298 Million Yr Old Forest Found

Professor X,

Based on what you wrote, your position sounds pretty reasonable. You’ve admitted your logic is based on probability and you don’t claim to absolutely know god exists.

Believe it or not, you’re not all that far off from the agnostic atheist position. Your position is still different however.

To illustrate what I’m saying, aliens could come down tomorrow and give us advanced knowledge of the universe rendering all modern theology to be false. Regardless of this new information, many theists would continue believing the claims of the Bible/Qu’ran/whatever. Based on what you wrote, I get the impression you wouldn’t.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
Professor X,

Based on what you wrote, your position sounds pretty reasonable. You’ve admitted your logic is based on probability and you don’t claim to absolutely know god exists.

Believe it or not, you’re not all that far off from the agnostic atheist position. Your position is still different however.

To illustrate what I’m saying, aliens could come down tomorrow and give us advanced knowledge of the universe rendering all modern theology to be false. Regardless of this new information, many theists would continue believing the claims of the Bible/Qu’ran/whatever. Based on what you wrote, I get the impression you wouldn’t.

[/quote]

I’m also saying that in that very same scenario, how do you know that isn’t what the concept of God truly is?

I have seen many of you relating God to a cartoon character…as if your ideas of God are equal to a bearded white guy in a robe. Anyone thinking of it in those terms, whether they be Christians or Atheists, is possibly not able to comprehend much more.

So PX, you’re a deist?

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
So PX, you’re a deist?[/quote]

It’s spelled dentist.

And he doesn’t like people joking about it, trust me.

What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.

[quote]anonym wrote:

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
So PX, you’re a deist?[/quote]

It’s spelled dentist.

And he doesn’t like people joking about it, trust me.[/quote]

Looks like you’re right.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

Without having to re-read the entire thread, what page did you state this on?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I’m also saying that in that very same scenario, how do you know that isn’t what the concept of God truly is?
[/quote]

If god is an abstract non-physical concept it would be irrelevant to me. It would mean god doesn’t interact in the physical world, doesn’t answer prayers for instance and therefore making worship of him unnecessary. By and large that concept of god is useless.

If god is indeed physical and operates within the physical world, then that needs to be demonstrated before I believe in a god.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

I have seen many of you relating God to a cartoon character…as if your ideas of God are equal to a bearded white guy in a robe. Anyone thinking of it in those terms, whether they be Christians or Atheists, is possibly not able to comprehend much more.

[/quote]

Well that’s because it’s a concept of god many people do believe in. I also can’t for life of me understand the justification for believing god cares so much about human sexual practises.

Fuck who you want, fuck who you like. No, I don’t mean children (before someone mentions that).

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

Without having to re-read the entire thread, what page did you state this on?[/quote]

You are one demanding individual when you have yet to answer the following for some reason:

[quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If the goal is to make the belief in God tantamount to believing in a children’s character, why is it you can’t comprehend how insulting that is to educated professionals and the level of hubris/superiority you would have to display to arrive at that conclusion?

I mean, what have you done in life that makes you think you are so much smarter or more grounded?[/quote]

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Your trying to take this in another direction than I intended. Give me 1 example of something you don’t believe in that is not a children’s character.[/quote][/quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

Without having to re-read the entire thread, what page did you state this on?[/quote]

You are one demanding individual when you have yet to answer the following for some reason:

[quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If the goal is to make the belief in God tantamount to believing in a children’s character, why is it you can’t comprehend how insulting that is to educated professionals and the level of hubris/superiority you would have to display to arrive at that conclusion?

I mean, what have you done in life that makes you think you are so much smarter or more grounded?[/quote]

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Your trying to take this in another direction than I intended. Give me 1 example of something you don’t believe in that is not a children’s character.[/quote][/quote][/quote]

I can answer that much better once I have a better understanding of your beliefs.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

Without having to re-read the entire thread, what page did you state this on?[/quote]

You are one demanding individual when you have yet to answer the following for some reason:

[quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If the goal is to make the belief in God tantamount to believing in a children’s character, why is it you can’t comprehend how insulting that is to educated professionals and the level of hubris/superiority you would have to display to arrive at that conclusion?

I mean, what have you done in life that makes you think you are so much smarter or more grounded?[/quote]

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Your trying to take this in another direction than I intended. Give me 1 example of something you don’t believe in that is not a children’s character.[/quote][/quote][/quote]

I can answer that much better once I have a better understanding of your beliefs. [/quote]

My beliefs have nothing to do with that question.

It is very straight forward…yet you run from it.

That is very strange.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What is the deal with so many of you trying to label me when I have already stated what I believe?

If you are having a hard time with labels…GOOD.[/quote]

Without having to re-read the entire thread, what page did you state this on?[/quote]

You are one demanding individual when you have yet to answer the following for some reason:

[quote]

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If the goal is to make the belief in God tantamount to believing in a children’s character, why is it you can’t comprehend how insulting that is to educated professionals and the level of hubris/superiority you would have to display to arrive at that conclusion?

I mean, what have you done in life that makes you think you are so much smarter or more grounded?[/quote]

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Your trying to take this in another direction than I intended. Give me 1 example of something you don’t believe in that is not a children’s character.[/quote][/quote][/quote]

I can answer that much better once I have a better understanding of your beliefs. [/quote]

My beliefs have nothing to do with that question.

It is very straight forward…yet you run from it.

That is very strange.[/quote]

Okay, your question is in response to something I said yesterday. I was assuming that you had certain beliefs which I may have been WRONG about. If I was wrong then my question/statement was invalid which also makes your question invalid.

Poor show. I have noticed none of you seem to want to respond to that even though I have phrased the question three different ways in this thread.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Poor show. I have noticed none of you seem to want to respond to that even though I have phrased the question three different ways in this thread.[/quote]

Ambiguous call outs are for dweebs. Seeing as how you hate labels, try being a little more direct.

Push had the nuts to call people out specifically.

Take some notes from that.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If the goal is to make the belief in God tantamount to believing in a children’s character, why is it you can’t comprehend how insulting that is to educated professionals and the level of hubris/superiority you would have to display to arrive at that conclusion?
[/quote]

It is not the goal, therefore the question part does not apply.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I mean, what have you done in life that makes you think you are so much smarter or more grounded?[/quote]

Nothing, which is why I am not smarter or more grounded.

Professor X, now could you answer my question.

So I read this thread a litte and there is one thing that bugs me,that is when people are quoting engineering professor or anything engineering as valid source/expert. There is so much idiots right now in engineering it doesnt mean anything. In a nutshell engineering is science for dumbasses. But the most pathetic actually is that all these people think they are so smart because they are engineers/studying engineering when in fact they don’t know shit. Carry on.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:
Professor X, now could you answer my question.[/quote]

I’m not restating what I just wrote in this thread. Sorry, guy.

I’m not sure what I havent answer

[quote]anonym wrote:

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
So PX, you’re a deist?[/quote]

It’s spelled dentist.

And he doesn’t like people joking about it, trust me.[/quote]

I lolled.