[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Things I have observed from Hard Knocks
Somebody Has to tell Joe Namath that his pants should not be pulled up to his nipples
His daughter is hot
Rex Ryan loves dropping the F bomb
The lap band surgery was a waste[/quote]
OH NO!!! I had to Tivo due to work sched. Shouldn’t have read this post. Gonna try & get to it tonight. As much I love ya Matty & I do love ya. You can’t bust on the legend that is simply known as Joe Willy. Pants to nips or not, he is the only viable thing we have had to greatness.[/quote]
X2, Joe Nameth rocked that fur coat better than anybody lol.
^ I think the “franchise” will win more games than lose them this yr. Saw Braylon “Kimbo Slice” Edwards on the NFL network last night. Said Mark has great control over the playbook & his confidence is spewing over in the huddle. I’m expecting big things from him this yr. Especially w/LT always being a bail-out.
I honestly think the Jets can do well without Revis. Their CB trio, excluding Revis, is well above average, and the rest of their defense is pretty superb.
Dirty Sanchez just needs to do his best Ben Roethlisberger impression (on the field), manage games, limit his turnovers, and occasionally make a big throw to keep the pressure off of the run game. To me, this team looks very similar in build to the Steelers team that won the Super Bowl.
I dont want to spoil the show for those that didnt see it, but Hard Knocks did a good job showing the depth of the Jets defense, from the studs down to undrafted rookies.
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
I honestly think the Jets can do well without Revis. Their CB trio, excluding Revis, is well above average, and the rest of their defense is pretty superb.
Dirty Sanchez just needs to do his best Ben Roethlisberger impression (on the field), manage games, limit his turnovers, and occasionally make a big throw to keep the pressure off of the run game. To me, this team looks very similar in build to the Steelers team that won the Super Bowl.[/quote]
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
I honestly think the Jets can do well without Revis. Their CB trio, excluding Revis, is well above average, and the rest of their defense is pretty superb.
Dirty Sanchez just needs to do his best Ben Roethlisberger impression (on the field), manage games, limit his turnovers, and occasionally make a big throw to keep the pressure off of the run game. To me, this team looks very similar in build to the Steelers team that won the Super Bowl.[/quote]
My surprise team is the Detroit Lions and Cards…I think the Cards will still win the division even with all the losses, and Stafford is gonna go ape shit this year.
Ever notice how Broadway Joe says the words play and players or anything beginning with a PL? its fucking hilarious.
Mark Sanchize…hmmmm I still think he is gonna throw his fair share of interceptions. With the receiving corp he has (Holmes, edwards and cotchery) I would like to see him less of a game manager and really open it up. I understand the thought of game managing…But their strength to me is their receivers (Keller included) and he has to use them and abuse secondarys
^ Like I said at the begining of this thread, would love to have Rex as the coach of the Cowboys. He is old school and funny as shit. Plus his defenses kick ass.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Like I said at the begining of this thread, would love to have Rex as the coach of the Cowboys. He is old school and funny as shit. Plus his defenses kick ass.[/quote]
Ryan’s coaching abilities are insanely good as well. Tactically, he is pretty much a defensive genius.
Revis should be thankful that he plays in that system, and better sign a contract soon, because I think it is highly likely that Cromartie or Wilson gets plugged into that spot and has a sensational year.
^They have already talked about Revis being back by Mon’ nights opener. As for Wilson, Rex said over the weekend
he is the best corner to come out of college he’s ever seen. & has no problems starting him in the Revis spot. He’s already learned the corner & the nickel positions. Lets just hope Revis is back sooner rather than later.
