[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
nephorm wrote:
I’m not in the business of trying to figure out who is “deviant” or unhealthy in the head.
No, that would be Headhunter’s job.
Yep, and I described you perfectly.
[/quote]
For all your talk of personal attacks being indicative of low character, you make more personal attacks than anyone.
Fine, old man. Let us play. So I am deviant and unhealhy in the head, according to your standards.
We shall leave aside the fact that you do not know me, nor do you know anything about my personal life. However, I embrace your diagnosis wholeheartedly. In fact, judging from your statements here and on other threads, I find it a great relief. To be considered “normal” and “sane” by someone whom I hold in such disdain and contempt would be, to me, the height of repugnance.
[quote]
I answered your question. You are simply not intelligent enough to discern the answer. [/quote]
As a matter of fact, she is extremely intelligent. I would venture to say that she is far more so than you, sir, though that is not saying very much.
But tell me, just to satisfy my curiosity: how does baldly implying childhood sexual abuse, by way of explaining why one might be tolerant of sexual mores not to your liking, qualify as an answer to the simple question “who made you arbiter of what constitutes perversity?”
Do you even have you an answer to this? Has God, in fact, appointed you his personal Censor? Inquiring minds want to know.
This woman has more character in her little finger than you have in your entire body, or will likely manage to cobble together in the span of your remaining days. Interesting, though, that you choose to attack her immediately in the wake of berating her for making personal attacks.
I don’t see what this has to do with anything. It must be particularly meaningful to you, though, as you keep harping on it.
Headhunter, you use the word “fascinating” quite a bit, here and elsewhere. The title of the thread implies that you think people younger than yourself are “fascinating”, a word that your subsequent posts reveal to be a sarcastic euphemism for “immoral, deviant, ungodly and insane.”
At the risk of damaging your assessment of my character by descending into a personal attack, just let me say that you, sir, are banal. You are also self-righteous, pompous, and hypocritical. These do not strike me as very Christian qualities.
In fact, I see very little difference between you and an orthodox Muslim mullah, so perhaps you are better off counting yourself out, as you put it.
You clearly forget what it was like to be young, but I shall remember you, sir, if only to avoid becoming, with age, anything like you.