NIST responding to some explosive-demolition questions.
The CTers sometimes talk about seismic records showing evidence of eplosive demo. False. In fact, the seismic records are very good evidence in ruling out such an event.
Basically, there are a ton of Academic studies, essays, journals, qualified proffesionals (in relevant fields)that have explained the failure of the WTC buildings. And, that have completely ruled out explosive-demo. These writings and journals are easily found.
Again, is there one Structural Engineer/Demo-Explosive expert that refutes the “official story”? Or, anyone, of any other truly relevant field of study, related to the discussion?
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
You are wasting your time. These conspiracy nuts are irrational people and liars to boot.
[/quote]
Zap you are missing American Idol.
Sloth I have been checking out your links. They are interesting. Hopefully you can take a few minutes to see what that MIT graduate presentation has to say as well. He starts at about 20 mins into the vid. He mentions how Weidlinger & Associates’ Chief Engineer who is an expert on building collapes specifically disavowed the pancake theory and the latest study by the NIST (National Institues of Standards & Technology) rejected the floor collapse theory.
[quote]TurboSSR wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
You are wasting your time. These conspiracy nuts are irrational people and liars to boot.
Zap you are missing American Idol.
Sloth I have been checking out your links. They are interesting. Hopefully you can take a few minutes to see what that MIT graduate presentation has to say as well. He starts at about 20 mins into the vid.
[/quote]
Actually I am watching a Nova special on how the towers collapsed on PBS.
Some very interesting insight on how the trusses served to pull away from the wall and contributed to the collapse.
As an engineering graduate myself I find this loose change stuff so poorly done it is an embarassment.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
ctually I am watching a Nova special on how the towers collapsed on PBS.[/quote]
Proof by computer animation.
Are you wondering where the cores are in their computer animations? In that link I posted the MIT grad shows how they are not there to make the pancake theory look plausable.
[quote]TurboSSR wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
ctually I am watching a Nova special on how the towers collapsed on PBS.
Proof by computer animation.
Are you wondering where the cores are in their computer animations? In that link I posted the MIT grad shows how they are not there to make the pancake theory look plausable.
[/quote]
The Nova show is based on the NIST report. It is different than the pancake theory.