[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I have already laid out an argument for why it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic.
By “fully attain our nature” I simply mean that we would be allowed to do what comes naturally to us with out interference by coercive authority: in the economic sense all this means is that we would be allowed to exchange our property with each other.
crying to be breastfeed ?
no government in history has ever disallowed that.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I have already laid out an argument for why it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic.
By “fully attain our nature” I simply mean that we would be allowed to do what comes naturally to us with out interference by coercive authority: in the economic sense all this means is that we would be allowed to exchange our property with each other.[/quote]
"Since every human pursuit requires the employment of capital and the delaying of consumption in order to bring that capital about every person who works (produces marketable goods) or saves the fruits of his labor for future consumption must be considered a capitalist.
In fact, it is impossible to even produce labor without delaying consumption: learning a trade or going to college requires delaying consumption in that we give up entering the work force and the subsequent wage we would expect from said employment and thus also the consumption that that wage allows.
We do this only because we expect a higher utility (that is greater possibility to consume) from the investment of out time and energy in the future."
This argument doesnt explain why its “in our nature” to be capitalistic. It explains how people in a capitalist structure have to function to survive in it. To say its “in our nature” because everyone under capitalism acts as a capitalist, is bad logic.
If it were “in your nature” to be communist, but you were born in America, you’d still need to get a job so you could make money to provide for yourself and those you’re responsible for. That would not mean capitalism was “in your nature”.
What if I have lunch at work?
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.[/quote]
I always lose? You haven’t yet made a valid point. You sound like a douche bag, oh I win! Oh, why you following me around?
I haven’t lost, because you haven’t posted a logic argument. Second, I’m not following you around. You just happen to post the dumbest shit.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.[/quote]
I always lose? You haven’t yet made a valid point. You sound like a douche bag, oh I win! Oh, why you following me around?
I haven’t lost, because you haven’t posted a logic argument. Second, I’m not following you around. You just happen to post the dumbest shit.[/quote]
You’re right. I can’t disprove God. I just hope nobody ever explains the burden of proof fallacy to you.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.[/quote]
I always lose? You haven’t yet made a valid point. You sound like a douche bag, oh I win! Oh, why you following me around?
I haven’t lost, because you haven’t posted a logic argument. Second, I’m not following you around. You just happen to post the dumbest shit.[/quote]
You’re right. I can’t disprove God. I just hope nobody ever explains the burden of proof fallacy to you.[/quote]
Logical fallacy is like a way of life for some people around here.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.[/quote]
I always lose? You haven’t yet made a valid point. You sound like a douche bag, oh I win! Oh, why you following me around?
I haven’t lost, because you haven’t posted a logic argument. Second, I’m not following you around. You just happen to post the dumbest shit.[/quote]
You’re right. I can’t disprove God. I just hope nobody ever explains the burden of proof fallacy to you.[/quote]
I understand the burden of proof fallacy. I also understand that you attacked me on an unrelated subject instead of actually addressing the topic at hand.
[quote]swoleupinya wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
No, my point is that if it is inherent in our nature to be capitalistic we ought not implement policies that do not allow us to fully attain our nature.[/quote]
What makes you think its inherent in our nature to support any one economic structure?
Also, please elaborate on what you mean by “fully attain our nature”.[/quote]
I don’t think you fully attain the meaning of capitalism which is void of economic structure in the sense that the state does not impose on private actors against their free will that would otherwise have no negative externalities.
[/quote]
Please stop following me around like a lost puppy trying to pick fights because you always lose on the sky wizard debate.[/quote]
I always lose? You haven’t yet made a valid point. You sound like a douche bag, oh I win! Oh, why you following me around?
I haven’t lost, because you haven’t posted a logic argument. Second, I’m not following you around. You just happen to post the dumbest shit.[/quote]
You’re right. I can’t disprove God. I just hope nobody ever explains the burden of proof fallacy to you.[/quote]
Logical fallacy is like a way of life for some people around here.
[/quote]
Yes, some people just love straw man arguments and even not addressing the point at hand, instead of attacking irrelevant beliefs of others…I think that’s called ad hominem.