[quote]Aleksandr wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
Well, I’d say this picture definitely qualifies as child pornography according to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2256, wouldn’t you say, Doogie?
Those fucking French perverts.
OMG you are going to jail for having child porn on your computer and for distributing it. I know, I’ve seen the law!!!11[/quote]
But apparently you can’t read it.
[quote]doogie wrote:
Aleksandr wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
Well, I’d say this picture definitely qualifies as child pornography according to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2256, wouldn’t you say, Doogie?
Those fucking French perverts.
OMG you are going to jail for having child porn on your computer and for distributing it. I know, I’ve seen the law!!!
But apparently you can’t read it.[/quote]
Oh, I don’t know. This is a gray area. The law plainly states that if a visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, then it’s child porn.
A little girl touching a gigantic phallic-shaped artillery shell probably “appears to be” obscenely sexually explicit to some people.
Probably the same people who look at drawings of sexually mature women with juvenile faces and immediately associate them with children.
[quote]Vegita wrote:
And just to defend harris, god can give me a blowjob too! I mean take the best blowjob on earth and make it a million times better. After all he did create the blowjob, so i’m pretty sure he could give the best blowjob in existance. I see no problem with this line of thinking or for harris requesting it.
V[/quote]
Well, since God is a girl, getting a bj would be rather in order. Also, I’d eat her out.
hh, search the definition of troll. harris isn’t a troll.
I agree with Sabrina. Who died and left you in charge of what’s moral or not?
[quote]kroby wrote:
I agree with Sabrina. Who died and left you in charge of what’s moral or not?[/quote]
God, apparently, according to Nietzsche.
I will admit, I enjoy headhunter… and Mr.Pushups… remember him?
Without darkness, how is one to discern the light?
or…
Without the cave, how do we realize we are nothing but shadows and dust? Shadows and dust I say!
How would we define ourselves if not for those opposing viewpoints?
I think it very difficult for hh for the fact that he is in the vast minority wrt morals on this site.
You are the spice of life, hh. It’s up to all the others to decide whether you’re cinnamon or anise.
[quote]kroby wrote:
You are the spice of life, hh. It’s up to all the others to decide whether you’re cinnamon or anise.[/quote]
Nutmeg.
There are a few things needed to mature, grow up, however you want to put it.
Realize that your parents arent always right and they DO and have made mistakes.
The whole thing about the older generation not getting the younger generation is a crock O SHIT! If we all have one thing in common it is that we have thought no one else understood us. Every generation goes thru this and it is what makes us all the same. Try and wrap your head around that one.
The people who are making rude comments about god are just looking for a response. They feel better the more of a response they get. Ignore them and they will go away. I do however think it is ok for people to make comments like this.
Think about it, what is the alternative, killing people for publishing a cartoon that depicts Ala in a bad way? Oh that was already done and I think we all looked down on the people that did this. I have a question, how is this different than not allowing people to speak their mind? It doesnt matter that the person was just looking for a response to sound cool, this is what separates us for THEM right?
The next is we should not depict adolescent girls as sex objects. At what point is the age cutoff could be debated but seeing a baby in diapers with boobs would be there right? Well this follows back to the whole Im different so you just dont get me man saying. Crock o SHIT. Every generation will push the limits as far as they can to prove they are different. Showing obviously preteen girls this way is to far.
Finding the cutoff for the age is not set in stone but society will tell you what is too young and I think preteens is the general consensus.
Reading the posts from the younger generation saying your old this is what we do or whatever makes me laugh. Remember #2? It is obvious we are all the same and anyone different is just insane, so either you accept this or by definition you are insane!
I never paid attention in high school but they do still teach history correct? Pick up a book and read it, you may start to see things more clearly.
God is definatley a hot chick with nice dsl’s.
How about this for mind blowing, a couple 18 year old girls going on howard stern and hooking dildos up to sawzaws, cake mixers, power drills, and all sorts of machinery.
Or how about the girls who line up to get pissed on or shit on in porn?
And yet we have people who don’t complain about that but think anime is kiddie porn. You show me pictures of one real girl under the age of 18 with the builds of those anime cartoons and i’ll concede that it’s kiddie porn.
You know finally one woman had some common sense latley, one of the mothers of one of these 15 or 16 year old boys who got to drop heat on his hot blonde teacher, dropped the charges against the teacher because the kid was getting made fun of so much for taking the teacher to court the mom thought he would go through more emotional distress if they continued the lawsuit. The government put the consent age to 18 to make sure everyone was ready to handle thier business.
Unfortunately maturity happens at different times for different people and I have had sex with a few people over 20 and one over 30 who were not mature enough to handle the situation. also when I was under 18 I had sex with girls under 18 and they were all mature enough to handle what we were doing.
I’m glad the laws are there and shit, and any guy buying a video of a little girl or girls and the video zooms in on the pelvic area for extended periods of time, yea thats fucked up and the guy needs a kick in the head to re-wire his brain. Anime, with girth with quadrouple d tits and long legs and perfect asses is not kiddie porn no matter how bad you want it to be.
The fact of it is is that this is some peoples view of perfection. Just like comic books make our superheroes have amazing proportions, well our cartoon porn guys are going to do the same.
There ya go, vegita weighs in and nobody gives a shit.
V
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
kroby wrote:
You are the spice of life, hh. It’s up to all the others to decide whether you’re cinnamon or anise.
Nutmeg.[/quote]
anise = dillweed. Now, isn’t that funnier?
[quote]B415 wrote:
There are a few things needed to mature, grow up, however you want to put it.
I don’t know what the hell you are getting at with this.[quote]
2) The whole thing about the older generation not getting the younger generation is a crock O SHIT! If we all have one thing in common it is that we have thought no one else understood us. Every generation goes thru this and it is what makes us all the same. Try and wrap your head around that one. [/quote]
I disagree, there are plenty of older people that don’t understand younger people. But it’s not the lack of understanding that irritates me, it’s the refusal to try.
[quote]
3) The people who are making rude comments about god are just looking for a response. They feel better the more of a response they get. Ignore them and they will go away. I do however think it is ok for people to make comments like this. [/quote]
I was one, but the only reason I said anything was because too often I see extremely rude comments about people who don’t believe in God. These people make me laugh when they claim to hold Christian values yet throw them all away to degrade, insult, and belittle someone who doesn’t share the same beliefs.[quote]
Think about it, what is the alternative, killing people for publishing a cartoon that depicts Ala in a bad way? Oh that was already done and I think we all looked down on the people that did this. I have a question, how is this different than not allowing people to speak their mind? It doesnt matter that the person was just looking for a response to sound cool, this is what separates us for THEM right?
The next is we should not depict adolescent girls as sex objects. At what point is the age cutoff could be debated but seeing a baby in diapers with boobs would be there right? Well this follows back to the whole Im different so you just dont get me man saying. Crock o SHIT. Every generation will push the limits as far as they can to prove they are different. Showing obviously preteen girls this way is to far. [/quote]
What exactly are you refering to? I’m getting the feeling that you just wanted to rant for the sake of ranting.[quote]
Finding the cutoff for the age is not set in stone but society will tell you what is too young and I think preteens is the general consensus.
See what clearly?
I have no idea what the point of your post was.
[quote]Vegita wrote:
The fact of it is is that this is some peoples view of perfection. Just like comic books make our superheroes have amazing proportions, well our cartoon porn guys are going to do the same.
[/quote]
This really makes sense right here. Nobody wants to age and wrinkle. Everybody wants to stay and look young. So what’s wrong with drawing an image with an obviously mature and very perfect body with what could be argued as a perfect face to match? A face that has matured, but not to the point of showing signs of aging.
Boy is this going to be fun!
[quote]B415 wrote:
So you have devalued their personal opinion as being simply rude. Read: Either you believe my way, or you’re rude.
[quote]B415 wrote:
The next is we should not depict adolescent girls as sex objects… Showing obviously preteen girls this way is to far. [/quote]
And that is what “commandment?”
[quote]B415 wrote:
Remember #2? It is obvious we are all the same and anyone different is just insane, so either you accept this or by definition you are insane! [/quote]
Again, read: believe me, otherwise you are insane.
[quote]B415 wrote:
6) I never paid attention in high school but they do still teach history correct? Pick up a book and read it, you may start to see things more clearly.
[/quote]
And again, read: I’m smart. You obviously aren’t, so go back to school and get educated like me.
Apparently B415 sees the world as two camps. Us and Them. B415, your sanctimonious pontification bordering zealot status assumes that #1: there are only two camps; and #2:I believe there are only two camps. Let me assure you, there are many more than two camps. And there are many more on the fringe that think all camps are full of shit.
The zealot is the harbinger of fear mongering and narrowmindedness. Spare the fearless self-thinkers your diatribe. We need no appointed shepard, as the shepard is God, not man. God need no middleman, thus speaks to us all directly. Commonly, this is called a conscience.
For you to presume that you have appointed yourself “teacher” status is hubris in extremis.
Hey Headhunter! This is for you:
[quote]kroby wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
kroby wrote:
You are the spice of life, hh. It’s up to all the others to decide whether you’re cinnamon or anise.
Nutmeg.
anise = dillweed. Now, isn’t that funnier?[/quote]
It would be even funnier if you spelled anise “A-N-U-S”.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I answered your question. You are simply not intelligent enough to discern the answer.
You also show your character by immediately decending into personal attacks. When assuming others are assholes, begin by looking in the mirror.
Not one word about Harris telling God to suck his dick. Strike 3, you’re outta here!
LOL. You accuse her of “decending” into personal attacks…after you call her unintelligent because she disagrees with you. I see your popularity grows and grows no matter what forum you post on this site.[/quote]
Prof X,
Just curious…your father is a pastor, correct? How would he respond if he found out that you let Harris slide on his statement “God can suck my dick!”, and joined in the attack on me, the only one who denounces Harris for such an evil statement?
Would he call you a coward for joining in with the herd, for attacking the ONE PERSON who denounces evil when he sees it?
Would he call you loathsome for not having the integrity and honor to GO AGAINST the herd and be a MAN?
Why not show him this thread? I’ll rely on your honesty of how a man of God, like your dad, responds to this.
Just curious…
[quote]PGA200X wrote:
swivel wrote:
BIGRAGOO wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Sifu wrote:
Check this out
I would be SO first in line.
I’d be right behind you in line.
um ragoo, are you going brokeback or something ?
Yeah, that was kinda’ gay![/quote]
hahaha!
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
I answered your question. You are simply not intelligent enough to discern the answer.
You also show your character by immediately decending into personal attacks. When assuming others are assholes, begin by looking in the mirror.
Not one word about Harris telling God to suck his dick. Strike 3, you’re outta here!
LOL. You accuse her of “decending” into personal attacks…after you call her unintelligent because she disagrees with you. I see your popularity grows and grows no matter what forum you post on this site.
Prof X,
Just curious…your father is a pastor, correct? How would he respond if he found out that you let Harris slide on his statement “God can suck my dick!”, and joined in the attack on me, the only one who denounces Harris for such an evil statement?
Would he call you a coward for joining in with the herd, for attacking the ONE PERSON who denounces evil when he sees it?
Would he call you loathsome for not having the integrity and honor to GO AGAINST the herd and be a MAN?
Why not show him this thread? I’ll rely on your honesty of how a man of God, like your dad, responds to this.
Just curious…
[/quote]
That’s funny. I could have sworn Professor X’s comments had nothing to do with attacking you for denouncing evil, and more to do with laughing at you for insulting an innocent woman.
Nice job. You call into question Professor X’s manhood and morality, right after insulting Sabrina’s intelligence and femininity.
What’s next? Accusing Nate Dogg of knowing nothing about eating pussy?
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
nephorm wrote:
I’m not in the business of trying to figure out who is “deviant” or unhealthy in the head.
No, that would be Headhunter’s job.
Yep, and I described you perfectly.
For all your talk of personal attacks being indicative of low character, you make more personal attacks than anyone.
Fine, old man. Let us play. So I am deviant and unhealhy in the head, according to your standards.
We shall leave aside the fact that you do not know me, nor do you know anything about my personal life. However, I embrace your diagnosis wholeheartedly. In fact, judging from your statements here and on other threads, I find it a great relief. To be considered “normal” and “sane” by someone whom I hold in such disdain and contempt would be, to me, the height of repugnance.
I answered your question. You are simply not intelligent enough to discern the answer.
As a matter of fact, she is extremely intelligent. I would venture to say that she is far more so than you, sir, though that is not saying very much.
But tell me, just to satisfy my curiosity: how does baldly implying childhood sexual abuse, by way of explaining why one might be tolerant of sexual mores not to your liking, qualify as an answer to the simple question “who made you arbiter of what constitutes perversity?”
Do you even have you an answer to this? Has God, in fact, appointed you his personal Censor? Inquiring minds want to know.
You also show your character by immediately decending into personal attacks. When assuming others are assholes, begin by looking in the mirror.
This woman has more character in her little finger than you have in your entire body, or will likely manage to cobble together in the span of your remaining days. Interesting, though, that you choose to attack her immediately in the wake of berating her for making personal attacks.
Not one word about Harris telling God to suck his dick. Strike 3, you’re outta here!
I don’t see what this has to do with anything. It must be particularly meaningful to you, though, as you keep harping on it.
Headhunter, you use the word “fascinating” quite a bit, here and elsewhere. The title of the thread implies that you think people younger than yourself are “fascinating”, a word that your subsequent posts reveal to be a sarcastic euphemism for “immoral, deviant, ungodly and insane.”
At the risk of damaging your assessment of my character by descending into a personal attack, just let me say that you, sir, are banal. You are also self-righteous, pompous, and hypocritical. These do not strike me as very Christian qualities.
In fact, I see very little difference between you and an orthodox Muslim mullah, so perhaps you are better off counting yourself out, as you put it.
You clearly forget what it was like to be young, but I shall remember you, sir, if only to avoid becoming, with age, anything like you.[/quote]
This may qualify as some of the stupidest drivel I’ve read on this site. Do you even understand what a ‘setup-question’ is? Sabrina asked me this type of question. To directly answer it grants her premise. I therefore asked her (I think she’s a guy, btw) how she came to formulate this question. In other words, asking such a question is what some professor taught her to do, to disarm someone. This idea was formulated by the Left to teach us to tolerate any sort of evil, any sort of perverted behavior. “Who are YOU to question what I’m doing? My ideas are JUST as good as yours!” – even if it means insulting people of faith and those who hate secret kiddie-porn.
Are you starting to get a clue? You’re in way over your head here, Bubba. Back to the porn sites and tissues.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Did it sound like I was complaining? I said these things are fascinating to me. How is that complaining?
It sounds like the things you listed were things that you were kind of disgusted with, or irrritated about.
I for one, love hot broads making out. The rest of that stuff on your list I could take or leave, but there’s nothing like that site rrjc posted up.
EDIT- Headhunter, you are fishing for another fight on this thread with the guys from the politics thread.
Why? [/quote]
Because I like to denounce evil when I see it.
Now, somewhere else, you said you will ‘refrain from bashing me’. It takes a lot of courage to not join in with the herd. I appreciate it.
I know that you’re not with me in denouncing Harris and company, that’s cool. If you weaken and have to join in bashing me, that’s cool too. You held out a long time.
You are a man of honor and I state so publicly.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
This may qualify as some of the stupidest drivel I’ve read on this site. Do you even understand what a ‘setup-question’ is? Sabrina asked me this type of question. To directly answer it grants her premise. I therefore asked her (I think she’s a guy, btw) how she came to formulate this question. In other words, asking such a question is what some professor taught her to do, to disarm someone. This idea was formulated by the Left to teach us to tolerate any sort of evil, any sort of perverted behavior. “Who are YOU to question what I’m doing? My ideas are JUST as good as yours!” – even if it means insulting people of faith and those who hate secret kiddie-porn.
Are you starting to get a clue? You’re in way over your head here, Bubba. Back to the porn sites and tissues.
[/quote]
Nah, I prefer the Song of Solomon and the books of Exodus and Judges when I have a taste for kinky sex and violence.
And Sabrina may be many things, but “a guy” ain’t one of them.