[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Largely because you wouldn’t be bitching anything like as much if a 14 year old boy were doing the same thing. Like I say, you can go fuck yourself. Calling you a self-congratulating oaf doesn’t qualify as white knighting.
[/quote]
why are you guys beefing?
I already hit it, she wasn’t that great, neither was her form. case closed. one love. [/quote]
So you are a statuary Rapist? Bro, sorry to tell you but she hit you.
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Largely because you wouldn’t be bitching anything like as much if a 14 year old boy were doing the same thing. Like I say, you can go fuck yourself. Calling you a self-congratulating oaf doesn’t qualify as white knighting.
[/quote]
why are you guys beefing?
I already hit it, she wasn’t that great, neither was her form. case closed. one love. [/quote]
So you are a statuary Rapist? Bro, sorry to tell you but she hit you.
[/quote]
I can’t hide who I am, I refuse.
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Largely because you wouldn’t be bitching anything like as much if a 14 year old boy were doing the same thing. Like I say, you can go fuck yourself. Calling you a self-congratulating oaf doesn’t qualify as white knighting.
[/quote]
why are you guys beefing?
I already hit it, she wasn’t that great, neither was her form. case closed. one love. [/quote]
Back off dude, I already called dibbs when she turns 18. Dem genes nomsaying?
[quote]sgdiablo wrote:
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Largely because you wouldn’t be bitching anything like as much if a 14 year old boy were doing the same thing. Like I say, you can go fuck yourself. Calling you a self-congratulating oaf doesn’t qualify as white knighting.
[/quote]
why are you guys beefing?
I already hit it, she wasn’t that great, neither was her form. case closed. one love. [/quote]
Back off dude, I already called dibbs when she turns 18. Dem genes nomsaying?
[/quote]
lol waiting for her to turn 18. fucking conservative, you lose!
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
LOL instant panty-twist. I’ve no idea what mental gymnastics you’ve performed to construe what I’ve said as sexist,[/quote]
the same mental gymnastics you had performed…
[quote]
and beyond entertainment value I can’t think of a reason why I’d want to. But if there was any true criticism (note spelling) to be made, you haven’t bothered.[/quote]
read harder
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]sgdiablo wrote:
[quote]Claudan wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Largely because you wouldn’t be bitching anything like as much if a 14 year old boy were doing the same thing. Like I say, you can go fuck yourself. Calling you a self-congratulating oaf doesn’t qualify as white knighting.
[/quote]
why are you guys beefing?
I already hit it, she wasn’t that great, neither was her form. case closed. one love. [/quote]
Back off dude, I already called dibbs when she turns 18. Dem genes nomsaying?
[/quote]
lol waiting for her to turn 18. fucking conservative, you lose! [/quote]
It’s worth the investement…by then she’ll be repping 405 like it’s nothing haha
I think she is fantastic. this was strictly an exhibition, and she did great.
The can thing was simply because she didn’t have any boards. I don’t see where lifting a Tuna can could be considered as assisting.
If she sticks around for a few years she will own a ton of records.
[quote]Big Bencher wrote:
The can thing was simply because she didn’t have any boards. I don’t see where lifting a Tuna can could be considered as assisting.
[/quote]
It’s assisting unless you scream, “It’s all you!” while doing it.
[quote]Silyak wrote:
[quote]Big Bencher wrote:
The can thing was simply because she didn’t have any boards. I don’t see where lifting a Tuna can could be considered as assisting.
[/quote]
It’s assisting unless you scream, “It’s all you!” while doing it.[/quote]
Just like screaming, “NO HOMO!!!” before ghey sex?
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
LOL instant panty-twist.[/quote]
Insulting a man by implying that he wears panties is anti-feminist, as it relies on patriarchal ideals of masculinity and femininity to shame the man. It is also misogynist, because the man is being insulted for his similarities to a woman.
[quote]nephorm wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
LOL instant panty-twist.[/quote]
Insulting a man by implying that he wears panties is anti-feminist, as it relies on patriarchal ideals of masculinity and femininity to shame the man. It is also misogynist, because the man is being insulted for his similarities to a woman. [/quote]
Sooo…
Great fun all around?
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Most of the criticism is basically sexist, and those responsible for it can go fuck themselves.[/quote]
How is it sexist? If it was a pimply faced 14 y ear old boy the gloves would be off…given she’s a pretty cute girl everything is basically biased in saying good for her.
[quote]sen say wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Most of the criticism is basically sexist, and those responsible for it can go fuck themselves.[/quote]
How is it sexist? If it was a pimply faced 14 y ear old boy the gloves would be off…given she’s a pretty cute girl everything is basically biased in saying good for her.[/quote]
Not that I want to ever defend DS, but that is kind of the definition of sexist…
[quote]GeneticSynergy9 wrote:
[quote]sen say wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Most of the criticism is basically sexist, and those responsible for it can go fuck themselves.[/quote]
How is it sexist? If it was a pimply faced 14 y ear old boy the gloves would be off…given she’s a pretty cute girl everything is basically biased in saying good for her.[/quote]
Not that I want to ever defend DS, but that is kind of the definition of sexist…[/quote]
The entire idea of weight classes is sexist. Sexism is not a bad thing. But DS is completely clueless as to the sexism going on here.
[quote]Silyak wrote:
[quote]GeneticSynergy9 wrote:
[quote]sen say wrote:
[quote]Der_Steppenwolfe wrote:
Most of the criticism is basically sexist, and those responsible for it can go fuck themselves.[/quote]
How is it sexist? If it was a pimply faced 14 y ear old boy the gloves would be off…given she’s a pretty cute girl everything is basically biased in saying good for her.[/quote]
Not that I want to ever defend DS, but that is kind of the definition of sexist…[/quote]
The entire idea of weight classes is sexist. Sexism is not a bad thing. But DS is completely clueless as to the sexism going on here.[/quote]
Completely agreed, I was just replying to the “How is it sexist?” remark above.
Except for not touching her chest and no pause, it’s still impressive