I feel like all that is being argued at this point is the color of offenders in unreported rape cases. And, I feel like both sides are trying to act more morally righteous than the other while trying to argue the same thing. Dog is trying to insinuate that most rapes are committed by blacks, which isn’t truly supported by the statistics. So, it’s an invalid argument. However, X is essentially trying to argue that, because many rapes go unreported, most of them could be committed by whites.
Either way, both are just trying to hold the other race at fault for crimes that have gone unreported. Meaning, we have NO IDEA who committed those rapes and any attempt to state what is what on the matter is pure speculation and nothing more. These threads just show everyone’s true colors and how desperate most are to hate on other races. Dog seems to possess some animosity towards blacks, which I think is unfair.
However, in his attempt to vindicate blacks, X is speculating that more blame should be placed on whites. Both arguments seem to be driven, primarily, by nothing but disdain for the other race. I see this thread going nowhere.
http://www.911rape.org/facts-quotes/statistics
Simply put…if you see anyone using “blacks commit most rape” in a sentence, yes, they probably are more racist than they will admit.
Shit.
Another one.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
How about you stop giving a fuck about the skin tone and worry about all those Raped women. And yes those post make you either racist Or just a cruel motherfucker for woman[/quote]
maybe we should pay attention to the women more than the color of the rapist.[/quote]
Without question.
We live in a crazy world. That is never going to change. There will always be crazy people that want to hurt others, even if we were all the same damn color.
Skin color, irrelevant doesn’t stop crazy, nor does it make it more likely to happen.
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
I see this thread going nowhere.[/quote]
That is on you.
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
However, in his attempt to vindicate blacks, X is speculating that more blame should be placed on whites. Both arguments seem to be driven, primarily, by nothing but disdain for the other race. I see this thread going nowhere.[/quote]
And yet, here you are throwing a fit because X wants to ‘‘vindicate’’ blacks. Funny how you don’t mention the rest of the white posters who love to ‘‘vindicate’’ whites.
It’s X this, X that. You probably have wet dreams about him too.
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
However, X is essentially trying to argue that, because many rapes go unreported, most of them could be committed by whites. [/quote]
You add nothing to this forum.
That is not my argument. My argument is simply that anyone holding BLACKS responsible for most rapes is a racist because the facts don’t support it.
You are the one adding everything else.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/22/teen-charged-in-thrill-kill-australian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/[/quote]
See x? this is why you keep your mouth shut lmao. you look like a fish outta water now
[/quote]
Fish out of water?
Dude is an idiot…and mind you, that was apparently the worst they found?
[/quote]
Woah, woah. So when there is little evidence to support George Zimmerman being a racist you jump on that bandwagon and want to condemn him, but this “dude is an idiot”? Does it need to be any worse than this? Are you able to at least entertain the idea that Lane was shot simply for being white? Zimmerman was vilified for far less than this. I’ll be the first to admit that when information came out about the Martin shooting I was certain that it was racially motivated but I don’t believe that anymore.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]J. Prufrock wrote:
However, X is essentially trying to argue that, because many rapes go unreported, most of them could be committed by whites. [/quote]
You add nothing to this forum.
That is not my argument. My argument is simply that anyone holding BLACKS responsible for most rapes is a racist because the facts don’t support it.
You are the one adding everything else.
[/quote]
Look, I’m used to your whole, “You add nothing/whine/random insult” ploy. Okay, act your age. I said in my post that you are arguing that it is unfair to assume that blacks commit most rapes. Yes? Good. Now, if that is your argument (that it couldn’t possibly be mostly blacks), then who is it? Is it Hispanics? Those of Asian ethnic background?
Or, does everyone just share some of the blame? Just be honest, you were more than ready to agree with the “must be white frat-boys” comment. I see more racist comments coming from you than some others on here. You always make it about race. Always. Learn to play another tune. INB4 “WTF???”
Shit Prof, you got a tan or what?
You look blacker than you’ve ever been!
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Shit Prof, you got a tan or what?
You look blacker than you’ve ever been![/quote]
That’s how dark I really am. Just shitty cameras up until now.
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/22/teen-charged-in-thrill-kill-australian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/[/quote]
See x? this is why you keep your mouth shut lmao. you look like a fish outta water now
[/quote]
Fish out of water?
Dude is an idiot…and mind you, that was apparently the worst they found?
[/quote]
Woah, woah. So when there is little evidence to support George Zimmerman being a racist you jump on that bandwagon and want to condemn him, but this “dude is an idiot”? Does it need to be any worse than this? Are you able to at least entertain the idea that Lane was shot simply for being white? Zimmerman was vilified for far less than this. I’ll be the first to admit that when information came out about the Martin shooting I was certain that it was racially motivated but I don’t believe that anymore.
[/quote]
Yeah, your problem with what you just wrote is you never saw me condemn Zimmerman as a “racist”. I stayed out of that initial Zimmerman debate like others in this thread have already said.
Not to mention, those statements look like “lol jackass comments”…not “I am going to kill whitey” comments.
if that is the worst they can find, branding him a racist with his white friend driving is gonna be a rough ride.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Shit Prof, you got a tan or what?
You look blacker than you’ve ever been![/quote]
That’s how dark I really am. Just shitty cameras up until now.[/quote]
Fucking hell!
No wonder no one can talk shit to your face at the gym or in the street, Brotha.
You’re one scary BIG BLAAAAACK motherfucker.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
[quote]cwill1973 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/22/teen-charged-in-thrill-kill-australian-college-student-in-oklahoma-has-racist/[/quote]
See x? this is why you keep your mouth shut lmao. you look like a fish outta water now
[/quote]
Fish out of water?
Dude is an idiot…and mind you, that was apparently the worst they found?
[/quote]
Woah, woah. So when there is little evidence to support George Zimmerman being a racist you jump on that bandwagon and want to condemn him, but this “dude is an idiot”? Does it need to be any worse than this? Are you able to at least entertain the idea that Lane was shot simply for being white? Zimmerman was vilified for far less than this. I’ll be the first to admit that when information came out about the Martin shooting I was certain that it was racially motivated but I don’t believe that anymore.
[/quote]
Yeah, your problem with what you just wrote is you never saw me condemn Zimmerman as a “racist”. I stayed out of that initial Zimmerman debate like others in this thread have already said.
Not to mention, those statements look like “lol jackass comments”…not “I am going to kill whitey” comments.
if that is the worst they can find, branding him a racist with his white friend driving is gonna be a rough ride.[/quote]
While you may not have directly stated Zimmerman was a racist (I have not yet gone through all of Trayvon Martin 2 thread) you did insinuate that Zimmerman was racially motivated.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Yes, there are social implications to basically saying it is alright to judge a black man as a THREAT because he is dressed in a very common fashion item or “acting black”.
The issue was never what specific race Zimmerman was but what he was PERCEIVED as and what Martin was PERCEIVED as at the time of the incident.
[/quote]
Page 10 of Trayvon Martin 2 if you’re interested. And how do his statements appear to be “lol jackass comments”? If I were to come in here and post that “90% of Blacks are trashy. #HATE THEM.” would you label me a racist? His friend does not appear to me to be white as you contend. He appears to either be hispanic or mixed-race background.
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
While you may not have directly stated Zimmerman was a racist [/quote]
No, you can stop right there. That is what you accused me of…thank you for now admitting you were wrong.
Like I wrote, if that is the worst they can find, yes, that sounds like “troll” comments like many people here make.
If they found a manifesto pledging to kill white people, then they would have a story.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
While you may not have directly stated Zimmerman was a racist [/quote]
No, you can stop right there. That is what you accused me of…thank you for now admitting you were wrong.
Like I wrote, if that is the worst they can find, yes, that sounds like “troll” comments like many people here make.
If they found a manifesto pledging to kill white people, then they would have a story.
[/quote]
Tweeting about how you hate white people and bragging about knocking out 5 of them since the Trayvon Martin trial and that you plan to knock out more is just trolling? You can not be this thick.
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
Tweeting about how you hate white people and bragging about knocking out 5 of them since the Trayvon Martin trial and that you plan to knock out more is just trolling? You can not be this thick.[/quote]
You can have whatever opinion you want, but no, those TWO COMMENTS which was all they apparently found don’t mean much.
If he had 50 comments like that, then maybe.
If he was more explicit then maybe.
But if you jump to “full out race hate killer” from those two comments, you were looking to do that anyway.
It just doesn’t vibe.
Someone truly on a rampage like that would do more than make two snarky troll comments like that.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
Tweeting about how you hate white people and bragging about knocking out 5 of them since the Trayvon Martin trial and that you plan to knock out more is just trolling? You can not be this thick.[/quote]
You can have whatever opinion you want, but no, those TWO COMMENTS which was all they apparently found don’t mean much.
If he had 50 comments like that, then maybe.
If he was more explicit then maybe.
But if you jump to “full out race hate killer” from those two comments, you were looking to do that anyway.
It just doesn’t vibe.
Someone truly on a rampage like that would do more than make two snarky troll comments like that. [/quote]
Like make a tweet about taking lives? Or shooting someone just for fun?
[quote]BeefEater wrote:
Like make a tweet about taking lives? Or shooting someone just for fun?
[/quote]
“90% of white ppl are nasty. #HATE THEM.” Another post read, “Ayeee I knocced out 5 woods since Zimmerman court!:)”
Uh, yeah…if that sounds like a confession and not a kid acting like an ass, more power to you.
I won’t ride that train with you until they find more than this.