[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
I can only hear myself![/quote]
No, you can only hear what you can relate to through personal experience. [/quote]
Actually, I relate to others’ experiences for a living, and I’m very good at it as indicated by the numbers of people who request to work with me after encountering me through an intake, group situation, or crisis encounter. Referrals to friends from my clients would seem to suggest that people who know me better find me extremely relatable, too. These would include impoverished people, mentally ill people, handicapped people, grandmothers, fathers, and teen boys; none of which I am. I’m fascinated by others’ experiences, in fact, and can’t get enough of hearing about them. Which is why you interest me so. It’s your dogged adherence to such maladjustment and poor outcome that captivate me. I can certainly relate, to you and the others espousing your views. It’s very easy to do!
Got fucked over = bitter.
Got fucked over + read page upon page written by embittered others calling for “justice” against people who are not quite as entirely human/rational as oneself = bitter + wary + begin us vs. them mindset (enemy is identified).
Got fucked over + read page upon page written by embittered others calling for “justice” against people who are not quite as entirely human/rational as oneself + begin behaving in prescribed ways in order to defend against enemy = find women unintelligent and broken enough that they don’t mind this and assumptions about enemy are confirmed, vindicates bitter + wary + us vs. them mindset.
Again, several (many?) men here agree with my take on things. So it’s not just me, being my blankly hypergamic self. Do you know what my (and their) take on things is? Have YOU been able to relate?
[/quote]
Me me me…
You dont read your own posts do you?
Not really that one, because that actually is about what you can relate to, but generally.
We had a few threads together so you can look them up and you can see that I try to make sense of personal experiences by interpreting them as a specific case where general rules apply, while you constantly say that those general principles are not valid because they are not validated by your personal experiences and emotions about them.
Since the internet is chock full of women describing their experiences and all the other women relating to her by describing their experiences you can easily look up how eerily similar their modus operandi is to yours.
There is nothing wrong with that.
It is just that this tendency combined with massive snowflaking makes women literally blind to their own instincts regarding procreation and the emergent system that necessarily evolves because of them.
In a way that is good too, because the most intelligent women can be “gamed” so to speak if she is unable to look her instincts in the eye and reign them in.
Finally, unless you believe that I am lying, how come that my narrow and somewhat deluded ideas actually seem to work?
I mean, there is a phase space of ideas out there, I could literally believe anything and it should do nothing for me.
Yet I believe very specific things and it does a lot for me.
Whats up with that?
[/quote]
“Does a lot for me” = 40 years old and still limited to meaningless one-night sex?
[/quote]
“Does a lot for me” = blackmail a girl into having sex with you and then create some narrative where you’re the Alpha Male and she actually instinctively wants this so it sounds less rapey than it really is.
[/quote]
“blackmail”… tsk…tsk…tsk…
Words have a meaning you know.
She asked for my price, she got it.
