Is that all you have? LMAO scraping the barrel!
Spelling isnt my strong point, Im a mechanical engineer.
Feel free to go back through and correct my spelling if that’s all you can do.
Hope you enjoyed the picture, let me know if you need any help understanding it.
Something tells me that spelling isn’t the only thing that isn’t your strong point. It may just be due to an androgen deficiency.
“Millions of years…or 60 maybe.”
LMFAO
Sorry did you not follow that they were responses to two different conversations. Good God you are dumb. Your high T is probably causing brain fog.
You keep getting everything wrong! Its so funny. You should make a video about it.
Oh there will be a video… I can assure you… And it will be funny 
You should do one on evolution.
Yes… And how it relates to lab ranges. Perhaps I can invite you as a guest speaker?
I’d be happy to tell you that lab ranges and hence the normal human range, derived from testing of the population, is directly related to the evolution of our species.
And androgen resistance is what… A myth? You mean that the entire population simply needs to be anywhere in the normal range and they SHOULD be fine… Correct?
No, again you have misunderstood. Not anywhere, somewhere within it. Not above or below.
Dude… This place is troll city… I tell ya
Dbossa I like to listen to all views. Even yours. That’s how I gain knowledge.
Someone who poses a different viewpoint is trolling? Really. You don’t like opposing views your immediate reaction is predictable.
I think that having high testosterone levels, no matter how you feel, is a valid concern.
This is an evolving Field.
Not above. Got it. You’re a mechanical engineer, right? You’re logical, right?
My labs from 6 years ago showed high end of normal as 1100 ng/dL. On a dose of 250mg a week, my total T was 1068 so I was in the normal range. Is this ok with you?
If this is ok with you, what happens now that the ranges have been lowered to mid 700s? This means I wasn’t abusing testosterone 6 years ago, but I am now? Even though I haven’t changed anything?
Please explain this to me like I’m 4.
Your ignorance was kinda amusing at first, but now it’s a little disturbing.
The goal of trt should be to use the least possible dose, that relieves symptoms.
For one person that may be 100mg per week. For someone else, that may be 300mg per week.
Have the lab ranges actually been lowered in Canada, or is this a what-if scenario?
I guess you’re new to TRT?
Lab ranges have been on the steady decline. This is the whole point. My labs showed 1100 as high range 6 years ago. In the early 2000’s they were 1596. They are now mid 700s to mid 800s depending on which lab you use.
My question is, if I wasn’t “abusing” testosterone back then, because I was in your precious ‘normal range’, how am I suddenly a drug abuser now if I haven’t changed anything?
If you’re at 750 ng/dL, and they decide to drop the ranges yet again to high end being 700, can I call YOU a drug abuser at that point? Or will you lower your dose because the number makes you uncomfortable? Will you continue to lower your dose every time some idiot decides it’s time to lower the ranges again?
As a mechanical engineer, you should at least see how ridiculous this would be. Please at least admit to me this would be sheer idiocy.
Of the 25 labs, there were 17 and 13 different sets of reference values for total and free testosterone, respectively. The low reference value for total testosterone ranged from 130 to 450 ng/dL (350% difference), and the upper value ranged from 486 to 1,593 ng/dL (325% difference).
How do YOU go about deciding who is abusing? You don’t, that’s who.
trtwuzup gave you a good explanation, it is an evolving field. You are essentially a guinea pig. Either adapt as new information comes to light, or face the potential health consequences.
I would advocate looking at world wide data on lab ranges however.
Pardon?
See my previous post. You also didn’t answer the direct questions I asked in the post prior to that.
You seem to have a habit of deflecting/avoiding when asked direct questions.
