[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Google Robert Reich then hit youtube he does a lot of college lectures [/quote]
No thanks. Based on the “lies” video and the fact he thinks America is a Democracy, I’m pretty sure I’m not missing much.
But thanks, I’ll get my progressive propaganda from Hollywood like the rest of the uninformed co-eds he is lecturing.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Google Robert Reich then hit youtube he does a lot of college lectures [/quote]
No thanks. Based on the “lies” video and the fact he thinks America is a Democracy, I’m pretty sure I’m not missing much.
But thanks, I’ll get my progressive propaganda from Hollywood like the rest of the uninformed co-eds he is lecturing.[/quote]
Search Results
de·moc·ra·Cy
diË?mäkrÉ?sÄ?/
noun
noun: democracy
1.
a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.
"capitalism and democracy are ascendant in the third world"
synonyms: representative government, elective government;
I personally do not think you realize a republic and a democracy are indistinguishable
re·pub·lic
riË?pÉ?blik/
noun
noun: republic;â??plural noun: republics
1.
a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
archaic
a group with a certain equality between its members.
Origin
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not think you realize a republic and a democracy are indistinguishable
[/quote]
You are officially a moron.
Well done.
I’ve tried, and tired again to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I just can’t anymore. You need to put down the bong, you are post toastie.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally do not think you realize a republic and a democracy are indistinguishable
[/quote]
You are officially a moron.
Well done.
I’ve tried, and tired again to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I just can’t anymore. You need to put down the bong, you are post toastie. [/quote]
It’s like arguing with X…
Oh my feeling are crushed 
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
some youtube that anyone with a clue could pick apart.
[/quote]
Just… lol
No wonder you love this guy. He is the low information partisan’s wetdream. (On a video produced by a website aimed at low information partisans.)
[/quote]
no more than Sowell
[/quote]
Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep at night.
[/quote]
I really like Sowell and rarely take exception with his writing; but he is no less an ideologue than Reich.
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
I really like Sowell and rarely take exception with his writing; but he is no less an ideologue than Reich. [/quote]
Ideologue? I’d have less of an objection to.
Parisian propaganda minister like in that video? Sowell is no such thing.
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
some youtube that anyone with a clue could pick apart.
[/quote]
Just… lol
No wonder you love this guy. He is the low information partisan’s wetdream. (On a video produced by a website aimed at low information partisans.)
[/quote]
no more than Sowell
[/quote]
Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep at night.
[/quote]
I really like Sowell and rarely take exception with his writing; but he is no less an ideologue than Reich. [/quote]
I personally like Sowell also
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
I really like Sowell and rarely take exception with his writing; but he is no less an ideologue than Reich. [/quote]
Ideologue? I’d have less of an objection to.
Parisian propaganda minister like in that video? Sowell is no such thing. [/quote]
Yes…I prefer a different style of presentation myself.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally like Sowell also [/quote]
What is it that you like about Sowell? His views seem pretty opposite your own.
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally like Sowell also [/quote]
What is it that you like about Sowell? His views seem pretty opposite your own.
I like his objectivity , from what I have seen he does not disagree he states his points and allows you to make your decision
I did not watch your video , I can tell I will not like it
I like this better
[quote]RyuuKyuzo wrote:
Mhmm.[/quote]
It is coming no matter , might as well get the industry going for robots , I personally think it is a long way out
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So subsidizing through increased prices & increased unemployment is better that whatever current subsidizing is going on?
oh… okay. [/quote]
If minimum wage was increased to 10.50,which is roughly has the same purchasing power as it did in the late 60’s, price to businesses would only one increase 3-4% something the consumer could easily absorb. And the evidence of the past shows no decrease of employment. Sante Fe increased minimum wage by 65% with no decrease in employment.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So subsidizing through increased prices & increased unemployment is better that whatever current subsidizing is going on?
oh… okay. [/quote]
If minimum wage was increased to 10.50,which is roughly has the same purchasing power as it did in the late 60’s, price to businesses would only one increase 3-4% something the consumer could easily absorb. And the evidence of the past shows no decrease of employment. Sante Fe increased minimum wage by 65% with no decrease in employment.[/quote]
Why should the consumer have to absorb it? The people who are you know educated and actually worked for where they are pay the bulk of the taxes that are subsidizing these people who think they deserve everything without having to better themselves. Why should we have to absorb EVEN more costs?
[quote]Bauber wrote:
Why should the consumer have to absorb it? The people who are you know educated and actually worked for where they are pay the bulk of the taxes that are subsidizing these people who think they deserve everything without having to better themselves. Why should we have to absorb EVEN more costs?[/quote]
Because in this country we have the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which prohibits the making of any law respecting the establishment of religion, so we should create laws based on Bible verses like Luke 6:38: For if you give, you will get! Your gift will return to you in full and overflowing measure, pressed down, shaken together to make room for more, and running over. Whatever measure you use to give – large or small – will be used to measure what is given back to you.
That explanation makes sense, right?
This is going to put a bigger hole in the economy of America than Ronny Reagan did . There are 3.5 million truck drivers in America
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
This is going to put a bigger hole in the economy of America than Ronny Reagan did . There are 3.5 million truck drivers in America [/quote]
So advances in technology have been okay until now, but any further advances will hurt the economy?
