2 Children Murder for Fun

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
141

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why does their skin color matter in this instance?

The article didn’t even title itself “black teens”.

The next white criminal I find, can I do the same for dramatic effect?[/quote]

Who do you think President Obama will identify with in this case?

You don’t even try to get it, which is indicative of most blacks that feel what happened in the past requires retribution today.

Blacks that never suffered under civil rights violations of the past feel the need to mete out punishment on whites today that had no hand in those past civil rights violations.

FBI stats for 2007 represent an average year since the Tawana Brawley rape-hoax of 1987, over one-third of a million white women have been sexually assaulted by black males since 1987 with no visible protest from any civil rights leadership or blacks in general.

Researching the FBI numbers for Suicide of a Superpower, this writer concluded: An analysis of single offender victimization figures from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white – with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.

Blacks are outnumbered 5-to-1 in the population by whites, they commit eight times as many crimes against whites as the reverse. By those 2007 numbers, a black male was 40 times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse. Don’t ask for empathy from the majority of the black community.

142

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why does their skin color matter in this instance?

The article didn’t even title itself “black teens”.

The next white criminal I find, can I do the same for dramatic effect?[/quote]

Who do you think President Obama will identify with in this case?

You don’t even try to get it, which is indicative of most blacks that feel what happened in the past requires retribution today.

Blacks that never suffered under civil rights violations of the past feel the need to mete out punishment on whites today that had no hand in those past civil rights violations.

FBI stats for 2007 represent an average year since the Tawana Brawley rape-hoax of 1987, over one-third of a million white women have been sexually assaulted by black males since 1987 with no visible protest from any civil rights leadership or blacks in general.

Researching the FBI numbers for Suicide of a Superpower, this writer concluded: An analysis of single offender victimization figures from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white – with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.

Blacks are outnumbered 5-to-1 in the population by whites, they commit eight times as many crimes against whites as the reverse. By those 2007 numbers, a black male was 40 times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse. Don’t ask for empathy from the majority of the black community.[/quote]

RACIST!

143

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/21/hate-them-heres-what-teen-accused-of-murdering-australian-student-had-to-say-about-white-people-guns-and-killing-on-twitter/

But he had a white guy driving so he must love white people.

144

If these turds of society get charged with anything less than adults committing a hate crime, and murder then there is something seriously fucked up.

145

[quote]Aggv wrote:
If these turds of society get charged with anything less than adults committing a hate crime, and murder then there is something seriously fucked up. [/quote]

I hate the “Hate Crime” laws. I understand they came about for the same reason “Stand Your Ground” had to come about. Our system was ignoring our Basic rights to live and let live. Racist would kill someone for no other reason than how someone looks and the Justice system failed to convict because of lopsided juries and a bias society. So now we have laws that do little but make one murder worse than another.

Stand your Ground should not be needed if our society could just agree that a person has a right "black, white,male female or whatever) to walk as a free citizen without harm and if assaulted has a right to defend.

But we can’t trust ourselves so we need to be constantly watched and guarded by our big brother legal system.

Sorry I went off track.

Fuck everyone envolved Driver included.

146

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

I understand the gun culture in the US is a part of its history and very different from over here, but man, I’m glad I live in a country where I’m a waiting victim. [/quote]

Edit mine,

Enjoy sleeping at night knowing you’ll have no choice but die on your knees.

I’ll die a free man, thank you very much. [/quote]

Did I offend you? If so, I apologise.

I watched that, and though it didn’t tell me much I didn’t already know, I understand your point.

However, Australia enforced strict gun control laws in '96 and we haven’t had a single mass shooting since then, so respectfully, my position hasn’t changed. Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.

147

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Why does their skin color matter in this instance?

The article didn’t even title itself “black teens”.

The next white criminal I find, can I do the same for dramatic effect?[/quote]

Who do you think President Obama will identify with in this case?

You don’t even try to get it, which is indicative of most blacks that feel what happened in the past requires retribution today.

Blacks that never suffered under civil rights violations of the past feel the need to mete out punishment on whites today that had no hand in those past civil rights violations.

[/quote]

RACIST![/quote]

Ya, it is racist, and yes I know you are being sarcastic.

What conservativedog wrote translates to me as:
1.) He beleive all black people are the same, which is pretty stupid.
2.) He thinks black people (most of them) want to somehow punish white people, which is also stupid.

I have never once met a black person that in any way shape or form wanted to, “punish,” white people for past transgressions.

Unlike conservativedog I also don’t live in interent fairy tale land so I have actually met real life black people…

My God, the tone of his entire post is racist…

Also, I took out the crime stats in his post because that’s not what we are disucssing.

148

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

However, Australia enforced strict gun control laws in '96 and we haven’t had a single mass shooting since then, so respectfully, my position hasn’t changed. Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.
[/quote]

I just wanted to point out that Australia’s population is like 7% of America, so I think it’s difficult to say gun laws that work in Australia would work in America. Statistically there is a greater chance of gun violence in America because of sheer #s alone. As far as I know we are much more of a melting pot than your country, which as you can see, can cause issues. You also have to consider proximity; NY for example has about half of your population alone and is obviously much smaller than Australia. With that many people living that close to each other there is bound to be violence.

Basically, what I’m saying is that comparing the two is difficult at best.

149

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

However, Australia enforced strict gun control laws in '96 and we haven’t had a single mass shooting since then, so respectfully, my position hasn’t changed. Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.
[/quote]

I just wanted to point out that Australia’s population is like 7% of America, so I think it’s difficult to say gun laws that work in Australia would work in America. Statistically there is a greater chance of gun violence in America because of sheer #s alone. As far as I know we are much more of a melting pot than your country, which as you can see, can cause issues. You also have to consider proximity; NY for example has about half of your population alone and is obviously much smaller than Australia. With that many people living that close to each other there is bound to be violence.

Basically, what I’m saying is that comparing the two is difficult at best.
[/quote]

Actually, I agree with you. I probably made it sound as I think America should ban guns, but I don’t think it will happen and I doubt it would work anyway, for some of the reasons you said. Your border situation would make gun smuggling easier too.

I don’t like the idea of everyone being armed, but if I lived in the US, I’d probably want a gun too.

150

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

However, Australia enforced strict gun control laws in '96 and we haven’t had a single mass shooting since then, so respectfully, my position hasn’t changed. Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.
[/quote]

I just wanted to point out that Australia’s population is like 7% of America, so I think it’s difficult to say gun laws that work in Australia would work in America. Statistically there is a greater chance of gun violence in America because of sheer #s alone. As far as I know we are much more of a melting pot than your country, which as you can see, can cause issues. You also have to consider proximity; NY for example has about half of your population alone and is obviously much smaller than Australia. With that many people living that close to each other there is bound to be violence.

Basically, what I’m saying is that comparing the two is difficult at best.
[/quote]

Actually, I agree with you. I probably made it sound as I think America should ban guns, but I don’t think it will happen and I doubt it would work anyway, for some of the reasons you said. Your border situation would make gun smuggling easier too.

I don’t like the idea of everyone being armed, but if I lived in the US, I’d probably want a gun too.
[/quote]

Ya, haha, our borders are an issue to say the least!

151

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

However, Australia enforced strict gun control laws in '96 and we haven’t had a single mass shooting since then, so respectfully, my position hasn’t changed. Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.
[/quote]

I just wanted to point out that Australia’s population is like 7% of America, so I think it’s difficult to say gun laws that work in Australia would work in America. Statistically there is a greater chance of gun violence in America because of sheer #s alone. As far as I know we are much more of a melting pot than your country, which as you can see, can cause issues. You also have to consider proximity; NY for example has about half of your population alone and is obviously much smaller than Australia. With that many people living that close to each other there is bound to be violence.

Basically, what I’m saying is that comparing the two is difficult at best.
[/quote]

Actually, I agree with you. I probably made it sound as I think America should ban guns, but I don’t think it will happen and I doubt it would work anyway, for some of the reasons you said. Your border situation would make gun smuggling easier too.

I don’t like the idea of everyone being armed, but if I lived in the US, I’d probably want a gun too.
[/quote]

My only beef with the Anti-Gun crowd is they seem to have no issues with the Police or Military being armed. They want the average Joe to be hands-Feet & Tooth ready only. But the idea of living in a state with the Politicaly controlled Police have the only authority to be armed does not scare them at all.

FUCK THAT

I would respect the argument more if they wanted a total Ban Military down within the country, because while stupid it’s better than the idea of being controlled and protected by armed guards like a Prison.

152

[quote]Cimmerian wrote:

Did I offend you? If so, I apologise.[/quote]

Nope. If you offended anyone it was yourself.

That is wonderful. I mean, I can’t fathom how just amazing that really is.

Good thing the only people that have guns are the people that rule over you in every aspect of your life outside of which bar soap to use in the shower.

That fact that you are defenseless if another country invaded your city or town before a response from your military could be mustered is just totally moot because you don’t have any “mass shootings”.

[quote]Call me naive if you want (or tell me how I’m going to die some more, thanks), but the worst I fear from my government is gross economic mismanagement.
[/quote]

I don’t want to call you naïve, but you leave me no choice.

I wonder how many European Jews felt the same way in the early 20th century?

“My government would NEVER do THAT!”

153

[quote]four60 wrote:
My only beef with the Anti-Gun crowd is they seem to have no issues with the Police or Military being armed. They want the average Joe to be hands-Feet & Tooth ready only. But the idea of living in a state with the Politicaly controlled Police have the only authority to be armed does not scare them at all.

FUCK THAT

I would respect the argument more if they wanted a total Ban Military down within the country, because while stupid it’s better than the idea of being controlled and protected by armed guards like a Prison.[/quote]

This.

If I had a master it certainly isn’t some random dude with a badge, or some jackwagon politician who thinks he/she knows what is better for me even though they have never lived a day in my life.

154
155

[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/22/teen-charged-in-thrill-kill-australian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/[/quote]

See x? this is why you keep your mouth shut lmao. you look like a fish outta water now

156

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/22/teen-charged-in-thrill-kill-australian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/[/quote]

See x? this is why you keep your mouth shut lmao. you look like a fish outta water now
[/quote]

Fish out of water?

Dude is an idiot…and mind you, that was apparently the worst they found?

157

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Who do you think President Obama will identify with in this case? [/quote]

Not sure what you mean here. I am sure the rhetoric is on repeat in your head but the rest of us can’t hear the same voices.

Wow…that isn’t my stance at all.

Like, not in any way what so ever. Nothing I have written is about “retribution for the past”.

My posts are clearly about the here and now…a present day scenario that is the way it is because of what came before.

Understanding that is a must to even have a conversation.

How am I “meting out” punishment?

By asking why you hate a culture just because it is different than your own and why you call it “criminal” or “thuggish” when it is simply a style of dress?[quote]

FBI stats for 2007 represent an average year since the Tawana Brawley rape-hoax of 1987, over one-third of a million white women have been sexually assaulted by black males since 1987 with no visible protest from any civil rights leadership or blacks in general. [/quote]

To my knowledge, many women don\t even report this when it happens…so why are you so confident with these stats?

MOST RAPE OCCURS BY A CLOSE FAMILY MEMBER.

[quote]Researching the FBI numbers for Suicide of a Superpower, this writer concluded: An analysis of single offender victimization figures from the FBI for 2007 finds blacks committed 433,934 crimes against whites, eight times the 55,685 whites committed against blacks. Interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white – with 14,000 assaults on white women by African Americans in 2007. Not one case of a white sexual assault on a black female was found in the FBI study.
[/quote]

I explained this above…all rape cases aren’t even reported…so why do you have so much faith in these stats that seem to only focus on race?

158

According to:

Sexual assault is one of the most under reported crimes, with 54% still being left unreported.

Which brings into question if the race of the suspect may lead to more convictions in the cases that DO finally get reported.

That is why you can’t trust a stat like conservativedog wrote…unless you are using it to support a flimsy race hate stance.

159

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

Blacks are outnumbered 5-to-1 in the population by whites, they commit eight times as many crimes against whites as the reverse. By those 2007 numbers, a black male was 40 times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse. Don’t ask for empathy from the majority of the black community.[/quote]

RACIST![/quote]

Hey…I didn’t write that…he did.

160

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

But blacks get that on a daily basis. No one says a thing against it until another black person raises hell.[/quote]

So do whites. Shit look at the hypocritical contradictory “white privilege” bullshit. I get daily reminders that I’m automatically a racist everyday because I’m white. I start with a strike against me too. And when I comment on this I had people call me a bunch of names right here on this board.[/quote]

I have to disagree with you here.

You wrote this before:

Right in this thread people like conservativedog are trying to link my skin color with an act of violence.

He is literally trying to say my darker skin CAUSES me to be more criminal.

I do not see whites treated that way at all…in any way…at all on a grand scale.

[quote]

Ignoring it isn’t condoning it. [/quote]

Ignoring it too much gives it more of a voice and more power.