You use gloves when you do a workout. That is 100% homo right there.
[quote]maxbm wrote:
You post WAY too much in my thread to be heterosexual. It’s like you have an e-crush on me.
Also, you’re another one in this thread who needs to eat something.[/quote]
shut up, b!tch…
don’t speak without my permission.
Now you’re making double posts. That doesn’t surprise me, considering the amount of gayness you exude.
You really fall veeeeryyy low…
i will leave you just to not feel guilty about you having a sex change surgery.
C U, quasimodo…
[quote]maxbm wrote:
Our CIA helped create Al-Qaeda by funding and arming Osama bin Laden along with the Mujahideen militia who were defending Afghanistan against the Soviet invaders/occupiers from the end of 1979 and throughout most of the '80s.
[/quote]
How does this comment support your case? Yes, the CIA went to great lengths to help create a dangerous, competent Islamic militia movement in order to oppose the USSR. It worked. Unfortunately, the movement didn’t end when the Cold War did, and Bin Laden took issue with the US presence in the middle east.
The straw that broke the camel’s back was when Saudi Arabia allowed US troops to set foot in Islam’s most holy land. This helps to explain why Bin Laden wanted to attack the US. It is completely consistent with the official story.
This brings up a question that I’ve had for some time. You claim that 9/11 was intended to legitimize the Bush preemptive war doctrine. If this is the case, then why didn’t we find any WMD’s in Iraq?
After all, if this NWO is capable of secretly planting enough explosives to bring down the WTC towers, why couldn’t they plant a few vials of anthrax or something in Iraq? This would have totally legitimized the Bush doctrine and opened the door to future conflicts with other countries such as Iran.
Instead, Bush is sitting at 30% approval rating, and a majority of Americans think going to Iraq was a mistake: Iraq . It doesn’t add up. Compared to the complexity of perpetrating the 9/11 attacks, it seems like faking a few WMD’s should be a piece of cake. Maybe they could even establish a link between Osama and Iraq while they’re at it.
I’m looking forward to your responses.
[quote]juanjromero wrote:
maxbm wrote:
You post WAY too much in my thread to be heterosexual. It’s like you have an e-crush on me.
Also, you’re another one in this thread who needs to eat something.
shut up, b!tch…
don’t speak without my permission.[/quote]
[center][photo]15905[/photo][/center]
Timbo,
Just FYI, all the 9/11 conspiracy rambling is maxbm, not me… the way your post has the quotes done it looks like I said it…
[quote]kayveeay wrote:
Timbo,
Just FYI, all the 9/11 conspiracy rambling is maxbm, not me… the way your post has the quotes done it looks like I said it…[/quote]
I see what you mean. I’ll try to edit that for you.
[quote]timbofirstblood wrote:
How does this comment support your case? Yes, the CIA went to great lengths to help create a dangerous, competent Islamic militia movement in order to oppose the USSR. It worked. Unfortunately, the movement didn’t end when the Cold War did, and Bin Laden took issue with the US presence in the middle east.
The straw that broke the camel’s back was when Saudi Arabia allowed US troops to set foot in Islam’s most holy land. This helps to explain why Bin Laden wanted to attack the US. It is completely consistent with the official story.
[/quote]
- If USAma Bin Laden, our government’s #1 boogeyman, was responsible for 9/11, the single most horrific domestic terrorism attack on our nation, then why the hell aren’t the crimes of the 9/11 terrorist attacks mentioned on his FBI Ten Most Wanted webpage? It was updated -after- 9/11/01.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
- If UBL hated the U.S. so much, don’t you think he would claim responsibility for such a tremendous amount of death and destruction inflicted on America?
Here is your “confession” from the man himself:
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/
You’re asking me to get into the minds of sadistic, sociopathic murderers and explain their every move. That’s not an easy task to perform, considering I’m a rational human being.
The absence of WMD in Iraq does -not- disprove complicity of the U.S. government in regards to the 9/11 attacks. Did you ever think that maybe only a small rogue element of the U.S. govt, not the entire bureaucracy, is responsible for 9/11, along with the push for war with Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Iran?
They know that sooner or later the rest of the U.S. govt is going to catch them in the act, so they were biding their time until the next false-flag operation, probably either this year or next year, coming soon to a sprawling metropolis near you.
There already -is- a link between Osama and Saddam. Both men are/were CIA assets.
http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html
[quote]maxbm wrote:
You use gloves when you do a workout. That is 100% homo right there.[/quote]
Argument fail. Gloves? That’s the best you could do?
DW is back!!!
This thread is destined for 100+ pages, or at least until they throw his pedophilia ridden ass out of the public library…
[quote]animalmj wrote:
they throw his pedophilia ridden ass out of the public library…
[/quote]
LOL!
Hahahaha. This thread is filled with laughter, fail and cheesy comebacks. 10/10 on the thread. 3/10 on the physique.
10/10 for your 100% pure homoerotic avatar. It’s funny how most of the people talking shit either don’t have their own pics posted on this board, or are very scrawny, or have an almost completely naked dude as their avatar, or a combination of more than one of the above. Now -that- is “fail” and laughter.
P.S. - The last poster had epic fail with his avatar of the naked dude on a wind-swept beach, like out of some romance novel. Das ist uberghey.
[quote]maxbm wrote:
10/10 for your 100% pure homoerotic avatar. It’s funny how most of the people talking shit either don’t have their own pics posted on this board, or are very scrawny, or have an almost completely naked dude as their avatar, or a combination of more than one of the above. Now -that- is “fail” and laughter.[/quote]
nahh… not really.
Yes… really.
[quote]maxbm wrote:
The last poster had epic fail with his avatar of the naked dude on a wind-swept beach, like out of some romance novel. Das ist uberghey.[/quote]
lol wut.
Never heard of Frank Zane I take it?
I know who he is, a past Mr. Olympia winner, but that pic is more queer than a $2 bill.
[quote]maxbm wrote:
I know who he is, a past Mr. Olympia winner, but that pic is close to being as queer as my picture in the original post.[/quote]
So close, yet so far.
The sting of jealousy hurts when you’re weak and scrawny. Sorry, bro.