenty of experts that say guys like you are wrong and have explained why, but you don’t want to listen.

Stop by my town and I’ll introduce you to a guy who thinks the local farmers and government are conspiring against him to pollute his drinking water. The same guy who built his septic tank over a well that was drilled to shallow.

Have fun hanging out with Alex Jones imagining that everyone is out to get you.[/quote]

There are fireman that USED to attest to hearing distinct sounds of explosions as well. They have since mysteriously “hushed up.”

This is a discussion, not a flame fest. Not one single person with in the Government, has been cited and held accountable for failing to do their jobs and the subsequent deaths/murders of 3000 citizens. Is there one person, be it FAA, NORAD, CIA, FBI, or any supervisors or cabinet Officials that you know of?

This is about how the people FAILED to react properly on OR before 9/11 that could have stopped this AND SAVED LIVES but because of poor choices and poor job performance, in effect, AIDED IN THE DEATHS OF 3000 PEOPLE.

This is an unsolved crime, the evidence has been whisked away before an investigaton could begin. For nearly 2 years the president fought against an investigation, and when there was an investigation dubious people were chosen to perform the investigation, and the product of the investigation was garbage that appears as though it was contrived to explain the government’s theory.

Just because I or anyone else choose to question the government’s inaction & official story does not make me a whack job, loon, or anything else.

The last time I checked, when there is a crime people are charged and convicted. If the perpetrators cannot be found, there is a lengthy investigation.

The further away from this come time gets, the harder it in to investigate.

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Very good point Irish. I like nut cases who can talk about a myriad of things that could never have possibly happened.

[/quote]

I know what you mean. Like when we talk about you getting laid.

There is something I wish you guys would stop saying.

Simply because I feel that a lot of scattered “facts” with no motive or exactly how some incredible feats of sabotage were performed stretches credibility…does NOT mean that I accept the Government’s explanation without question.

Some of you guys think that its “either/or”…you believe the Government or you believe “us” (and some general, group of Architects, whomever…)

I’m approaching all of it with a degree of VERY heavy skepticism.

Also…about the “hints” that this elaborate ruse was perpetrated to “get us into a War in Afghanistan”?

First…we were already there, and had been there for years.

Second…Bin Laden took full responsibility for these bombings and actually posted videos of his celebration afterwards.

Were we in fact in collaboration with him?

If so, why in the world would he want the U.S. to be involved MORE in Afghanistan?

If it was all Governmental…Who planned it? How did they do it? With something that would have required the involvement of at LEAST hundreds of collaborators; why not one “leak” or SOMEBODY coming forth 7 years later? This would LITERALLY be the “Story of the Past Two Centuries” where the U.S. government kills three-thousand plus of it’s citizens and risk the financial health of its entire economy (entire divisions of major Corporations were in those Towers) in order to…do what, exactly?

This can go on and on. But my point is that by not fully accepting a hodge-podge of non-interconnecting “facts” does not make me a sheeple of the U.S. Government.

Mufasa